Hot_Topic

The problems of the world are not solved overnight. Typically, the greatest injustices in history have taken several decades of opposition to overturn. Fueled by highly dedicated groups of people who believe in their cause, the path to justice is often met by many roadblocks and challenges along the way. In this new episode of 9/11 Free Fall, host Andy Steele is joined by longtime Palestinian rights activist, Paul Laurudee to not only discuss the latest developments in the Middle East but to also share with the 9/11 Truth Movement his wisdom from his many years of experience as an activist. We’re in a time now where the consequences of our government’s failure to acknowledge the overwhelming evidence of controlled demolition at the World Trade Center are manifesting on the world stage, turning what was once a promising future for our world into a scary and dismal present in 2024.

The Solicitor General for England and Wales, acting on behalf of the Attorney General for England and Wales, once again has denied the Campbell family’s application for a fresh inquest into the death Geoff Campbell at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. Without addressing any of the evidence which clearly demonstrates that the Twin Towers were brought down in controlled demolitions, the Solicitor General’s decision relied solely on obtuse bias and the hollow authority of the NIST reports, robbing Geoff, as well as thousands of other victims at the WTC, the justice they deserve. It’s clear now that the system is stonewalling, hoping the Campbells give up. But they AREN’T, and WE and our army of supporters, are standing with them! In this special episode of 9/11 Free Fall, host Andy Steele is joined by Matt Campbell, the brother of Geoff who has taken the lead in the push for a new inquest into Geoff’s death. The Campbells are demanding a judicial review. But they need YOUR help to make it happen. With Geoff’s case now at a critical moment, in this interview Matt dismantles the Solicitor General’s irresponsible ruling and lays out the battle plan for the next chapter of his family’s historical fight. The Campbells must raise £60,000 (roughly $76,000) by March 1st to make their stand. Will YOU stand with them?

COINTELPRO was a secret FBI program aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting, and disrupting several movements that were peacefully working for change in the United States. After it was exposed in 1971, the U.S. government claimed that the program ended, but many believe that it did not as there have been several documented cases of government infiltration of activist groups over the last several decades. In this episode of 9/11 Free Fall, writer Craig McKee joins host, Andy Steele to discuss his latest article for AE911Truth, titled, "Under any other name… COINTELPRO is alive and well in 2024," which delves into the history of government infiltration of movements in the United States. He lays out some of the methods that were employed within the 9/11 Truth Movement to derail its efforts, including the tactic of "cognitive infiltration" that Obama's former information czar, Cass Sunstein, described in the 2008 paper that he co-authored, titled "Conspiracy Theories." McKee's article and this interview describe what cognitive infiltration is and how it may be employed. As well, Steele also explains some of the known cases of COINTELPRO subversion from the past as outlined in the film "Cointelpro 101," which can viewed at this link. This episode is an introduction to a very important topic not only for members of the 9/11 truth movement but for activist members of any movement that challenges establishment agendas.

In this week’s episode of Unthinkable, host Julia Piccici is joined by civil engineer, and Project Due Diligence volunteer, Eric Francis-Wright. As a young boy living in Queens, New York, on September 11th, Eric lived through the aftermath of the World Trade Center disaster. As an engineer, he has had the courage to challenge the official story of the towers’ destruction despite being part of a profession that has mostly conformed to the official narrative of the event. Being almost the same age on 9/11, Julia and Eric talk about their experiences around the time of the tragedy. Eric offers his take on the evidence for the controlled demolitions of the towers as well reflecting on the deadly health impacts suffered by first responders who spent time at the scene. Don’t miss this thought-provoking interview, which offers an intriguing insight into how 9/11 affected an entire generation.

In this episode of 9/11 Free Fall, AE911Truth’s director of marketing and Board member, Jeff Long, joins Andy Steele to discuss his past work with U.S. Air Force Intelligence, manipulating the news and planting false information in the media on behalf of Uncle Sam during the Cold War. He also explains the difficulties he faced getting out of the dark intelligence world when he decided that his moral convictions wouldn’t allow him to continue. Jeff’s story is part of a much bigger picture of media control within the United States, from the CIA’s Operation Mockingbird to the corporate ownership of most of what we watch, hear, and read in our country. This keeps the flow of information controlled and the truth about September 11, 2001, suppressed. Andy and Jeff provide chilling examples of how pervasive the coordination is of our media and how strong is their power to reshape our perceptions to suit government agendas. This episode is a crash course on how the media works and why – despite the overwhelming evidence of controlled demolition at the World Trade Center on 9/11 – the battle to get the truth out is needed more than ever.

Roland Angle considers this cause to be the greatest of the past century. In addition to serving the engineering profession for more than 50 years, AE911Truth’s chairman has spent the past decade working to expose his fellow engineers across the U.S. to the scientific evidence that the World Trade Center towers were destroyed by explosives, not by plane impacts and the ensuing fires, on September 11, 2001. Angle considers this approach to be the key to breaking down support for the official reports that the 9/11 official story depends on for its survival. In this episode of Unthinkable, Angle joins host Julia Picicci to talk about not only his career and the WTC evidence but also his thoughts about the significance of AE911Truth's efforts in the grander scheme of world history. He also discusses his thoughts about how the organization’s work is part of a greater story of human progress despite the resistance it has had to overcome. Don't miss this impactful interview, which offers the 9/11 truth community a deeper look into the heart and mind of our spokesman as he pushes forward with the fight to expose to the world the truth about 9/11.

Media rhetoric against 9/11 truth intensifies. Now YOU are a threat! Malcolm X once said: “The media's the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power. Because they control the minds of the masses.” When it comes to 9/11 truth and the World Trade Center evidence, the media have pushed that power to its limits, actively covering up the crime of the century!

This proposed legislation would require scientific reports issued by the federal government to feature data, evidence, and findings that are accurate and true. As well, it would empower all U.S. citizens by giving them standing to challenge inaccurate reports in court. If passed, the Scientist Integrity Act could prevent another scientific cover-up like the one that protected the official narrative of the World Trade Center destruction. In this week’s episode of 9/11 Free Fall, host Andy Steele is joined by AE911Truth general manager Kamal Obeid to discuss this important new initiative and how AE911Truth is preparing to wage this important battle for the future of our nation.

Roland Angle on what the Scientific Integrity Act will mean for our country On the last episode of 9/11 Free Fall, host Andy Steele was joined by AE911Truth board member Kamal Obeid to discuss the organization’s bold new initiative – the Scientific Integrity Act, which is legislation currently being drafted by AE911Truth that would require that scientific reports issued by the federal government be accurate and true (as well as giving standing to American citizens who wish to challenge inaccurate reports in court). On this week’s show, AE chairman Roland Angle discusses not only the Act but also important instances of scientific dispute between professionals and the federal government that the legislation would impact, as well as the recent Chevron ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court curtailing the power of federal agencies. The Scientific Integrity Act would remove legal loopholes that make it possible for agencies like the National Institute of Standards and Technology to deceive the American people with scientifically fraudulent reports. In fact, it is reports like the one NIST produced on the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 that have been used to keep the 9/11 cover-up from being completely exposed. Don’t this miss this important and informative episode as the head of our organization speaks to YOU about the critical work that lies ahead for AE and for all of us in the 9/11 Truth Movement as we attempt to bring integrity to our system.

Did you know that there’s a tape from the early 1960s in which Robert Kennedy suggests to the president that the U.S. stage a false flag attack against one of its own ships in Cuba? In this episode 9/11 Free Fall you’re going to hear it! This week, Free Fall host Andy Steele is back, and this time he’s joined by Jeff Long and Craig McKee as well as engineers Kamal Obeid and John Schuler to discuss a number of recent news items. Among them are the apparent assassination attempt on Donald Trump and its relationship to the 9/11 truth issue, Candace Owens’ recent commentary about 9/11 and false flags, and the newly released video of the Twin Towers falling that shows flashes that some have speculated could be explosions. In the WTC part of the discussion, you’ll get a glimpse into the kind of behind-the-scenes discussions that go on at AE911Truth as its members analyze and debate the footage and comment on whether it displays any evidence of explosives. We also looked at footage of Building 7 coming down that also shows flashes. Along with that, Steele plays a segment from a PBS documentary about the Cuban Missile Crisis that features then attorney general Bobby Kennedy casually suggesting that the U.S. stage a false flag attack as a pretext for military action against Cuba – which demonstrates that false flag attacks are indeed an option for governments that wish to secure public support for their actions.

During AE911Truth’s anniversary event, The 24th Hour, Swiss historian Daniele Ganser gave an important presentation on the history of false flags and deceptive U.S. narratives that have initiated wars, all the way from the sinking of the USS Maine to 9/11. When interviewed post presentation by AE911Truth’s Andy Steele, Ganser commented on the U.S. government’s use of a PR firm to sell the lie that Iraqi soldiers killed newborns at a Kuwaiti hospital to drum up support in the U.S. for the first Gulf War: “People understand that stories are being sold, like the story, ‘You should buy this car’ or ‘You should eat your food in this restaurant … and advertisements are designed to influence people, otherwise you wouldn’t spend millions on advertising. People understand that… But people don’t think this goes to the level of selling wars.” He concluded: “It’s not so difficult. Just don’t believe what the president says when he says we have to go to war. That’s really not so difficult, because the president has to move through this very critical door where he says, ‘Now we go to war.’ And there I really urge people to pay attention and say ‘wait… which country? What’s the reason?’ And with 9/11, the attack was on September 11th, and the attack on Afghanistan was on seven of October. So, we don’t even have one month for people to reflect.”

In a move that is being welcomed by the family of 9/11 victim Geoff Campbell and their barrister Nick Stanage, the West London Coroner’s Court notified the family in a letter last Thursday that it would be making no objection to the family’s pending application for a new inquest into their son’s murder 20 years ago. In addition, wrote Acting Senior Coroner Lydia Brown, the court would not oppose the Campbells’ application at any future hearing in the High Court. The neutrality of the West London Coroner’s Court — which conducted the first inquest into Geoff Campbell’s murder in 2013 and could have argued for the family’s recent application to be denied — removes a potential obstacle to having the new inquest opened. The family’s application, submitted on August 26, 2021, is currently under review by UK Attorney General Suella Braverman, whose authority must be obtained in order for the family to apply to the High Court for an order granting the new inquest. Historically, the High Court has always granted applications that the attorney general has authorized to come before it. The Campbell family believes its application easily satisfies the test for a new inquest to be opened based on two separate grounds: first, that there is significant additional evidence that was not considered at the first inquest; and, second, that the coroner at the first inquest did not conduct a sufficient inquiry, having concluded that the North Tower’s destruction was due to the airplane impact without considering any evidence as to the cause.

Ray McGinnis, author of the recent "Unanswered Questions: What the September Eleventh Families Asked and the 9/11 Commission Ignored," sits down with Andy Steele to talk about the story of the 9/11 families who fought for the formation of the 9/11 Commission — only to have most of their questions go unanswered and the truth about 9/11 covered up. McGinnis offers his meticulously researched book as a way into the issue for readers who may be hesitant to question the official 9/11 narrative.

This video contains the statements of 36 reporters who covered the events in New York City on September 11, 2001, and who collectively described the explosive demolition of the Twin Towers. These statements, organized chronologically by the time at which they were made on 9/11, make up the first appendix of the forthcoming article, "How 36 Reporters Brought Us the Twin Towers' Explosive Demolition on 9/11," which will be published soon at https://AE911Truth.org.

This week on 9/11 Free Fall, structural engineer Larry Cooper joins Andy Steele to talk about his days as an activist for Palestinian human rights, when he served as president of the National Unitarian Universalists for Justice in the Middle East, and about his experience since becoming active with Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, where he recently joined the board of directors. After sharing his journey from human rights activism to 9/11 Truth, Larry converses with Andy about the NIST investigation, the University of Alaska Fairbanks study, and AE911Truth’s ongoing outreach to the engineering profession.

Before his former company, Weidlinger Associates, merged with Thornton Tomasetti in 2015, Abboud led Weidlinger’s studies into the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7 as part of the litigation efforts of developer Larry Silverstein. In this presentation, Abboud puts forth Weidlinger’s theory that the Twin Towers collapsed due to heat-induced failure of the core columns. This theory differs significantly from NIST’s theory that the perimeter columns failed first, as a result of being pulled inward by heat-induced sagging of the floor trusses. Abboud asserts that all of the studies supporting fire-induced collapse have converged around certain findings. But, in reality, they involve very different collapse initiation mechanisms, and none of them actually analyze how the destruction propagated following collapse initiation. Angle and Walter methodically refute Abboud’s claims and explain how the NIST and Weidlinger theories are as much at odds with the evidence as they are with each other. In Part 2, Angle and Walter will examine the multiple conflicting fire-based theories for Building 7’s destruction, which are even more numerous and diverse than those for the Twin Towers.

This presentation by German mathematician and physicist Ansgar Schneider was shown at the annual congress of the International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE) on September 5, 2019. Schneider was invited to give this presentation in person but was denied entry to the United States. He therefore prepared a video of his presentation, which was played during his session.