HealthFreedom2020

This is a clip from Dr. Rashid Buttar's interview with Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson, which you can watch in it's entirety, here: https://rumble.com/v2ocmig-dr.-rashid-buttar-and-the-coronavirus-agenda.html In this interview, Dr. Buttar shows part of the interview that was edited from CNN, where the interviewer mocks him for saying the Covid vaccines are dangerous. Just 14 months later, he was dead. Dr. Buttar believes he was targeted. You can see a video with Mike Adams, talking about how bioweapons could be used against people like Dr. Buttar, here: https://www.brighteon.com/9acb15e9-3bf7-4b5e-8de9-3ea1668a70e1 Please watch and share this information.

"Relative risk reduction is a way of exaggerating the benefits of any intervention, clearly which would be in the interest of people trying to sell you something - in this case, the pharmaceutical industry" Dr. Aseem Malhotra explains. The REAL risk reduction (the ABSOLUTE risk reduction) for the Covid vaccines is a mere 0.84%. You can see the full documentary on this page: https://thehighwire.com/videos/episode-287-a-second-opinion/ Oracle Films in partnership with News Uncut, present ‘Safe & Effective: A Second Opinion.’ Download and share this film. This film is being provided at no cost. Documentary only (on the Highwire site): https://thehighwire.com/videos/safe-and-effective-a-second-opinion/ On the Oracle Films site: https://www.oraclefilms.com/safeandeffective To Support the work of Oracle and News Uncut: DONATE at buymeacoffee.com/oraclefilms, today! #SafeAndEffective #OracleFilms #NewsUncut Partial Transcript: When vaccine efficacy was declared at 95%, relieved governments gave the green light. But Dr. Malhotra argues that the methodology was flawed. “Relative risk reduction is a way of exaggerating the benefits of any intervention, clearly which would be in the interests of people trying to sell you something, in this case the pharmaceutical industry. So if, for example you have a thousand people in a trial that didn't have the vaccine, vs a thousand people that did, in the placebo group, in the dummy group. you may have two people dying, and in the intervention group you may have just one person dying. And that's a reduction of 50%, one over two is a 50% relative risk reduction, but actually I've only saved one life out of 1000, so the absolute risk reduction is only one in a thousand… it’s a big difference.” ‘The guidance has been, for many years, that we must always use absolute risk reduction in conversations with patients, not just relative risk reduction alone, otherwise it's considered unethical.” The accusation is that governments acted on Pfizer's relative risk figure of 95% efficacy when the absolute risk was a mere 0.84%. In other words, you'd have to vaccinate 119 people to prevent just one from Catching Covid. “So we were basically sold him something that ultimately, in retrospect in retrospect now, was very, very misleading.”