GATE12

House of Wisdom : I promise I will not cry | Siege of Baghdad 1258 | Mongols Hulagu Strikes (2) stay tuned The Siege of Baghdad properly the most negative influential doing the Mongolia have done that completely changed history. Sub to Goofy Historians : https://www.youtube.com/c/GoofyHistorians The siege of Baghdad was a siege that took place in Baghdad in 1258, lasting for 13 days from January 29, 1258 until February 10, 1258. The siege, laid by Ilkhanate Mongol forces and allied troops, involved the investment, capture, and sack of Baghdad, which was the capital of the Abbasid Caliphate at that time. The city is designed generally to be unconquerable, at least from outside. If someone read about the city, especially the core circle part they would start to think " Am I reading a fantasy book? ". There are many things about the city that would make it straight up out of a fantasy book. The only thing missing is Dragons and magic. LoL. Walls 20m high and 8m thick (not talking about the wall towers) elevation over the ground. The circular walls are even bigger average 32m high and at some points reaching to 50m high and 12+m thick. The main army was out away and the Mongolias attack was a surprise and was highly calculated. The leaders were weak and scared ,they committed tons of mistakes. Also, they didn't use their money, they were in panic. Especially as the military commanders were out of the city the politicians did not know what to do. The Mongolias also bypassed the castles very quickly. The attack was fast and the city wasn't prepared. The leaders committed more mistakes and people were thinking they are Gog and Magog people so did not want to fight, also most of the people didn't understand the Mongolias yet and they were naive. The city of Baghdad at the time was very much impossible to take down by force even with WW1 technology (no airforce). They were naive and thought Mongolias would want peace. They surrendered to the Mongolias without a fight because they were cowards and then as the Mongolias army was in for free, turned on them and destroyed the city. The city did fight but very little. The Mongolias using palm trees as a weapon is like an out of Hollywood movie. The Mongolia army still lost half of their numbers at the end of the week. The city is too big and military designed as a a big castle, especially the circular core of the city. That it is very much impossible to defeat if the 1.5M-2M people resisted. Most of the male and female in the city are trained in fighting and military. The police force alone are 100k men and some few thousand women in the city. The amount of gold and importance of the city can very much be used to unify the Muslim world against the Mongolia if the leaders played it right. The Mongolias did not defeat Baghdad, Baghdad surrendered without a fight. Imagine fighting a city the size of Auckland in NZ that is designed to be a giant castle for every inch ,house and street in the city. The city can't be starved due to the river across and a lackes inside and multiple wales and there is a giant guardian and other sections of small farms. There is inside about 20k palms trees. There are so many walls ,layers, traps, underground tonals and secrets. With preparations and 30k strong military soldiers and tons of money ,storage, siege equipment . It makes the city at least a 100× harder to take down than Constantinople. Not to mention the castles that if were not a full horse force would be forced to take down first, and every main layer has a 3-3 layer walls defense system which is 18× harder to crack than the 2 layer walls system in Constantinople but generally the same idea but more expensive. Baghdad had 5 of those main layers then a big castle in the middle. There was many castles in the city. There was a lot of gold that the Mongolias didn't want to bring all of it so it didn't corrupt them. Also they wanted to take a big part but they couldn't as they can't carry it with them , no space. The Mongolias weant on 8 days of freetime, basically -- ie u know. #mongolia #mongol One of the most horrific things happened.

The streets will never forget the 2022 World Cup. Here's a nice highlights/recap on the entire internet Copyright Disclaimer: Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides the statutory framework for determining whether something is a fair use and identifies certain types of uses—such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, transformation, scholarship, and research—as examples of activities that may qualify as fair use. The content on this YouTube Channel, 'GATE12', is transformative in nature and therefore falls under fair use. Because of this, we ask that you DO NOT strike or claim our content. The 2022 World Cup being straight bussin for 9 minutes straight #worldcup #worldcup

France President Emmanuel Macron was watching FIFA World Cup Final between France and Argentina. Macron had difficult moments in France vs Argentina Final. Macron went crazy when Mbappe scored equalizer against Argentina. Then again Macron could not hold his emotions when Mbappe equalize against Argentina twice in Extra time. Macron was very happy before France Argentina penalties but his face was just wiped when Argentina won World Cup final. Watch France president Macron all reactions in World Cup final. Watch Macron all crazy reactions to Mbappe goals vs Argentina. Watch Macron reaction to Argentina winning World Cup against France. #MacronReactionWorldCup #MacronReactiontoMbappeGoal #MacronReactiontoFranceArgentinapenalty #MacronMbappe #MacronReactions #MacronMessi 😂France President Macron All Crazy Reactions to Mbappe Messi Goals in World Cup Final!

Semi-final Slander #semifinal #slander #ytp #funny #soccer #football #fifa #players #memes #viral #slander #slandermeme #fifaworldcup2022 #qatar2022 #fifaworldcupqatar2022 #worldcup #worldcupslander

Well Fought Kings. FIFA World Cup Slander ( France Vs Morocco) Semi-Final. France Vs Morocco Slander Guys Please Don't Spread Hate to Any Team. They Tried their Best but Somehow didn't Qualify. #slander #slandermeme #fifaworldcup2022 #qatar2022 #fifaworldcupqatar2022 #worldcup #worldcupslander #slander #ytp #funny #soccer #football #fifa #players #memes #viral

FIFA World Cup Slander Part 3 #slander #slandermeme #fifaworldcup2022 #ronaldo #qatar2022 #fifaworldcupqatar2022 #worldcup #worldcupslander

Legends are waiting for Argentina Vs Morocco! How to Beat Brazil: -Pray to God Marquinhos is playing -Drag them into Penalties #fifa22 #fifaworldcup #worldcup FIFA World Cup Slander

FIFA World Cup Slander #slander #fifaworldcup2022 #ronaldo #qatar2022 #fifaworldcupqatar2022 #slandermeme

World Cup 2022 SLANDER Morocco or France ? The video is for your mood #slander #ytp #funny #soccer #football #fifa #players #memes #viral

The video is for your mood Morocco or France ? #slander #ytp #funny #soccer #football #fifa #players #memes #viral WORLD CUP SLANDER morocco portugal england france

It's Argentina Vs Croatia Tonight. #fifa FIFA World Cup Slander (Argentina Vs Croatia)

Mix الشبح | Argentina Vs Saudi Arabia World Cup 2022 Captain Tsubasa Style | كابتن ماجد NOTE: The transparent white cover on top is for the YT copyright stuff. Watch it here without the cover https://odysee.com/@GATE:3/Mix%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D8%A8%D8%ADArgentinaVsSaudiArabia:2 #fifa #worldcup #saudiarabia #argentina #worldcup2022 #saudiarabiavsargentina Argentina Vs Saudi Arabia World Cup 2022 Captain Tsubasa Style | Mix الشبح | كابتن ماجد #worldcup Argentina Vs Saudi Arabia Mix الشبح World Cup 2022 Captain Tsubasa Style | Mix كابتن ماجد #worldcup

MORGAN FREEMAN REACTS TO QUR'AN AT QATAR FIFA WORLD CUP #fifa #worldcup #quran

On national TV, an Islamophobe insulted HIJAB and Islam and a Muslim gave an amazing response in the form of a Poem, leaving the other guy speechless. This happened on National TV in Saudi Arabia, The verses are sure to move your heart. Quran is the words of the God. God is the author of the Quran. Muhammad the prophet is the living Quran , a living word of God and his mercy. Poem FOR Anti-Hijab | Muslim Defends HIJAB with A POWERFUL POEM on National TV from an Islamophobe #hijab #islam #muslim

What connects Adolf Hitler to Margaret Thatcher and Ho Chi Minh to Ronald Reagan? They were all nationalists, and they each valued nation, nationality, and nationhood as critical and important to their respective political visions and ideologies. Nationalism was everywhere in the 19th century, as people carved new nation-states out of empires. Nationalist leaders changed the way people thought of themselves and the places they lived by reinventing education, military service, and the relationship between government and governed. But what does it mean to adhere to nationalism and to be a nationalist? If we need nationalism explained, what guidance can be given to us by the other ideologies? This video explores, explains and examines the concepts and distinctions of nationalism, including liberal nationalism, conservative nationalism, expansionist nationalism, anti-colonial nationalism, civic nationalism, cultural nationalism, religious nationalism, ethnic nationalism, and others; as well as the stances and opinions of other distinct ideological groups such as liberals, conservatives, fascists, communists, socialists, and anarchists. Nationalism, through its espousal of the nation state, has shaped modern history more than perhaps any other political ideology, and it has continued to change its appearance in response to ever-shifting global conditions. Also, as a bounce we going to check nationalism in islam and the nation of Mohammed. @Mohammed Hijab @MoFreedomFoundation @Smile 2 Jannah @Whatifalthist Bibliography: • Anderson, Benedict (2006) [1983]. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso. ISBN 9781844670864. • Ball, Terence (2017). Ideals and Ideologies: A Reader (10th ed.). Routledge. ISBN 9781315625546. • Baradat, Leon P.; Phillips, John A. (2017). Political Ideologies: Their Origins and Impact (12th ed.). Routledge. ISBN 9781315625539. • Badoglio, Pietro (1948). Italy in the Second World War: Memories and Documents. Oxford University Press. • Baumeister, Andrea (2011). "Patriotism". In Badie, Bertrand (ed.). International Encyclopedia of Political Sciene. 6. pp. 1832–1834. ISBN 9781412959636. • Breuilly, John (2013a). "Nationalism and National Unification in Nineteenth-Century Europe". In Breuilly, John (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of Nationalism. pp. 149–174. ISBN 9780199209194. • Breuilly, John (2013b). "Introduction: Concepts, Approaches, Theories". In Breuilly, John (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of Nationalism. pp. 1–20. ISBN 9780199209194. • Darwin, John (2013). "Nationalism and Imperialism, c. 1880–1940". In Breuilly, John (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of Nationalism. pp. 341–358. ISBN 9780199209194. • Dieckhoff, Alain (2011). "Zionism". In Badie, Bertrand (ed.). International Encyclopedia of Political Sciene. 8. pp. 2765–2767. ISBN 9781412959636. • Goldman, Emma (1910). "Patriotism: a Menace to Liberty". Anarchism and Other Essays. • Grant, Susan-Mary (2012). A Concise History of the United States of America. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521848251. • Haynes, Jeffrey (2011). "Religious Movements". In Badie, Bertrand (ed.). International Encyclopedia of Political Sciene. 7. pp. 2263–2268. ISBN 9781412959636. • Heywood, Andrew (2021). Political Ideologies: An Introduction (7th ed.). Macmillan International. ISBN 9781352011944. • Holbraad, Carsten (2003). Internationalism and Nationalism in European Political Thought. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9781403982315. • Keating, Michael (2011). "Nationalism". In Badie, Bertrand (ed.). International Encyclopedia of Political Sciene. 5. pp. 1653–1658. ISBN 9781412959636. • Leach, Robert (1996). British Political Ideologies (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 9780135181768. • Mann, Michael (2004). Fascists. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780511216510. • Mazzini, Giuseppe (1862). The Duties of Man. Chapman & Hall. • Miller, David (2006). "Nationalism". In Dryzek, John S. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford University Press. pp. 529–545. ISBN 9780199270033. • Motyl, Alexander J., ed. (2001). Encyclopedia of Nationalism: Leaders, Movements and Concepts. 2. Academic Press. ISBN 0122272323. • Payne, Stanley G. (1995). A History of Fascism: 1914–1945. Routledge. ISBN 0203501322. • Rowe, Michael (2013). "The French Revolution, Napoleon, and Nationalism in Europe". In Breuilly, John (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of Nationalism. pp. 127–148. ISBN 9780199209194. • Stearns, Peter N. (1997). "Nationalisms: An Invitation to Comparative Analysis". Journal of World History. 8 (1): 57–74. • Thompson, Mark R. (2011). "Nationalist Movements". In Badie, Bertrand (ed.). International Encyclopedia of Political Sciene. 5. pp. 1658–1663. ISBN 9781412959636. #national #nation #muhammad #islam #ummah #liberalism #nationalism Nationalism Under Study | #islam & #ummah - #nation of #muhammad #nationalism #nationalismineurope | WE NEED SPIRONOLACTONE

House of Wisdom : I promise I will not cry | Siege of Baghdad 1258 | Mongols Hulagu Strikes (INTRO) stay tuned The Siege of Baghdad properly the most negative influential doing the Mongolia have done that completely changed history. Sub to Goofy Historians : https://www.youtube.com/c/GoofyHistorians The siege of Baghdad was a siege that took place in Baghdad in 1258, lasting for 13 days from January 29, 1258 until February 10, 1258. The siege, laid by Ilkhanate Mongol forces and allied troops, involved the investment, capture, and sack of Baghdad, which was the capital of the Abbasid Caliphate at that time. The city is designed generally to be unconquerable, at least from outside. If someone read about the city, especially the core circle part they would start to think " Am I reading a fantasy book? ". There are many things about the city that would make it straight up out of a fantasy book. The only thing missing is Dragons and magic. LoL. Walls 20m high and 8m thick (not talking about the wall towers) elevation over the ground. The circular walls are even bigger average 32m high and at some points reaching to 50m high and 12+m thick. The main army was out away and the Mongolias attack was a surprise and was highly calculated. The leaders were weak and scared ,they committed tons of mistakes. Also, they didn't use their money, they were in panic. Especially as the military commanders were out of the city the politicians did not know what to do. The Mongolias also bypassed the castles very quickly. The attack was fast and the city wasn't prepared. The leaders committed more mistakes and people were thinking they are Gog and Magog people so did not want to fight, also most of the people didn't understand the Mongolias yet and they were naive. The city of Baghdad at the time was very much impossible to take down by force even with WW1 technology (no airforce). They were naive and thought Mongolias would want peace. They surrendered to the Mongolias without a fight because they were cowards and then as the Mongolias army was in for free, turned on them and destroyed the city. The city did fight but very little. The Mongolias using palm trees as a weapon is like an out of Hollywood movie. The Mongolia army still lost half of their numbers at the end of the week. The city is too big and military designed as a a big castle, especially the circular core of the city. That it is very much impossible to defeat if the 1.5M-2M people resisted. Most of the male and female in the city are trained in fighting and military. The police force alone are 100k men and some few thousand women in the city. The amount of gold and importance of the city can very much be used to unify the Muslim world against the Mongolia if the leaders played it right. The Mongolias did not defeat Baghdad, Baghdad surrendered without a fight. Imagine fighting a city the size of Auckland in NZ that is designed to be a giant castle for every inch ,house and street in the city. The city can't be starved due to the river across and a lackes inside and multiple wales and there is a giant guardian and other sections of small farms. There is inside about 20k palms trees. There are so many walls ,layers, traps, underground tonals and secrets. With preparations and 30k strong military soldiers and tons of money ,storage, siege equipment . It makes the city at least a 100× harder to take down than Constantinople. Not to mention the castles that if were not a full horse force would be forced to take down first, and every main layer has a 3-3 layer walls defense system which is 18× harder to crack than the 2 layer walls system in Constantinople but generally the same idea but more expensive. Baghdad had 5 of those main layers then a big castle in the middle. There was many castles in the city. There was a lot of gold that the Mongolias didn't want to bring all of it so it didn't corrupt them. Also they wanted to take a big part but they couldn't as they can't carry it with them , no space. The Mongolias weant on 8 days of freetime, basically -- ie u know. #mongolia #mongol One of the most horrific things happened.