ConstitutionalConventions

Regional District of Address Date TO: Board Chair, CAO, CEO, Directors et al FROM: The enclosed documentation: 1) Proof of the Incorporation of the following entities, NOTE: government services corporations dba ("doing business as") EDGAR Search U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; Government of Canada, (CIK 0000230098) Government of British Columbia, (CIK 0000836136) and (CIK 0000014306) Government of Alberta, (CIK 0000810961) Government of Saskatchewan, (CIK 0000203098) Government of Manitoba, (CIK 0000826926) Ontario, (CIK 0000074615) Quebec, (CIK 0000722803) Province of New Brunswick, (CIK 0000862406) Province of Nova Scotia, (CIK 0000842639) 2) Copy of The CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE; showing that Corporations by ANY name DO NOT have the legal jurisdiction to Taxation or Law Enforcement et al without a consent to contract by those involved in the transaction. Personal liability is then enforceable upon those acting illegally. The enclosed documents show that the Regional District through its Incorporation may be operating under the "Color of Law" and as such is de-facto, un-lawful, and ultra vires. This information is not here-say nor opinion, rather they state the facts of the matter, which are; ?- What Oath, Declaration, or Covenant was signed upon the commencement of the positions in council? This matters. ?- What jurisdiction is the office under? There are 3 possible Jurisdictions; 1) Government Office: a PUBLIC OFFICE institution, with lawful de-jure status as a holder of the "PUBLIC TRUST", Trustee with Fiduciary control, and thus legal authority to the taxation of the men and women within a geographical area, and is one of "service" to the local needs; school, hospital, peace keeping, infrastructure, courts, et al. 2) Non-Governmental Office (NGO) : a PRIVATE CORPORATE OFFICE, that provides "Service Contracts," and is known as a "Body Corporate" to "Incorporated Inhabitants." This jurisdiction requires Consent to Contract, is de-facto, un-lawful and as such has NO legal jurisdiction to taxation. The Executive Control and Authority comes from the corporation of the province wherein the office is located. The Acts, Statutes, Bylaws et al are downloaded to the district and are corporate policies. 3) Public/Private/Partnerships (PPP) : an INTERNATIONAL ENTITY, recieving downloads from a "FOREIGN" Corporation; United Nations, WHO/World Health Organization, WEF/World Economic Forum et al. This is also a de-facto, un-lawful jurisdiction with NO legal grounds to the taxation of men and women, and also requires Consent to Contract. NOTE: In British Columbia, as an example, The BC Assessment Authority is a CROWN Corporation, created in 1974 by the Corporation of British Columbia Inc., "in order to earn profit for the Government of British Columbia Inc., without jurisdiction nor contracts with the men and women of BC. NOTE: There are 3 levels of lawful, de-jure governance; Local, Provincial and Federal - each has their sphere of jurisdiction and geographical area - each has independent legislative, fiduciary, and judicial powers - NO level can legislate for the other jurisdiction NOR has the authority to operate beyond its purview These 2 questions are the most important because the answer to them will establish the personal liability through the signature/autograph put upon the documents requiring a vote. Was there full comprehension of the Oath, Declaration, or Covenant signed when entering office as a Director? Was there time to peruse any documents requiring a vote? Most often these documents are many pages long and were made over many years, by legal firms and lawyers whose signatures are NOT contained therein. Whose is? Making that signature "personally" liable for the desicions made. Was there full comprehension of the difference between the legal wording contained therein, and the knowledge of their meanings? Such as person, individual, constituent, citizen,et al. "Legalese" is a language unto itself and is the basis for most FRAUD, which in law vitiates everything. The men and women in our Regional District Office, were empowered by the men and women, to operate under, and in a jurisdiction that is de-jure, lawful, and with a fiduciary trust, to serve the men and women of our geographical area and no other. To ensure that the needs of the local men, women, and their property, were the priority and responsibility of the Regional District. So...What Office is held? Lawfuly/de-jure or unlawfully and de-facto? We require an answer, on or before __________________ No answer will be considered a tacit agreement. The office of the Regional District is held by the trust of the members of our community, the neighbours and friends who voted for positions in an office to serve the community. That's why we require proof of what oath, declaration, or covenant was given. An unalienable right and exercised dominion of The men and women Autograph____________________:___________________________ All rights reserved.

Notice Proof of Claim to Taxation, By Laws et al Proof of Consent to Contract Date ________________________________ Reference # __________________________ To: the City of Brooks 201 - 1st. Avenue West Box 879 Brooks Alberta T1R 1B7 From the property listed below: _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ Notice to agent is notice to principal, notice to principal is notice to agent. This notice is formally served. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law and consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls upon the claimant. The City of Brooks was first incorporated; July 14, 1910; most recently on September 1, 2005. Therefore, the Clearfield Doctrine within, is applicable. The City of Brooks is operating under the "Color of Law." Tacit consent has been given against said property, without full disclosure. SEE: The 10 points of Contacts Law enclosed. It is incumbent upon the City of Brooks through its clerk, agents, officers, councilors, mayor, employees et al to provide certified evidence of any and all contracts, or consent to contract regarding the aforementioned property and The City of Brooks, Alberta. Regarding; taxation, land use, water use, structures and buildings below, on, or above the land, any and all animals and birds thereon, machinery, equipment and chattels thereon, by laws et al that said property is subject to. The burden of proof falls upon the claimant. Canada Inc., Alberta Inc., The City of Brooks et al, are government service corporations doing business as governments. Any Acts, Statutes, by laws, created by these entities only apply to their employees, franchisees, officers, and dependants. Their rules do not apply to the people in general. That's why the rules they create (statutes) are referred to as "public policy." Men and women living on the landmass known internationally as Canada or Alberta, in this case, are not subject to any "public Policies", mandates, or other acts of legislation promoted by any commercial or municipal corporation for its officers and employees. All Acts, Bills, By laws, and Statutes et al created only apply to "person." The definition of "person" in Black's Law Dictionary 5th Edition, page 1028, states; in general usage a human being (i.e. natural person) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: include, the inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. As plainly stated, anything that applies to "person" only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Not a living man or woman. Black's Law is referenced because this is contract law, the law of commerce. The Crown Corporation is a For Profit corporation, corporations by any name require contracts. Adhesion contracts are not contracts. Tacit contracts have been made without full disclosure. This requirement for evidence is expected within 30 days as is customary in these matters. No response will be confirmation of The City of Brooks tacit consent to this notice. Send a confirmation e-mail to: ____________________________________________________ This is the unalienable right and exercised dominion of Autograph _____________________:______________________ All rights reserved.

Notice Proof of Claim to Taxation, By Laws et al Proof of Consent to Contract Date ________________________________ Reference # __________________________ To: the City of Brooks 201 - 1st. Avenue West Box 879 Brooks Alberta T1R 1B7 From the property listed below: _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ Notice to agent is notice to principal, notice to principal is notice to agent. This notice is formally served. No man or woman has jurisdiction over another man or woman without their consent. Contract makes the law and consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls upon the claimant. The City of Brooks was first incorporated; July 14, 1910; most recently on September 1, 2005. Therefore, the Clearfield Doctrine within, is applicable. The City of Brooks is operating under the "Color of Law." Tacit consent has been given against said property, without full disclosure. SEE: The 10 points of Contacts Law enclosed. It is incumbent upon the City of Brooks through its clerk, agents, officers, councilors, mayor, employees et al to provide certified evidence of any and all contracts, or consent to contract regarding the aforementioned property and The City of Brooks, Alberta. Regarding; taxation, land use, water use, structures and buildings below, on, or above the land, any and all animals and birds thereon, machinery, equipment and chattels thereon, by laws et al that said property is subject to. The burden of proof falls upon the claimant. Canada Inc., Alberta Inc., The City of Brooks et al, are government service corporations doing business as governments. Any Acts, Statutes, by laws, created by these entities only apply to their employees, franchisees, officers, and dependants. Their rules do not apply to the people in general. That's why the rules they create (statutes) are referred to as "public policy." Men and women living on the landmass known internationally as Canada or Alberta, in this case, are not subject to any "public Policies", mandates, or other acts of legislation promoted by any commercial or municipal corporation for its officers and employees. All Acts, Bills, By laws, and Statutes et al created only apply to "person." The definition of "person" in Black's Law Dictionary 5th Edition, page 1028, states; in general usage a human being (i.e. natural person) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: include, the inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. As plainly stated, anything that applies to "person" only applies to a firm, labor organization, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Not a living man or woman. Black's Law is referenced because this is contract law, the law of commerce. The Crown Corporation is a For Profit corporation, corporations by any name require contracts. Adhesion contracts are not contracts. Tacit contracts have been made without full disclosure. This requirement for evidence is expected within 30 days as is customary in these matters. No response will be confirmation of The City of Brooks tacit consent to this notice. Send a confirmation e-mail to: ____________________________________________________ This is the unalienable right and exercised dominion of Autograph _____________________:______________________ All rights reserved.

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca

Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8

https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca

pissed of grama,grama,gramas,dallas hills,constitutional conventions,mayors,pogg,councillors,de fact,de jure,lawful,clear field doctrine,love,truth,facts,corruption,corporation,canada,provinces,municiplaity,deputations,mother,father,live birth,cra,taxes,by laws,town,community,off grid,coop

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca https://rumble.com/v3jf786-do-not-vote.html

Wally Dove is one of Canada’s more persistent anti-government activists. Arguably, he is also one of the most successful. Back in 2004 he and Sonya Zenz (relationship unclear) were charged with tax evasion, conspiracy to evade taxes, and false partnership claims. This led to two reported decisions: R. v. Dove, 2004 CanLII 31861 (Ont. S.C.): http://canlii.ca/t/1hxgc R. v. Dove, 2004 CanLII 45964 (Ont. S.C.): http://canlii.ca/t/1jdl6 In the first case Wally argued that the accused had not committed tax evasion because there was no such thing as the Income Tax Act. Justice O’Connor put it this way (para. 1): … Mr. Dove seeks an order dismissing the charges “because there is no law called the Income Tax Act, Chapter 1 (5th Supp.) R.S.C. 1985, as amended”. In the alternative, he seeks an order requiring the Crown attorney “…to place before the Court, the Income Tax Act…, the very act which the charges in this matter have been laid against the Applicant, by producing a certified copy from the Clerk of the Parliaments”. Dove tried and tried to get a certified copy of the Income Tax Act – he and others phoned government agencies, all in search of the One True Act. The Law Clerk, Parliamentary Counsel, the Clerk of Parliament, and CCH Canadian Limited. No luck. Ergo, if no official copy of the Income Tax Act exists, it can’t really be a law – and the offences are nullities! And the judge rejected Wally’s application: [4] I disagree with his position. The solution to his supposed dilemma is simple. However it is one he has chosen to ignore. In response to his letter to the Office of the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel, Colette R. Charlebois of that office replied on July 28, 2004: The Clerk of the Parliaments, who is the custodian of the original Acts of Canada and on whose behalf this office prepares certified copies, can only respond to a request that specifies the Act required to be certified with a full citation (i.e. chapter no. and year of statute) to the Statutes of Canada. If only a portion of an Act is to be certified, it should be identified by section number as well as by the full citation. [5] Ms. Charlebois explains that upon payment of a nominal per page fee, the certified copy requested will be provided. She also provides other suggestions for obtaining copies of public statutes, from local bookstores or from the Canadian Government Publishing, Communication Canada. The Office of the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel gave substantially the same answer and advice to friends and supporters of Mr. Dove in response to similar requests, which responses are contained in his application materials. [6] Mr. Dove and his supporters have simply failed to avail themselves of the offer to deliver certified copies of the Act or portions of it upon their advising the Clerk what parts of the very voluminous statute they wish certified, i.e. chapter and section numbers, together with a prescribed nominal fee. I am confident they will receive a certified copy upon compliance with this procedure. [7] I am satisfied the Income Tax Act is a lawfully passed and constitutionally valid statute of Canada. [8] Mr. Dove’s application for a declaration that the Income Tax Act does not exist is dismissed. On to judgment #2! This time Wally and Sonya each have lawyers. The accused made an application to stay the charges they faced and … they win! Freedom! So what was the key to their having defeated the C[C]RA? Simply put, delay. Wally and Sonya successfully argued that the delay in their trial had been so great that it was contrary to justice for the proceeding to continue. In total, it had taken 65 months to reach trial, with 108 appearances. As a consequence the judgment does not directly address whether Wally and Sonya were, in fact, guilty, but it does lay out a little of what they were up to. Both Wally and Sonya were accountants had had set up a partnership that allegedly was structured to evade tax. The scheme was based around an obsolete software package that had been purchased for $8,700, but was valued at $2.85 million. The scheme was to depreciate the software and offset income: para. 4-7. The Crown argued that Wally had engaged in “antics” and those were a substantial cause for delay (paras. 26-27): … The crown attorney argued that the manner in which he conducted his defence, most particularly during the 30 month preliminary inquiry was obstreperous, nonsensical and largely a waste of everyone’s time. Some of the time spent at the preliminary inquiry dealt with motions by Dove respecting matters that would not have been advanced by competent counsel on his behalf. For example, he moved to have the court exclude Ms. Lynn Watson, the chief investigator, from the court. The court had ruled at the outset that she was exempt from the order excluding witnesses. He argued at some length that “…the Crown was using this court for criminal purposes…”, allegedly compelling witnesses “…to give evidence against their will.” Of course, the witnesses had been served with proper subpoenas and had little choice about giving evidence. He sought to have the charges dismissed on grounds he was not one of the persons named in the indictment. He took the position he had copyrighted his name and sold it. He also took the position that he was a member of the “Nishwinobi” Nation and that, as an aboriginal person, the court had no jurisdiction over him. He presented no evidence that he is aboriginal, nor that the Nishwinobi Nation even exists, nor why the court would not have jurisdiction to hear these criminal charges against him. He wrote lengthy letters to crown counsel, the investigator, and the preliminary inquiry judge demanding compensation for alleged wrongs, including using his copywrited name without his permission. On several occasions the court adjourned briefly, usually for no more than an hour or two, to permit Dove to consult with duty counsel. … Both Wally and Sonya argued they were substantially harmed by these delays. For Sonya she ran up a ton of debts and had a hard time finding work: para. 54. Wally suffered even more. Before trial he and his wife had owned two houses and lived a comfortable lifestyle, but instead had run into debt to continue this lawsuit: para. 53. But that was not all (para. 52): Dove suffered physical and emotional stress over and above that expected and associated with any accused person awaiting trial on criminal charges. The extensive delays in this matter resulted in his becoming depressed, according to his wife and his doctor. Dr. Rick Lindall performed a psychological assessment of Dove and gave evidence of his findings and treatment of him. He said, “Mr. Dove also had an elevated score on the Major Depression scale, within in (sic) the Severe Syndrome scales… Mr. Dove reported that he continues to experience psychological/emotional difficulties as a direct consequence of the lawsuit. The symptoms he experiences include: Anxiety, depression, irritability, anger, frustration, apprehensions about health, somatic problems, changes in sleep pattern, diminished libido, disturbing dreams, marital stress, fatigue, and a compromise in cognitive functioning due to stress. The psychological test findings indicate a significant level of affective distress for Mr. Dove in terms of anxiety and depression…” See Ex. 29. Dr. Warsi, another physician with whom he consulted, said, “He experienced an episode of vasovagal syncope in Dec. 2003…” See Ex. 30. … Curiously, litigation on the Dove/Zenz con was still going on as late as last year! In February the Tax Court of Canada refused to permit a constitutional challenge of an aspect of an audit of Dolores Romanuk (Romanuk v. The Queen, 2012 TCC 58: http://canlii.ca/t/fq9wf) who had been one of the subscribers to the software depreciation scam. The gears grind slow at times here in Canada… So, now living free and easy, would Wally make his life afresh and anew? Well, not really. First Wally hooks up with David-Kevin: Lindsay, and in R. v. Maleki, 2006 ONCJ 401 (http://canlii.ca/t/1pwgv) provides affidavit evidence on the non-existence of the Income Tax Act. Yep, basically the same argument. Still doesn’t work. So what else do we know about Wally? Well, among other things, Dove claims to be a former auditor of the Canada Revenue Agency, at the time named the Canada Customs Revenue Agency. But he defected, as a “deeply religious man”, given the disturbing things he had witnessed. A lot of the accounts of his time with the CCRA seem to have disappeared off the net, but here are some I found: https://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?t=9418

ZOOM MEETING INFO:https://us02web.zoom.us/j/9259008609?pwd=WUFXQnVSZUtrMkxrRWVQWUlRS05JZz09 WHO: Kawartha Freedom Group WHAT: A group of informed concerned caring accountable individuals who are aware of the times WHERE: Willy's Man Cave (look for Teepees) 3900 Hwy 35 North, Cameron ON WHEN: Mondays 7-9pm, Doors open at 6:30pm WHY: We share knowledge and wisdom about how to navigate current times and make life better for our families. We watch out for each other and our neighbours. HOW: We arrange for speakers to bring us up to speed on latest news, in areas such as health, politics, and the economy, hosting live and on Zoom.Meeting ID: 925 900 8609Passcode: 547803 KawathaFreedomGroup/KLTPA 6:06 PM ZOOM MEETING INFO:https://us02web.zoom.us/j/9259008609?pwd=WUFXQnVSZUtrMkxrRWVQWUlRS05JZz09 ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ www.facebook.com/groups/kawarthafreedomgroup https://www.facebook.com/groups/kltpa info@KawarthaFreedomGroup.ca SueThem@KLTPA.ca Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca

press@thepeoplesoperationrestoration.com +1 406.240.7881 https://thepeoplesoperationrestoration.com/ Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca

20240319 - Clearfield Doctrine Explained - Fenelon Falls - Kawartha Lakes Corruption CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 US. 363-371. https://www.iyoutome.com/hr/ ~~~~~~~~~~~ Raw Sewage From Pumping Station Overflowing Into Fenelon River By Pamela Vanmeer June 12, 2022 https://www.kawartha411.ca/2022/06/12... ~~~~~~~~~~~ Raw Sewage From Pumping Station Overflowing Into Fenelon River | Kawartha 411 https://kawarthanow.com/2023/04/06/fe... ~~~~~~~~~~~ Water-wastewater rates being kept to 0.74 per cent hike, or about $11 per year. Wednesday, November 27, 2019 Kawartha Lakes talks water quality, invests in water pollution control plant (thepeterboroughexaminer.com) ~~~~~~~~~~~ Daily Zoom with Dallas - 5-10 pm est www.constitutionconvention.ca ~~~~~~~~~~~ email us to set up a Chapter in your area to SueThem@OTPA.ca ~~~~~~~~~~~ email us your stories to SueThem@KLTPA.ca Let us know if you would like us to read your story out or if you would like to come to our live broadcast or on Zoom. ~~~~~~~~~~~ WHY We share knowledge and wisdom about how to navigate current times and make life better for our families. We watch out for each other and our neighbours. HOW We arrange for speakers to bring us up to speed on latest news, in areas such as health, politics, the economy and also you who have experience with Kawartha Lakes, good or bad. CONTACT US if you would like to be a guest speaker or share your your experience with Kawartha Lakes, good or bad. ~~~~~~~~~~~ www.facebook.com/groups/kawarthafreedomgroup www.facebook.com/groups/kltpainfo@KawarthaFreedomGroup.ca SueThem@KLTPA.ca ~~~~~~~~~~~ LOCATION WILLY'S MAN CAVE (look for Teepees) 3900 Hwy 35 North, Cameron ON Every Monday Doors open at 6:30, meeting starts at 7pm ZOOM MEETING INFO us02web.zoom.us/j/9259008609?pwd=WUFXQnVSZUtrMkxrRWVQWUlRS05JZz09 Meeting ID: 925 900 8609 Passcode: 547803

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca 2024.03.19 Kawartha First Nation William J. Denby Chief Brother Steve Deputy Chief https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=991yjK3yj84 ... meanwhile today at the Kawartha Lakes City Council • 2024.03.19 Kerfuffle With First Natio... Historical Event at City Hall Today! March 19, 2024. It got so hot, the City Staff called the Kawartha Lakes Police Service for protection. No longer does the public take it from the Council, Mayor, or should I say “Head of Council” and the unelected CAO. (not that I’m convinced that ANY of the others were legitimately elected, but that’s another topic). The Municipality, in writing, claimed they respect the First Nations people of this land and promised to involve them in decisions on things such as land issues, yet they are barging ahead on some gigantic residential development (think of all the tax and also permit $$$ coming to them – btw, we still have not seen where that line is in the budget) that the poor city cannot possibly digest, as they are already over capacity in sewage, roadways, schools, health, police services… the list goes on. Go to the Kawartha Lakes city website and type in First Nation Policy June15 2021 https://www.kawarthalakes.ca/.../CP20.... Read where the Municipality made it POLICY to involve First Nations in decisions. Sounds really nice but in reality they DENIED the requests of six band council members to speak. So they all spoke anyway despite the mayor ordering them to sit down (and this was at recess!). Videos coming... If you watched the city’s broadcast of the meeting today, you will not see the part where the cops walked in or hear any of the kerfuffle, but we got it all here! Even the part where Councilor Perry goaded on an upset woman as if he was going to take her in a fight. Betters in the audience were giving her 10 to 1 odds. Who was denied? Here are the deputations by the SIX individuals who were DENIED to speak, as recorded in the lobby of City Hall that same afternoon: William J. Denby Chief / Brother Steve Deputy Chief • 20240319 Deputation William J. Denby ... Deputy Chief Jeff Armitage • 2024.03.19 Kawartha First Nation - Je... Deputy Chief Jim Greensides • 2024.03.19 Kawartha First Nation - Ji... Doug Shaw Deputy Chief • 2024.03.19 Kawartha First Nation - Do... Joanne Pepper - Band Council • 2024.03.19 Kawartha First Nation - Jo... Susan lough - Band Council • 2024.03.19 Kawartha First Nation - Su... Ancient artifacts used by our ancestors found by farmers in Kawartha Lakes: a) grinding stone tool used to grind grains b) hide scraper blade c) sling stone for slingshots d) perforated stone used with a hide strap possibly used as a weapon

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca TheMagicShow:CanadaisaCorporation Pierre-AndréParé "AllisprivilegeconcededbytheState:yourcar,yourhouse,yourprofession,inshortyourlife;andwhatthestategives(you),itcantakeback(fromyou)ifyou’renotadociletaxpayer." Pierre-AndréParé formerDeputyMinisterattheQuebec DepartmentofRevenue beforeacommissionoftheNationalAssemblyofQuebec.PublishedbyLe Devoir,April6,1996.)[CouncilOrder863-96,July10,1996-https://bit.ly/2FmRcif] Thediscretionofajudgeissaidtobethe lawoftyrants. Itisalwaysunknown. Itisdifferrent in different men. It is casual and depends upon constitution, temper-andpassion. Inthebest,itissometimescaprice.Intheworst,itiseveryvice,follyand passiontowhichhumannatureisliable." JusticeCharlesPratt,LordCamden(1714-1794)(Emphasisadded) Ladies and Gentlemen, Look! Look!Quetheband. Drawthecurtains. AndlettheShadowMagicbegin! UKRoyalsCoatofArms,motto:"Godandmyright"(dieuetmondroit) ACTONE (THEROYALCHARTER) SmokeandmirrorsandRupert'sLandActappears In 1670, King Charles II of England formed a charter for a corporation, called" TheGovernorandCompanyofAdventurersofEnglandTradinginthe HudsonBay".Itwouldlaterbecalledthe HudsonBayCompanyorHBC.The chartercomprised40%ofwhatisnow the Canadian landmass, andincluded much of whatis currently the U.S.states ofMinnesotaandNorthDakota. https://constitutionalconventions.ca/2020/01/16/1670-hudsons-bay-company-chartered/ CharlesIIKingofEngland,(Scotland, France,andIrelandandDefenderof theFaith)3,861,400squarekilometers(1,490,900squaremiles) RoyalCharter1670 The Royal Charter for incorporating The Hudson's Bay Company, A.D. 1670. https://constitutionalconventions.ca/2020/01/16/1670-hudsons-bay-company-chartered/ https://constitutionalconventions.ca/2021/01/20/canadians-need-to-be-educated-about-canadas-history/ 3,861,400squarekilometers(1,490,900squaremiles) King Charles II signed the Hudson Bay Charter over to his German cousin, Prince Rupertof the Rhine, and seventeen of Rupert's associates known collectively as "The CompanyofAdventurers". Thedeedwasinthenameofthemonarch,fullyandforever,forallheirsin perpetualsuccession.Itcanneverberevoked. Rupertheldtherightsto"soletradeandcommerce"ofthisenormousland. KingCharlesIIcalledhiscousinandthe17associatesthe"trueand absoluteLordsandProprietors"ofwhatwouldnowbereferredtoas Rupert'sLand. PrinceRupertoftheRhine HudsonBayCompanyCoatofArms,motto:"askinforaskin" HocusPocusFishbonesChokus! Nevermindthemillionsofpeoplewhoseancestor's,successorsandheirs, alreadyinhabited the land, the Native People, plus the settlers, all of whom would come: todespiseandloathetheruthlessHudsonBayCompany.Thecharter's partnersranintotheir forts and locked up with their cannons in order to stay protected from those ontheoutside,whohatedthiscompany. PrinceRupert Fortinbackground The Rupert's Land Charter controlled 100% of all resources of the land, the furtrade,forestry,minerals,thewaterways,andeverythingelse.Itwasafull-onmonopoly,plus,theycouldmaketheirownlawsandenforcethem.AndallmembersoftheHBChadtotakeoathsbacktotheKingand/orQueen,astheystilldotoday. Rupert'sLandMap TradingwiththeHBC NooneknowswhattheactualdealwasbetweenKingCharlesandPrince Rupert,andwe are only given a cryptic clue which sounds more like an inside joke. We are told thatinexchangeforthedeed,theHudsonBayCompanyowedtheBritish Royalstwobeaverpelts and two elk heads yearly. One can imagine what one likes, but It might havemeant that King Charles II was getting a cut of the profits. Symbolically, the two beaverpelts,andtwoelkheadsmighthavebeenawayofsayingthisbusiness"fleecesthem,decapitatesthem,andmountstheirheadsliketrophies". Beaver TheHudsonBayCompanyranlikethisfor200years. BuildingForts The company allowed courts and all the trappings of a regular country, but it wasactuallya forprofitcorporation,calledtheHudsonBayCompany.Everythingcamedowntopayingfeesandpenalties,usingthecorporatecourtsystemtouphold lawsandmakemoney. NativeMan EverythingwascontrolledbytheHBCbecausetheyhadthebiggestgunsand anarsenalofbioweaponsincludingdiseasesandliquour.Anythingthecommonmenandwomenwantedtodo,theyhadtogothroughthecompany,suchas puttingtheircanoes in the bay. You had to pay to travel the bay. Settlers could not trade with theNatives,andiftheydid,theywerefined. calendar-gallery-1926-governors-inspection Let the curtains close to prepare for the next act and let us reflect on what we haveseen. What it was then — it is now. Canada actually operates under this perpetualcharterbuttheroyals,andthemagicianswhoworkforthem, makebelievethatelectedofficialsareenactinglaws.Thesamesystemis stillinplace. Thekeysolution,orthewaytocontestthisbackthen—asitisnow—isto refuteanylawthatisrepugnanttoCommonLaw,ortheBible.Thekingsand queenshaveswornan oath on the 1611 King James Bible to be "defenders of the faith" so whatevercontracts they have entered into they must notbe repugnant. But if they are, andeveryonestillagreestoupholdthem,theroyalsareexonerated. King-James-Bible-1611-credit-British-Library-Board Whatwasmeanttobechecksandbalancesonthelaws,hadbeenignored.TheKingsand Queens did whatever they wanted, so long as no one complained. If men andwomendon'tobject,theyagree,andtheHudsonBayCompanygot awaywithitfor250years,i.e.from1670till1920. HBCTradingToken Then one day, in the 1860’s, the monarchs back in England said to themselves, theseHBCpeoplehaveacountrywheretheycandowhatevertheywant andmakeasmuchmoney as they want, and all they give us in return is a nebulous gift. King Charles wasneverabletogetoutofit;itwasacontractthathehadsigned,andhetookanoathonthe1611KingJamesBibletoupholdhiscontracts. This was no way for royals to do business . . . poof!Themagicianswereatworkbuildinganewillusion. ACTTWO (THEBRITISHNORTHAMERICAACT) AbodyissawedintwoandthenputbacktogetheragainwiththeBNAActof1867.IzzyWizzy-let'sgetbusy! QueenVictoria In 1866 - 1867 the then ruling monarch, Queen Victoria, had a plan to get the charterbackfromtheHudsonBayCompany.ShejoinedtheprovincesofNovaScotiaandNewBrunswick with Upper Canada and Lower Canada, added a railroad and formed: adominioncalledBritishNorthAmericabypassinganact.Thisactwas calledtheBritishNorthAmericaAct(BNAAct). The1867BNAActformedaBritishdominion,calledBritishNorthAmerica. https://constitutionalconventions.ca/2020/01/16/1867-bna-act-passed-by-british-parliament-cherry-picked-from-the-quebec-res/ BNAAct1867 map1867 BRITISH-NORTH-AMERICA-ACT ACTTHREE (REPATRIATIONOFTHERUPERT’SLANDACT) Andnow,ladiesandgentlemen,thetwopartsofthebodywillberejoined intoone!SimSalaBim! Recapitulation:thereweretwocorporateentitiesrunningsidebyside,thedominion,BritishNorthAmerica(Canada)andtheHudsonBayCompany. Next, QueenVictoriademandedtheHudsonBayCharterback.Bymakinga "country"calledBritishNorthAmerica,thequeenforcedtheHBCtobe admittedinto thenewlyformedcountry. NowtheHBCCharterwasgivenbacktoHerMajesty,forthepriceof12millionpounds.Victoriagotherpieceofpaperbutthepeopleofthelandhadtopayforit,asusual. Somethingsneverchange. 31July1868,HBChadtosurrendertheirchartertothequeen,andher majesty'ssuccessorsandheirsinperpetuity. Rupert's Land Act, 1868, 31-32 Vict., c. 105 (U.K.) https://constitutionalconventions.ca/2020/01/16/1868-ruperts-land-act/ So, the people of Canada who paid for the charter did not get it. The queen and herheirsgotit. CanadianCoatofArms ACTFOUR (STATUTELAWREVISIONACT) OnJune9th1893,queenVictoriapullsarabbitoutofherhatandun-enactstheBNAAct,26yearsaftershehadformedit. UjuBujuSuckAnotherJuju! BeaverskintophatcourtesytheHBC ScreenShotabove Therabbit(orthecountrynowcalledCanada)whichQueenVictoriapulledoutofherhat26yearsagohoppedaway!TheBNAActdisappeared! ThedominionofBritishNorthAmericawasremovedbythequeenwithher StatuteLawRevisionActof1893,butnooneknewwhatshehaddone. Eventoday,nooneknows,exceptinsiders. Statute Law Revision Act, 1893 - Enactment No. 3 https://constitutionalconventions.ca/2020/01/17/1893-statute-law-revisions-act-uk-removal-of-sec-2-of-the-bna-act-legally-removing-the-monarchy-from-canada/ QueenVictoria Letthecurtainsfallsowecanhaveanintermissionandreflectonwhatit means that thereisNoAct,NoParliament,NoConstitution,Nodejurelaws. QueenElizabethII The current queen, Elizabeth II, does NOT sign the laws into being in British Columbia,Canada.The Lieutenant Governor, who represents thequeen,alsodoesNOTsignthelawsintobeing. Zip!Nothing!Itsallagrandillusion. The Lieutenant Governor of British Columbia is the viceregal representative of theCanadianmonarch,QueenElizabethII. Thisofficewascreatedin1871,andhas served thecrowneversince. IonaCampagnolo TheLieutenantGovernorfrom2001-2007,wasIonaCampagnolo.Shewasverywiseand she made a statement in one of her speeches, where she removed herself fromliability. She admitted that she did not sign any laws, and neither did the queen whomsherepresented.Why?BecausethelawsarerepugnanttoCommonLawand theBible. Voila! IonaCampagnolo'sCoatofArms HereiswhatIonaCampagnolo,LieutenantGovernorsaid: “AsHeadofState,Ihavethesame mandateasHerMajesty, QueenElizabeth, the Queen of Canada; that is to say, apart from a single reserve power to sustaindemocraticgovernance...NONE! ...ThusHerMajestyisourheadofState,whiletheGovernorGeneralisthe defactoHeadofState, andneitherisincommandofProvincialorTerritoria jurisdiction! ….AHeadofStatehoweveristheCEOoftheProvinceandisrequiredtosignallstatedocumentsinthenameofthePeopletorenderthemintolaw.” ButneitherIonaCampagnolo,northequeensignthem!Abracadabra! ThereareNOdejurelawsinB.C.Canada. Iona Campagnolo Speech coin NowthecurtainssuddenlymalfunctionandcomecrashingdownontheShadowMagicShow,sendingthemagiciansscurryingandthestagehands scramblingtogetthingsrighted. Whenmany educated men and woman wereincourt,challengingthelegal"namegame" (thestrawman/legal fictitious name, manifested by the issuance of the state’s birth certificate after the child’sphysical birth), the judges roll their eyes!! WhenreadingthewordsbyIona Campagnolo,thatrelatedtothefactthat she didnotsignthelawsandneither didthequeen. Suddenly, many of thejudgeputhishandsupandcried: "Stop!Wehavetotakeabreak!" Theprosecutinglawyersaid:"Idon'tevenunderstandwhatthisisallabout!" Thejudge'sreply:"Ithinkthey arechallengingthejurisdictionofthecourt." The words of Iona Campagnolo and pondered, "How can someoneadmit theyhavenopower andthensignthe documentsintolaw?" Theyassume shewassigning them. They may know or NOT but soon learn later that she was not; a clerk of the court was signingthem. IonaCampagnolowasaverysmart,nononsenselady,whowas exonerating herself from the whole scam and any liability. What she said in herspeechwas, "Iamsupposedtobesigningthese documentsintolaw,butIamnot, andthereforethereisnolaw." CoronationofQueenElizabethII Whyisthequeennotsigningthelaws?Because,theyarerepugnantto CommonLawand the Bible. The queen’s representative, Iona Campagnolo was not signing themeither. So, tax laws are not tax laws, they only exist inside the Hudson Bay Charterjurisdiction. The minute you step into Common Law jurisdiction, or a higherjurisdiction,theydon’tapply. Thefull liability would land on the Queen and LieutenantGovernorin CommerceLawjurisdiction. ThecurtainshavebeensecuredandtheShadowMagicShowhasbeen restoredsoontothenextact! ACTFIVE (REPATRIATIONOFTHECONSTITUTION) HahchahMahchah!Watchthis,kiddo! PierreTrudeau ANEWMAGICIANCALLEDPIERRETRUDEAUWASONTHESTAGE with thecurrentqueen,ElizabethIIofEngland. Trudeau,the15th CEO of the Corporation of Canada - know as a character called the PrimeMinisterofCanada. The problem was, he had to call the act by a different name, because the BNA Act hadbeen repealed by Queen Victoria and that made it impossible to revivify. So the magic show begins There was nomechanismtorestoretheBNAAct,becausetheBNAActcreatedthe parliamentandtheparliamenthadbeenvirtuallydissolved,sotheycouldn’tevenpassanacttocreatethemselves!TheQueen’smagicianshadthe morepowerfulmagicwords. TrudeaudecidedtonamehistricktheConstitutionActof1982,addinginaCharterandBillofRightsandfreedoms. Which resulted in more crimes against Sovereign Men and Women. Charter of Rights and Freedoms: A charter for the Coporation to Protect the Corporation and to ensure Sovereign Men and Women would be enslaved. https://constitutionalconventions.ca/2020/01/22/1982-constitution-act-includes-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms-an-act-created-by-the-uk-parliament-on-behalf-of-the-queen-of-england/ PierreTrudeau Trudeau's"honorary"CoatofArms,ahousewithnoroof!Theselogostellalotmorethanyouthink... ACTSIX (QUEENELIZABETH'SPROCLAMATION) Trudeau’s Constitution Act, the queen pulled, and is still pulling, now it is the magic show of the so called (King Charles III) astringofscarvesfromhersleeve.Scarvesandmorescarvesmanymiles longasthequeensmilesconfidently.Thisisperhapsthemostclevertrickofall.... Doo-DeeDoo-deeDoo-dee! PROCLAMATIONofApril17,1982, proclaiming in force the CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982 SI/82-97, May 12, 1982. ELIZABETH R JEAN CHRÉTIEN Attorney General of Canada ELIZABETH THE SECOND, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories QUEEN, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith. To All to Whom these Presents shall come or whom the same may in anyway concern, Greeting: A Proclamation Whereas in the past certain amendments to the Constitution of Canada have been made by the Parliament of the United Kingdom at the request and with the consent of Canada; And Whereas it is in accord with the status of Canada as an independent state that Canadians be able to amend their Constitution in Canada in all respects; And Whereas it is desirable to provide in the Constitution of Canada for the recognition of certain fundamental rights and freedoms and to make other amendments to the Constitution; And Whereas the Parliament of the United Kingdom has, at the request and with the consent of Canada, enacted the Canada Act, which provides for the patriation and amendment of the Constitution of Canada; And Whereas section 58 of the Constitution Act, 1982, set out in Schedule B to the Canada Act, provides that the Constitution Act, 1982 shall, subject to section 59 thereof, come into force on a day to be fixed by proclamation issued under the Great Seal of Canada. Now Know You that We, by and with the advice Our Privy Council for Canada, do by this Our Proclamation, declare that the Constitution Act, 1982 shall, subject to section 59 thereof, come into force on the seventeenth day of April in the Year of Our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty-two. Of All Which Our Loving Subjects and all other whom these Presents may concern are hereby required to take notice and to govern themselves accordingly. In Testimony Whereof We have caused these Our Letters to be made Patent and the Great Seal of Canada to be hereunto affixed. At Our City of Ottawa, this seventeenth day of April in the Year of Our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty-two and in the Thirty-first Year of Our Reign. By Her Majesty's Command ANDRÉ OULLET Registrar General of Canada PIERRE TRUDEAU Prime Minister of Canada GOD SAVE THE QUEEN QueenElizabethII Queen'sProclamation1982 Of particularinterest isthissentence fromthequeen's proclamation: "Now Know You that We, by and with the advice Our Privy Council for Canada, do bythis Our Proclamation, declare that the Constitution Act, 1982 shall, subject to section59thereof,comeintoforceontheseventeenthdayofAprilin the YearofOurLordOneThousandNineHundredandEighty-two." Section59oftheConstitutionof1882 Section23"MinorityEducationRights" The operative words here are “subject to section 59” (of the Constitution Act). Nowsection 59 defers to section 23 (of the Constitution Act), and what is 23? It is thelanguageissue.So,thepeopleofQuebecwouldhavetoagreethatin theirprovince,children may be educated in any language that their parents desire. In Quebec, this isnever going to fly. They will not sign off on a language issue and the Queen knew it. Sosection59/23istheconditionforwhichtheConstitutionof1982will come into force and effect! NEVER HAPPENED IT WAS NEVER FULFILLED or satisfied (and So many are still deeived all across the land mass known as canada) proclamation-of-patriation And that did not happen. The Queen’s magic words are the strongest of all. So, therethe Constitution sat. And is still sitting as of March 19,2024 in no where land! MeechLakeAccordof1987andtheCharlottetownAccordof1992. Bothfailed. Nomatterwhatman thinkthey knowaboutCanada’sConstitution,it is LOST as Sea!! it issittinginlimbosubjecttosection 59.Section59says, when 23issatisfied, therehas tobeanotherProclamationandthissectionhastobenotonlyrepealed,butdisappeared. Ta-daa! Canadian2dollarbill All that Trudeau did, does not come into effect, until section 59 has been satisfied, sothattakesusbacktotheHudsonBayCharter. AndtheonewhoownstheHudsonBayCharterisQueenElizabethII,orsoherfamily.Whenshementionstheword"Canada"inherproclamation,she isnottalkingaboutacountry,sheistalkingabouttheHudsonBay Corporation.WhoeverownstheRoyalChartercorporation,ownsallofthe resources, licensing fees, fines, and taxes extorted from the men and women across a land mass known asCanada. HBCIOU “Now Know You . . . Constitution Act, 1982 shall, subject to section 59 thereof, comeintoforceontheseventeenthdayofAprilintheYearofOurLordOneThousandNineHundredandEighty-two.” The1982ConstitutionwithitsBillofRightsnevercameintoforce. Thatiswhy,whenyougointocourtandtrytoassertyourfreedomrightsbyway oftheConstitution, they love it. They know that the constitution does not exist and you justgavethemjurisdiction. The monarchs perceived that if this magic trick were exposed, it might prove tooinflammatory. So, the royal magicians have been trying to change the name andconnotationsoftheBNA/ConstitutionActgoingallthewaybackto 1867. Theywantto pretendlikethe1867BNAActwasneverthere! AndthisnewConstitutionActin1982hasalwaysbeenhere,butithasnot. TheQueensignstheConstitutionAct;notethe2pinsonherleftshoulder. AnotherinterestingpartoftheQueen’sProclamationisthis: “OfAllWhichOurLovingSubjectsandallotherwhomthesePresentsmay concernareherebyrequiredtotakenoticeandtogovernthemselves accordingly.” Sheistalkingtotwosetsofpeoplehere,“mysubjects”and“allothers”whoarenotmysubjects.Youarefreetonotbemysubject.You,whoareoutsidemysubjects,andstillwanttointeractwiththisdocument, “whomthesePresentsmayconcern”,youmustgovernyourselves accordingly. This document tells where Canada actually is. Until section 59 is satisfied, there are NOlaws,NOgovernment,NOacts,No parliament,andNolegislature.All thereis,iswhatevertheycangetwith theirHudsonBayCharter. HappisCrapis!ThisSHIT SHOWiscomplete! THEILLUSIONvsJURISDICTIONS Where'stheAfter-Party? Nowitistimeforthethe Solution Constitutional Conventions (https://constitutionalconventions.ca/,willexplainhowtheillusions in this shadow show work.First of all, he understood the court’sboundariesconcerningtheQueen’sProclamationof1982. The fact that thisproclamation made all the laws nonexistent], these judges just stare at any man or woman,not knowing what to say! Theyjustwanttogetoutofthere,becauseattheendoftheday,iftherearenolaws,howcanthejudgefineyouorsendyoutojail? In the states, you would say, "What is your jurisdiction over me?" It is a writ in CommonLaw,wherethejudgehastoproveit.QuoWarrantoisawritthat saysbywhatauthorityare you doing this?" This writ goes way back, it is ancient, instituted long before peoplecouldtravelquickly.AstheCommonwealthrealmspread,anyone couldgointoanewareaandsay,"IamthenewLord,andyouhavetopaymetaxes."Howwouldyouknowifitweretrue?AndtheKingwouldnotwantthistohappeneitherbecausehewouldn'tget his cut. Enter "Quo Warranto", where the King would actually be a nominal plaintiffonthis,makingsurethattheLordhadthesealoftheKingandwas therealdeal. PrinceRupertoftheRhine So, you can do a writ: "By what authority are you operating?"First, explain in that writthattheQueenhas un-enactedtheBNAAct,andtheConstitutionActof1982issubjectto section 59 and still has not been satisfied. Then say, "By what authority are youoperating?"andthisrequiresthepersontowhomitisdirectedtoshowwhatauthoritythey have for exercising some right or power they claim to hold. Quo Warranto. TheHudsonbayCharteristheonlythingtheycancomeupwith,andmostofthejudgesdon'tknowaboutit. Nomatterwhatyouaretryingtodo,gowiththehighertruth,andaskthem tojustleaveyoualone. classroom Asfaraspensionplansandbenefits,ifyoudonotrecognizeCanadaasa country,you must waive your benefits and give them up. When you go for the benefits, youwaiveyourrights. Theydon’ttellyouthat,butthat’showitworks.It’sanagreement. Eachpersonhastodecide. tool Internationally,allcorporationsareregisteredundertheUniform CommercialCode,UCC.TheUCCisamodernversionofLawMerchant. LawMerchantareancientcustoms that are still operating today. Contract Law has to give full disclosure, but youhavetodemanddisclosure,theyarenotgoingtodoitforyou. TheagentsoftheQueenare ignorant of most of this information, bydesign, to protect the Queen. Ignorance ofthelawisnoexcuseevenfortheagents,butthisisthewayitis.Ifyou areonthephonetrying to have a discussion with them, they won't know what you are talking about. Youcantrytoeducatethem,butiftheydonotstopwhatevertheyaredoingthatisbuggingyou,tellthemyouwillgoabovethemtothequeen.Ifyoudogotothequeenanduse thewronghistoricalexamples,shewilljustignoreyou. DetailofStatute ofWestminster http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1931/4/pdfs/ukpga_19310004_en.pdf For instance, everyone sites the Statute of Westminster, but if you read it, it tries toreverse the idea that laws can be considered repugnant. It states that the laws nolonger haveto be,”not repugnant to Common Law”. I would never site that Actbecause theyare tryingto getout of avery importantclause inthe HudsonBay Charter. Thekeyistousethecorrecthistoricalexamples. WheninCanadiancourts,doNOTsitethewrongActs,becausethatpropelsthefiction.The judge gleefully thinks, “Oh, they believe that!” and he will pull you into hisfraudulent jurisdiction. The judges love so-called Constitutional arguments! They getexcited when they hear that word, because they can use the fraudulent Constitution to pull you into that FICTION!! Theyarehappyaboutit.Tricks! WhenyourecitetheirfraudulentActs,youarenowanagentofthecountry, andyougivethejudgejurisdictiontofindyouguilty.Thereisapointofviewofwhat reality is (the truth) and they keep you mired in a different reality (the fiction), So theyhavecontroloveryou.Whenyougotoahigherjurisdiction,thisgamedoes'tmatter.Ifyouhavethecorrecthistoricalanswers,youpullthe argumentintoahigherjurisdiction. WhenyouknowwhathappenedintheShadowmagicShowof1670,1867,1893,and1982,youhavetheknowledgetopullthejudgeintoahigher jurisdiction. voyagers Ajudgewillasktheaccusediftheyagreewithafineorpenalty.Thesmartjudges ask for your agreement in the "contract" because they don't want to be heldliable.It’sconsensual.Thescrupulousjudgesknowwhatisreallygoingonandtheydon'tknowwhothismanorwomanstandingbeforethemis, andwhomightbesittingin the audience, so they are very careful to get consent on everything. This way theywillneverbeheldliable. A judge that does not get consent can be held liable with an Notice of Liability: "Bywhat authority have youpenalized me?" In Canada, the authority does not exist andyou can actually show it. Unless section 59 has disappeared from theAct, there is noConstitutioninCanada.Fifty-ninehastobeerasedandanewproclamationmadeinorderforthe ConstitutionAct1982tocomeintoforceandeffect.Itsaysitrightthere, veryclearly,thereisnocountry!Whenyousaytothejudges, "Youwillbeheldliable" thatiswhentheyrecusethemselvesorquit. Looking Peoplearesodeepintheirbeliefsthatthisinformationthrowsthemfora loopandit takes a while to sink in. Once it does, a lot of the puzzle pieces that did not makesense before, start to make sense. When you realize they are operating under thischarter, it makes sense. It all becomes crystal clear. Hold your ground, and they stayaway from you. It takes courage, conviction, and inner strength, to maintain yourauthority. Courthouse Eventhearchitectureofthecourthouseandcourtroomsarebuilttoimpresspowerover people, and strip away their authority. The doors are heavy and the steps areawkward. The courthouseinside is constructedto getyou out ofyour comfort zone. Thepewsarehardanduncomfortable.Thejudgewearsalargeblackcape,andbehindhim on the wall are plaques, all creating the illusion that the judge has authority overyoubuthedoesnot. Court Court Trueauthorityliesinhigherjurisdictions.Themonarchsknowthisandare afraidofthis. Kings and Queens have taken oaths on the 1611 King James Bible and to Common Law Theyfearrenunciationoftheiroaths.AllversionsofourNoticeofLiability contain1611KJBverses.WhenIusedversesfromotherbibles,theywere ignored. RemembertheUCCisamodernversionofLawMerchant,ancientcustomsthatarestill operating todayand there isnothing thekings and queenscan doabout it. Itstheirstuff! EspeciallyinCanada,whereyoucanundoalloftheirActs. "QueenVictoriaun-enactedthatActin1893". That is all I said and I stood there quietly and we just stared at each other. Evenbringup1982becauseanotherslapintheface! Voyagers RemembertheUCCisamodernversionofLawMerchant,ancientcustomsthatarestill operating todayand there isnothing thekings and queenscan doabout it. Itstheirstuff!EspeciallyinCanada,whereyoucanundoalloftheirActs. Itisallaboutjurisdictions.Itismystrongopinionthattheonlyjurisdiction theQueen hasis undertheHudson BayCharter. Thatis theonlything theroyals havebecauseitisperpetualanditbelongstotheQueen. Bamburgh_Castle TheRoyals Their offsprings deemed themselves the royal elite. These are the bankingfamiliesandtheEuropeanRoyalsandtheyhavealwaysinterbred withintheircircle. ThesemonarchsclaimtohaveapeculiarDNAandtheyhaveallofthe money and they are in all of the power positions, BUT, they do NOT have anyauthority! When you realize they are all FRAUD! arundel castle england. In the end, it has to do with us and our souls and if we can change. Ultimately we decide. Theroyalsarejustusingusaspawnstocreatearealityandmanyare followingit,butifenoughofusturnaway,itsover. Oncewehitacriticalmass... Itsover! TAKE BOLD ACTION NOW FOR YOUR FUTURE AND FOR THE FUTURE OF YOUR CHILDREN. There is no other path. It is our destiny,and if we don’t take action we will be diluted outfrom ever again being able to take this course of actionthat will make us the free Organize a Local Meeting - We have so many men and women looking to connect!

KawathaFreedomGroup/KLTPA 6:06 PM ZOOM MEETING INFO:https://us02web.zoom.us/j/9259008609?pwd=WUFXQnVSZUtrMkxrRWVQWUlRS05JZz09Zoom.Meeting ID: 925 900 8609Passcode: 547803Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.caAssembly of Kawartha First Nation ~~~ DETAILS ~~~ WHO: Kawartha Freedom Group WHAT: A group of informed concerned caring accountable individuals who are aware of the times WHERE: Willy's Man Cave (look for Teepees) 3900 Hwy 35 North, Cameron ON WHEN: Mondays 7-9pm, Doors open at 6:30pm WHY: We share knowledge and wisdom about how to navigate current times and make life better for our families. We watch out for each other and our neighbours. HOW: We arrange for speakers to bring us up to speed on latest news, in areas such as health, politics, and the economy, hosting live and on Zoom.Meeting ID: 925 900 8609Passcode: 547803 KawathaFreedomGroup/KLTPA 6:06 PM ZOOM MEETING INFO:https://us02web.zoom.us/j/9259008609?pwd=WUFXQnVSZUtrMkxrRWVQWUlRS05JZz09 ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ www.facebook.com/groups/kawarthafreedomgroup https://www.facebook.com/groups/kltpa info@KawarthaFreedomGroup.ca SueThem@KLTPA.ca

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to We the People Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1516344 Subscribe to Constitutional Conventions on Rumble https://rumble.com/user/ConstitutionalConventions Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 https://rumble.com/v4govwc-facts-vs-fiction-know-who-owns-the-land-not-canada-or-their-corrup-peice-of.html info@ConstitutionalConventions.ca https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1osxH54JPkk

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Freedom of information uncovers the fact that the Police are a business run for theft.

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Good afternoon Darcy, Thanks for providing your delegation form (attached) earlier this week. In reviewing the document (as well as the information package provided earlier to all members of Council), I wanted to confirm the desired resolution you are seeking. If I understand the request correctly, you are hoping to provide guidance to Council on the legitimacy (or lack there-of) of Council’s jurisdiction. If that understanding is correct, I can confirm that local governments in BC are creations of the Province, and if there is concern about validity of jurisdiction, that concern is best directed to the Provincial Government, as it is outside of the authority of Council to change. Our Procedure Bylaw guides our delegation process and matters that fall outside of the scope of Council’s authority are typically not permitted. If I am off-base on the purpose and desired outcome of the delegation, please let me know and I can review further (I will be out of the office for a week or so, but can review upon my return). I can also confirm that even if the delegation is in-scope, we cannot extend the time past 10 minutes as you requested (though additional time can be provided at the meeting by the Mayor for Council to ask the delegation questions). Sincerely, RevisedLARGE - Copy Ross Coupé Corporate Officer 250.392.1773 | kisspng-computer-icons-fax-encapsulated-postscript-clip-ar-fax-icon-5ae0e4186c9a48 250.392.4408 rcoupe@williamslake.ca www.williamslake.ca City of Williams Lake 450 Mart Street, Williams Lake, BC V2G 1N3 I am grateful to work on the traditional territory of the T’exelcemc people of the Secwepemc Nation. The information contained in this email message, including any attached documents, is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the sole use of the recipient(s) to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient(s), any review, use, copying, distribution or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender, and delete and destroy all copies of this email message. Good evening Ross, You must be confused. I did not ask for a "Delegation Request", the MAYOR did! It was the mayor who told you to schedule a meeting with the council and to be sure of unlimited time for this important issue, and to be made public. I have no desired resolution, that is up to the men and women who were voted into a "Public Office", NOT a Public/Private/Partnership with United Nations foreign influence on local matters. If you did read the package, with complete truthful evidence therein, then you are well aware of the situation the City mayor and councillors find themselves in. They are in an un-lawful, de-facto, and ultra-vires situation, (operating under the color of law) without the lawful or legal jurisdiction to taxation et al without contracts from the people, giving consent to contract with the corporations of BC, Canada, City of Williams Lake, Cariboo Regional District, and the corporation of the United Nations amongst others. Going to the province of BC Inc is pointless since they too are "acting" as a legal government when in fact they're just another corporation in the same unlawful jurisdiction as the city is. Contract makes the law and consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls upon the claimant. The City is claiming to have jurisdiction. In this case the City of Williams Lake is asking for taxes et al without contract or consent to contract. I see that CAO Gary Muraca Cc (unelected and 2nd in command, if not 1st) is well aware of the situation, as are all the other unelected CAO's in the corporations of Canada Inc. et al. The point of the matter is that the corporation known as the City of Williams Lake CAN NOT collect tax, enforce Acts, Statutes, By-laws et al without contract. Gary Muraca, the CFO, and the city lawyer know this too. So do I. This is my community, my family and others built this community and in law; "He who creates owns." There's enough fraud going around at every level. Adhesion Contracts are not contracts, tacit contracts made without disclosure, amongst other things are fraud, conversion, and extortion. I need not add more, although I most likely could. Government Service Corporations doing business as Government of Canada and/or the government of British Columbia et al can only create rules (statutes) that only apply to their employees, franchisees, officers, and dependants. Their rules do not apply to the people in general. That is why the rules they create (statutes) are referred to as "Public Policy." All Acts, Bills, and Statutes created by any level of government corporations only apply to "person." Black's Law Dictionary 5th Edition, page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnership, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of the another. Thus, it does not apply to men and women, to whom this trespass is occurring. Maybe you'd best take this up with a lawyer, they're well aware we're operating under Maritime Law, the law of commerce, which requires contracts. (Praetextu legis injusta agens duplo puniendus) As I told the Mayor, it's his neighbors and friends who voted for what we comprehended was a public, de-jure, and lawful office, to serve the local men and women. Is CAO Muraca's signature on all the documents that our local men and women in office are responsible for with theirs? Their Oath of Office, if I recall correctly, states; "I will be accountable for the decisions that I make, and the actions that I take, in the course of my duties." They swear this Oath to the Corporation of British Columbia and Canada as noted on the top left side, an NGO. (non-governmental office) Where is the CAO Oath of Office? Yet he seems to wield great power in Williams Lake as they do elsewhere. Interesting. Needless to say, fraud, extortion, and numerous other crimes are being committed against the good men and women of my area. The future will tell how the people will respond when they know of these crimes, especially the one in which the United Nations, through their WHO/ World Health Organization committed great harms, death, and the sterilization of their children. There's no anger than that of a parent so grieved. Personally, I wouldn't want to have to explain that one. And it fell upon Williams Lake with the stroke of a mayor's pen. There's no statute of limitation on fraud. Simply Ross, I care. I care about my Village. I grew up here and I see a storm a coming. How we deal with that depends on the honesty and courage of all. If you can't give me what our mayor asked for then We the People already have our answer. De-facto, unlawful, ultra-vires, and with Foreign influence. Not looking good for the good men and women we voted in. May god have mercy upon their souls, they're going to need it. In all sincerity, without any malice, and always with love and respect in my heart, Darcy Martens, woman All rights reserved. To: mayor@williamslake.ca <mayor@williamslake.ca>; Angie Delainey <adelainey@williamslake.ca>; gmuraca@williamslake.ca <gmuraca@williamslake.ca>; vschwartz@williamslake.ca <vschwartz@williamslake.ca> Subject: Fw: Delegation Request To the Enclosed. Specifically, Mayor Rathor. (Any definitions on words, and noted herein, come from Black's Law 6th Edition, pages for easy reference) This e-mail with the enclosed responses is being sent to you because you've been Cc'd or have been given this information three times already, most recently in the documented proof sent and received on the 20th of February. I received confirmation of such in February. The fact that it was or wasn't read is not my problem, it's yours. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Ross Coupe in his e-mail to me confirmed what I discussed with the Mayor on March 11th at City Hall. "Council's jurisdiction," and "I can confirm that local governments in BC are creations of the Province." Black's Law page 366: Create, To bring into being; to cause to exist; to produce; as, to create a trust, to create a corporation. The proof of contract law with corporations, now proven through Ross, has been presented with the Clearfield Doctrine, and in paragraphs 4-5 in my response. Contracts make the law; consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls upon the claimant. Other legal terms necessary to comprehend regarding this situation are: Pages 265-266, Color of Law, The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal right. Misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state, is action taken under "color of state law." inter alia Page 416, De facto, or a state of affairs which must be accepted for all practical purposes, but is illegal or illegitimate. Thus, an officer, King, or government de facto is one who is in actual possession of the office or supreme power, but by usurpation, or without lawful title, inter alia Page 1545, Usurpation of franchise or office, The unjustly intruding upon or exercising any office, franchise, or liberty belonging to another. ( He who creates owns, the men and women of Williams Lake built the village through their work and taxation, therefore, it is the men and women who OWN and thus, are the ones being trespassed upon, having every right to a de jure lawful office of the Mayor, Councilor, or Director) Black's Law Dictionary 11th Edition, page 537, De jure, as a matter of law, existing by right or according to law. (LAW; Land Air Water, "water" refers to Maritime Law, the law of commerce, the law of contracts.) Page 1522, Ultra vires, An act performed without any authority to act on subject. By doctrine of ultra vires, a contract made by a corporation beyond the scope of its corporate powers is unlawful. ( Where is the disclosure? See: paragraphs 4-5 in my response, also The10 Points of Contract Law) et al Pages 660-663, Fraud, An intentional perversion of truth for the purpose of inducing another in reliance upon it to part with some valuable thing belonging to him or to surrender a legal right. inter alia (This began when we, and our sons and daughters were "born", through the fraud of the Bond Birth Certificate, creating the slaves we are today, and so on, and so on.) Page 585, Extortion, The obtaining of property from another induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right. inter alia Page 332, Conversion, An unauthorized assumption and exercise of right of ownership over goods or personal chattels belonging to another, to the alteration of their condition or the exclusion of the owner's rights. inter alia (Note here, all the foreclosures of property due to taxation fraud, not good on behalf of the corporation of Williams Lake, having done so under all the definitions above.) Page 1523, Unalienable Right, Inalienable; incapable of being aliened, that is, sold or transferred. Rights which can never be abridged because they are so fundamental. Page 572, Exercised Dominion, Open acts and conduct relative to land as evidence of claim of right of absolute possession, use, and ownership. "All Rights Reserved" Look that up for yourself. As I stated to the mayor on March 11th, and within the packages to all councillors, CAO Muraca, and the board of the Cariboo Regional District and their CAO; What jurisdiction are you in as a corporation that allows you legal means to taxation, by-laws etcetera, without Consent to Contract? You are all in serious trouble as are those before you operating under the color of law. The men and women in Williams Lake have the Unalienable Right to lawful governance. ( Authorized by, and accountable to, We the People) Mayor Walt Cobb was in office when the WHO/ World Health Organization overstepped their authority as a Foreign Corporation and mandated needles in the arms of the people, without consent! It doesn't matter what CEO Brian Mulroney signed at the Rio Summit in 1992, because that fell upon the corporation and its employees, against their will too. Where in their employment contracts did they agree to give up their bodily autonomy when accepting employment? This too is coming your way and to the other officers and officials in the municipalities worldwide, who by their signatures allowed this treason? Page 1501, Treason, consists of two elements: adherence to the enemy, and rendering him aid and comfort. It was my desire to enlighten my neighbours and friends, who sought and gained office within our geographical area. Knowledge is power and he who has it, wields it with either justice or deception. Operating in ultra vires can be remedied. The conversation must be had though. Swearing Oaths without "Certainty of Meaning and Full Disclosure" (10 Points of Contract Law) affects you too, when done in deception, fraud, and others. Suffice it to say, I know you know. Others know too, worldwide. Free will is a right we all possess. Use your wisely and with discernment. Respectfully then and respectfully now, Darcy Martens All rights reserved.

Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Good afternoon Darcy, Thanks for providing your delegation form (attached) earlier this week. In reviewing the document (as well as the information package provided earlier to all members of Council), I wanted to confirm the desired resolution you are seeking. If I understand the request correctly, you are hoping to provide guidance to Council on the legitimacy (or lack there-of) of Council’s jurisdiction. If that understanding is correct, I can confirm that local governments in BC are creations of the Province, and if there is concern about validity of jurisdiction, that concern is best directed to the Provincial Government, as it is outside of the authority of Council to change. Our Procedure Bylaw guides our delegation process and matters that fall outside of the scope of Council’s authority are typically not permitted. If I am off-base on the purpose and desired outcome of the delegation, please let me know and I can review further (I will be out of the office for a week or so, but can review upon my return). I can also confirm that even if the delegation is in-scope, we cannot extend the time past 10 minutes as you requested (though additional time can be provided at the meeting by the Mayor for Council to ask the delegation questions). Sincerely, RevisedLARGE - Copy Ross Coupé Corporate Officer 250.392.1773 | kisspng-computer-icons-fax-encapsulated-postscript-clip-ar-fax-icon-5ae0e4186c9a48 250.392.4408 rcoupe@williamslake.ca www.williamslake.ca City of Williams Lake 450 Mart Street, Williams Lake, BC V2G 1N3 I am grateful to work on the traditional territory of the T’exelcemc people of the Secwepemc Nation. The information contained in this email message, including any attached documents, is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the sole use of the recipient(s) to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient(s), any review, use, copying, distribution or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender, and delete and destroy all copies of this email message. Good evening Ross, You must be confused. I did not ask for a "Delegation Request", the MAYOR did! It was the mayor who told you to schedule a meeting with the council and to be sure of unlimited time for this important issue, and to be made public. I have no desired resolution, that is up to the men and women who were voted into a "Public Office", NOT a Public/Private/Partnership with United Nations foreign influence on local matters. If you did read the package, with complete truthful evidence therein, then you are well aware of the situation the City mayor and councillors find themselves in. They are in an un-lawful, de-facto, and ultra-vires situation, (operating under the color of law) without the lawful or legal jurisdiction to taxation et al without contracts from the people, giving consent to contract with the corporations of BC, Canada, City of Williams Lake, Cariboo Regional District, and the corporation of the United Nations amongst others. Going to the province of BC Inc is pointless since they too are "acting" as a legal government when in fact they're just another corporation in the same unlawful jurisdiction as the city is. Contract makes the law and consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls upon the claimant. The City is claiming to have jurisdiction. In this case the City of Williams Lake is asking for taxes et al without contract or consent to contract. I see that CAO Gary Muraca Cc (unelected and 2nd in command, if not 1st) is well aware of the situation, as are all the other unelected CAO's in the corporations of Canada Inc. et al. The point of the matter is that the corporation known as the City of Williams Lake CAN NOT collect tax, enforce Acts, Statutes, By-laws et al without contract. Gary Muraca, the CFO, and the city lawyer know this too. So do I. This is my community, my family and others built this community and in law; "He who creates owns." There's enough fraud going around at every level. Adhesion Contracts are not contracts, tacit contracts made without disclosure, amongst other things are fraud, conversion, and extortion. I need not add more, although I most likely could. Government Service Corporations doing business as Government of Canada and/or the government of British Columbia et al can only create rules (statutes) that only apply to their employees, franchisees, officers, and dependants. Their rules do not apply to the people in general. That is why the rules they create (statutes) are referred to as "Public Policy." All Acts, Bills, and Statutes created by any level of government corporations only apply to "person." Black's Law Dictionary 5th Edition, page 1028 states: In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person) though by statute term may include a firm, labor organization, partnership, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. Maxim: Include, The inclusion of one is the exclusion of the another. Thus, it does not apply to men and women, to whom this trespass is occurring. Maybe you'd best take this up with a lawyer, they're well aware we're operating under Maritime Law, the law of commerce, which requires contracts. (Praetextu legis injusta agens duplo puniendus) As I told the Mayor, it's his neighbors and friends who voted for what we comprehended was a public, de-jure, and lawful office, to serve the local men and women. Is CAO Muraca's signature on all the documents that our local men and women in office are responsible for with theirs? Their Oath of Office, if I recall correctly, states; "I will be accountable for the decisions that I make, and the actions that I take, in the course of my duties." They swear this Oath to the Corporation of British Columbia and Canada as noted on the top left side, an NGO. (non-governmental office) Where is the CAO Oath of Office? Yet he seems to wield great power in Williams Lake as they do elsewhere. Interesting. Needless to say, fraud, extortion, and numerous other crimes are being committed against the good men and women of my area. The future will tell how the people will respond when they know of these crimes, especially the one in which the United Nations, through their WHO/ World Health Organization committed great harms, death, and the sterilization of their children. There's no anger than that of a parent so grieved. Personally, I wouldn't want to have to explain that one. And it fell upon Williams Lake with the stroke of a mayor's pen. There's no statute of limitation on fraud. Simply Ross, I care. I care about my Village. I grew up here and I see a storm a coming. How we deal with that depends on the honesty and courage of all. If you can't give me what our mayor asked for then We the People already have our answer. De-facto, unlawful, ultra-vires, and with Foreign influence. Not looking good for the good men and women we voted in. May god have mercy upon their souls, they're going to need it. In all sincerity, without any malice, and always with love and respect in my heart, Darcy Martens, woman All rights reserved. To: mayor@williamslake.ca <mayor@williamslake.ca>; Angie Delainey <adelainey@williamslake.ca>; gmuraca@williamslake.ca <gmuraca@williamslake.ca>; vschwartz@williamslake.ca <vschwartz@williamslake.ca> Subject: Fw: Delegation Request To the Enclosed. Specifically, Mayor Rathor. (Any definitions on words, and noted herein, come from Black's Law 6th Edition, pages for easy reference) This e-mail with the enclosed responses is being sent to you because you've been Cc'd or have been given this information three times already, most recently in the documented proof sent and received on the 20th of February. I received confirmation of such in February. The fact that it was or wasn't read is not my problem, it's yours. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Ross Coupe in his e-mail to me confirmed what I discussed with the Mayor on March 11th at City Hall. "Council's jurisdiction," and "I can confirm that local governments in BC are creations of the Province." Black's Law page 366: Create, To bring into being; to cause to exist; to produce; as, to create a trust, to create a corporation. The proof of contract law with corporations, now proven through Ross, has been presented with the Clearfield Doctrine, and in paragraphs 4-5 in my response. Contracts make the law; consent makes the contract. The burden of proof falls upon the claimant. Other legal terms necessary to comprehend regarding this situation are: Pages 265-266, Color of Law, The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal right. Misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state, is action taken under "color of state law." inter alia Page 416, De facto, or a state of affairs which must be accepted for all practical purposes, but is illegal or illegitimate. Thus, an officer, King, or government de facto is one who is in actual possession of the office or supreme power, but by usurpation, or without lawful title, inter alia Page 1545, Usurpation of franchise or office, The unjustly intruding upon or exercising any office, franchise, or liberty belonging to another. ( He who creates owns, the men and women of Williams Lake built the village through their work and taxation, therefore, it is the men and women who OWN and thus, are the ones being trespassed upon, having every right to a de jure lawful office of the Mayor, Councilor, or Director) Black's Law Dictionary 11th Edition, page 537, De jure, as a matter of law, existing by right or according to law. (LAW; Land Air Water, "water" refers to Maritime Law, the law of commerce, the law of contracts.) Page 1522, Ultra vires, An act performed without any authority to act on subject. By doctrine of ultra vires, a contract made by a corporation beyond the scope of its corporate powers is unlawful. ( Where is the disclosure? See: paragraphs 4-5 in my response, also The10 Points of Contract Law) et al Pages 660-663, Fraud, An intentional perversion of truth for the purpose of inducing another in reliance upon it to part with some valuable thing belonging to him or to surrender a legal right. inter alia (This began when we, and our sons and daughters were "born", through the fraud of the Bond Birth Certificate, creating the slaves we are today, and so on, and so on.) Page 585, Extortion, The obtaining of property from another induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right. inter alia Page 332, Conversion, An unauthorized assumption and exercise of right of ownership over goods or personal chattels belonging to another, to the alteration of their condition or the exclusion of the owner's rights. inter alia (Note here, all the foreclosures of property due to taxation fraud, not good on behalf of the corporation of Williams Lake, having done so under all the definitions above.) Page 1523, Unalienable Right, Inalienable; incapable of being aliened, that is, sold or transferred. Rights which can never be abridged because they are so fundamental. Page 572, Exercised Dominion, Open acts and conduct relative to land as evidence of claim of right of absolute possession, use, and ownership. "All Rights Reserved" Look that up for yourself. As I stated to the mayor on March 11th, and within the packages to all councillors, CAO Muraca, and the board of the Cariboo Regional District and their CAO; What jurisdiction are you in as a corporation that allows you legal means to taxation, by-laws etcetera, without Consent to Contract? You are all in serious trouble as are those before you operating under the color of law. The men and women in Williams Lake have the Unalienable Right to lawful governance. ( Authorized by, and accountable to, We the People) Mayor Walt Cobb was in office when the WHO/ World Health Organization overstepped their authority as a Foreign Corporation and mandated needles in the arms of the people, without consent! It doesn't matter what CEO Brian Mulroney signed at the Rio Summit in 1992, because that fell upon the corporation and its employees, against their will too. Where in their employment contracts did they agree to give up their bodily autonomy when accepting employment? This too is coming your way and to the other officers and officials in the municipalities worldwide, who by their signatures allowed this treason? Page 1501, Treason, consists of two elements: adherence to the enemy, and rendering him aid and comfort. It was my desire to enlighten my neighbours and friends, who sought and gained office within our geographical area. Knowledge is power and he who has it, wields it with either justice or deception. Operating in ultra vires can be remedied. The conversation must be had though. Swearing Oaths without "Certainty of Meaning and Full Disclosure" (10 Points of Contract Law) affects you too, when done in deception, fraud, and others. Suffice it to say, I know you know. Others know too, worldwide. Free will is a right we all possess. Use your wisely and with discernment. Respectfully then and respectfully now, Darcy Martens All rights reserved.

Subscribe thank You https://www.youtube.com/@constitutionalconventions6240 Subscribe to get important Information https://constitutionalconventions.ca/contact/ - ensure you get confirmation - check spam or junk mail. Zoom 5-10 EST daily https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6945489985?pwd=UllwRmwzRUhWS2pXUWNQODNEbnhSZz09 SwT80SwT8 Copy Right STRAWMAN & Live Birth to Become the Beneficiary https://rumble.com/v4io1ze-copy-right-strawman-and-live-birth-to-become-the-beneficiary.html