ConspiracyXVideos

The subject of ‘healing’ is a huge conversation, with a very deep and wide range of modalities. From east to west, the kind of medicine which is considered ‘traditional’ varies greatly. In finding which works best, one must take into account how their illness came about in the first place, from every dimension of observation. What emotions have we left unprocessed? What food and drink are we consuming; what is their nutritional content? Are we connected to the energetic blueprint of Spirit? All these factors play a part in our overall wellbeing, or the lack thereof. In this episode of Spirit Science, we take a look at what makes (or breaks) one’s health, from the perspective of our multidimensional selves. We cannot fixate on only one ‘method’ to inspire healing, we must realize that health needs to be tackled from the perspectives of both body, mind, and spirit. The truth is, every form of medicine has its proper place. The more aware we are of the root causes of our illnesses and diseases, the easier time we will have in addressing them at their core, and guaranteeing success in our healing. This episode was based on the book “Scientific Healing Affirmations”, by Yogic Master Paramahansa Yogananda, and we highly encourage you checking it out if you want to go deeper into this subject. ~ ~ Animations by Jordan River Additional Art by Wipalo

Almost a year to the day that Louisville police officers killed Breonna Taylor during a no-knock raid, the Kentucky Senate passed a bill which makes it a crime to insult and taunt cops. If S.B. 211 becomes law, you could get up to three months in jail and a $250 fine if you flip off the fuzz in a way "that would have a direct tendency to provoke a violent response from the perspective of a reasonable and prudent person." It's just one example of a slew of proposed new laws that are chilling free speech. While freethinkers are rightly worried that private online platforms such as Amazon, Twitter, and Facebook are increasingly—and often arbitrarily—cracking down on speech for political reasons, the much graver threat comes from governments at all levels seeking to compel or ban speech. In Texas, conservative Republicans want to stop social media platforms from running their businesses the way they see fit. A bill poised to pass the state Senate, S.B. 12, "would create a state law prohibiting business censorship, defined as actions that block, ban, remove, deplatform, demonetize, de-boost, restrict, deny equal access or visibility to, or otherwise discriminate against expression." This law is backed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott, who says, without citing actual evidence, that conservative speakers are systematically silenced. "Pretty soon," he brags, such supposed censorship is "going to be against the law in the state of Texas." Back in the pre-internet days, you could count on right-wingers to scream about the need to regulate sex and drugs on TV but these days, they seem to want social media companies to do no moderating of content. So maybe that's progress. At the same time, liberal Democrats, who themselves used to scream about violent video games, are pushing for more regulation of speech they don't like. In Colorado, a proposed law would create a "digital communications commission" that would investigate platforms to make sure they don't allow "hate speech," "undermine election integrity," or "disseminate intentional disinformation, conspiracy theories, or fake news"—all exceptionally vague terms that aren't even defined in the legislation. The commission would have the ability to order changes in the way platforms operate. At the national level, two congressional Democrats—Rep. Anna Eshoo (D–Calif.) and Rep. Jerry McNerney (D–Calif.)—have sent letters to the heads of Comcast, Verizon, Dish, and other cable and satellite companies demanding to know why such private services carry Fox News, Newsmax, and other supposed purveyors of "misinformation." As Reason's Robby Soave put it, the demand "was an act of intimidation." It's a rare week when high-wattage politicians such as Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D–Mass.) or Sen. Ted Cruz (R–Texas) don't threaten Big Tech with some sort of reprimand because they don't like what's popular on Facebook or Twitter. The good news is that laws seeking to control individuals and platforms are blatantly unconstitutional because they compel the speech of private actors and because Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act allows broad discretion in running websites and platforms. When challenged in court, they'll almost certainly be struck down. The bad news is that the laws just keep coming, because politicians of all stripes want to control speech in a way that favors their agendas and they don't care about whether a law respects the First Amendment. We should loudly criticize platforms for kicking people off in arbitrary ways that diminish our ability to freely argue and disagree about politics and culture. We want more participation, not less. But it's even more important to recognize private citizens' and businesses' right to freely associate with whomever they want. Far worse than such private cancel culture is when politicians tell us we don't have a right to insult cops, or when they're the ones setting the rules about what we must prohibit—or allow.

Sadhguru describes the opening of the third eye as the most significant aspect of Shiva’s life. He also speaks about two ways to open the third eye to enhance one’s perception beyond the physical.

RESOURCES: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1S... Chapters: 0:00 Intro 2:42 Defining Conspiracy Theory 10:30 Philosophy of Conspiracy Theories 15:30 History of Conspiracy Theories 21:40 Proven Conspiracy Theories 23:31 Evaluating a Conspiracy Theory 33:40 Conclusion

The internal company documents offer a behind-the-scenes glimpse at how the federal agencies distorted the public debate one of the world's largest social media platforms. ---- https://reason.com/video/2023/01/09/d... CORRECTION: This article originally described Nostr as a "blockchain-based social media site." Nostr is an open protocol that allows users to transmit a post over a decentralized network of relays using cryptographic keys. The so-called Twitter Files, written by a group of independent journalists given access to internal company documents, offer a behind-the-scenes glimpse at how the federal government shaped the flow of information on one of the world's largest social media platforms. Some tech pundits say that the Twitter Files contain no secrets: they knew about the thousands of takedown requests the company receives every month from law enforcement agencies and the courts, or they had already opined about the immense challenges of content moderation. However, the Twitter Files have brought important new information to light. They show that the company stifled debate over important policy issues by shadowbanning certain accounts for no good reason and then misleading the public. They show that Twitter was routinely strongarmed by the White House and the FBI into complying with frivolous takedown requests. And they provide evidence that the intelligence community likely influenced the decision to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story during Joe Biden's 2020 presidential campaign. "Almost every conspiracy theory that people had about Twitter turned out to be true," Elon Musk said on the All-In Podcast in late December. "Is there a conspiracy theory about Twitter that didn't turn out to be true?" Conspiracy theorists are often sloppy with the facts and exaggerate what actually happened. But the information brought to light by the Twitter Files should be alarming to anyone who cares about free speech and a free society. Is the government meddling similarly with YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, and Google search? How can we prevent the internet from becoming a centralized apparatus through which state actors shape and censor public debate? Here are three major takeaways from the Twitter Files: #1 Twitter distorted the conversation and misled the public Twitter had a system of "whitelists" that allowed its algorithms and human moderators to turn engagement dials up and down based on what a user said. It used this power to limit the ability of certain groups and individuals to reach an audience, including conservative commentator Dan Bongino, Stanford economist and medical school professor Jay Bhattacharya, mRNA vaccine critic Alex Berenson, and the Libs of TikTok account. #2 The government is secretly policing speech. The most troubling thing about the Berenson de-platforming isn't Twitter's decision per se, but whether it made that decision freely. Was it done at the behest of the federal government? The Twitter files provide circumstantial evidence that the White House played a role. #3 Twitter permitted covert state propaganda on its platform. The U.S. ran sock-puppet accounts on Twitter and then may have tried to shut them down secretly when it looked like it was caught in the act. Produced by Zach Weissmueller; edited by Regan Taylor; sound editing by John Osterhoudt. Photo credits: PIERRE VILLARD/SIPA/Newscom; Adrien Fillon/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Al Drago - Pool via CNP/SIPA/Newscom; Alisdare Hickson, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons; CelebrityHomePhotos/Newscom; Daniel Oberhaus, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Dominick Sokotoff/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Dylan Stewart/Image of Sport/Newscom; Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons; I, Aude, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Image of Sport/Newscom; imageBROKER/Markus Mainka/Newscom; Jarek Tuszyński / CC-BY-SA-3.0 & GDFL, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Kyodo/Newscom; Kris Tripplaar/Sipa USA/Newscom; Lordalpha1, CC BY 2.5, via Wikimedia Commons; LiPo Ching/TNS/Newscom; Michael Ho Wai Lee/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom ;Ministério Das Comunicações, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons; New Media Daysderivative work: -- Cirt, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Oliver Contreras - Pool via CNP/picture alliance / Consolidated News Photos/Newscom; Paul E Boucher/ZUMA Press/Newscom; picture alliance / Frank Duenzl/Newscom; Ron Sachs/picture alliance / Consolidated News Photos/Newscom; Ser Amantio di Nicolao, CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Tesla Owners Club Belgium, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Newscom; Whoisjohngalt, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Yichuan Cao/Sipa USA/Newscom; ZUMAPRESS/Newscom Music Credits: "Fleeting Wave," by Palm Blue via Artlist; "Quiet Pull," by Tamuz Dekel via Artlist; "Ripples," Tamuz Dekel via Artlist; "Particles," by Nobou via Artlist; "From Above," by Dan Mayo via Artlist

Explore shocking true conspiracy theories in this brief video! Learn about the CIA's secret mind control program, Project MKUltra, experimenting with drugs and psychological torture. Dive into the Manhattan Project, the US government's covert nuclear weapons research during World War II. Uncover Operation Snow White, the Church of Scientology's criminal conspiracy to erase damaging documents. Discover these secretive and astonishing events in our compilation!

We all know the old trope of the tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist who believes crazy things like "the government is spying on us" and "the military is spraying things in the sky" and "the CIA ships in the drugs." Except those things aren't so crazy after all. Here are five examples of things that were once derided as zany conspiracy paranoia and are now accepted as mundane historical fact.

There’s a good chance you have never heard of them. In less than 30 years, this American financial firm has grown from nothing to becoming the world’s largest and most trusted manager of other people’s money. The assets left in their care are worth a staggering 6.3 trillion US dollars – a figure with 12 zeroes.

You know you're in deep, deep trouble when Joe Biden and Donald Trump agree on anything—and that's especially true when it comes to insisting that nobody should ever cut "a single penny" from Social Security, the nation's income program for people over 65. Here are three reasons why Social Security should be scrapped completely and replaced with a plan that will help the truly needy without impoverishing everyone else. Social Security is unsustainable. Created in 1935, Social Security is paid for by a 12.4 percent payroll tax on income up to $160,200. Supporters pretend that Social Security is like a retirement plan, where your specific contributions build value over time. But the system is a Ponzi scheme, in which current beneficiaries are paid out of new money coming into the system. The problem is that when the program started paying out benefits in 1940, there were 160 workers per retiree, so a surplus built up. Today, there are just 2.8 workers per retiree. In a decade, there won't be enough money coming into the system to cover the current level of benefits. By law, benefits will need to be cut by 20 percent or payroll taxes will need to be jacked up even more than they already are. In 2023, we'll be taxed on all income up to $160,200—a figure that's up from $113,700 a decade ago and $87,000 in 2003. Social Security is unfair. The payroll tax hits younger, poorer workers harder than older and wealthier ones. A minimum-wage worker might pay virtually nothing in federal taxes, but will still be forced to fork over 12.4 percent of his or her compensation in payroll taxes. It's a bad deal for retirees from an investment point of view: According to a 2016 Tax Foundation study, a worker retiring after making average wages could expect an annual payout of about $20,000. If that person had instead put just 10 percent of their annual earnings into an conservative IRA, they could expect an annual retirement income of almost three times more. And don't think the government actually owes you anything when you retire, regardless of how much you paid in. In 1960, the Supreme Court ruled in Flemming v. Nestor that there is no contractual or constitutional right to receive Social Security benefits. Social Security is unnecessary. When Social Security was passed during the Great Depression, old age and poverty went hand in hand. Now the median net worth of households headed by someone over 65 is more than double that of households headed by someone half their age. Households headed by people 75 years or older had a median net worth of $254,800 and those headed by people between the ages of 65 and 74 came in at $266,400. For those between 35-44, the figure was just $91,300. To be fair, part of the reason older Americans are relatively flush is because of Social Security and Medicare. But it's mostly because people are living and working longer and accruing more wealth so that old-age programs are less and less important to financial stability and well-being. There's simply no good reason to pay out universal benefits to millionaires like Joe Biden and billionaires like Donald Trump. Rather than jawboning about saving Social Security, politicians—and voters—should be talking about ways to wind it down as quickly as possible. Let people within a decade or so of retirement get benefits, but reduce and eliminate payroll taxes for the rest of us so we have more money to fund our own retirements. The federal government can and should continue to help older Americans—indeed, Americans of any age—who need assistance with food, housing, and health care. But that doesn't require forcing all of us to pay into a system that is increasingly unsustainable, unfair, and unnecessary.

YouTube removed this March 2021 roundtable organized by Florida governor Ron DeSantis because of the views Bhattacharya and others expressed about masking children in school. Was this part of an illegal censorship campaign, as a lawsuit in federal court alleges?

This video will dive deep into why corruption is legal in america

Biden Energy Officials Exposed: Pay-to-Play and Insider Trading In this video, you will see Senator Josh Hawley grill two Biden administration officials from the Department of Energy: Jennifer Granholm, the Secretary of Energy, and David Turk, the Deputy Secretary of Energy. Hawley exposes how Granholm and Turk have engaged in unethical and potentially illegal activities, such as accepting lucrative speaking fees from foreign entities, holding stocks in energy companies that benefit from their policies, and using their positions to influence the energy market. Hawley asks them tough questions and demands accountability for their actions, which have harmed the American people and compromised the national security. Watch this video to learn more about the corruption of Biden’s Energy Department and how Hawley is fighting for transparency and justice.

David Koresh was a spiritual leader who saw himself as the final prophet in a world that was coming to an end. Though Koresh and his followers were largely peaceful, they were amassing weapons as a way to defend themselves when the apocalypse came. Numbering about 100, the Branch Davidians lived a quiet existence in a compound known as Mount Carmel, located just outside of Waco, Texas. In 1993, the federal government obtained a warrant to raid their headquarters on the grounds that they possessed illegal weapons. When they showed up on February 28 of that year, federal agents with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) thought they would be in and out. But the Branch Davidians resisted. Four ATF agents and six Branch Davidians were killed during the initial raid, and after a 51-day standoff, the siege ended with the burning of Mount Carmel. Seventy-six Branch Davidians—including 25 children—perished after being trapped inside. Now 30 years since the historic standoff, director of Waco: American Apocalypse, Tiller Russell, tells the story of Waco from a very human perspective. The docuseries features never-before-seen footage from the FBI hostage negotiation room as well as interviews of Branch Davidians, FBI hostage negotiators, FBI hostage rescue team members, and reporters who were on the ground during the siege. Waco was the largest gunfight on American soil since the Civil War, and many people point to it as a pivotal moment in American history that created new levels of distrust in the federal government.

First they banned it, then they banned it again. Then they gave up. It's the most watched conspiracy video in the history of the internet. This video goes straight to the top of the NWO pyramid in an attempt to discover the root of global government. This video goes beyond the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations), Bilderberg, Skull and Bones and Bohemian Grove. Instead it unveils our philosophy on Zionism, Satanism and Freemasonry. We ask the questions that most won't even think about. We confront the sources of power with no fear. We are fighting for humanity. No Rockefeller or Rothschild can defeat us. Nothing is more powerful than an idea whose time has come. Can you handle the most banned conspiracy theory video? Watch and find out

Decentralize, this government is more corrupt then ever. Embrace the great escape and get away from the “great reset”

In his testimony before congress, former U.S. intelligence official David Grusch claims the U.S. government is in possession of extraterrestrial spacecraft and "non-human" biologics. Even though his claims are certainly intriguing, he has no evidence to validate what he's saying.

Responding to a question by Czech entrepreneur and mathematician, Karel Janeček, Sadhguru explains the root cause of the Russia-Ukraine war, and what we must do to put an end to it.

The underlying problem is not inflation. It’s corporate power. The entire American economy is concentrated into the hands of a few greedy, corporate giants with the power to raise prices.

Dive into the shadowy realm of conspiracy theories with our eye-opening video, "Unveiling the Unthinkable." In this intriguing exploration, we bring you five of the most unsettling and thought-provoking conspiracy theories that have captured the imaginations of many. Discover the world of flat Earth believers, uncover the mysteries behind alleged chemtrails, and delve into the controversial claims of a 9/11 inside job. We also shed light on the enigmatic Illuminati and the perplexing QAnon phenomenon. This video aims to provide a balanced view of these theories, encouraging critical thinking and an examination of the evidence surrounding them. Remember, the truth is often stranger than fiction, and understanding these conspiracy theories is essential for a well-rounded perspective on the world of ideas. Join us on this journey, but always approach these theories with a skeptical and discerning mind.

In this video, President Trump addresses reporters during his civil fraud trial in New York City. He discusses his perspective on the trial and expresses his views on "government corruption at its finest," specifically mentioning Attorney General Letitia James. Tune in to hear Trump's take on this legal battle and its broader implications.

A Front of House Manager reveals what working in a hotel for the super-rich is really like. From hiring out the whole hotel for a ‘themed’ orgy to covering the tracks of staff sleeping with customers, the Informer details how the job can be demanding physically and emotionally. Blood and gore are all part of the job.

On Thursday, Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) discussed a proposed amendment on the House Floor.

The Freemasons are the world's most well-known secret society, and are the subject of countless parodies and conspiracy theories. But who are they exactly? Mo Rocca ventures inside Masonic Lodges to find out.

A video informing you of multiple “conspiracy theories” that all have now turned out to be true. Corrupt government getting caught

Raven rock is an underground command center where the government will work from in the event of a nuclear apocalypse