ConservativeActivist

Please propagate this work excerpt from the video "Racism is Normal, Moral, and Healthy"

Please share this video. Major rewrite soon coming at TabooRaceBook.com

Please combat Democrat Genocidal Evil by propagating this video. Written transcription below... My name is Winston Smith, and I am normal moral and healthy. Democrat pure evil has no power over me. It is normal, moral, and healthy to state the truth that illegal aliens are selfish immoral invading vermin that deserve no compassion but only profound disgust and ridicule. Illegal aliens selfishly, immorally invade homelands of a sovereign citizenry, causing extreme suffering financially, socially, physically, and most critically culturally. When illegal aliens penetrate the sovereign border of their victim country, they know full well they are guilty of a moral and legal crime. Always be aware that they know of their immorality against you, and that they don't care exactly because they are selfish and immoral; thus, it is your moral duty to only treat illegal aliens with hostility so that they are rightfully exposed as the immoral invaders that they are. Of course, a moral government would immediately punish then expel the invader illegal alien, but in the absence of a moral government it is the citizen's responsibility to do everything that is reasonable to rightfully expel this invader. Behold the many ways illegal aliens victimize the citizenry: The financial cost of the invading millions upon millions of illegal aliens is breathtaking. As only one example: The US House Committee on Homeland Security reported that in 2023 alone, the illegal alien invasion costs the victim citizenry $500,000,000,000. I repeat: In 2023 alone, the illegal alien invasion costs the victim citizenry $500,000,000,000. Try to ponder the size of that dollar amount. That is 500,000 million dollars, in 2023 alone!—Ponder how much good could be done with that money annually! How is such an astounding sum tallied? Firstly, because illegal aliens are typically professionally unskilled, they pay little to no taxes. The money they make from any work they do, or they receive from welfare, is typically sent to their families in their foreign country, thus draining the victim nation’s economy. Most costly is the illegal aliens’ overwhelming hospital utilization. Take a trip to an urban hospital emergency room to witness the disgusting illegal-alien saturation yourself. You will feel like you are in Guatemala after an earthquake. Ponder how each of these vermin and their children do not pay the hundreds of billions of dollars for their emergency room costs per year. It is the invaded citizenry that pays the hundreds of billions of dollars each year for the illegal-alien invader’s emergency room costs. These illegal aliens force the victim citizenry to pay hundreds of billions of dollars for their food, their clothing, their housing, their electricity, their water and heat. Each year the illegal aliens leech from their victim nation billions of dollars in law enforcement, schools and universities, infrastructure, and amenities. The financial cost alone of illegal aliens is high enough to deeply condemn them as immoral invading vermin, yet the social cost is staggering as well. Illegal aliens necessarily poison their victim community's social harmony with racial tension. Illegal aliens often traffic narcotics, which forces on victim population not only medical suffering, but also physical suffering as well as fear from violent crime. Illegal aliens force their victim population to suffer overpopulation problems such as disease, homelessness, over-capacity schools, over-capacity amenities, automobile traffic, and all forms of increased pollution. Illegal aliens bring deadly religious and political terrorism. These social costs alone deeply endite illegal aliens as sickening immoral vermin, yet what makes the illegal alien most repulsive is his necessarily constant and never-ending destruction of his victim citizenry’s culture. The core of a healthy society is its preserved culture-- its collective natural expression in its many forms such as language, religion, values, architecture, art, music, literature, traditions, legends, cuisine, commercial media, national awards, and others. And the documentation of these cultural elements is the society's precious history. Now, it must be appreciated that this cultural expression stems from its citizenry's unique racial DNA. Put more simply, culture can be defined as expression of racial DNA. This is witnessed in the distinct and uniform flavor of each race's cultural expression. For example, everything in India has a consistent same unique flavor, as does everything in Japan, and Saudi Arabia, and Nigeria, and Sweden, and Argentina. The preservation of this racial cultural expression is maximally essential to maintaining the psychological health of the indigenous citizenry, because it is what at all times surrounds the citizen, and reinforces his same DNA expression. This constant saturation of the citizen's same DNA expression is his amniotic-fluid that at all times confirms to him his psychological, spiritual identity. Without his surrounding cultural expression he is psychologically, spiritually lost. This lack of surrounding identity confirmation will generate within the citizen anxiety, depression, despair, a loss of will to create, and a loss of will to live. Because their victim society's cultural expression is not the expression of their DNA, illegal aliens will only destroy the existing culture; and thus, illegal aliens are perpetrating on their victim citizenry a deeply violent act. These illegal aliens, by their illegal immoral invasion of a homeland, are directly destroying the citizenry's culture that is literally fundamental to the victim citizenry’s sanity. These illegal aliens poison the native culture with their alien language, alien religion, alien values, alien architecture, alien art, alien music, alien literature, alien traditions, alien legends, alien cuisine, alien commercial media, alien influence on national awards, and others. These illegal aliens care nothing about the native culture or preserving its history, for if they did they would not invade. Clearly through their actions illegal aliens prove that they have no compassion at all for their victim nation. To the illegal alien invader the victim population is at best a nuisance, and at worse a people needing extermination. In short, the invasion of illegal aliens causes the native racial population extreme, untenable, unsolvable, psychological suffering. While the illegal alien’s enumerated financial or social injustices are easily enough to morally condemn him, the illegal alien’s perpetrated destruction of the victim society's psychologically critical culture, proves to be profound evil. I repeat: While the illegal alien’s enumerated financial or social injustices are easily enough to morally condemn him, the illegal alien’s perpetrated destruction of the victim society's psychologically critical culture proves to be profound evil. As a moral note, in the same way that it does not matter if cancer knows that it causes suffering to its victim, it does not matter if a particular illegal alien appreciates the extent of how monstrous he is. It is self-evident that moral humans have a responsibility to ponder the consequences of their actions. When the illegal alien traverses his victim nation’s national border barrier, he definitely knows he is committing an immoral act. He knows the citizenry has placed that barrier to keep him out, yet he willingly violates it. There is no possible moral reprieve for illegal alien invaders. So then, in conclusion, illegal aliens are appallingly selfish, immoral invaders that heinously victimize the innocent citizenry not only financially and socially but most critically in their destruction of the victim population’s culture. It is this unavoidable cultural destruction that generates within the victim population excruciating anxiety, depression, despair, a loss of will to create, and a loss of will to live. Thus, it has been proven that it is ridiculous to feel any compassion at all for illegal aliens because they are nothing more than utterly selfish, immoral invaders of their victim society. It is normal, moral, and healthy to declare that illegal aliens are selfish immoral invading vermin that deserve no compassion but only profound disgust and ridicule. I repeat, it is normal, moral, and healthy to declare that illegal aliens are selfish immoral invading vermin that deserve no compassion but only profound disgust and ridicule. My name is Winston Smith, and I am normal, moral, and healthy. Democrat pure evil has no power over me.

Leftist Flawed Thinking The most consequential flaw in the leftist paradigm is that it implies that its definitions of utopia, morality, ignorance, and scientific knowledge are self-evident and beyond question. This shortcoming is simply proven by asking a leftist, “What is the theoretical evidence that would disprove your belief?” A conservative not only can easily answer this, but he continually challenges himself with such validating questions. Behold a simple conservative answer, “I would change my politics if you could disprove that man’s essential nature is flawed, that small government is best, that society must preserve inalienable individual rights.” Leftist has no such answers because their politics prove unsound because they originate from a non-real universe grounded in emotional physics. Leftist ideological failure is further exposed by comparing the basic political strategies of both the right and left. The right cultivates morality through rational compassion. The right cultivates societal wellbeing through teaching authentic history, economics, and the wisdom of tradition. The left is unable to adopt this strategy because authentic history, economics, and tradition directly antagonize their utopian aspirations. Because they have no choice they cultivate not societal wellbeing, but power through all methods possible. As Orwell stated, "Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing." Thus, over so many decades leftists have mastered many strategies and tactics for the direct acquisition of power. Their most celebrated instruction manual is Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals.” Of course all the while leftists believe they are doing good despite all logic and direct evidence proving otherwise. To again quote Orwell, "Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them." Thus there is virtually nothing that will change leftist minds, and that is the crux of the problem— it is impossible to reveal to leftists actual reality. Additionally, leftists are stunted by their ill certainty that their virtue is superior to that of the right. The right has no such binding as it freely submits that anyone may possess healthy virtue. Because the right champions what does good which often does not feel good, the left cannot comprehend let alone admit rightist methodology could be moral because it would imply the suicidal negation of the emotional physics of their universe. A perfect example of this dynamic manifests during a debate on morality when a leftist says, “You’re from another planet.” He is metaphorically correct. Rightists and leftists truly live in psychologically separate universes with different fundamental physics. To defend 2+2=7 leftists mainly employ epistemological relativism grounded in their delusional emotional universe which remains perfectly shielded by their impenetrable egos. They attest that all knowledge is relative, specifically the morality of right and wrong; thus, as they see fit they label evil the victim of good. Such thinking is illustrated in venerated Marxist Max Horkheimer’s proud clinically insane statement "Logic is not independent of content." Any sane high school student can appreciate that a=a regardless of the contents of “a,” yet obvious refutations such as this are uniformly suppressed by the left. Today at most every Western university you can witness this mental illness within tenured Marxist professors by challenging them with such refutations. You can then appeal to their department heads to again witness the illness. These people are no less than clinically insane; and thus, it is impossible for them to retain a healthy conception of morality– they may truly believe anything, such as moral innocence in wanton mass rape and murder. The left’s emotional universe inexorably subscribes them to the dogma of ends justifying means because, unlike the right, the left has no moral paradigm to deter them. Their morality is the result of childish goals of preserved feelings, short term peace, and long term utopia. Because logic and reality antagonize leftist ends, the leftist need to construct successful political paradigms is not a passion, but a contemptible chore. This is why leftist arguments are so flimsy. Leftists not only suffer a deficit in logical aptitude, but their arguments are irrelevant to the leftists themselves. Typically, truth is that which must be overcome in any way possible. This can be witnessed daily in leftist newspapers such as The New York Times and The Washington Post, and websites such as HuffingtonPost.com.

Please propagate this work. Text transcription below. excerpt from "The Catastrophe of Multiethnic Society" found at TabooRaceBook.com --- Leftism: Essential to sociology is an understanding of the mentality of the political right and left. History has proven that within every society exist two groups, one primarily motivated by emotion– the left, and the other by logic and wisdom– the right. The validity of these defining characteristics is validated by studying history, or applying critical thought to correlating political ideologies. Testament to the validity of the dichotomy is that modern science has dedicated significant resources to understanding its biological causes. Because political stakes are no less than the fate of society, there will always exist ardent conflict between the political right and left. The Leftist Brain It seems obvious that societal problems are best remedied through a dominant application of logic and wisdom, yet through their politics leftists evidence that they disagree. Thus an investigation of the mental disorder of leftism is as fascinating as it is relevant. Because this investigation is necessarily complex, this section is the most intellectually challenging of the treatise; thus, the reader should now heighten his concentration. Because the leftist’s reality has been constructed by his emotionally dominant brain, he is unaware of the fundamental incongruity of his emotional universe in the same way that a fish is unaware of his water universe. However misaligned with his goals his results have proven, and continue to prove, it remains self-evident to a leftist that moral actions must be chosen by what feels good. To the leftist it is perverse insanity to suggest that morality is best defined not by what feels good but by what does good. For a leftist to affirm a problem-solving dynamic that values logic and wisdom over emotion would be much more than morally reprehensible; it would be a psychological experience on par with a suicidal departure to insanity. He would be annihilating his universe (his ego) which includes literally all he loves—his morality, his children, his life, everything. Thus it makes perfect sense that such minds maximally resist the embrace of this Armageddon necessary for their awakening to reality. This is why leftist politics prove irrational to the point of surreal. As a matter of insightful fact, the artistic surrealism movement of the early twentieth century is politically associated with communism. Behold surrealism’s definition as stated within André Breton’s 1924 “Surrealist Manifesto”… “Surrealism is based on the belief in the superior reality of certain forms of previously neglected associations, in the omnipotence of dream, in the disinterested play of thought. It tends to ruin once and for all other psychic mechanisms and to substitute itself for them in solving all the principal problems of life.” Leftist problem-solving methodology first intuits a solution that feels best, builds around it the most plausible paradigm, then defends the paradigm with all imaginable sophistry. This methodology would be laughable if it weren’t so widely championed. Specifically, leftist solutions prioritize the most speedily achieved peace with the least hurt feelings. The primary leftist paradigm states that man is essentially good, so it is not his biology that separates him from a communal utopia, but his ignorant cultural institutions. Thus, leftists conclude that for man to return to utopia he only needs to replace his institutions with scientific knowledge. Not only is this a false premise because it ignores instinct and wisdom, but leftists don’t even implement their premise with any consistency. The foundation of science is logic and the study of empirical evidence. Obviously this evidence includes social world history. Leftists very clearly disdain logic and the evidence of social world history. The left’s correspondingly insane ultimate goal is articulated best in the lyrics of John Lennon’s song Imagine: “Imagine there’s no heaven… no countries… nothing to kill or die for… Imagine all the people living life in peace… no possessions… no need for greed or hunger… imagine all the people sharing all the world… the world will live as one.” A moderate amount of logic or wisdom reveals how unrealistic is this emotional utopia, yet leftists directly have not the ability to appreciate such logic or wisdom. An absence of religious foundation leads to nihilistic depression. An absence of borders defines anarchy. An absence of possessions smothers critical motivation. Because man is innately lazy, greedy, ambitious, and violent, and also because survival resources will always be in short supply, every attempt to erect the impossible leftist utopia has resulted in the most horrific societies in history— rampant poverty, starvation, disease, lawlessness, censorship, and extreme psychological and physical oppression. Far more than one hundred million deaths and incomprehensible suffering have already resulted in the USSR, China, Korea, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Yemen, Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Mozambique, Congo, Angola, Benin, Nicaragua, and Cuba. This is the truth that is literally unable to exist in left’s insane reality. Their mental illness does not label this maximal logical and historical evidence as failure of insane political methodology; instead, they obfuscate with any explanation possible such as “it wasn’t real communism,” “It was successful for a while,” “it was subverted by fascism.” Thus it is not a question of if there will be a next country on the list, It is a question of which country it will be, then which country will follow after that. The most recent victim is Venezuela. As of this writing, presidential candidate Joe Biden with his millions of passionate American voters are doing their best for the next victim to be the United States. Leftist Flawed Thinking The most consequential flaw in the leftist paradigm is that it implies that its definitions of utopia, morality, ignorance, and scientific knowledge are self-evident and beyond question. This shortcoming is simply proven by asking a leftist, “What is the theoretical evidence that would disprove your belief?” A conservative not only can easily answer this, but he continually challenges himself with such validating questions. Behold a simple conservative answer, “I would change my politics if you could disprove that man’s essential nature is flawed, that small government is best, that society must preserve inalienable individual rights.” Leftist has no such answers because their politics prove unsound because they originate from a non-real universe grounded in emotional physics. Leftist ideological failure is further exposed by comparing the basic political strategies of both the right and left. The right cultivates morality through rational compassion. The right cultivates societal wellbeing through teaching authentic history, economics, and the wisdom of tradition. The left is unable to adopt this strategy because authentic history, economics, and tradition directly antagonize their utopian aspirations. Because they have no choice they cultivate not societal wellbeing, but power through all methods possible. As Orwell stated, "Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing." Thus, over so many decades leftists have mastered many strategies and tactics for the direct acquisition of power. Their most celebrated instruction manual is Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals.” Of course all the while leftists believe they are doing good despite all logic and direct evidence proving otherwise. To again quote Orwell, "Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them." Thus there is virtually nothing that will change leftist minds, and that is the crux of the problem— it is impossible to reveal to leftists actual reality. Additionally, leftists are stunted by their ill certainty that their virtue is superior to that of the right. The right has no such binding as it freely submits that anyone may possess healthy virtue. Because the right champions what does good which often does not feel good, the left cannot comprehend let alone admit rightist methodology could be moral because it would imply the suicidal negation of the emotional physics of their universe. A perfect example of this dynamic manifests during a debate on morality when a leftist says, “You’re from another planet.” He is metaphorically correct. Rightists and leftists truly live in psychologically separate universes with different fundamental physics. To defend 2+2=7 leftists mainly employ epistemological relativism grounded in their delusional emotional universe which remains perfectly shielded by their impenetrable egos. They attest that all knowledge is relative, specifically the morality of right and wrong; thus, as they see fit they label evil the victim of good. Such thinking is illustrated in venerated Marxist Max Horkheimer’s proud clinically insane statement "Logic is not independent of content." Any sane high school student can appreciate that a=a regardless of the contents of “a,” yet obvious refutations such as this are uniformly suppressed by the left. Today at most every Western university you can witness this mental illness within tenured Marxist professors by challenging them with such refutations. You can then appeal to their department heads to again witness the illness. These people are no less than clinically insane; and thus, it is impossible for them to retain a healthy conception of morality– they may truly believe anything, such as moral innocence in wanton mass rape and murder. The left’s emotional universe inexorably subscribes them to the dogma of ends justifying means because, unlike the right, the left has no moral paradigm to deter them. Their morality is the result of childish goals of preserved feelings, short term peace, and long term utopia. Because logic and reality antagonize leftist ends, the leftist need to construct successful political paradigms is not a passion, but a contemptible chore. This is why leftist arguments are so flimsy. Leftists not only suffer a deficit in logical aptitude, but their arguments are irrelevant to the leftists themselves. Typically, truth is that which must be overcome in any way possible. This can be witnessed daily in leftist newspapers such as The New York Times and The Washington Post, and websites such as HuffingtonPost.com. Leftist Word Manipulation "Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful, and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind." -Orwell The most relevant example of the left’s contempt for truth and morality is their technique of bamboozling the public by branding their evil concepts with words that are irrelevant without context yet inherently associated with positive concepts. Behold their cornerstones of “equality,” “tolerance,” “diversity,” and “social justice.” Equality arbitrarily means two quantities are equal, yet the word implicitly associates with the moral goal of equal administration of justice. Thus the left brands its evil feel-good concept of equality of outcome with the word “equality” so that it may conflate moral perfection with moral reprehensibility. Tolerance arbitrarily means enduring an undesired stimulus, yet the word implicitly associates with the wisdom of allowing contrary ideas to endure because each idea may yet prove unsound. Thus the left brands its evil feel-good acceptance of sickening Islam justified oppression with the word “tolerance” so that it may conflate wisdom with horror and cultural suicide. Diversity arbitrarily means different, yet the word implicitly associates with the positivity of choices, opportunities, and rainbow colors. Thus the left brands its evil feel-good policies of multiculturalism and mass-immigration with the word “diversity” so that it may conflate positivity with white cultural and racial genocide. “Social Justice” seems to imply the pinnacle of virtue—the ideal of a perfectly morally administrated society. In reality the concept “social justice” is a terrifying weapon to arbitrarily enforce what everyone should champion, and no one dare question. It is impossible to reveal to the leftist these or any other of their myriad fallacies and cascading inconsistencies because it would require from them an earnest patience to listen and then also comprehend. This necessary patience can never exist in ones so fundamentally certain of their superior morality. One would think directly showing leftists the fruit of right wing thought such as massive wealth, technical and medical advancement, happiness, freedom, food, law and order, and relative peace, and then showing them the fruit of left wing thought such as massive waste, technical deficiency, unhappiness, totalitarianism, starvation, murder, war, and suicide would compel in them enough humility for their egos to shrink enough to enable them to recover their capacity for critical thought. It achieves zero. Thus, for the sake of societal advancement, it cannot be publically repeated enough that leftists are clinically insane. Why Leftism Thrives Because the left can’t help but exhibit sheer insanity, it seems to not make sense that they represent about half the population; one would think the large demographic of political moderates would side with the non-insane. Even if their brains tended towards an emotional universe, one would think that instinct would lead them to trust the logic and historical success of the right. The reason for the left’s enduring effectiveness is their wealth of organic advantages. Firstly, the appeal of leftist superficial feel-good policies attracts most young adults. These voters have not yet endured the inevitable life experience that both settles unbridled emotions and reveals the sobering realities of society, nor have they had the proper education or years of intellectual reflection to realize the correctness of nuanced conservative thought. Secondly, if leftists can stay free from the influence of moral truth, they enjoy an intellectually, emotionally, and socially easier political path. While the rightist’s morality demands intellectual effort to investigate the complexities of social issues, the leftist is allowed to champion whatever feels best from whatever unverified information passes his way. The rightist must endure the emotional and social difficulty of not only making tough decisions, but also voicing them in social settings. Conversely, the left supports the decisions emotionally and socially easiest. The third reason leftism enjoys popularity is that the dynamic of brain chemistry within the leftist mind self sustains political activity because the more the leftist promotes what feels good, the more he satisfies his egomania. In other words, regardless of the consequences that his emotional policies inflict on the world, his acts of asserting them maintains his dopamine high. For example, while the rightist endures painful empathy of refusing charity to a drug addict, the leftist enables the addict with charity. For his own selfish and unwarranted high, the leftist not only hurts the addict but also promotes dirtiness, homelessness, crime, and additional drug activity. The fourth and most consequential force encouraging leftism originates from the leftist dominated cultural institutions. Schools and universities, film and television, journalism, and commercial media create a virtually irresistible illusion that one must champion “correct” leftist morality or suffer justified ostracization. After pondering how ubiquitous and severe is this indoctrination, one wonders how the right endures at all. The final advantage enjoyed by the left is the inextricable dynamic that forever creeps all societies left. Because the surrounding status quo appalls them, leftist motivation for political activity is more easily cultivated than for the right. As long as the rightist feels the establishment is safe he will remain largely inactive. Only when his institutions become so rancid with leftist progress does the carefree conservative shock into action. He must experience the sudden anxiety accompanying a confrontation with leftist progress, such as the Netflix title “Dear White People,” or a lawsuit for civil misuse of gender pronouns, or his daughter’s homework instructing the copying of the Islamic statement of faith. Thus, in truth the great human bane is not hunger, or homelessness, or oppression, or disease. As a matter of fact we’ve greatly ameliorated if not solved most societal ills. What devastates us is the mental condition of leftism that perpetuates a massive global epidemic of profound stupidity— an inability to perceive accurately and think soundly to effectively remedy societal issues. Again, the typical leftist does not intend to be a vehicle for evil; he is just exasperatingly stupid because of his mental condition. The leftist’s defining insane brain that erects a universe grounded in emotional physics yields the pitiful, very stupid, and clearly apocalyptic dynamic of believing ridiculous premises, implementing catastrophic solutions, and maximally refusing all criticism because of perfect hubris resulting from the psychological impossibility of conceiving that the objective universe is grounded in logic and common sense. It is the billions of these mental cripples that are causing the great majority of the world’s suffering; and therein lies the problem— their stupidity unknown to them makes them fierce antagonists to solving societal problems everyone yearns to solve. Thus, finding a solution to the apocalyptic epidemic of leftist stupidity deriving from their mental illness demands highest priority, for it is the overwhelming cause of humanity’s suffering. Until we can find this cure, the right understands that they can never stop fighting because the alternative is the psychological and physical hell of unending versions of communism. Thus endures the epic political war. -from TabooRaceBook.com

Please propagate my work. (Video transcription below.) TabooRaceBook.com --- Why Leftism Thrives Because the left can’t help but exhibit sheer insanity, it seems to not make sense that they represent about half the population; one would think the large demographic of political moderates would side with the non-insane. Even if their brains tended towards an emotional universe, one would think that instinct would lead them to trust the logic and historical success of the right. The reason for the left’s enduring effectiveness is their wealth of organic advantages. Firstly, the appeal of leftist superficial feel-good policies attracts most young adults. These voters have not yet endured the inevitable life experience that both settles unbridled emotions and reveals the sobering realities of society, nor have they had the proper education or years of intellectual reflection to realize the correctness of nuanced conservative thought. Secondly, if leftists can stay free from the influence of moral truth, they enjoy an intellectually, emotionally, and socially easier political path. While the rightist’s morality demands intellectual effort to investigate the complexities of social issues, the leftist is allowed to champion whatever feels best from whatever unverified information passes his way. The rightist must endure the emotional and social difficulty of not only making tough decisions, but also voicing them in social settings. Conversely, the left supports the decisions emotionally and socially easiest. The third reason leftism enjoys popularity is that the dynamic of brain chemistry within the leftist mind self sustains political activity because the more the leftist promotes what feels good, the more he satisfies his egomania. In other words, regardless of the consequences that his emotional policies inflict on the world, his acts of asserting them maintains his dopamine high. For example, while the rightist endures painful empathy of refusing charity to a drug addict, the leftist enables the addict with charity. For his own selfish and unwarranted high, the leftist not only hurts the addict but also promotes dirtiness, homelessness, crime, and additional drug activity. The fourth and most consequential force encouraging leftism originates from the leftist dominated cultural institutions. Schools and universities, film and television, journalism, and commercial media create a virtually irresistible illusion that one must champion “correct” leftist morality or suffer justified ostracization. After pondering how ubiquitous and severe is this indoctrination, one wonders how the right endures at all. The final advantage enjoyed by the left is the inextricable dynamic that forever creeps all societies left. Because the surrounding status quo appalls them, leftist motivation for political activity is more easily cultivated than for the right. As long as the rightist feels the establishment is safe he will remain largely inactive. Only when his institutions become so rancid with leftist progress does the carefree conservative shock into action. He must experience the sudden anxiety accompanying a confrontation with leftist progress, such as the Netflix title “Dear White People,” or a lawsuit for civil misuse of gender pronouns, or his daughter’s homework instructing the copying of the Islamic statement of faith. Thus, in truth the great human bane is not hunger, or homelessness, or oppression, or disease. As a matter of fact we’ve greatly ameliorated if not solved most societal ills. What devastates us is the mental condition of leftism that perpetuates a massive global epidemic of profound stupidity— an inability to perceive accurately and think soundly to effectively remedy societal issues. Again, the typical leftist does not intend to be a vehicle for evil; he is just exasperatingly stupid because of his mental condition. The leftist’s defining insane brain that erects a universe grounded in emotional physics yields the pitiful, very stupid, and clearly apocalyptic dynamic of believing ridiculous premises, implementing catastrophic solutions, and maximally refusing all criticism because of perfect hubris resulting from the psychological impossibility of conceiving that the objective universe is grounded in logic and common sense. It is the billions of these mental cripples that are causing the great majority of the world’s suffering; and therein lies the problem— their stupidity unknown to them makes them fierce antagonists to solving societal problems everyone yearns to solve. Thus, finding a solution to the apocalyptic epidemic of leftist stupidity deriving from their mental illness demands highest priority, for it is the overwhelming cause of humanity’s suffering. Until we can find this cure, the right understands that they can never stop fighting because the alternative is the psychological and physical hell of unending versions of communism. Thus endures the epic political war. -from TabooRaceBook.com

Please share my work. (Video transcription below) TabooRaceBook.com --- Leftist Word Manipulation "Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful, and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind." -Orwell The most relevant example of the left’s contempt for truth and morality is their technique of bamboozling the public by branding their evil concepts with words that are irrelevant without context yet inherently associated with positive concepts. Behold their cornerstones of “equality,” “tolerance,” “diversity,” and “social justice.” Equality arbitrarily means two quantities are equal, yet the word implicitly associates with the moral goal of equal administration of justice. Thus the left brands its evil feel-good concept of equality of outcome with the word “equality” so that it may conflate moral perfection with moral reprehensibility. Tolerance arbitrarily means enduring an undesired stimulus, yet the word implicitly associates with the wisdom of allowing contrary ideas to endure because each idea may yet prove unsound. Thus the left brands its evil feel-good acceptance of sickening Islam justified oppression with the word “tolerance” so that it may conflate wisdom with horror and cultural suicide. Diversity arbitrarily means different, yet the word implicitly associates with the positivity of choices, opportunities, and rainbow colors. Thus the left brands its evil feel-good policies of multiculturalism and mass-immigration with the word “diversity” so that it may conflate positivity with white cultural and racial genocide. “Social Justice” seems to imply the pinnacle of virtue—the ideal of a perfectly morally administrated society. In reality the concept “social justice” is a terrifying weapon to arbitrarily enforce what everyone should champion, and no one dare question. It is impossible to reveal to the leftist these or any other of their myriad fallacies and cascading inconsistencies because it would require from them an earnest patience to listen and then also comprehend. This necessary patience can never exist in ones so fundamentally certain of their superior morality. One would think directly showing leftists the fruit of right wing thought such as massive wealth, technical and medical advancement, happiness, freedom, food, law and order, and relative peace, and then showing them the fruit of left wing thought such as massive waste, technical deficiency, unhappiness, totalitarianism, starvation, murder, war, and suicide would compel in them enough humility for their egos to shrink enough to enable them to recover their capacity for critical thought. It achieves zero. Thus, for the sake of societal advancement, it cannot be publically repeated enough that leftists are clinically insane.

Please share this work

Please propagate this work. Excerpt from video "Racism Is Normal, Moral, & Healthy" Transcript below --- what is this previously-mentioned force that has disallowed the white people from statically defining the term “racism” or investigating its origin?… It is the force of the political left, who in the United States are the members of the Democrat political party. Why would the Democrats want to prevent something so obviously helpful as achieving a fixed definition of the term “racism”? Because unlike anyone intellectually healthy, meaning one who can think morally and reasonably such as past Democrats before the 2008 inauguration of president Barak Obama, the modern Democrat is very clearly a communist, meaning he is no longer guided by anything rational. The modern Democrat’s communist goal gives him no motivation to clarify social issues, it is the contrary. Very clearly revealed by modern Democrat policies, a modern Democrat’s goal is to progress to the idea of a communist utopia in which the people of the world are a single commune where exists no borders, no races, no inequality of anything, and most of all no ideas that would question the morality of the communist utopia itself. Of course, to anyone sane this Democrat idea of utopia is the supreme of all horrors, yet today’s Democrats are very clearly these communists, and to every sane person’s horror, their every increasing hellish culture now dominates the West. The challenge of proving the existence of this current communist hell is not that one must seek factual examples, it is the opposite—because the current Western culture is so maximally culturally communist in every way, the challenge is to explain to the average citizen that he is actually spellbound, brainwashed, enchanted in believing that his current culture is normal when it is the literal opposite of normal-- it is a communist hell in which natural freedom of thought and choice and liberty are appallingly oppressed. Nothing is clearer to a current sane intellect than that currently he is utterly forbidden to freely investigate social and political concepts, freely choose his beliefs, or freely live as he wishes. In today’s West you MUST think, choose, and live as Democrats demand, or they will utterly destroy you. This is exactly communist group-think totalitarianism. I will state this again: In today’s West you MUST think, choose, and live as Democrats demand, or they will utterly destroy you. This is exactly communist group-think totalitarianism. So then, in order for this Democrat communist utopia to be possible at all, it is implicitly required that, not only all races have no instinctive repugnant feelings for each other, but critically that all races are equally intelligent, and have the same restraint from violence; if this was not the true biological state of all races, the utopia would be definitively impossible to achieve because less intelligent and more violent races would, by definition, never be able to achieve organic equality no matter what social programs were implemented. Sadly and inconveniently yet maximally scientifically conclusively, all-faceted overwhelming evidence proves that different races have dramatically different IQs and tendencies toward violence. (Please research for yourself the comprehensive exhaustive evidence of race-realism.) Through an epic and fully documented investigation over a century, it has been proven that Ashkenazi Jews have an average IQ of 112, Asians of 106, whites of 100, Central and South Americans of 91, and Africans of 85. Here are just two of countless corroborations of this fact: In 2018 the median US household income was approximately $129,000 for Jews, $87,000 for Asians, $71,000 for whites, $51,000 for Hispanics, and $41,000 for blacks. Out of a survey of 16,000 US high-schools, 16,000 schools reported that Asians achieved better grades than whites, and 16,000 schools revealed that whites achieved better grades than blacks. Furthermore, it has been proven that blacks have on average more testosterone which, in addition to their critically debilitating low IQs, makes them more prone to violence. This very deeply proven truth of race-realism makes the Democrat communist utopia directly impossible to achieve because these brown and black races are conclusively unable to create the advanced and harmonious societies that can the Jewish, Asian, and white races. As can be seen everywhere on Earth, the discussed Brown and especially Black races, in their own habitats, produce technologically and socially primitive societies in which the hallmark characteristics are violence, and poverty. (As a brief aside, to squelch the leftist argument in which they point to the rarest instances of seemingly first world African settings— please discover for yourself the non-brown and black races of the architects of the noteworthy structures, and where came the money for these structures. In short, browns and especially blacks are very clearly incapable of intellectually competing with the lighter skinned races. So then, because the survival of the modern Democrat ego is fully dependent on the realistic validity of their communist utopia, Democrats MUST, and I do mean 100% at all costs MUST hide, even from themselves, the maximally obvious realities of biological altruism as well as race-realism, or their all-defining psychological universe would explode. The way they hide these realities is to implicitly refuse the existence of a clear definition of the phenomena of racism or its origin, because to allow any fixed definition or research of “racism” would allow it to be investigated and undeniably concluded that browns and especially blacks are incapable of achieving anything close to financial or social success relative to the other races. Of course the unfortunate plain truth is always in broad daylight-- the brown and especially black races are incomprehensible burdens to the white and other races in every way—financially, socially, criminally. In the name of sanity, this truth must be repeated-- There is no more utterly obvious societal truth than that the brown and especially black races are incomprehensible burdens to the white and other races in every way—financially, socially, criminally. Because this clearest truth is must completely destroy to the Democrat psyche, it is exactly natural that they rabidly silence any mention of it. Behold just three examples of the Democrat’s ruthless character assassination of any who tries to clarify the issue of racism… James Watson, the Nobel laureate discoverer of the DNA helix, was immediately removed from society when he made a race-realist claim. Democrats forced the cancellation of his publicity tour, removed his 40-year tenure at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, and stripped him of all his honorary titles. Democrats forced The University of Chicago to suddenly cease pursuit of a 2005 patent for professor Bruce Lahn’s biological test confirming superior levels of intelligence through a presence of genes abundant in Europeans and rare in Africans. When questioned on his university’s motive for withdrawal, Lahn replied, “It’s getting too controversial… society will have to grapple with some very difficult facts.” In 2018, The Democrats removed University of Pennsylvania law professor Amy Wax from her freshman classes because, when specifically questioned on the downsides of affirmative action, she stated, “I don’t think I’ve ever seen a black student graduate in the top quarter of the class, and rarely, rarely in the top half.” So then, because this very deeply proven, and very obvious truth of race realism shatters the Democrats’ reason for being, Democrats must maintain a terribly evil lie to maintain the possibility of their utopia—they relentlessly assert that the success of the white race compared to the brown and black races is because whites oppress the brown and black races. Simple logic concludes that the consequence of this lie must necessarily be an empirically confirmable white genocide. Behold this maximally explicit genocidal confirmation strategy from the words of Democrat Harvard Professor Noel Ignatiev’s teachings… quote “There can be no white race without the phenomenon of white supremacy. …The task is to bring this minority together in such a way that it makes it impossible for the legacy of whiteness to continue to reproduce itself… Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.” In other words, explicit white genocide.

Please propagate my work. Transcription below... -- Leftism: Essential to sociology is an understanding of the mentality of the political right and left. History has proven that within every society exist two groups, one primarily motivated by emotion– the left, and the other by logic and wisdom– the right. The validity of these defining characteristics is validated by studying history, or applying critical thought to correlating political ideologies. Testament to the validity of the dichotomy is that modern science has dedicated significant resources to understanding its biological causes. Because political stakes are no less than the fate of society, there will always exist ardent conflict between the political right and left. The Leftist Brain It seems obvious that societal problems are best remedied through a dominant application of logic and wisdom, yet through their politics leftists evidence that they disagree. Thus an investigation of the mental disorder of leftism is as fascinating as it is relevant. Because this investigation is necessarily complex, this section is the most intellectually challenging of the treatise; thus, the reader should now heighten his concentration. Because the leftist’s reality has been constructed by his emotionally dominant brain, he is unaware of the fundamental incongruity of his emotional universe in the same way that a fish is unaware of his water universe. However misaligned with his goals his results have proven, and continue to prove, it remains self-evident to a leftist that moral actions must be chosen by what feels good. To the leftist it is perverse insanity to suggest that morality is best defined not by what feels good but by what does good. For a leftist to affirm a problem-solving dynamic that values logic and wisdom over emotion would be much more than morally reprehensible; it would be a psychological experience on par with a suicidal departure to insanity. He would be annihilating his universe (his ego) which includes literally all he loves—his morality, his children, his life, everything. Thus it makes perfect sense that such minds maximally resist the embrace of this Armageddon necessary for their awakening to reality. This is why leftist politics prove irrational to the point of surreal. As a matter of insightful fact, the artistic surrealism movement of the early twentieth century is politically associated with communism. Behold surrealism’s definition as stated within André Breton’s 1924 “Surrealist Manifesto”… “Surrealism is based on the belief in the superior reality of certain forms of previously neglected associations, in the omnipotence of dream, in the disinterested play of thought. It tends to ruin once and for all other psychic mechanisms and to substitute itself for them in solving all the principal problems of life.” Leftist problem-solving methodology first intuits a solution that feels best, builds around it the most plausible paradigm, then defends the paradigm with all imaginable sophistry. This methodology would be laughable if it weren’t so widely championed. Specifically, leftist solutions prioritize the most speedily achieved peace with the least hurt feelings. The primary leftist paradigm states that man is essentially good, so it is not his biology that separates him from a communal utopia, but his ignorant cultural institutions. Thus, leftists conclude that for man to return to utopia he only needs to replace his institutions with scientific knowledge. Not only is this a false premise because it ignores instinct and wisdom, but leftists don’t even implement their premise with any consistency. The foundation of science is logic and the study of empirical evidence. Obviously this evidence includes social world history. Leftists very clearly disdain logic and the evidence of social world history. The left’s correspondingly insane ultimate goal is articulated best in the lyrics of John Lennon’s song Imagine: “Imagine there’s no heaven… no countries… nothing to kill or die for… Imagine all the people living life in peace… no possessions… no need for greed or hunger… imagine all the people sharing all the world… the world will live as one.” A moderate amount of logic or wisdom reveals how unrealistic is this emotional utopia, yet leftists directly have not the ability to appreciate such logic or wisdom. An absence of religious foundation leads to nihilistic depression. An absence of borders defines anarchy. An absence of possessions smothers critical motivation. Because man is innately lazy, greedy, ambitious, and violent, and also because survival resources will always be in short supply, every attempt to erect the impossible leftist utopia has resulted in the most horrific societies in history— rampant poverty, starvation, disease, lawlessness, censorship, and extreme psychological and physical oppression. Far more than one hundred million deaths and incomprehensible suffering have already resulted in the USSR, China, Korea, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Yemen, Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Mozambique, Congo, Angola, Benin, Nicaragua, and Cuba. This is the truth that is literally unable to exist in left’s insane reality. Their mental illness does not label this maximal logical and historical evidence as failure of insane political methodology; instead, they obfuscate with any explanation possible such as “it wasn’t real communism,” “It was successful for a while,” “it was subverted by fascism.” Thus it is not a question of if there will be a next country on the list, It is a question of which country it will be, then which country will follow after that. The most recent victim is Venezuela. As of this writing, presidential candidate Joe Biden with his millions of passionate American voters are doing their best for the next victim to be the United States. --Full book download at TabooRaceBook.com

Please propagate this work. --- Race Realism "The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those who speak it." –Orwell Race realism is the appreciation of the differing physical and intellectual attributes of the various races. The relative dearth of intelligence and impulse control of the black race results in the black race consistently achieving the lowest level of societal success. In a leftist-free society, this inequality of outcome would breed no more than understandable frustration in blacks, and compassion from everyone else. Because leftism does thrive, leftists have totally subverted the truth of race realism, as well as all the compassion whites have shown to blacks, so that they are able to promote the evil narrative that the cause of black failure is actually white oppression. Their narrative is based on nothing reasonable yet has generated a massive vogue of multifaceted aggressive anti-white racism. Moral citizens have a responsibility not only to whites but indeed to blacks as well as all people to assert the race-realist truths that debunk the lies supporting Democrat anti-white racism that result not only in direct pejoratives and slander but most consequentially in vicious social policies. As Michael Levin states in his critically acclaimed book on intellectual race-realism titled “Why Race Matters,” “The right of the accused to present his case includes the right to raise issues that distress his accuser. A plaintiff demanding damages for a broken leg cannot ask at the same time that his leg not be talked about, nor take offense when the defendant presents evidence that the injury was congenital. By claiming harm he opens question of why his leg is game. Claiming racial harm has opened the topic of race differences.” Mountains of irrefutable science coupled with overwhelming history so demand the acceptance of race realism that its denial implies insincerity or insanity. Indeed it is both. The Democrats’ psychotic necessity to maintain their all-important false oppression narrative has spawned race-realism denial so ridiculous that asserting utterly obvious racial intelligence reality necessitates paragraphs of proof where none should suffice. If the human species didn’t evolve differently during the 70,000 years after separating for Africa to very different climates, then Darwinian evolution itself would prove invalid. For starters, irrefutable science has corroborated that many dozens of characteristics such as blood-pressure, blood chemistry, and bone density prove different between races. At least 60,000 diseases correlate to specific races. Differences in physical attributes such as muscle fiber and hip axis length between whites and blacks obviously contribute to the superiority of black athleticism which can be confirmed in the typical 100% black ethnicity of Olympic 100 meter dash finalists and modern National Basketball Association all-star teams. Among countless other scientists, the work of Douglas Whitman documents a widest variety of race specific distinct evolutionary adaptations. He notes the exact nucleotide differences within the exact genes within the exact chromosomes that cause many of these differences, and the racial and geographic distribution of the humans that contain these genes. These evolutionary adaptations occur in all creatures, and they are as varied as they are intriguing. Arctic rabbits evolved dense fur to retain heat, and tiny ears and feet to minimize exposed surface area. Desert rabbits evolved the opposite traits to dissipate heat. Swamp rabbits evolved thick fur to rebuff the bites of abundant insects. Both camels and the African Khoekhoe humans evolved fat storage dominantly in their lower backs or rears so that the rest of the body remains free of insulation thus allowing maximal cooling. Humans in cold climates evolved long straight hair for insulation while humans in tropical climates evolved frizzy hair that allowed the neck and shoulders to remain cool and also free of disease-promoting dampness. The Terra Del Fuegians who lived at the southern tip of South America evolved tolerance to cold temperatures. Centuries of livestock breeding evolved in Europeans a tolerance to the lactose in dairy products. The genetically isolated Australian Aborigines possess the keenest sense of smell, obviously evolved from hunter-gatherer survival. Filipino sea gypsies evolved a culture sustained through underwater gathering, and thus evolved eyes conducive to sea submersion and spleens that produce hemoglobin rich blood granting their incredible ability to descend as low as 200 feet while holding their breath for up to 13 minutes! Though it is obviously stupid to expect that the brain organ reacts singularly evolutionally differently than the rest of the organs, it is only because intellectual traits are not directly visible as are physical traits that leftists can still spin resistance against intellectual racial truth. Everyone knows that leftists repress this obvious truth because they incorrectly fear it will generate wrong yet dangerous validation that blacks are less societally worthy. Though this fear is plausible, it does not alter humanity’s correct highest respect for truth. Additionally, the handful of sociopaths that would disrespect blacks is far insignificant. On the other hand, the ever-present multifaceted suffering the citizenry endures, especially whites, by not affirming racial intellectual differences is as severe as it is incommensurate with the rest of Western progress. Thirdly, despite moronic contrary leftist belief, there is zero shame in a race’s characteristic lower IQ. It is obvious to any healthy person that all of us have equal spiritual worth. Besides, there’s a whole lot more to the quality of a person than exceptional intelligence, such as his integrity, sense of humor, compassion, courage, talents, experiences, and wisdom. All of this should be obvious, yet as always, leftist sickness demands of us repugnant chores of lengthy elucidation. Leftist suppression of racial truth evidences in the instant and unmitigated character assassination of anyone, regardless of his qualifications, that notes or contributes to the mountains upon mountains of evidence proving the truth of black intellectual ability. No less than Nobel laureate James Watson, discoverer of the DNA helix, was appallingly driven from scientific society because of his objective race-realist statements. Immediately after he spoke he was forced to cancel his publicity tour. Though his affiliated Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory gained world-wide prestige and finances from his forty years of work on the human genome, in 2019 the Lab administrators unceremoniously fired him and stripped him of all his honorary titles. This great pioneer who contributed so much to humanity must now live his remaining days as a pariah. The left’s assassination squads forced The University of Chicago to suddenly cease pursuit of a 2005 patent for professor Bruce Lahn’s biological test confirming superior levels of intelligence through a presence of genes abundant in Europeans and rare in Africans. When questioned on his university’s motive for withdrawal, Lahn replied, “It’s getting too controversial… society will have to grapple with some very difficult facts.” In 2018, University of Pennsylvania law professor Amy Wax was removed from her freshman classes because when specifically questioned on the downsides of affirmative action, she stated, “I don’t think I’ve ever seen a black student graduate in the top quarter of the class, and rarely, rarely in the top half.” It could not be more obvious either from academic testing or historical accomplishment that whites are more intelligent than blacks. There is nothing, literally nothing in modern intellectual discussion more ridiculous than the denial of this fact. Let’s put it this way: if it were indeed true that one race was more intelligent than another, what would be the evidence a rational mind would accept to prove it true? A reasonable analysis compares the aggregate racially separated results of tests in various academic subjects, as well as the results of tests designed specifically to manifest possible differences in intellectual ability. Additionally it compares the quantity and quality of all cultural achievements of each race. Consistently from World War I to the present, IQ tests show an average black IQ of 85 and an average white IQ of 100. As one of very many examples, Shuey’s 1966 “The Testing of Negro Intelligence” performed 382 studies derived from 80 separate tests conducted over 40 years with hundreds of thousands of blacks and whites widely varying in all demographics such as age, income, background, and profession. Virtually all the results of these tests manifested this same 85 and 100 average IQ result. Exactly 0 out of 16,000 United States school districts show black student grades on par with grades of whites, and 0 out of 16,000 show white student grades on par with grades of East Asians. Tests specifically designed to eliminate cultural bias also confirmed consistent intelligence disparities between various races, most relevantly between blacks and whites. As can be seen in the graphic, these tests contained no language; they scored on pattern recognition. A second test challenged subjects to repeat back series of numbers. Because this was a memory test, all subjects scored basically equally. Yet when they were challenged to repeat back the numbers in reverse order, Asians scored highest and blacks scored lowest. There exists overwhelming documented consistency between racial intelligence and income. Global IQ’s average 112 for Ashkenazi Jews, 106 for East Asians, 100 for whites, 89 for Hispanics, and 85 for blacks. In 2018 United States, the median household income was $129,000 for Jews, $87,194 for Asians, $70,642 for whites, $51,450 for Hispanics, and $41,361 for blacks. Linda Gottfredson at the University Delaware utilized the racial bell curves of intelligence with IQ data of different professionals to reveal professional consequences of IQ differences. Professor Gottfredson’s conclusions revealed that professions requiring high IQ’s such as those of lawyers, chemists, or executives prove 30 times more likely to be occupied by whites than blacks. Many studies have confirmed the virtual irrelevance of IQ to family affluence and racial environment. Sandra Scarr and Richard Weinberg tested the IQ’s of many black children adopted by upper and middle class white families. The results revealed that white and black small children had basically the same IQ’s, but at 18 years the black children had IQ’s merely 2-3 points above the historical black mean of 85. A 2009 study of SAT scores revealed the resounding fact that black students from families with yearly incomes above $160,000 scored lower than whites from families with incomes less than $20,000 year. A second powerful testament to the consistency of black intellectual inferiority independent of environment is that in 1972 Ugandan’s Indians represented 1% of the population yet accounted for 90% of Uganda’s tax revenue. New president Idi Amin expelled this Indian population in the expectation that the native black population would take over these lucrative economic positions within the already erected economy. Instead, Uganda’s economy shrunk by more than half. In 1986, Yoweri Museveni became president, and encouraged Indians to return. Presently the Ugandan Indians represent 1% of the population yet pay 65% of Uganda’s taxes. As can be seen in the graph above, University of Ontario’s Professor John Philippe Rushton used CAT and MRI scans to measure the skullsizes of various races. These tests indisputably revealed a consistent direct correlation between skull size and racial intelligence. Chinese typically manifest large skull sizes while blacks manifest the smallest. Such racial disparities can be witnessed in the historical results of chess players. While 5 of the 12 twentieth century world chess champions are Jewish, not only are zero black, but out of the 1680 historical grandmasters, only 3 of them are black, and each barely achieved the qualification. There exists a critical correlation between crime and racial intelligence and temperament. Because the main deterrent to crime is the intelligent appreciation of future legal consequences, the less intelligent commit more crime. Additionally, because blacks have been proven to produce more than average testosterone, it makes sense that they possess less restraint ability, and thus prove more prone to violence. The consequences of these obviously true conclusions evidence in profound racial disparities in violent crime statistics. Though blacks make up 13% of the population, the US Department of Justice confirms that blacks committed 52.5% of all homicides from 1980 to 2008. E. Rubenstein’s book “Color of Crime” reveals that in 2013, United States blacks committed an astounding 27 times more violent crime against whites than whites did against blacks. Furthermore, if the total New York City population was white, the murder rate would fall 91%, the shootings rate by 97%, and the robbery rate by 81%; If Chicago had an all-white population, murder would fall 90%, rape by 81%, and robbery by 90%. Ponder those staggering numbers. Thus, it is not racism but healthy intelligence that compels a woman to clench her purse when walking past a group of blacks. Of course everyone would prefer a different reality, yet all proof confirms that blacks are naturally predisposed to commit more crime. This in itself is not an untenable condition. The untenable condition is created from the Democrat denial of it. To eliminate the possibility that low black intelligence and social progress are a consequence of historic United States oppression, note that even with unprecedented financial and social aid the same black consistencies display in the white majority societies of Canada and the United Kingdom where never existed historic oppression. Within the United States, neither the end of segregation, nor black school busing, nor black youth academic and financial programs have broken these racial IQ consistencies. Behold black fortune: besides the 75 year span of European colonization, Africa has remained globally virtually unmolested since the dawn of man. Africa contains 98% of the world’s chromium, 90% of its cobalt, 90% of its platinum, 80% of its coltan, 70% of its tantalite, 64% of its manganese, 50% of its gold, 50% of its diamonds, 33% of its uranium, and abundant oil. Additionally, since 1950 the world’s countries have given Africa a free $1,400,000,000,000—that’s 1,400,000 units of $1,000,000. What have blacks achieved from this? In world history Africans have produced relatively nothing technologically noteworthy, as can be immediately proven by the difficulty to prove otherwise without using the internet (Science and anthropology attests that the ancient Egyptian civilization almost certainly originated from the Middle East and Europe. Carthaginians descended from Phoenicians.) Before blacks encountered an outsider they had not built a two-story building or a mechanical device, nor had they domesticated a beast of burden, nor had they invented a calendar, a written language, or the wheel. Today the least prosperous African countries are those that were least touched by European colonization, while the most advanced are those most habituated by whites. Even though two centuries have passed since colonialists revealed to Africans the value of their resources and demonstrated how to cultivate them, excluding Antarctica, the African continent currently ranks dead last in GDP and life longevity. The 2018 global slavery index ranks Africa first in current slaves per capita with 9,240,000 active African slaves. Over 200,000 children were sold in West Africa in 2018 alone. The same cultural consistency manifests 4000 miles away from Africa in the black nation of Haiti. Despite its over 200 years of independence, and receipt of many billions of dollars in free assistance, Haiti is the poorest country by far in the Western Hemisphere with a GNP per capita totaling a mere one-third of the next poorest country of Nicaragua. What are the chances that after reading this section a Democrat will admit the black race is less intelligent than others?... 0.0%. What are the chances he believes he is intellectually sound?... 100.0%. Don’t believe these percentages?... Ask him. Better yet, behold this quote from professional “racial justice educator” Debby Irving: “The idea of race is just that, an idea — a social construct developed in the 1600’s during the Enlightenment fervor to classify nature. Since these early efforts to categorize humanity’s immense variation, the idea that the “white” race is superior has been promoted and perpetuated by none other than the white race. Simultaneously, white people have discriminated against and loaded with stereotypes those they’ve labeled as “other races.” The combined effect has created the perception that race does exist and is attached to inherent human differences such as intelligence, emotional make up, and athletic ability. Worst of all, this illusion has created massively different life experiences and outcomes for people according to assigned “race.” The differences we observe along racial lines today are the result of hundreds of years of racism, the system of allocating power and resources by racial categorization. Though race is not real; racism is very real.” It is truly sad, isn’t it? Is it even possible to be any more brainwashed than Ms. Irving? For a conclusive wealth of facts and analysis on race statistics you can peruse Michael Levin’s previously quoted book “Why Race Matters.” - This literature can be found at TabooRaceBook.com

Please propagate my work. TCMS#2: "Elements Consequential to a Healthy Society" Download at TabooRaceBook.com

Please propagate my work. --- Hate is not the opposite of love. Hate is defense of the loved. The world-wide incorrect belief that love and hate are opposites causes critical social suffering because it results in the incorrect fundamental conclusion that hate is bad, which then leads to well-meaning social policies that actually produce harm because they forbid the defense of what a society rightfully loves, and actually keeps the society healthy and unified. Thus, social health demands that a highest priority be placed on propagating the following fact: Hate is not the opposite of love. Hate is defense of the loved. (As an aside, the opposite of love is fear. That explanation is beyond the scope of this discussion.) We see it everywhere—slogans such as “Stop the hate.” and “Hate has no home here.” and in the concepts “hate speech” and “hate crime”. And we see it indirectly in insane slogans such as “Love your enemies.” and “Turn the other cheek”. The fact is that if your strategy is to champion love by loving your enemies by not defending against them, and turn the other check when they attack you, they will destroy you, and thus your championing of love will permanently end. We can witness the glaring incongruity of the actions of the people who promote these anti-hate concepts. These people are the political left, and in the United States these are the Democrats. Nothing is more evident than the abundant and passionate hatred by the Democrats for any who oppose them. Behold the still unceasing intense torrent of hate Democrats direct at President Donald Trump. When one understands that hate is defensive love, the motivation of the Democrats’ behavior is clear—they deeply love progressing towards their communist idea of utopia. Donald Trump directly and effectively antagonizes that communist progress in both his policies and also his demonstration of what he believes is acceptable social demeanor; thus, it makes perfect sense that they feel deep hatred for him—this is a clear example of defensive love, and also utter hypocrisy. Now, the deeply consequential point is that the resulting social policies stemming from the incorrect condemnation of hate causes an inability to defend that which is rightly loved. Currently, this incorrect condemnation of hate combined with the West’s recent intense cultural communism, is resulting in a maximally immoral and tragic, horrific result. The white race’s maximally correct normal moral and healthy hate against the very apparent, overt, and aggressive destruction of the white race’s culture in their homelands, and verifiable genocide of the white race itself, is resoundingly condemned and silenced. In short, the incorrect conclusion that hate is bad is causing the White culture and race to be eliminated from the Earth. This current Western communism has made its citizenry so mentally sick that they are unable to even contemplate that the forces which are rapidly destroying their native cultures, and literally the white race itself, are to be rightly hated and maximally fought against. When anyone states that whites have a right to hate and act upon their hatred of the selfish invasion of millions of deeply foreign brown and black races that are necessarily destroying their rights, their economy, their culture, and their living and breeding space, the Democrat communists immediately socially destroy him exactly because they are so deeply sick with confusion locked inside an impenetrable seal of hubris. These Democrat communists’ brains have been permanently irreversibly prevented from digesting new data or thinking logically. Indeed it is a terrifying fate. These once hopeful free-thinking humans are now uncurable zombies programmed to solely execute ends-justify-the-means progress toward communist utopia. That’s it. This can be verified any time by experiencing a discussion with a Democrat. There is no possible way of revealing to them the genocidal situation they are imposing on the white race. Democrats are now literally irredeemable communist genocidal monsters. I will repeat, Democrats are now literally irredeemable communist genocidal monsters. What can be done about this situation? If the white race and culture is to survive, at least what can be done is to educate those still capable of rational thought that hate for foreign invasion is absolutely morally correct. Hate for anything that is antagonistic to the survival of the white race and culture is to be embraced as utterly maximally moral, and thus acted upon. Dr Jay Lifton stated “If somebody is kept confessing, you can achieve control of his guilt and shame mechanisms. There is no greater control that one can achieve over another human being.” We must stop this oppression by shame dynamic by head-on refuting the false premise that hate is bad. Hate is extremely good. Hate is literally defense of the loved. We must right now defend our right to hate that which is aggressively destroying our race and its culture. When a Democrat or anyone demands that you “Stop the hate!” or “Hate has no home here!”, reply to them. “Hate is defense of the loved. Democrat pure evil has no power over me.”

Please share this video. #IAMRACIST because I am NORMAL, MORAL, and HEALTHY. My name is Winston Smith. I am here to tell you that racism is normal, moral, and healthy. In the current West there exists a truth so taboo, that if a person states it, no amount of money, political influence, or social influence, can stop the swift total destruction of his membership in society. The taboo truth is this: Racism is normal, moral, and healthy. I state again, the truth is that racism is moral, normal, and healthy. This fact is relevant because its suppression is very clearly destroying Western civilization, and the white race itself. Now then, what is racism? Surely this thing so powerful and feared must have been defined and explored a long time ago. It has not. For a profoundly sinister reason I’ll discuss in a moment, the political left has prevented society from defining any fixed definition for the term “racism.” It is accepted without question that racism is immoral. OK then, is it racist to prefer a spouse of one’s own race? If so, then how can everyone be morally exempt from marrying within one’s race? China and Japan explicitly state in their government literature that they guard against immigration from other races, yet no one condemns this maximum racism. What could be greater proof of the inconsistency of the moral condemnation of racism than this? Behold that it is only in the West that the taboo exists. In the East the taboo exists nowhere, and they have complete racial harmony. So then, because the political left has denied any fixed definition of racism, I will very reasonably define the word “racism”: Racism is the instinctive perception of other human races as fundamentally different, and to some extent repugnant. What is the root of this racism instinct? It is the phenomenon seemingly present in all life, called biological altruism. I will explain… The fundamental biological truth of life is an eternal competition between DNA to survive, evolve, and proliferate. A deeper investigation reveals there is more to this truth. In a common sociological experiment subjects view a variety of organisms then list them in the order they would save each from death. Invariably they select an order like this: nuclear offspring, nuclear family member, distant family member, monkey, deer, squirrel, lizard, flower, and fungus. Thus, this experiment adds to our initial premise: because DNA is able to recognize foreign DNA similar to itself, and because DNA’s fundamental nature is a striving to endure, DNA behaves altruistically to foreign DNA in proportion to how similar is the foreign DNA to itself. In other words, all animals prefer to comingle with and champion DNA closest to their own. This phenomenon is biological altruism, and its validity is so evident that to deny it really is insanity. Behold the same-species clustering of mammals, reptiles, fish, even insects. Behold the mutual championing of siblings. Behold the common occurrence of a parent of most any species sacrificing its life for its offspring—the future of its DNA. And thus, because biological altruism, a synonym for racism, is both natural and normal, and is in itself non-violent, it must be deemed moral and healthy. Now, this does not mean that natural normal healthy people, in other words, racists, cannot get along with those of other races, or even have best friends of other races. Healthy people, in other words, racists, get along just fine with those of other races, as is proven each moment by normal peaceful and enjoyable interaction between members of different races. This tension-free racist dynamic is best compared to the interaction of a stranger within a family house—The family prefers and prioritizes the other family members over the stranger, and the family feels hostile if the stranger negatively affects the family members, or family culture in the house, yet the family has no negative feelings for the stranger. The family probably feels positive feelings to the stranger, but these positive feelings are definitely subordinate to the feelings for the family and the preservation of the culture inside this family house. This is exactly biological altruism in action, and to deny its dynamic is unquestionably insane. Ponder what should be obvious—100% of all healthy humans on Earth have always have been racist, are now racist, and always will be racist because, of course, racism is as normal, moral, and healthy as is love, fear, lust, curiosity, or any other basic instinct. It was only during the 1960’s communist inspired fatefully dubious American civil rights movement that, overnight, racism suddenly became something immoral; and the taboo only began oppressive dominance with the 2008 election of Barak Obama that ushered in a grotesque new era of cultural communism. In other words, it seems that the power of this bogeyman of being labeled racist is so strong, that of course it must have existed since the beginning of time, yet the simplest examination reveals that it is a very new vogue, and only exists in a small part of the Earth’s geography, namely the United States, Canada, and Europe—in other words, the homelands of the white race. As we will see, this is no coincidence. Is racism inconvenient? Absolutely. Is racism antagonistic to equal compassion for other races? Absolutely racism is antagonistic to equal compassion for other races, but this does not mean the healthy person, meaning the racist, cannot have compassion for those of other races. It simply means the compassion is less than that of his race—his extended family. Does racism occasionally lead to violence? Definitely both healthy and unhealthy racism can lead to violence. Unhealthy racism exists when there does not exist a normal level of compassion. As discussed, a healthy person gets along fine with a person of a different race. If for any reason someone has not a reservoir of normal compassion and tolerance, he may commit violent racist acts that cannot be justified with reasonable morality. Now, healthy racism can definitely lead to morally unclear or actually justified violence as well. An example of morally justified racial violence is when a foreign race, armed or unarmed, invades a homeland, and the native race has no political or social means to stop the invasion. In this case, in order to satisfy the race’s most fundamental healthy biological altruism, which in turn prevents the race from extinction, the homeland native race instinctively uses violence to repel the invasion. Of course this is a moral response- nothing could be more obvious to a clear-minded person than that physical violence is maximally justified when necessary to protect ones homeland. Yet, a person who has not responsibly explored this situation, but instead makes all decisions based on the positive reinforcement of a dopamine high attained from an abused compassion reflex, will dismiss this violence as immoral. It is definitely not immoral. I will repeat: In the case that a native race’s homeland is suffering armed or unarmed invasion, and there exists no political or social remediation, of course violence is acceptable. In what other situation could violence be more warranted than to repel an invasion of one’s homeland—the destruction of one’s DNA and amniotic fluid of culture? Never forget that nothing is more self-evident than the fact that a race of people, an altruistic grouping of same DNA, has a maximal right to live amongst themselves, to defend their native DNA and its amniotic fluid of culture. If one denies this self-evident maximal right then let him explain his case. I say again: If one denies this self-evident maximal right then let him explain his case. Now that we understand the truth of biological altruism, we can see that cultural-Marxist multicultural societies MUST always generate intractable psychological suffering against the dominant native race because the dominant race’s rights and culture are aggressively politically and socially oppressed to the point that physical rebellion becomes the only recourse left for the native race. Currently within the total of white homelands-- The United States and Europe, whites are so severely oppressed by being unallowed to vocally express the utterly visible elimination of their culture and living space (which is directly defined as genocide, as I will fully define in a moment), that a clear-minded white is inescapably riddled with anxiety, depression, resentment, and intractable justified anger. Of course, this leads to violence as it obviously should. What cause could possibly be more justified for violence than defense against genocide? Will any Democrat attempt to answer this-- What cause could possibly be more justified for violence than defense against genocide? The only question is- Is there any alternative to stop the white genocide besides violence? Exactly this question is what MUST immediately be answered, because the time for this question actually may have already passed. If there is any realistic case at all stating a non-violent alternative to stop the very very clearly evident complete invasion of white homelands, and with it the destruction of the white race and its culture, this case needs to be stated immediately, and I do mean immediately. To complete this point, it is required that I now state the literal definition of genocide. I will first recite the definition of genocide as stated by the term’s inventor: Raphael Lemkin... “Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.” Here are four more critical definitions of genocide: United Nations General Assembly— “Any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.” John Cox-- “Genocide differs from other mass crimes against humanity and atrocities by its ambition. Genocide aims to not only eliminate individual members of the targeted group but to destroy the group’s ability to maintain its social and cultural cohesion and, thus, its existence as a group. Because perpetrators very rarely provide explicit statements of genocidal intent, this intent can be uncovered by examining policies, actions, and outcomes, as well as the guiding ideology.” Henry Huttenbach—“Genocide is any act that puts the very existence of a group in jeopardy.” Irving Louis Horowitz-- “…a systematic effort over time to liquidate a national population, usually a minority…[and] functions as a fundamental political policy to assure conformity and participation of the citizenry.” Tony Barta-- “…genocidal society—as distinct from a genocidal state—is one in which the bureaucratic apparatus might officially be directed to protect innocent people but in which a whole race is nevertheless subject to remorseless pressures of destruction inherent in the very nature of the society.” Now that we have explored the definition of “racism,” and touched upon the dynamic of oppression of the native dominant race in a cultural Marxism infected society that has now led to a clearly verifiable undeniably explicit genocide of the white race, what is this previously-mentioned force that has disallowed the white people from statically defining the term “racism” or investigating its origin?… It is the force of the political left, who in the United States are the members of the Democrat political party. Why would the Democrats want to prevent something so obviously helpful as achieving a fixed definition of the term “racism”? Because unlike anyone intellectually healthy, meaning one who can think morally and reasonably such as past Democrats before the 2008 inauguration of president Barak Obama, the modern Democrat is very clearly a communist, meaning he is no longer guided by anything rational. The modern Democrat’s communist goal gives him no motivation to clarify social issues, it is the contrary. Very clearly revealed by modern Democrat policies, a modern Democrat’s goal is to progress to the idea of a communist utopia in which the people of the world are a single commune where exists no borders, no races, no inequality of anything, and most of all no ideas that would question the morality of the communist utopia itself. Of course, to anyone sane this Democrat idea of utopia is the supreme of all horrors, yet today’s Democrats are very clearly these communists, and to every sane person’s horror, their every increasing hellish culture now dominates the West. The challenge of proving the existence of this current communist hell is not that one must seek factual examples, it is the opposite—because the current Western culture is so maximally culturally communist in every way, the challenge is to explain to the average citizen that he is actually spellbound, brainwashed, enchanted in believing that his current culture is normal when it is the literal opposite of normal-- it is a communist hell in which natural freedom of thought and choice and liberty are appallingly oppressed. Nothing is clearer to a current sane intellect than that currently he is utterly forbidden to freely investigate social and political concepts, freely choose his beliefs, or freely live as he wishes. In today’s West you MUST think, choose, and live as Democrats demand, or they will utterly destroy you. This is exactly communist group-think totalitarianism. I will state this again: In today’s West you MUST think, choose, and live as Democrats demand, or they will utterly destroy you. This is exactly communist group-think totalitarianism. So then, in order for this Democrat communist utopia to be possible at all, it is implicitly required that, not only all races have no instinctive repugnant feelings for each other, but critically that all races are equally intelligent, and have the same restraint from violence; if this was not the true biological state of all races, the utopia would be definitively impossible to achieve because less intelligent and more violent races would, by definition, never be able to achieve organic equality no matter what social programs were implemented. Sadly and inconveniently yet maximally scientifically conclusively, all-faceted overwhelming evidence proves that different races have dramatically different IQs and tendencies toward violence. (Please research for yourself the comprehensive exhaustive evidence of race-realism.) Through an epic and fully documented investigation over a century, it has been proven that Ashkenazi Jews have an average IQ of 112, Asians of 106, whites of 100, Central and South Americans of 91, and Africans of 85. Here are just two of countless corroborations of this fact: In 2018 the median US household income was approximately $129,000 for Jews, $87,000 for Asians, $71,000 for whites, $51,000 for Hispanics, and $41,000 for blacks. Out of a survey of 16,000 US high-schools, 16,000 schools reported that Asians achieved better grades than whites, and 16,000 schools revealed that whites achieved better grades than blacks. Furthermore, it has been proven that blacks have on average more testosterone which, in addition to their critically debilitating low IQs, makes them more prone to violence. This very deeply proven truth of race-realism makes the Democrat communist utopia directly impossible to achieve because these brown and black races are conclusively unable to create the advanced and harmonious societies that can the Jewish, Asian, and white races. As can be seen everywhere on Earth, the discussed Brown and especially Black races, in their own habitats, produce technologically and socially primitive societies in which the hallmark characteristics are violence, and poverty. (As a brief aside, to squelch the leftist argument in which they point to the rarest instances of seemingly first world African settings— please discover for yourself the non-brown and black races of the architects of the noteworthy structures, and where came the money for these structures. In short, browns and especially blacks are very clearly incapable of intellectually competing with the lighter skinned races. So then, because the survival of the modern Democrat ego is fully dependent on the realistic validity of their communist utopia, Democrats MUST, and I do mean 100% at all costs MUST hide, even from themselves, the maximally obvious realities of biological altruism as well as race-realism, or their all-defining psychological universe would explode. The way they hide these realities is to implicitly refuse the existence of a clear definition of the phenomena of racism or its origin, because to allow any fixed definition or research of “racism” would allow it to be investigated and undeniably concluded that browns and especially blacks are incapable of achieving anything close to financial or social success relative to the other races. Of course the unfortunate plain truth is always in broad daylight-- the brown and especially black races are incomprehensible burdens to the white and other races in every way—financially, socially, criminally. In the name of sanity, this truth must be repeated-- There is no more utterly obvious societal truth than that the brown and especially black races are incomprehensible burdens to the white and other races in every way—financially, socially, criminally. Because this clearest truth is must completely destroy to the Democrat psyche, it is exactly natural that they rabidly silence any mention of it. Behold just three examples of the Democrat’s ruthless character assassination of any who tries to clarify the issue of racism… James Watson, the Nobel laureate discoverer of the DNA helix, was immediately removed from society when he made a race-realist claim. Democrats forced the cancellation of his publicity tour, removed his 40-year tenure at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, and stripped him of all his honorary titles. Democrats forced The University of Chicago to suddenly cease pursuit of a 2005 patent for professor Bruce Lahn’s biological test confirming superior levels of intelligence through a presence of genes abundant in Europeans and rare in Africans. When questioned on his university’s motive for withdrawal, Lahn replied, “It’s getting too controversial… society will have to grapple with some very difficult facts.” In 2018, The Democrats removed University of Pennsylvania law professor Amy Wax from her freshman classes because, when specifically questioned on the downsides of affirmative action, she stated, “I don’t think I’ve ever seen a black student graduate in the top quarter of the class, and rarely, rarely in the top half.” So then, because this very deeply proven, and very obvious truth of race realism shatters the Democrats’ reason for being, Democrats must maintain a terribly evil lie to maintain the possibility of their utopia—they relentlessly assert that the success of the white race compared to the brown and black races is because whites oppress the brown and black races. Simple logic concludes that the consequence of this lie must necessarily be an empirically confirmable white genocide. Behold this maximally explicit genocidal confirmation strategy from the words of Democrat Harvard Professor Noel Ignatiev’s teachings… quote “There can be no white race without the phenomenon of white supremacy. …The task is to bring this minority together in such a way that it makes it impossible for the legacy of whiteness to continue to reproduce itself… Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.” In other words, explicit white genocide. And now note how Democrats have so monstrously weaponized this term “white supremacy”-- By conflating the white population’s maximally self-evident right to have their culture saturate their ethnic homelands, with the term “white supremacy,” which is defined as (quote) “the belief that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races.”, whites are now not only stripped of expressing their biological altruism through social preference, but they are directly unable to grow or even maintain their cultural expression, they must even partake in its destruction or else they are again branded as irredeemably immoral. All their media, their culture, and history is being aggressively removed. Whites in all their homelands—America and Europe, are socially forbidden from creating their natural white media. Note how ridiculous it would be to demand Mexicans, or Chinese, or Africans to not create their natural racial media in their own homelands—to socially forbid them to express promote and enjoy the occurrence of their people and culture within their movies, television shows, books, music, awards events, and everything else. Now that we have reasonably defined “racism”, investigated its source of biological altruism, and noted the motivation of Democrats to hide the moral, normal, and healthy essence of racism, we can now appreciate that the Democrats have created clearly, far-and-away and without exaggeration, the most evil psychological weapon in world history. Similar to how the AIDS virus strips the body’s immune system from being able to defend itself from death, the “racism/white-supremacy” weapon strips the white race’s natural and only immunity from defending itself from genocide. If a white person shows even a hint of his biological altruism, he is financially and socially destroyed with the label “racist”. If he shows even a hint of wanting to preserve the amniotic fluid of his culture, he is financially and socially destroyed with the term “white supremacist”. In other words, aggressive explicitly defined and confirmed white genocide cannot be resisted in any social or political way. And right now in the white homeland of the United States the final implementation of white genocide is in progress-- Democrat president Joe Biden has adopted a policy of a 100% wide-open US border. This directly treasonous and genocidal lack of border enforcement has been engineered to allow the brown and black races with their vastly greater numbers to invade- Biden gleefully admitted exactly this. Before becoming president Biden stated, “the [immigration] wave still continues. It’s not gonna stop, nor should we want it to stop… Folks like me who are Caucasian of European descent, for the first time… we’ll be in an absolute minority in the United States of America, absolute minority. Fewer than 50% of the people in America from then and on will be white European stock.” Biden has followed through to make reality his explicit genocidal statement-- in less than three years a over 8,000,000 blacks and browns have invaded, ponder how large is the actual number of perhaps more than 16,000,000. Ponder that number of non-European people invading America. These invaders have stolen the white living space, are destroying its amniotic fluid of culture, and are fast bankrupting its economy with hundreds of billions of dollars in free shelter and food and medical care. And of course, the Democrat mainstream media outlets refuse to report it. (Please right now go to CNN.com, MSNBC.com, NYT.com and confirm yourself.) United States movies, television shows, commercials, retail media, sporting events, awards shows, popular music is all forcibly dominated by non-whites with anti-white narratives. Inside the white homeland white literature is being either portrayed with brown or black characters, or simply erased from academic curriculum. Inside the white homeland white students are deeply discriminated against when applying to schools and universities founded by their forefathers, as are white adults in businesses founded by their white forefathers. Inside the white homeland whites cannot socially defend themselves against browns or blacks regardless the circumstances. Inside white homelands whites cannot resist mobs tearing down the statues of their heroes. Inside white homelands white police cannot protect whites against the extreme violence of browns and especially blacks. Inside the white homelands, the justice system that whites created deny whites justice when their stores are looted by browns or especially blacks, their property is damaged or stolen by browns or especially blacks, or they are raped or murdered by browns or especially blacks. Such examples are everyday countless. In Europe the advanced state of white cultural and biological genocide is the same. Through wide open borders flood millions upon millions of uneducated and evidently savage browns and blacks. Once the greatest city on Earth, London, England is culturally unrecognizable. Whites now have nowhere on Earth to express or experience the harmony that they naturally produce and psychologically need. The leftists, imbued with such heinous sickening evil, have achieved their explicit white genocidal goal by flooding the once beautiful white homelands with tens of millions of deeply foreign, low IQ, violent browns and blacks. Theft, vandalism, and especially rape of white women by brown and black men is now epidemic. These facts are not just verifiable, they are daily inescapable. Do you now see how ghastly evil are Democrats? Do you now see that Democrats are unimaginably incomprehensibly horrific monsters? Honestly please tell me, has the world ever seen such frightening nightmarish psychological evil as the Democrats genocidal manipulation of the concepts of “racism” and “white-supremacy”? This is called literal confirmable aggressive genocide. It is so obvious that to attempt to debate against it is preposterous. Now listen up, there is only one way out of this genocide. ONE. (pause) The way to stop the white genocide is for the masses to state the truth to break the taboo. The masses must state: RACISM IS NORMAL MORAL AND HEALTHY. I will say this all-critical conclusion again: The only way out of this white genocide is to state: RACISM IS NORMAL MORAL AND HEALTHY. ONLY by breaking the taboo, can we break the abominably evil Democrat white-genocide technology. -- Of course, it is the white race that has everything at stake, but all moral people of every race clearly have a responsibility to join in the breaking of this terrible Democrat genocidal taboo. All moral people have a responsibility to state the truth that RACISM IS NORMAL, MORAL and HEALTHY. Let’s get the hashtag trending #IAMRACIST. This hashtag is both provocative and true. White people, rise up as is your most basic human right! White people, stop the Democrat’s sickening evil from destroying your parents, brother, sisters, sons and daughters. White people, you have a right to survive your extremely clear extermination! It is evil, pure maximal EVIL that within your white homelands you are not allowed to live amongst only your white selves, create and marinade in exclusively your own racial expression. It is EVIL, pure maximal EVIL that within your white homelands you are not allowed to fight with any and all means necessary against foreign invaders! How deeply sick must white societies have become that I must state these most obvious self-evident truths? Whites, you have literally MAXIMAL moral right to preserve and defend the genetic makeup of your homeland! Jesus, wake up! THERE IS NO GREATER HUMAN RIGHT THAN TO DEFEND YOU RACE FROM GENOCIDE. I repeat: Whites, you have no greater right than to defend the genetic makeup of your homeland. Whites, there is nothing in the universe more moral than your right to expel non-whites from your homelands by any means necessary. This is exactly called racism, normal moral and healthy racism that God has imbued in you exactly so that you can survive! NOTHING IS MORE HEALTHY THAN TO ACT ON THIS RACISM THAT EXISTS MOST OF ALL TO PREVENT YORU GENOCIDE. Our race would never have survived without our critical racism, and as you can see, the white race will definitely not survive without your public vocal white racism. IT IS CLEARLY THAT SIMPLE—IF YOU DON’T DEFEND YOURSELF BY DECLARING YOUR NORMAL MORAL AND HEALTHY GOD GIVEN RACISM, WHITES WILL BE ERADICATED FROM THE EARTH. This is the way it always has been, and always will be. Wake up! Wake up! The sickeningly evil monstrous Democrats have brainwashed you so deeply, that you are silently experiencing your maximally evident genocide. Stand up now, right now, for your family, for the legacy handed to you over thousands of years from your loving forefathers to your beautiful deserving hopeful children. You MUST fight against this particular so terrible psychological genocidal evil. And the ONLY, and I do mean ONLY way to fight this evil is to very clearly state the greatest moral truth that RACISM IS NORMAL, MORAL, AND HEALTHY. Watch how I fight against maximal evil-- My name is Winston Smith and I am racist because I am normal, moral and healthy. Democrat pure evil has no power over me. My name is Winston Smith and I am racist because I am normal, moral and healthy. Democrat pure evil has no power over me. Destroy the genocidal evil. State it often, loud and proud. Racism is normal, moral, and healthy. Racism is normal, moral, and healthy. My name is Winston Smith, and I am racist because I am normal, moral, and healthy. Democrat pure evil has no power over me.

Please propagate my work. "The Catastrophe of Multiethnic Society" TabooRaceBook.com