BroGC

Has the resurrection Paul talked about in his writings to Timothy past? Most certainly! The resurrection Paul talked about in his writings to Timothy had certainly past...during their generation. It is evident, not only by their writing that their resurrection passed, but subsequent generations was afforded the same opportunity to be resurrected from the dead. Even now, people are willing being resurrected from the dead to new life. What did Jesus taught Nicodemus? That is when the doctrine or the trump (the sound truth) sounds that a person who was dead would rise from the grave. Even though Nicodemus was an established teacher in Israel at the time, he did not know about the spiritual resurrection. Even today, many established and revered teacher still look for the second coming and have not yet know the truth... This is the truth, the resurrection Paul talked about to Timothy did passed during their generation. Likewise, every generation before then and subsequent generation will be afforded their own resurrection to a new life...if they are willing.

The age old question and the numerous of thoughts to represent the true response is still being exercise. Is there meaning to life> Is there meaning to your life>Is there meaning in life? Yes there is! it has been reported on since the inception of thought or man. Even the bible and other literature reveals there is meaning to life and it is apparent to those who can see and understand. Here it is: the meaning in life is to love God, that is truth. And the second which is similar to the first, is to love our neighbor or fellowman as is the somewhat modern saying.

Can an individual man or woman live 500+ years? That is a myth aka a lie sold to us by demons. Seducers have sold us mythology which hampered us like mule unable to multiply because of dead ☠️ poison. We no longer subscribe to myths or is it the place we derive meaning. Here is the truth…

The resurrection according to the Bible is not like what movie portrays. It is not actual person who has died, was buried underneath the earth, in a coffin, stop breathing and after a couple days, they dig themself out of the grave😅. That description is movie magic, a myth, a lie…that was from the imagination of deceptive individuals or groups. The facts is written right there in the text. The text made it clear when Jesus asked his students, who do the people thought he was? They responded by saying he was one of the prophets raised from the grave or dead. Some thought he was Elijah, others said he was John the Baptist, still others thought he was Jeremiah. This information clearly informed me that the people believed in bodily resurrection! Not just bodily, but the actual person who lived before. But what was Peter second response? Peter said he was the messenger of God. A right interpretation. In other words, he was not one of the resurrected prophets. Matt 16: 13-16. On another occasion the students of Jesus were perplexed about the Christ coming. They believed that Elijah must come before the Christ! Now, if they now understood that Jesus was the messenger, where was Elijah? Jesus told them a shocking revelation Matt 17: 11-12. That John was Elijah. The resurrection is in the spirit. Isn’t it stands to reason then, if all this is true as in never will change, Jesus resurrection in another will be in the spirit? Which Paul incidentally allude to in his writings to the Corinthians. The coming of Christ will be in the spirit…on a particular person, or rather, the sons of God will be evident with the spirit of their Heavenly Father. The resurrection according to the Bible. The problem…how to know the resurrected sons of God from imposters? 🤔

Did the apostle Paul opposed science as according to 1 Timothy 6:21? The Lie could not be further from the Truth. The letter carrier/ mailman/ apostle Paul did not opposed science rather, he opposed those who falsely opposed science. In other words, they were wrong according to the science he was espousing specifically the resurrection of the dead. He used analogy of the moon and the stars and the sun and their glory (their light)in contrast to the natural semblence (inner person) which glows when the sons of God light their lamps. In retrospect and introspection, Paul glorifies good science and vilify evil or bad science. The science of marriage? The science of stealing? The science of fornication? These were all proven over time and found to be everlasting! Who can deny that a man and woman being married is not good for any society, any culture, any nation, any people, any language, any ethnicity...etc? That science is proven that is natural and should be establish across generation. Is not science at its basic core and definition is to test a theory or a hypothesis or a theology and prove that it is good and true? Well, even John according to the inscription of the letters of New testament wrote the saints then should test every spirit which comes to them if it is of the truth. Why? To know the truth so it can set the participants from dogmas which are molded in the darkness of the pit.

Up until my true consciousness arose inside me, I have always heard the battle of Armageddon where mankind will gather to war against God almighty. When I started to take notice of the doctrines that were preached to me and other, as I delved deep into the mysteries of Babylon, I started to realized the truth! What a deception! Can mankind truly battle God as it is so called revealed in the book of Revelation ? I said so called because that is what they been preaching and teaching to us mere mortals. What if they (the writers of revelation) were plainly saying something which was evident to them at that time and our theological scholars and soothsayers misunderstood the text and subsequently taught generations myth and lies? Or, It could be the Nicene creed of 325Ad which put the ball of mysticism in motion for the rest of us mere mortals? Actually, both options are the same. Weren't the Nicene Creed made up of men? The truth is obvious to me, I would like to re-reveal the truth to those who truly want to know: Can mankind battle God? The truth is so ever present...

If all children are born evil, then Jesus was born evil. But if children are not born evil, then Jesus was not born evil. I realized my belief is consistent with reality...and even with certain clear plain writings in the Bible. Romans 9:11. How can babies be evil or good when they do not know good or evil? Babies are born malleable or even innocent as they say. This doctrine is pervasive even prolific and has leap bounds and entered into many society and capture many minds with its deception. Here is where the misconception or the gap aka grand canyon of understanding comes in, because it is said and observed that children need to be reared to be good, the implication then says they were initially bad/evil at inception. Wrong! Here is the truth: the parents are either good or evil that is why their offspring exhibit their tendencies unknowingly. Who ever hear or read this; Matthew 12:33, either make the tree good and its fruit good or make the tree corrupt and its fruit corrupt...for the tree is known by its fruit. OR Luke 7:35, wisdom is justified of all her children If babies are born evil, it's the tree faults which bears the fruit. That it is why it is imperative to change the tree before fruit bears. The fruit tells the tree what type of tree it is unbeknownst to the fruit.

The seven age fallacy interpretation of the church's period was handed down to many generation by...who the hell knows. No one knows definitely the origins of this and other ambiguous doctrines, such as the second coming of christ for literally over 2000+ years and still cannot burst the sky...I always digress. No one knows the origin of these doctrine for sure. Many would say it was handed down by the Nicene creed of 325Ad which is very plausible, very plausible. But I have come to a much simpler conclusion based on the very text which was either handed down to my generation, forced upon us or subtle induced. Here is my topical take on the 7 delusional age of the church.