BradLee296

The case of George Zimmerman & Trayvon Martin is one of the most misunderstood stories of any of our lifetimes. There is sufficient evidence to understand what did and not occur the night of February 26, 2012, in Sanford, Florida - so there need not be such misunderstanding. Why, then, does there continue to be so much confusion and so much division, 11 years after the incident? Following the shooting incident, a narrative was created by a team of lawyers and public relations specialists. That narrative was fed to the media, and the media asserted that narrative repeatedly rather than doing their own investigative journalism and arriving at conclusions based on their own findings. Why did the media do that? Why was the media uninterested in following the evidence? What is presented here is based on actual evidence and testimony. The focus is the 4 minutes of time between when Trayvon Martin first began to run and the start of the physical altercation - and also the attack that continued thereafter. 8 witnesses to the incident were called to testify by the prosecution. None effectively contradicted a single element of George Zimmerman's version of the story. Yet, people have somehow arrived at the conclusion George Zimmerman lied and was guilty of murder. Why? Fundamentally, how can one determine George Zimmerman lied about his entire story when none of the 8 witnesses was able to contradict a single thing George Zimmerman said? Ignoring what the witnesses said is why people believe George Zimmerman is guilty. Why did and why do people continue to ignore the witnesses? Why do they ignore evidence? What is presented in the video can stand up to scrutiny. Unlike those who believe George Zimmerman was guilty, the author of this video welcomes scrutiny. Challenge: Address any element presented in this video and make your case like a reasonable adult. If something is not understood or requires clarification, ask in the comments. Questions will be answered. The truth is too important to ignore. If what is presented in this video is not the truth, what is? What evidence leads you to your conclusions? Are you willing to be scrutinized?