ProudBoysUSA

20 Followers

Minimal Government, Maximum Freedom, Free Speech (1st Amendment), Gun Rights (2nd Amendment), Anti-Racism, Anti-Racial Guilt, Anti-Political Correctness, Anti-Drug War, Closed Borders, Glorifying the Entrepreneur, Venerating the Housewife, Reinstating a Spirit of Western Chauvinism 👌🏿 Freedom, liberty, and justice are at the core of what it means to be human. They are not mere slogans, but rather the foundation of a just society. These principles represent a vision for a society that is grounded in these principles. Maximum freedom and minimal government mean that individuals should have as much freedom as possible to live their lives as they see fit, without interference from the state. This does not mean anarchy but rather a limited government that is responsible for protecting individual rights, enforcing contracts, and ensuring that the rule of law is respected. This type of government should not seek to control every aspect of people's lives, but rather should allow individuals to make their own decisions about their lives as long as they do not harm others. Free speech is a cornerstone of any free society. People should be free to express their opinions, no matter how unpopular they may be, without fear of censorship or retaliation. This means that the government should not be in the business of regulating speech, but rather should allow people to express their views, even if they are offensive or controversial. Owning guns is a fundamental right that is enshrined in the Second Amendment of the US Constitution. This right should be protected, as it is a vital part of the right to self-defense. The government should not be in the business of disarming law-abiding citizens, but rather should ensure that people have the ability to defend themselves against those who would do them harm. Foreign or domestic. Anti-racism is a principle that is essential to a just society. People should be judged on their character and their actions, not on the color of their skin or their ethnicity. Racism is an insidious evil that has no place in a free and just society. The government should not be in the business of promoting or perpetuating racism, but rather should work to eradicate it wherever it exists. The vision of anti-racial guilt is a bold one that challenges the conventional wisdom of the day. It argues that people should not be made to feel guilty for the color of their skin, for the sins of their ancestors, nor should they be held responsible for the actions of others who happen to share their race. This does not mean that we should ignore the effects of racism or discrimination, but rather that we should all move beyond victimhood or guilt and towards reconciliation and prosperity. The anti-drug war is a failed policy that has done more harm than good. It has resulted in the mass incarceration of non-violent drug offenders, the erosion of civil liberties, and the empowerment of criminal organizations. The government should not be in the business of punishing people for using drugs, but rather should focus on providing education and treatment opportunities to those who are struggling with addiction. Venerating the housewife is another cornerstone that challenges the assumptions of the modern age. Being a homemaker is a noble and worthwhile pursuit, and that it should be respected and honored as such. This does not mean that women should be confined to the home, but rather that the decision to stay at home and raise a family should be seen as a valid and important choice. Glorifying the entrepreneur is based on the fact that individuals who take risks and create businesses are the driving force behind economic growth and prosperity. Entrepreneurs should be celebrated for their accomplishments, and that they should be given the freedom and support they need to succeed. Anti-political correctness is a vision that challenges the idea that certain words or ideas are taboo or offensive. It argues that people should be free to express themselves, even if their opinions are unpopular or controversial. This does not mean that people should be free to engage in hate speech or incitement to violence, but rather that they should be allowed to express their views without fear of censorship or retaliation. Closed borders defines a nation and challenges the idea that countries should be open to unlimited immigration. Nations have the right to control their borders, and that they should be able to determine who is allowed to enter and who is not. This does not mean that immigrants should be treated with hostility or discrimination, but rather that immigration should be controlled and managed in a way that serves the national interest. Reinstating a spirit of Western chauvinism challenges the notion that all cultures are equal. Western civilization has contributed more to human progress and prosperity than any other civilization and should be celebrated and defended. This does not mean that other cultures should be denigrated or excluded, but rather that the values and achievements of the West should be acknowledged and celebrated. Together, these principles represent a vision for a society that is grounded in freedom, justice, and individual rights. It is a vision that is based on the belief that people are capable of making their own decisions about their lives, and that the government should not be in the business of controlling every aspect of people's lives. However, critics argue that maximum freedom and minimal government will result in chaos and anarchy, that free speech will allow discrimination and incitement to violence, that owning guns will lead to more violence, that anti-racism is a threat to free speech and will result in reverse discrimination, and that the anti-drug war will harm public health and safety. These principles challenge assumptions about race, gender, economics, politics, and culture. They challenge the idea that people should feel guilty for the sins of their ancestors, that being a housewife is somehow inferior to other pursuits, that entrepreneurs are greedy and selfish, that certain ideas are taboo, that borders should be open to all, and that all cultures are equal. This foundation will likely provoke strong reactions from many people, but also represents an opportunity for honest and open dialogue about the future of our society. Challenges us to think deeply about the values and principles that we hold dear, and to question whether they are truly serving the best interests of all people. Critics of this foundation will argue that it is divisive, exclusive, and even dangerous. They will argue that anti-racial guilt ignores the very real effects of racism and discrimination, that venerating the housewife reinforces sexist stereotypes, that glorifying the entrepreneur ignores some effects of capitalism, that anti-political correctness is a license to offend and hurt others, that closed borders are xenophobic and discriminatory, and that reinstating a spirit of Western chauvinism is racist and exclusionary. In order to maintain this country for ourselves and for others from all over the world who come here for a dream, we must be willing to engage in open and honest dialogue about the challenges and the opportunities that lie ahead. We must be willing to listen to each other.