Episode 124. Attorneys General Write Letter Opposing Red Flag Laws
Show Notes:
Episode 124. Attorneys General Write Letter Opposing Red Flag Laws
In this episode, Alex Ooley shares a letter from the attorney general of West Virginia and other states expressing opposition to the Biden administration's National Extreme Risk Protection Order Resource Center. The letter argues that red flag laws violate Second Amendment rights and lack due process. It also criticizes the Department of Justice for partnering with the John Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions, which advocates for strict gun control measures. The host highlights the dangers of red flag laws and the need to protect individual rights.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Letter from Attorneys General
02:06 Opposition to the National Extreme Risk Protection Order Resource Center
03:40 The Flaws of Red Flag Laws
06:07 The Department of Justice's Ideological Partnership
09:32 The Dangers of Pre-Crime Laws
11:28 Protecting Second Amendment Rights
Takeaways
· Red flag laws are a threat to Second Amendment rights and lack due process.
· The Biden administration's National Extreme Risk Protection Order Resource Center undermines state and local laws and promotes anti-gun measures.
· Red flag laws do not have a significant impact on reducing violent crime or saving lives.
· The Department of Justice's partnership with the John Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions raises concerns about bias and ideological influence.
· The Supreme Court may review cases involving assault weapons bans in Maryland and Illinois.
Resources
Red Flag Center Letter to AG Garland.docx - 4-11-24-ERPO-Letter-to-AG-Garland.pdf
https://www.ohioattorneygeneral.gov/Files/Briefing-Room/News-Releases/4-11-24-ERPO-Letter-to-AG-Garland.aspx
Citing Constitutional Concerns, Yost Urges DOJ to Scrap ‘Red Flag’ Gun-Confiscation Program - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
https://www.ohioattorneygeneral.gov/Media/News-Releases/April-2024/Citing-Constitutional-Concerns-Yost-Urges-DOJ-to-S
Trump: Take the guns first, go through due process second - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=du4xz6Lndxk
Do Red Flag Laws Save Lives? by John R. Lott, Carlisle E. Moody :: SSRN
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3492120
Episode 118. Kamala Harris Exploits Tragedy for Gun Control Agenda: The Battle Over Red Flag Laws - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gn6ZIE5r-N0
MarylandAWban.com: Bianchi v. Brown - FPC Law 2A Challenge to Maryland's "Assault Weapons" Ban
https://www.firearmspolicy.org/bianchi
Harrel v. Raoul - FPC Challenge to Illinois "Assault Weapon" and Magazine Bans
https://www.firearmspolicy.org/harrel
Sound Bites
"Take the guns first, go through due process second."
"Former president Donald Trump gets it backward. Current president Joe Biden doesn't even care if he gets it backward."
"These cases are ripe to be heard by the Supreme Court."
Keywords
red flag laws, Second Amendment, due process, attorney general, Biden administration, National Extreme Risk Protection Order Resource Center, gun control
Tags:
#liberty
#freedom
#firearms
#handguns
#guns
#2A
#training
#personalresponsibility
#firstresponder
#law
#litigation
#lawfare
#executivebranch
#tyranny
#redflag
#ERPO
#dueprocess
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
33
views
Episode 123. What Charles Ponzi’s Scheme and US Entitlement Programs Have in Common
Show Notes
Episode 123. What Charles Ponzi’s Scheme and US Entitlement Programs Have in Common
In this episode, Alex Ooley shares an article titled 'What Charles Ponzi's Scheme and US Entitlement Programs Have in Common' by Daniel Kowalski. The article compares the structure of Ponzi schemes to the US social security and Medicare systems, highlighting the inherent problems and unsustainability of these programs. The host discusses how these systems operate like a Ponzi scheme, relying on new money to pay off old investors. The conversation also touches on the national debt and the government's irresponsible financial practices. The episode concludes with a call to protect oneself and be prepared for the possibility of not receiving the promised benefits from these entitlement programs.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Guest Episode Update
01:02 Comparing Ponzi Scheme to US Entitlement Programs
04:39 Expanding Social Security with Medicare
07:20 The Government's Financial Practices
08:26 The Future of the US and Entitlement Programs
11:59 Government's Irresponsible Financial Practices
12:29 Conclusion and Call to Action
Resources
"What Charles Ponzi’s Scheme and US Entitlement Programs Have in Common" by
Daniel Kowalski
https://fee.org/articles/what-charles-ponzis-scheme-and-us-entitlement-programs-have-in-common/
Sound Bites
"A Ponzi scheme promises investors massive returns on an investment that does not really exist."
"The financial amount of these benefits dwarfed what the first retirees put in during their working careers."
"Today, there are more medical treatments available than there were 60 years ago. This helps people live longer."
Takeaways
US entitlement programs like social security and Medicare operate similarly to Ponzi schemes, relying on new money to pay off old investors.
The structure of these programs is unsustainable in the long term, as the number of beneficiaries increases while the number of contributors decreases.
The government's financial practices, including the national debt and printing money, resemble fraudulent activities.
Individuals should be prepared for the possibility of not receiving the promised benefits from these entitlement programs and take steps to protect themselves financially.
Keywords
Charles Ponzi scheme, US entitlement programs, social security, Medicare, Ponzi scheme structure, national debt, government financial practices
Tags
#liberty
#freedom
#forgeoffreedom
#PonziScheme
#entitlementprogram
#SocialSecurity
#medicare
#nationaldebt
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
17
views
Episode 122. Defining a Firearm: The Frame or Receiver Rule at SCOTUS (Garland v. VanDerStok)
Show Notes:
Episode 122. Defining a Firearm: The Frame or Receiver Rule at SCOTUS (Garland v. VanDerStok)
The United States Supreme Court has accepted a case called Garland v. VanDerStok, which challenges the administrative authority of the ATF. The case focuses on the definition of a firearm and specifically the frame or receiver rule. The ATF argues that incomplete frames or receivers, known as 80% lowers, are firearms because they may readily be converted. However, the Firearms Policy Coalition and the Second Amendment Foundation argue that the ATF is overstepping its authority and changing the law. The case is about limiting agency overreach and maintaining the separation of powers.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Case Overview
07:22 Ghost Guns and Unserialized Components
14:00 The Fifth Circuit's Opinion
Resources
Supreme Court Takes Up ATF’s Unilateral ‘Ghost Gun’ Rules
https://reason.com/2024/04/24/supreme-court-takes-up-atfs-unilateral-ghost-gun-rules/
Garland v. VanDerStok - SCOTUSblog
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/garland-v-vanderstok-2/
Justices take up “ghost guns” case for next term - SCOTUSblog
https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/04/justices-take-up-ghost-guns-case-for-next-term/
Supreme Court Takes Up FPC, FPCAF Lawsuit Challenging ATF’s “Frame or Receiver” Rule - Firearms Policy Coalition
https://www.firearmspolicy.org/supreme-court-takes-up-fpc-fpcaf-lawsuit-challenging-atfs-frame-or-receiver-rule#gsc.tab=0
VanDerStok cert resp Final.pdf
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-852/302555/20240307152938802_23-852%20VanDerStok%20cert%20resp%20Final.pdf
Definitions, 18 U.S.C. § 921
https://casetext.com/statute/united-states-code/title-18-crimes-and-criminal-procedure/part-i-crimes/chapter-44-firearms/section-921-definitions
Meaning of terms, 27 C.F.R. § 478.11
https://casetext.com/regulation/code-of-federal-regulations/title-27-alcohol-tobacco-products-and-firearms/chapter-ii-bureau-of-alcohol-tobacco-firearms-and-explosives-department-of-justice/subchapter-b-firearms-and-ammunition/part-478-commerce-in-firearms-and-ammunition/subpart-b-definitions/section-47811-meaning-of-terms
Definition of Frame or Receiver, 27 C.F.R. § 478.12
https://casetext.com/regulation/code-of-federal-regulations/title-27-alcohol-tobacco-products-and-firearms/chapter-ii-bureau-of-alcohol-tobacco-firearms-and-explosives-department-of-justice/subchapter-b-firearms-and-ammunition/part-478-commerce-in-firearms-and-ammunition/subpart-b-definitions/section-47812-definition-of-frame-or-receiver
Vanderstok v. Garland - Second Amendment Foundation
https://saf.org/vanderstok-v-garland/
https://saf.org/supreme-court-grants-cert-in-saf-vanderstok-frames-receivers-case/
Garland v. Cargill - SCOTUSblog
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/garland-v-cargill/
United States v. Rahimi - SCOTUSblog
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/united-states-v-rahimi/
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo - SCOTUSblog
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/loper-bright-enterprises-v-raimondo/
The Supreme Court Accepts Another Opportunity to Box ATF In - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGqobSI_mqw&t=392s
Ron Paul quote
https://quotlr.com/images/quotes/BtPZn-pCQAAxKaF.jpg
Keywords
United States Supreme Court, Garland v. Vanderstalk, administrative authority, ATF, frame or receiver rule, 80% lowers, Firearms Policy Coalition, Second Amendment Foundation, agency overreach, separation of powers
Takeaways
The case challenges the administrative authority of the ATF and focuses on the definition of a firearm.
The ATF argues that incomplete frames or receivers, known as 80% lowers, are firearms because they may readily be converted.
The Firearms Policy Coalition and the Second Amendment Foundation argue that the ATF is overstepping its authority and changing the law.
The case is about limiting agency overreach and maintaining the separation of powers.
Sound Bites
"The ATF in promulgating its final rule attempted to take on the mantle of Congress to, quote, do something, end quote, with respect to gun control."
"The final rule is limitless without qualification. It purports to regulate any piece of metal or plastic that has been machined beyond its primordial state for fear that it might one day be turned into a gun, a gun frame, or a gun receiver."
"May future generations look back on our work and say that these were men and women who, in a moment of great crisis, stood up to their politicians, the opinion makers, and the establishment, and saved their country."
Tags
#liberty
#freedom
#firearms
#handguns
#guns
#2A
#training
#personalresponsibility
#firstresponder
#law
#litigation
#lawfare
#selfdefense
#ATF
#agencyrulemaking
#executivebranch
#tyranny
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
53
views
Episode 121. The Danger of the West’s Neglect of Individual Rights
Show Notes
Episode 121. The Danger of the West’s Neglect of Individual Rights
Alex Ooley shares an article by Finn Andreen that discusses the neglect of individual rights in the West and the consequences of this neglect. It highlights the violation of property rights, exorbitant fiscal and inflationary pressures, mass surveillance, censorship, and the erosion of freedom of speech. The article argues that the Western world has taken individual rights for granted and emphasizes the importance of negative rights over positive rights. It calls for a renewed focus on educating the public about the principles of freedom and the need to protect individual rights.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Importance of Individual Rights
04:05 The Neglect of Individual Rights in the West
08:22 The Poor Protection of Individual Rights
12:27 The Focus on Positive Rights
Resources
The Danger of the West’s Neglect of Individual Rights | Mises Institute
https://mises.org/mises-wire/danger-wests-neglect-individual-rights
TenthAmendmentCenter on X: "The same government..."
https://twitter.com/TenthAmendment/status/1783975613508047221
Episode 14. Positive & Negative Rights – The Forge of Freedom
https://forgeoffreedom.com/2023/05/09/episode-14-positive-negative-rights/
Quote by Frederic Bastiat
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/132893-socialism-like-the-ancient-ideas-from-which-it-springs-confuses
TenthAmendmentCenter on X (@TenthAmendment)
https://twitter.com/TenthAmendment/status/1780732125236367481
Takeaways
The neglect of individual rights in the West has led to violations of property rights, exorbitant fiscal and inflationary pressures, mass surveillance, censorship, and erosion of freedom of speech.
The Western world has taken individual rights for granted and needs to refocus on protecting negative rights rather than enforcing positive rights.
Education about the principles of freedom and the importance of protecting individual rights is crucial to resist the creeping violation of rights.
The public needs to actively enforce the principles and ideals contained in documents like the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen and the Bill of Rights.
The government's focus on control rather than protecting individual rights is evident in its expansion of surveillance and restrictions on privacy.
Sound Bites
"There is no massive opposition to these glaring violations of individual rights."
"Liberty dies with apathy. It's up to us to maintain freedom."
"We don't want the government to produce our food, dictate resources for healthcare, education, religion, or equality."
Keywords
individual rights, neglect, property rights, fiscal pressures, inflation, mass surveillance, censorship, freedom of speech, negative rights, positive rights, education, principles of freedom
Tags
#liberty
#freedom
#personalresponsibility
#government
#dueprocess
#Constitution
#FISA
#FISA
#section702
#NSA
#FBI
#foreignintelligence
#spying
#tyranny
#warrant
#probablecause
#4thAmendment
#4A
#mises
#bastiat
#forgeoffreedom
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
48
views
1
comment
Episode 120. ATF Final Rule on Firearms Sales and What it Means to Be “Engaged in the Business”
Show Notes:
Episode 120. ATF Final Rule on Firearms Sales and What it Means to Be “Engaged in the Business”
In this episode of the Forge of Freedom podcast, Alex Ooley and Mike Ooley discuss the ATF's new final rule regarding what it means to be engaged in the business of selling firearms. They highlight the complexity of the rule and its origins in the bipartisan safer communities act. They also discuss the power and history of the ATF, as well as the potential implications of the rule, including increased costs for private firearms transactions and the potential for registration and confiscation. They emphasize the need to be vigilant about government overreach and the importance of focusing on individual and community freedom.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Overview
09:28 The ATF's Power and History
16:18 The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act and the ATF's Final Rule
35:46 The Government's Disregard for the American People and the National Debt
43:29 Taking Control of What You Can: Individual and Community Freedom
Takeaways
The ATF's new final rule regarding what it means to be engaged in the business of selling firearms is complex and stems from the bipartisan safer communities act.
The rule could have implications such as increased costs for private firearms transactions and the potential for registration and confiscation.
It is important to be vigilant about government overreach and to focus on individual and community freedom.
The power and history of the ATF, including incidents like Ruby Ridge and Waco, highlight the potential dangers of government agencies enforcing ambiguous rules.
Resources:
Bipartisan Safer Communities Act of 2022 - Ballotpedia
https://ballotpedia.org/Bipartisan_Safer_Communities_Act_of_2022
S.2938 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Bipartisan Safer Communities Act | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/2938
Definition of "Engaged in the Business" as a Dealer in Firearms - eib.fr_.1140-aa58.2024_508.signed_final_4.10.24.pdf
https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/docs/ruling/atf-final-rule-definition-engaged-business-dealer-firearms/download
18 U.S. Code § 924 - Penalties | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/924
18 U.S. Code § 922 - Unlawful acts | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/922
The White House on X: "It’s time for Congress to act. https://t.co/KEDm5EQg13" / X
https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1781699342178332678
Second Amendment Roundup: ATF redefines “engaged in the business”
https://reason.com/volokh/2024/04/19/second-amendment-roundup-atf-redefines-engaged-in-the-business/
Justice Department Publishes New Rule To Update Definition of "Engaged in the Business" as a Firearms Dealer | Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
https://www.atf.gov/news/pr/justice-department-publishes-new-rule-update-definition-engaged-business-firearms-dealer
Office of Public Affairs | Justice Department Publishes New Rule to Update Definition of “Engaged in the Business” as a Firearms Dealer | United States Department of Justice
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-publishes-new-rule-update-definition-engaged-business-firearms-dealer
Final Rule: Definition of “Engaged in the Business” as a Dealer in Firearms | Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
https://www.atf.gov/firearms/final-rule-definition-engaged-business-dealer-firearms
Definition of "Engaged in the Business" as a Dealer in Firearms - eib.fr_.1140-aa58.2024_508.signed_final_4.10.24.pdf
https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/docs/ruling/atf-final-rule-definition-engaged-business-dealer-firearms/download
Episode 57. ATF Proposed Rule on Definition of “Engaged in the Business” as a Dealer in Firearms – The Forge of Freedom
https://forgeoffreedom.com/2023/09/04/episode-57-atf-proposed-rule-on-definition-of-engaged-in-the-business-as-a-dealer-in-firearms/
ATF HQ on X:
https://twitter.com/ATFHQ/status/1778393298991775744
Keywords
ATF, final rule, engaged in the business, firearms, gun control, bipartisan safer communities act, registration, confiscation, government overreach, individual freedom, community freedom
Tags:
#liberty
#freedom
#firearms
#handguns
#guns
#2A
#training
#personalresponsibility
#firstresponder
#law
#litigation
#lawfare
#selfdefense
#ATF
#agencyrulemaking
#executivebranch
#engagedinthebusiness
#FFL
#universalbackgroundchecks
#tyranny
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
121
views
Episode 119. FISA 702 Explained: Is Your Privacy at Risk?
Show Notes:
Episode 119. FISA 702 Explained: Is Your Privacy at Risk?
In this episode, host Alex Ooley discusses the reauthorization of FISA 702, a provision of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that allows the government to conduct targeted surveillance of foreign nationals without a warrant. He explains the significant privacy implications of this provision and highlights instances of abuse by intelligence agencies. The episode also covers the failed attempt to impose a warrant requirement through the Biggs Amendment and the concerns raised by civil liberties organizations. The host emphasizes the importance of protecting privacy rights and urges listeners to be engaged citizens in order to prevent encroachments on their freedoms.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Background on FISA 702
06:26 Concerns about Privacy and Abuse
13:59 The Failed Attempt to Impose a Warrant Requirement
27:53 The Importance of Protecting Privacy Rights
Takeaways
FISA 702 allows the government to conduct targeted surveillance of foreign nationals without a warrant, but it has significant privacy implications for American citizens as well.
There have been numerous instances of abuse by intelligence agencies, including the wrongful search of foreign surveillance data for the names of US senators and state judges.
The Biggs Amendment, which would have imposed a warrant requirement for surveillance involving American data, failed to pass in the House of Representatives.
Civil liberties organizations have long opposed FISA 702, arguing that it violates privacy rights and allows for the collection of information without a warrant.
It is important for citizens to be engaged and hold their representatives accountable to protect their privacy rights and prevent encroachments on their freedoms.
Sound Bites
"The critics of section 702 worry that... powers are too broad and allow for the incidental collection of data on U.S. citizens and that the provision is ripe for abuse."
"Section 702 clearly is a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment."
"The amendment to require the government to obtain a warrant to search Section 702 data for Americans communications failed by an achingly close vote of 212 to 212."
Resources:
Elizabeth Goitein on X
https://twitter.com/LizaGoitein/status/1778844476607201640
Final Vote Results for Roll Call 114
https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2024/roll114.xml
Rand Paul on X (@RandPaul):
https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1780627078645248462
TenthAmendmentCenter on X (@TenthAmendment)
https://twitter.com/TenthAmendment/status/1780732125236367481
Letter from 21 Privacy Companies
cdt.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Coalition-Statement-for-Record-Senate-Judiciary-Hearing-on-Section-702-6-12-23.pdf
Edward Snowden (@Snowden) / X
https://twitter.com/Snowden
FISA Section 702: What it is and why Congress is debating it
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/section-702-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-act-congress-what-know-rcna96259
Statement by National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan on the Upcoming Vote on Reauthorization and Reform of FISA Section 702 | The White House
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/04/17/statement-by-national-security-advisor-jake-sullivan-on-the-upcoming-vote-on-reauthorization-and-reform-of-fisa-section-702/
Bad Amendments to Section 702 Have Failed (For Now)—What Happens Next? | Electronic Frontier Foundation
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/04/bad-amendments-section-702-have-failed-now-what-happens-next
What is Section 702? | Learn Liberty
https://www.learnliberty.org/videos/what-is-section-702/
Naomi Brockwell (@naomibrockwell) / X
https://twitter.com/naomibrockwell
What is the FISA court, and why is it so secretive? | CNN Politics
https://www.cnn.com/2017/03/08/politics/fisa-court-explainer-trnd/index.html
Keywords
FISA 702, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, privacy, warrant requirement, abuse, civil liberties, surveillance, Fourth Amendment
Tags:
#liberty
#freedom
#personalresponsibility
#government
#dueprocess
#Constitution
#FISA
#FISA
#section702
#NSA
#FBI
#foreignintelligence
#spying
#tyranny
#warrant
#probablecause
#4thAmendment
#4A
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
98
views
Episode 118. Kamala Harris Exploits Tragedy for Gun Control Agenda: The Battle Over Red Flag Laws
Show Notes:
Episode 118. Kamala Harris Exploits Tragedy for Gun Control Agenda: The Battle Over Red Flag Laws
In this episode, Alex Ooley and Mike Ooley discuss Kamala Harris's visit to Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School and her use of the massacre as a platform to promote gun control. They delve into the concept of red flag laws and the violation of due process and individual rights that they entail. They highlight the inconclusive evidence regarding the effectiveness of these laws and the potential for abuse. The episode concludes with a reminder of the importance of preserving freedom and liberty.
Chapters
00:00 Kamala Harris Exploits Tragedy for Gun Control Agenda
09:06 The Violation of Due Process in Red Flag Laws
32:43 The Importance of Preserving Freedom and Liberty
Takeaways
Kamala Harris used the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School massacre as a platform to promote gun control
Red flag laws violate due process and individual rights
The evidence regarding the effectiveness of red flag laws is inconclusive
Red flag laws can be abused and used as a tool for personal vendettas
Preserving freedom and liberty is of utmost importance
Sound Bites
"Anytime the government says, 'I'm here to help,' that's the most concerning words you could ever hear."
Keywords
Kamala Harris, Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, gun control, red flag laws, due process, individual rights, evidence, abuse, freedom, liberty
Resources:
FACT SHEET: Vice President Kamala Harris Announces Two Gun Safety Solutions While Continuing Efforts to Keep Schools Safe from Gun Violence | The White House
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/03/23/fact-sheet-vice-president-harris-announces-gun-safety-solutions-while-continuing-efforts-to-keep-schools-safe-from-gun-violence/
National Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) Resource Center - The National ERPO Resource Center
https://erpo.org/
U.S. Constitution - Fourteenth Amendment | Resources | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-14/
Remarks by Vice President Harris Highlighting Historic Gun Safety Measures | Parkland, FL | The White House
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2024/03/23/remarks-by-vice-president-harris-on-gun-violence-prevention-while-at-marjory-stoneman-douglas-high-school-parkland-fl/
Office of Gun Violence Prevention | The White House
https://www.whitehouse.gov/ogvp/
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
https://www.usdebtclock.org/
Vice President Marks Parkland Tragedy Anniversary by Dancing-in-the-Blood
https://www.ammoland.com/2024/04/vice-president-harris-marks-parkland-tragedy-anniversary-with-political-gun-grab/
Father of Parkland high school victim speaks out on Vice President Kamala Harris' visit: 'Hallowed ground'
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/father-of-parkland-high-school-victim-speaks-out-on-vice-president-kamala-harris-visit-hallowed-ground/vi-BB1knFyW#details
MSD-Report-2-Public-Version.pdf
https://www.fdle.state.fl.us/MSDHS/MSD-Report-2-Public-Version.pdf
Kamala Harris delivers remarks in Parkland - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCTp0Bu1boI
Episode 55. Red Flag Laws: A Threat to the Constitution and Individual Liberty - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9HKEyKRdwY
Policy Arguments Against Red Flag Laws #freedom #firearms #liberty #redflag #guncontrol - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kvQ45IH9pA
Tags:
#liberty
#freedom
#firearms
#handguns
#guns
#2A
#training
#personalresponsibility
#lawfare
#selfdefense
#redflag
#ERPO
#Parkland
#government
#dueprocess
#Constitution
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
94
views
Episode 117. ‘The Zone of Interest’ in Forgiveness
Show Notes:
Episode 117. ‘The Zone of Interest’ in Forgiveness
The episode discusses the movie 'The Zone of Interest' and explores the themes of forgiveness and mercy, particularly in relation to the character Rudolf Höss, the Commandant of Auschwitz. It raises questions about the capacity for evil in seemingly ordinary people and the Christian belief in forgiveness. The episode also touches on the importance of learning from history to prevent similar atrocities from happening again. The host reflects on how forgiveness applies to our own lives and interactions with others.
Takeaways
The movie 'The Zone of Interest' raises questions about forgiveness and mercy in the context of the Holocaust and the character Rudolf Haas.
Reflecting on history and learning from past atrocities is crucial to prevent similar events from happening again.
The Christian belief in forgiveness challenges us to consider the capacity for redemption and forgiveness even in the most evil individuals.
While forgiveness does not mean condoning or forgetting crimes, it prompts us to reflect on how we treat others and how we address certain types of crimes.
The reauthorization of FISA without requiring a warrant for surveillance involving American citizens raises concerns about privacy and government overreach.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Background
09:24 The Challenge of Forgiveness
15:22 Reflecting on How We Treat Others
Resources:
‘The Zone of Interest’ in Forgiveness
https://intellectualtakeout.org/2024/03/the-zone-of-interest-forgiveness/
Episode 17. The Forge of Freedom – Were the Perpetrators of the Holocaust Just Following Orders? - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IG4bv5WHVuA
The Zone of Interest | Official Trailer HD | A24
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-vfg3KkV54
Tags:
#liberty
#freedom
#2A
#tyranny
#evil
#forgiveness
#Christianity
#mercy
#personalresponsibility
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
45
views
Episode 116. Soft on Crime, Hard on Self-Defense? Indianapolis & the Fight for Gun Rights
Show Notes:
Episode 116. Soft on Crime, Hard on Self-Defense? Indianapolis & the Fight for Gun Rights
In this episode, Alex Ooley and Mike Ooley discuss two topics related to gun rights and self-defense. The first topic focuses on the push for soft-on-crime policies in Indianapolis, which is leading to a rise in self-defense cases. The officials in Indianapolis are upset that people are defending themselves and using deadly force against criminals. The second topic discusses a tragic incident in Nashville where a mother negligently shot and killed her daughter. The hosts emphasize the importance of treating all guns as if they are loaded and investing in quality holsters. They also mention the upcoming NRA Annual Meeting and the importance of supporting organizations like Gun Owners of America and Firearms Policy Coalition in the fight to protect gun rights.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Overview
01:02 The Rise of Self-Defense Cases and the Push for Soft-on-Crime Policies
08:08 The Importance of Treating Guns as Loaded and Investing in Quality Holsters
25:18 Supporting Gun Rights Organizations
30:08 Closing Remarks
Sound Bites
"The implication here is that the act of self-defense is just as bad as the criminal act that preceded it."
"Always treat all guns as if they're loaded."
"Invest in a quality holster, do the same amount of research or more on your holster selections as you do your firearm selection."
Resources:
IMPD sees rise in self-defense shootings across Indy | wthr.com
https://www.wthr.com/article/news/crime/indianapolis-law-enforcement-sees-rise-self-defense-shootings-impd-chief-chris-bailey-marion-county-prosecutor-ryan-mears-indianapolis-mayor-hogsett/531-d3f15498-60d0-4dfd-947d-98215a1253ea
Amy Swearer on X
https://twitter.com/AmySwearer/status/1775545667353489892
‘It’s a nightmare’: Nashville mother accidentally shoots, kills daughter, police say
https://www.wsmv.com/2024/03/25/its-nightmare-nashville-mother-accidentally-shoots-kills-daughter-police-say/
Home | NRA Annual Meeting
https://www.nraam.org/
NRA Elections | The Firearms Coalition
https://firearmscoalition.org/nra-elections-3/
Episode 64. Jeff Knox: Fighting to Save the NRA (improved audio) - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRfrssgmQl4
My 2024 NRA Ballots
https://onlygunsandmoney.com/2024/03/11/my-2024-nra-ballots.html
https://onlygunsandmoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/IMG_6492.jpg
https://onlygunsandmoney.com/2024/03/28/nra-ballots-due-in-one-month.html
Polite Society Podcast - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/@Politesocietypodcast
Crime Report for Indianapolis after NRAAM Rolls Through Town
https://www.ammoland.com/2019/04/crime-report-for-indianapolis-after-nraam-rolls-through-town/
Crime Prevention Research Center
https://crimeresearch.org/
Keywords
gun rights, self-defense, soft-on-crime policies, rise in self-defense cases, negligent shooting, treating guns as loaded, quality holsters, NRA Annual Meeting, supporting gun rights organizations
Tags:
#liberty
#freedom
#firearms
#lights
#handguns
#guns
#2A
#training
#personalresponsibility
#firstresponder
#law
#litigation
#lawfare
#selfdefense
#Indianapolis
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
78
views
Episode 115. What is The Presumption of Innocence? (rerun of Episode 7)
Show Notes:
Episode 115. What is The Presumption of Innocence? (rerun of Episode 7)
In this episode, Alex Ooley discusses the concept of the presumption of innocence and its importance to a civilized society. The presumption of innocence is the legal principle that every person accused of a crime is considered innocent until proven guilty. The burden of proof is on the prosecution to present compelling evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The host emphasizes that the presumption of innocence is essential to protect the rights of individuals and prevent unjust outcomes. He provides examples of cases where the presumption of innocence and due process safeguards were crucial in ensuring justice.
Takeaways
The presumption of innocence is a fundamental principle in a civilized society, ensuring that individuals are considered innocent until proven guilty.
The burden of proof is on the prosecution to present compelling evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Defense attorneys have a duty to provide a vigorous defense for their clients, regardless of their guilt or innocence, to protect the integrity of the legal process.
The presumption of innocence and due process safeguards are essential to prevent mob rule, trial by media, and unjust outcomes.
It is better for 10 guilty persons to escape punishment than for one innocent person to suffer.
Chapters
00:00 The Presumption of Innocence
05:41 The Legal Principle
06:43 The Burden of Proof
15:08 The Role of Defense Attorneys
Tags:
#liberty
#freedom
#law
#litigation
#presumptionofinnocence
#civilizedsociety
#burdenofproof
#legalsystem
#fairtrial
#dueprocess
#defenseattorney
#guilty
#mobrule
#trialbymedia
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
41
views
Episode 113. The Only Good One Is a Closed One: No Reform of Government Schools (with Marina Rocha)
Show Notes:
Episode 113. The Only Good One Is a Closed One: No Reform of Government Schools (with Marina Rocha)
In this episode, Marina Rocha discusses the problems with government schools and makes the case for their abolition. She highlights the lack of passion for learning and the indoctrination that occurs in these institutions. Marina also emphasizes the inefficiency of government schools and the negative impact on discipline and violence. She argues that positive rights, such as the right to education, can lead to confusion and undermine individual freedom. Marina concludes by exploring alternative options to government schools, such as homeschooling and private schooling. In this conversation, Marina discusses alternatives to government schools, including deregulation and homeschooling. She also talks about the history of public schools and their connection to war. Marina emphasizes the importance of parental rights and the need for resources and support for homeschooling. She also shares her perspective on the influence of Javier Milei in Brazil and the potential impact of inflation and the Federal Reserve. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of educational freedom and the challenges and opportunities in the current education system.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Background
01:26 Marina's Connection with the Mises Institute and Work as an Economic Advisor
32:02 The Socialist Calculation Problem and Inefficiency of Government Schools
36:43 Issues with Discipline and Violence in Government Schools
39:04 Positive Rights and Confusion in Public Discourse
39:24 Alternatives to Government Schools
39:29 Alternatives to Government Schools
41:03 Eliminating the Department of Education
42:34 Homeschooling and Deregulation
46:18 The History of Public Schools and War
49:03 The Rights of the Child vs. the Rights of the Parent
52:31 Resources for Homeschooling
59:36 The Influence of Javier Malé in Brazil
01:02:44 Inflation and the Federal Reserve in Brazil
01:07:42 Closing Remarks
Resources:
The Only Good One Is a Closed One: No Reform of Government Schools (Marina Rocha)
https://mises.org/mises-wire/only-good-one-closed-one-no-reform-government-schools
Marina Rocha - Mises Institute
https://mises.org/profile/marina-rocha
Marina Rocha - X/Twitter
https://twitter.com/m4rinarocha31
Rebel Educator / Hannah Frankman
https://twitter.com/rebelEducator/status/1772687279984660872
https://twitter.com/rebelEducator/status/1772509083771318724/photo/1
https://twitter.com/HannahFrankman
Kerry McDonald - LiberatED Podcast
https://www.liberatedpodcast.com/
Daniel Mitchell - A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words | International Liberty
https://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/cato-education-chart.jpg
https://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2009/10/15/a-picture-is-worth-a-thousand-words/
Homeschool Life, LLC -- Kids Don't Need School
https://twitter.com/Homeschool_LLC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vieJkvHhZo&t=1052s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cO66d6bHt1g
Episode 91. What Are Individual Rights? - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUWE3xYJhHc
Episode 14. The Forge of Freedom – Positive & Negative Rights - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkPhL_mZeA4&t=1142s
Education: Free and Compulsory | Mises Institute
https://mises.org/podcasts/education-free-and-compulsory
https://cdn.mises.org/Education%20Free%20and%20Compulsory_3.pdf
https://www.amazon.com/Education-Compulsory-Murray-N-Rothbard-ebook/dp/B0072QGTXW
FEE.org
https://fee.org/articles/education-in-a-free-society/
https://fee.org/articles/public-education-how-free/?gad_source=1
https://fee.org/articles/compulsory-schooling-is-incompatible-with-freedom/
No, the Brazilian Government Should Not Subsidize Carnival Festivities
https://mises.org/mises-wire/no-brazilian-government-should-not-subsidize-carnival-festivities
Tags:
#liberty
#freedom
#pandemic
#tyranny
#COVID
#government
#school
#unschool
#homeschool
#education
#mises
#austrianeconomics
#socialism
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
90
views
Episode 114. Glock Under Fire: Politicians Attempt to Shift Blame for Violence to Gun Manufacturers
Show Notes:
Episode 114. Glock Under Fire: Politicians Attempt to Shift Blame for Violence to Gun Manufacturers
In this episode, the hosts discuss the lawsuit filed by the city of Chicago against Glock, alleging that the company should be held responsible for the criminal misuse of their firearms. They also touch on the topic of soft on crime policies and the scapegoating of gun manufacturers. The hosts highlight the importance of individual responsibility and the need to be prepared to protect oneself. They also mention the creation of a National Extreme Risk Protection Order Resource Center and its potential impact on gun rights.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction
00:30 Transgender Day of Visibility and Easter
00:59 Discussion of Toronto Police Video
01:29 Lawsuit against Glock by City of Chicago
03:16 Advice to Be a Better Victim
04:15 Discussion of Glock Switches
06:15 Comparison to Lawsuit against Ford
07:10 Soft on Crime Policies and Scapegoating Glock
08:09 Discussion of Castle Doctrine
09:33 Lawsuit against Glock by City of Chicago
10:29 Discussion of Clearance Rate on Violent Crime
13:18 Discussion of Glock Switches
14:17 Government's Attempt to Shift Responsibility
20:06 Discussion of Lawsuit and PLCAA
24:39 Discussion of National Extreme Risk Protection Order Resource Center
30:13 Individual Responsibility and Tyranny
31:37 Quote from James Madison
39:46 Conclusion
Resources:
Toronto police advises residents to leave car keys within easy reach for thieves to avoid violence - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLAHY2n9IjY
Chicago Sues Glock for Endangering Chicagoans by Manufacturing and Selling Handguns that Can Be Easily Modified to Illegal Machine Guns | Everytown Law
https://everytownlaw.org/case/chicago-sues-glock-inc-for-endangering-chicagoans-by-manufacturing-and-selling-handguns-that-can-be-easily-modified-to-illegal-machine-guns/
City-of-Chicago-v.-Glock-Complaint.pdf
https://everytownlaw.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2024/03/City-of-Chicago-v.-Glock-Complaint.pdf
2024-0326_Multistate-Letter-to-Glock.pdf
https://www.nj.gov/oag/newsreleases24/2024-0326_Multistate-Letter-to-Glock.pdf
NSSF Calls on Congress to Investigate Conspiracy Behind Chicago's Lawsuit Against Glock – Bearing Arms
https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2024/03/20/nssf-calls-on-congress-to-investigate-conspiracy-behind-chicagos-lawsuit-against-glock-n1224261
Screenshot-2023-10-05-at-6.05.10-PM.jpg (JPEG Image, 750 × 966 pixels) — Scaled (78%)
https://freedomandprosperity.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Screenshot-2023-10-05-at-6.05.10-PM.jpg
Gun-v-Police.jpg (JPEG Image, 750 × 752 pixels)
https://freedomandprosperity.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Gun-v-Police.jpg
Gun control | International Liberty
https://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/tag/gun-control/
How They'll Try to Sue Glock Into Oblivion - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DwhVz7o9H8
Tags:
#liberty
#freedom
#firearms
#lights
#handguns
#guns
#2A
#training
#personalresponsibility
#firstresponder
#Glock
#Chicago
#everytown
#bloomberg
#law
#litigation
#lawfare
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
81
views
Episode 112. Beyond the Beam: Gun Digest, Weapon Lights, and Responsible Self-Defense
Show Notes:
Episode 112. Beyond the Beam: Gun Digest, Weapon Lights, and Responsible Self-Defense
In this episode, Alex Ooley and Mike Ooley discuss various topics related to self-defense and firearms. They start by following up on the previous discussion about weapon-mounted lights and the support for Ken Hackathorn's views. They then talk about the legal implications of pointing firearms and the practical and legal ramifications of using BB guns. The importance of training in self-defense is emphasized, and various training resources are recommended. The episode concludes with a discussion on the Second Amendment at the local level and a preview of the next episode.
Takeaways
Weapon-mounted lights can be a useful tool with proper training.
Pointing firearms, even with ambient light or light spillover, can have legal consequences and may escalate a situation.
BB guns and other non-lethal weapons can still cause serious bodily injury and have legal implications.
Training is crucial in self-defense and should not be overlooked when considering equipment.
There are various training resources available, such as Greg Ellifritz and Gunsite Academy.
The Second Amendment is being applied at the local level, and individuals should be aware of their rights and legal developments.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Follow-up on Weapon Mounted Lights
01:39 Supporting Ken Hackathorn's Discussion on Weapon Mounted Lights
12:44 The Legal and Practical Ramifications of BB Guns
25:41 Training Resources: Greg Ellifritz and Gunsite Academy
30:23 The Second Amendment at the Local Level
33:43 Closing Remarks and Preview of Next Episode
Resources:
Why you shouldn’t search with a weapon-mounted light on a handgun - Massad Ayoob Critical Mas EP40 - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yte_ynhPItY
Episode 110. Hackathorn on Lights: Are Weapon-Mounted Lights Overrated? - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VlfdNfsvaA
More Than Child’s Play: The Legal Implications Of BB Guns - Gun Digest
https://gundigest.com/handguns/personal-defense/legal-implications-bb-guns
ACLDN
https://armedcitizensnetwork.org/
Riding Shotgun With Charlie
https://www.youtube.com/@RidingShotgunWithCharlie
https://ridingshotgunwithcharlie.com/
Florida 150 Three Day Basic Pistol - Gunsite Academy
https://www.gunsite.com/classes/florida-150-three-day-basic-pistol/
Active Response Training – Greg Ellifritz | 2024 Classes | Active Response Training
https://www.activeresponsetraining.net/upcoming-classes
Rajon Rondo episodes
https://forgeoffreedom.com/2024/03/05/episode-106-rajon-rondos-arrest-bruen-the-2nd-amendment-and-gun-control-on-trial/
https://forgeoffreedom.com/2024/03/11/episode-108-prosecutors-challenge-2nd-amendment-in-rajon-rondo-case-part-2/
Tags:
#liberty
#freedom
#firearms
#lights
#handguns
#guns
#2A
#training
#personalresponsibility
#firstresponder
#gundigest
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
58
views
Episode 111. Why Would an Innocent Person Plead Guilty? (rerun of Episode 18)
Show Notes:
Episode 111. The Forge of Freedom – Why Would an Innocent Person Plead Guilty? (rerun of Episode 18)
This episode explores the topic of innocent people pleading guilty in the criminal justice system. The host discusses the widespread problem of innocent individuals accepting plea deals, influenced by factors such as overcharging, the trial penalty, lack of adequate defense counsel, overcriminalization, and prosecutorial threats. The plea bargaining system is examined as a tool that prioritizes efficiency over justice. The episode concludes with a study that highlights the concerning number of innocent individuals who falsely plead guilty. Overall, the episode raises doubts about the accuracy and fairness of the plea bargaining system.
Takeaways
Innocent individuals often plead guilty due to the power and leverage of the criminal justice system.
Factors such as overcharging, the trial penalty, and inadequate defense counsel contribute to innocent people accepting plea deals.
Overcriminalization and the disconnect between morality and law create a coercive dynamic in the criminal justice system.
Prosecutorial threats and coercion, including targeting family members, further pressure innocent individuals to plead guilty.
The plea bargaining system prioritizes efficiency over justice, raising doubts about its accuracy and fairness.
Chapters
00:00 The Widespread Problem of Innocent People Pleading Guilty
03:20 Factors Influencing Innocent People to Plead Guilty
05:42 The Trial Penalty and Public Defense Counsel
08:06 Overcharging and Lack of Recourse
09:47 Overcriminalization and Disconnect Between Morality and Law
14:02 Prosecutorial Threats and Coercion
15:49 The Plea Bargain as a Tool for Efficiency Over Justice
16:04 Study on Innocent Individuals Accepting Plea Deals
Tags:
#liberty
#freedom
#responsibility
#personalresponsibility
#suffering
#fortitude
#gratitude
#justice
#law
#libertarian
#libertarianism
#law
#crime
#punishment
#guilt
#innocence
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
34
views
Episode 110. Hackathorn on Lights: Are Weapon-Mounted Lights Overrated?
Show Notes:
Episode 110. Hackathorn on Lights: Are Weapon-Mounted Lights Overrated?
In this episode, Alex Ooley and Mike Ooley discuss the controversy surrounding weapon mounted lights. They address the misinterpretation of Ken Hackathorn's comments and emphasize the importance of understanding his perspective. The conversation highlights the significance of training and the need to be cautious of influencers on the internet. They explore the necessity of handheld lights and the different missions for weapon mounted lights. Legal considerations and the advantages of both types of lights are also discussed. The episode concludes with a reminder to seek knowledge from experienced individuals and make informed decisions based on personal preference and circumstances.
Takeaways
Understand the context and perspective of controversial statements before forming an opinion.
Training is crucial and often overlooked in discussions about equipment.
Be cautious of influencers on the internet and seek knowledge from experienced individuals.
Consider your personal circumstances and mission when deciding on the necessity of weapon mounted lights.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction
00:56 Controversy over Weapon Mounted Lights
05:47 Understanding Ken Hackathorn's Perspective
06:12 Importance of Training
07:35 Be Cautious of Influencers on the Internet
08:32 Considerations for Weapon Mounted Lights
09:31 The Necessity of Handheld Lights
18:36 Different Missions for Weapon Mounted Lights
20:22 Understanding Your Mission as a Private Citizen
23:18 Legal Considerations of Weapon Mounted Lights
25:40 The Importance of Handheld Lights
29:27 Advantages of Handheld Lights
32:45 Advantages of Weapon Mounted Lights
37:07 The Journey of Knowledge and Personal Preference
38:23 Conclusion
Resources:
Gun Gadgets - Addressing Trends Of Red Dots, Mounted Lights & Pocket Rockets - Gun Guys Ep76 - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQHgbltzGdA
Ken Hackathorn & Is an EMP Inevitable? | SOTG 1231
https://studentofthegun.com/premium-audio/radio/ken-hackathorn-sets-record-straight-and-is-an-emp-inevitable/
Handheld OR Handgun Mounted Light? - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqlfF2YSAOI&t=490s
Should I Keep a Light Mounted on My Pistol? | Active Self Protection Extra - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKLFUxTbrbA
Greg Ellifritz | Active Response Training
https://www.activeresponsetraining.net/issues-with-weapon-mounted-lights
https://www.activeresponsetraining.net/weapon-mounted-lights-and-a-dirty-little-police-secret
https://www.activeresponsetraining.net/more-info-on-weapon-mounted-lights
https://www.activeresponsetraining.net/light-discipline
Guest Shot: Thoughts on Lights for Concealed Pistols | Tactical Wire
https://www.thetacticalwire.com/features/cd3a5b45-6eba-4fc1-a581-0bc2a1734b97
A Weapon Light Might Be Wrong for a Defensive Firearm - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFya8vOZFOM
Get a Light: Don’t Shoot Your Loved Ones!
https://www.lowlightdefense.com/get-a-light-dont-shoot-your-loved-ones/
Indiana Code § 35-47-4-3. Pointing Firearm at Another Person
https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/2022/title-35/article-47/chapter-4/section-35-47-4-3/
Indiana Code § 35-45-2-1. Intimidation
https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/2022/title-35/article-45/chapter-2/section-35-45-2-1/
Tags:
#liberty
#freedom
#pandemic
#tyranny
#COVID
#government
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
68
views
Episode 109. Four Years Ago This Week, Freedom Was Torched (Jeffrey Tucker)
Show Notes:
Episode 109. Four Years Ago This Week, Freedom Was Torched (Jeffrey Tucker)
This episode reflects on the lockdowns implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the negative consequences and lack of accountability. It discusses the initial closures of venues and travel restrictions, as well as the government's role in exacerbating the situation. The extension of lockdowns, protests, and the impact on the economy and education are also explored. The episode emphasizes the need for reflection and learning from history to prevent similar situations in the future.
Takeaways
Lockdowns implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic had negative consequences and lacked accountability.
The government's involvement in the pandemic response worsened the situation.
Lockdowns had a significant impact on the economy, education, and public trust in institutions.
Reflection and learning from history are crucial to prevent similar situations in the future.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Reflection on Lockdowns
03:42 The Beginning of Lockdowns
05:03 Travel Restrictions and Closure of Broadway
06:25 Government Response and Control
08:50 Trump's Announcement and CARES Act
11:10 Extension of Lockdowns and Vaccine Resistance
13:21 Protests and Consequences of Lockdowns
16:14 Lack of Accountability and Media Coverage
18:19 Conclusion and Legislative Response
Resources:
Four Years Ago This Week, Freedom Was Torched ⋆ Brownstone Institute
https://brownstone.org/articles/four-years-ago-this-week-freedom-was-torched/
A Final Report Card on the States’ Response to COVID-19 - w29928.pdf
https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w29928/w29928.pdf
Diary of a Psychosis
https://tomwoods.com/book/diary-of-a-psychosis/
IGA | Senate Bill 234 - Disaster emergency
https://iga.in.gov/legislative/2024/bills/senate/234/actions
https://iga.in.gov/pdf-documents/123/2024/senate/bills/SB0234/SB0234.05.ENRH.pdf
TenthAmendmentCenter on X
https://twitter.com/TenthAmendment/status/1766878917745647791
Rand Paul on X: "Emulating Chinese communism is not the way to combat Chinese communism."
https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1768364204652728639
Deception: The Great Covid Cover-Up: Paul, Rand: 9781684515134: Amazon.com: Books
https://www.amazon.com/Deception-Great-Cover-Up-Rand-Paul/dp/1684515130
Tags:
#liberty
#freedom
#pandemic
#tyranny
#COVID
#government
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
66
views
Episode 108. Prosecutors Challenge 2nd Amendment in Rajon Rondo Case (Part 2)
Show Notes:
Episode 108. Prosecutors Challenge 2nd Amendment in Rajon Rondo Case (Part 2)
This episode of the Forge of Freedom podcast discusses the prosecution of Rajon Rondo for unlawful possession of a handgun. The host examines the charges, the motion to dismiss, and the response from the prosecutor. The prosecutor argues that domestic violence restraining orders can justify the deprivation of the right to bear arms, while the defense questions the constitutionality of such prohibitions. The host analyzes the historical analogies presented by the prosecutor and highlights the practical ineffectiveness of domestic violence restraining orders. The episode concludes with a reflection on personal responsibility and the importance of self-protection.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Background
00:52 Charges against Rajon Rondo
03:19 Response from the Prosecutor
04:58 Quotes by George Mason and Alexander Hamilton
05:27 Humorous Lawyer Joke
05:56 Motion to Dismiss the Unlawful Possession Charge
06:26 Burden of Proof and Historical Analogies
07:52 Prosecutor's Response and Annotations
13:14 Comparison to Felon in Possession Laws
14:44 Historical Analogies and Surety Statutes
21:28 Prosecutor's Arguments and Omissions
25:38 Opposing Conclusions in Federal District Courts
28:05 Relevance of Indiana Code and Persuasive Authority
31:39 Argument Based on Historical Regulation of Firearms
36:17 Citing Racist Gun Control Laws
40:47 Dissenting Opinion of Amy Coney Barrett
46:00 Severity of Burden and Personal Responsibility
53:16 Practical Ineffectiveness of Domestic Violence Restraining Orders
57:01 Conclusion and Reflections
Resources:
Prosecutors argue former UK, NBA star Rajon Rondo is not protected by 2nd amendment to carry a gun | In-depth | wdrb.com
https://www.wdrb.com/in-depth/prosecutors-argue-former-uk-nba-star-rajon-rondo-is-not-protected-by-2nd-amendment-to/article_b3e0298c-db44-11ee-8e4c-833679b62519.html
Kanter v. Barr
https://cases.justia.com/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/18-1478/18-1478-2019-03-15.pdf?ts=1552685416
Search results for "Rahimi" | Crime Prevention Research Center
https://crimeresearch.org/?s=Rahimi&et_pb_searchform_submit=et_search_proccess&et_pb_include_posts=yes&et_pb_include_pages=yes
https://crimeresearch.org/2023/11/on-americas-voice-live-with-steve-gruber-to-discuss-scotus-oral-arguments-on-rahimi-what-standards-should-be-met-to-take-away-someones-guns/
Episode 51. What is the Second Amendment? (rerun of Episode 9) – The Forge of Freedom
https://forgeoffreedom.com/2023/08/19/episode-51-what-is-the-second-amendment-rerun-of-episode-9/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nk4b1mXcQ-0
Episode 106. Rajon Rondo’s Arrest: Bruen, the 2nd Amendment, and Gun Control on Trial – The Forge of Freedom
https://forgeoffreedom.com/2024/03/05/episode-106-rajon-rondos-arrest-bruen-the-2nd-amendment-and-gun-control-on-trial/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPSQ2ZWU39w
Rajon Rondo was allegedly driving more than 100 mph, weaving through traffic before arrest | In-depth | wdrb.com
https://www.wdrb.com/in-depth/rajon-rondo-was-allegedly-driving-more-than-100-mph-weaving-through-traffic-before-arrest/article_c84c3b1a-c058-11ee-a93a-5734e81d8ca6.html
18 U.S. Code § 922
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/922
Indiana Code § 35-47-2-1.5. Unlawful Carrying of a Handgun
https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/2022/title-35/article-47/chapter-2/section-35-47-2-1-5/
United States v. Rahimi - SCOTUSblog
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/united-states-v-rahimi/
Clark Neily on X: "Among the worst things govt does is advance manifestly pretextual justifications for grossly unconstitutional actions.”
https://twitter.com/conlawwarrior/status/1764093590601380048?s=43
Tags:
#liberty
#freedom
#courts
#justice
#law
#firearms
#guns
#criminaljustice
#policing
#Bruen
#Rahimi
#Rondo
#2A
#drugs
#drugwar
#marijuana
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
117
views
Episode 107. Liberty and Responsibility
Show Notes:
Episode 107. Liberty and Responsibility
In this episode, Alex Ooley discusses an article titled 'Liberty is Meaningless Without Responsibility' by Tyler Brandt. The article explores the inseparable relationship between liberty and responsibility. Alex emphasizes the importance of personal responsibility in a free society and how it contributes to human flourishing. He also highlights the role of responsibility in learning, creating meaning in life, and building a better world. The episode concludes with a call to action to adopt more personal responsibility and protect individual freedoms.
Takeaways
Liberty and responsibility are inseparable in a free society.
Personal responsibility is necessary for human flourishing and building a prosperous society.
Responsibility leads to learning, meaningfulness, and a sense of purpose.
Adopting personal responsibility is crucial for protecting individual freedoms.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Article Overview
02:01 The Relationship Between Liberty and Responsibility
04:08 Responsibility as a Necessary Component of Liberty
06:43 Responsibility and Comparative Advantage
08:09 Responsibility Leads to Learning and Meaning
10:20 Frankl's Proposed Statue of Responsibility
13:54 Conclusion and Call to Action
Resources:
Liberty Is Meaningless without Responsibility - Foundation for Economic Education
https://fee.org/articles/liberty-is-meaningless-without-responsibility/
Tyler Brandt | People - Foundation for Economic Education
https://fee.org/people/tyler-brandt/
Liberty is Meaningless without Responsibility - Intellectual Takeout
https://intellectualtakeout.org/2018/02/liberty-is-meaningless-without-responsibility/
Tags:
#liberty
#freedom
#responsibility
#personalresponsibility
#suffering
#fortitude
#gratitude
#justice
#law
#libertarian
#libertarianism
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
42
views
Episode 106. Rajon Rondo's Arrest: Bruen, the 2nd Amendment, and Gun Control on Trial
Show Notes:
Episode 106. Rajon Rondo's Arrest: Bruen, the 2nd Amendment, and Gun Control on Trial
In this episode, host Alex Ooley discusses the arrest of NBA player Rajon Rondo in Indiana. Rondo was stopped for not having a license plate and was subsequently found to be in possession of marijuana and a firearm. The focus of the discussion is on the charge of unlawful carrying of a handgun, which is based on Rondo being subject to a protective order. The episode explores the relevance of the Second Amendment in this case and the challenges to gun control laws. It also highlights the lower standard of proof in protective orders and the importance of litigating Second Amendment issues.
Takeaways
NBA player Rajon Rondo was arrested in Indiana for not having a license plate and was found to be in possession of marijuana and a firearm.
The charge of unlawful carrying of a handgun is based on Rondo being subject to a protective order, which prohibits him from possessing a firearm.
The episode discusses the relevance of the Second Amendment in this case and the ongoing challenges to gun control laws.
It highlights the lower standard of proof in protective orders and the importance of litigating Second Amendment issues.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Background
01:04 Rajon Rondo's Arrest
10:04 Unlawful Carrying of a Handgun
12:01 Relevance of Second Amendment
15:41 Challenges to Gun Control Laws
22:44 Motion to Dismiss Based on Second Amendment
23:57 Importance of Litigating Second Amendment Issues
25:00 Government Pretext and Judicial Rationalizations
26:07 Smell of Marijuana as Probable Cause
27:04 Conclusion and Call to Action
Resources:
Rajon Rondo was allegedly driving more than 100 mph, weaving through traffic before arrest | In-depth | wdrb.com
https://www.wdrb.com/in-depth/rajon-rondo-was-allegedly-driving-more-than-100-mph-weaving-through-traffic-before-arrest/article_c84c3b1a-c058-11ee-a93a-5734e81d8ca6.html
18 U.S. Code § 922 - Unlawful acts | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/922
Indiana Code § 35-47-2-1.5. Unlawful Carrying of a Handgun
https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/2022/title-35/article-47/chapter-2/section-35-47-2-1-5/
United States v. Rahimi - SCOTUSblog
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/united-states-v-rahimi/
Clark Neily on X
https://twitter.com/conlawwarrior/status/1764093590601380048?s=43
probable cause | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/probable_cause
Episode 51. What is The Second Amendment? - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nk4b1mXcQ-0
Tags:
#liberty
#freedom
#courts
#justice
#law
#criminaljustice
#policing
#Bruen
#2A
#drugs
#drugwar
#marijuana
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
91
views
1
comment
Episode 105. From Beat Cop to Ballot Box: Mike ter Maat’s Libertarian Campaign for President
Show Notes:
Episode 105. From Beat Cop to Ballot Box: Mike ter Maat’s Libertarian Campaign for President
In this episode, Mike ter Maat, a Libertarian candidate for president of the United States, discusses his campaign and his ideas for police reform and criminal justice reform. He emphasizes the need for a principles-forward and professional campaign that differentiates the Libertarian party from Republicans and Democrats. Mike proposes sunsetting qualified immunity and requiring police officers to carry liability insurance as a way to hold them accountable and foster transparency. He also advocates for more competition and choice in policing by allowing communities to hire private sector organizations. Overall, Mike aims to change police culture and improve the relationship between law enforcement and communities. In this conversation, Mike ter Maat discusses the challenges of reforming police training, the issues surrounding no-knock warrants, and the failures of the war on drugs. He emphasizes the importance of political leadership and community involvement in shaping law enforcement policies. Mike also highlights the negative impact of bad public policy on society and advocates for individual liberty and personal responsibility. He concludes by inviting listeners to explore his campaign website and engage with the Libertarian Intelligence System application (LISA), an AI bot designed to promote libertarian ideas.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Background
03:01 Mike's Campaign for Presidency
06:40 Importance of Police Reform in Presidential Campaigns
09:45 The President's Role in Criminal Justice and Police Reform
13:52 Sunsetting Qualified Immunity and Liability Insurance for Police Officers
31:19 The Issue of Qualified Immunity
38:36 The Challenges of Reforming Police Training
43:04 No-Knock Warrants
51:58 The War on Drugs
01:06:42 The Impact of Bad Public Policy
01:09:23 Closing Remarks and Plugging Campaign
Resources:
Police & Justice Reform - Mike ter Maat Campaign
https://miketermaat.com/issues/police-and-justice-reform/
About The Campaign - Mike ter Maat Campaign
https://miketermaat.com/about-the-campaign/
Mike ter Maat - Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/mike.termaat.7311/
Mike ter Maat (@terMaatMike) / X
https://twitter.com/terMaatMike
Mike ter Maat - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCs8-rRseTINKUPYes8QUFZw
Mike ter Maat (@mike.termaat) - Instagram
https://www.instagram.com/mike.termaat
Home - The Gold New Deal
https://goldnewdeal.org/
LISA | Libertarian Intelligence System Application
https://libertarianintelligence.org/
Tags:
#liberty
#freedom
#courts
#justice
#law
#MiketerMaat
#libertarian
#libertarianism
#criminaljustice
#policing
#qualifiedimmunity
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
108
views
Episode 104. NRA Jury Verdict in New York Corruption Case
Show Notes:
Episode 104. NRA Jury Verdict in New York Corruption Case
In this episode, Alex Ooley provides an update on the trial against the NRA in New York. He shares quotes on freedom and discusses the power of thoughts and the consequences of absurd beliefs. Alex questions the authority and effectiveness of lockdowns during the pandemic. He delves into the details of the NRA lawsuit, bankruptcy, and the revelations of corruption within the organization. The jury verdict and damages are discussed, as well as the NRA's response and reform efforts. The next phase of the case and the hope for the NRA's reform are also highlighted.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Trial Update
01:11 Quotes on Freedom
03:05 Questioning Authority and Lockdowns
04:33 Consequences of Absurd Beliefs
05:02 NRA Lawsuit and Bankruptcy
08:41 Trial Proceedings and Verdict
10:43 Revelations of Corruption within NRA
12:17 Jury Verdict and Damages
25:13 Next Phase of the Case
27:01 Hope for NRA's Reform
Resources:
Attorney General James Wins Trial Against NRA and Wayne LaPierre
https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2024/attorney-general-james-wins-trial-against-nra-and-wayne-lapierre
About Us – NRA in Danger
https://nraindanger.wordpress.com/about/
NY Vs. NRA: The Verdict – NRA in Danger
https://nraindanger.wordpress.com/2024/02/23/ny-vs-nra-the-verdict/
NY V. NRA: Another Day of Trial, With Exhibits – NRA in Danger
https://nraindanger.wordpress.com/2024/01/30/ny-v-nra-another-day-of-trial-with-exhibits/
Exhibits
https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=VTonmjW0G0CNRFaHm_PLUS_0nMw==
The Jury Has Returned With A Guilty Verdict – (John Richardson: Only Guns and Money)
https://onlygunsandmoney.com/2024/02/23/the-jury-has-returned-with-a-guilty-verdict.html
NRA Responds to New York Trial Verdict; Decision Validates NRA’s Position Regarding Wrongdoing by Certain Vendors and Insiders | National Rifle Association
https://home.nra.org/statements/nra-responds-to-new-york-trial-verdict-decision-validates-nra-s-position-regarding-wrongdoing-by-certain-vendors-and-insiders/
Erik Uebelacker on X
https://twitter.com/Uebey/status/1761159660696940851?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1761159660696940851%7Ctwgr%5E008277d022242c29a0f269c003a917c5ec90a6cd%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fonlygunsandmoney.com%2F2024%2F02%2F23%2Fthe-jury-has-returned-with-a-guilty-verdict.html
New York jury finds Wayne LaPierre misappropriated NRA funds, cost group $5.4 million | Courthouse News Service
https://www.courthousenews.com/nyc-jury-finds-wayne-lapierre-misappropriated-nra-funds-owes-more-than-4-4-million/
Wayne LaPierre testifies he took ‘all-business’ safaris on the NRA’s dime | Courthouse News Service
https://www.courthousenews.com/wayne-lapierre-details-all-business-safaris-he-took-on-the-nras-dime/
NRA Elections | The Firearms Coalition (Jeff Knox)
https://firearmscoalition.org/nra-elections-3/
Jeff Knox (Episode 64)
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/l5MMhGXc4yE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRfrssgmQl4
Breaking: NRA & Wayne LaPierre Defeated In New York - What You Need To Know! - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vm8bxySuFEg
NRA, Wayne LaPierre found liable in lawsuit over lavish spending | AP News
https://apnews.com/article/nra-wayne-lapierre-trial-ruling-d4d9b950ee2cbd63380826eb2bf210e6
Tags:
#liberty
#freedom
#courts
#justice
#law
#tyranny
#2a
#NRA
#trial
#NYAG
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
164
views
1
comment
Episode 103. Problem-Solving Courts: A Critical Examination with Judge Houchin
Show Notes:
Episode 103. Problem-Solving Courts: A Critical Examination with Judge Houchin
In this episode, Judge Dustin Houchin discusses problem solving court. He highlights the lack of empirical evidence supporting the success of these courts and the methodological flaws in studies that claim otherwise. Judge Houchin also raises concerns about the separation of powers, as problem solving courts blur the lines between the judiciary and other branches of government. He argues that the judge's role in these courts undermines their neutrality and detachment, leading to potential enabling behavior and a lack of accountability.
Additionally, he addresses the perverse incentives created by problem solving courts. This conversation explores the creation and motivations behind problem-solving courts, the financial incentives and job concerns involved, the influence of corporate interests, the violation of the separation of powers, and the alternative of retributive theory. The conversation highlights the lack of solid evidence supporting the efficacy of problem-solving courts and the potential dangers of their implementation.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction of Judge Dustin Houchin
01:31 Problem Solving Courts and their Purpose
06:23 Different Perspectives on Drug Offenses
08:48 Effectiveness of Problem Solving Courts
10:37 Lack of Evidence for the Effectiveness of Problem Solving Courts
14:32 Methodological Problems in Studies on Problem Solving Courts
20:10 Creation and Implementation of Problem Solving Courts
22:59 Separation of Powers and Problem Solving Courts
26:37 Judicial Role in Problem Solving Courts
29:41 Enabling Behavior in Problem Solving Courts
32:12 Adversarial Process and Separation of Powers
34:38 Intrusion and Perverse Incentives in Problem Solving Courts
35:08 Judges' Role in Policy Making and Policing
39:36 Judges' Motivations for Creating Problem-Solving Courts
44:24 Financial Incentives and Job Concerns
47:12 Corporate Interests and Lack of Government Oversight
52:07 The Compassion Industrial Complex
56:29 Violation of Separation of Powers
59:19 Retributive Theory as an Alternative
01:01:59 Plug for Judex Substack
Resources:
Judex | Dustin Houchin | Substack
https://judex.substack.com/p/problem-courts?publication_id=1153073&post_id=141673914&isFreemail=true&r=2gxwto
The Problem of Problem-Solving Courts by Erin Collins :: SSRN
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3492003
Problem-Solving Courts: Fighting Crime by Treating the Offender | National Institute of Justice
https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/problem-solving-courts-fighting-crime-treating-offender
Episode 27. Crime and Punishment - A Retributive Theory of Justice with Judge Dustin Houchin - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJ3MIx-xcD4
Judex re Retributive Theory
https://judex.substack.com/p/retributive-justice?publication_id=1153073&post_id=110669882&isFreemail=true
https://judex.substack.com/p/retribution-and-status?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1153073&post_id=123168921&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email
https://judex.substack.com/p/retribution-and-drug-crimes?utm_source=%2Fsearch%2Fretribution&utm_medium=reader2
Welcome to The Contender! - Erin Houchin
https://erinhouchin.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-contender
The Contender with Erin Houchin | Podcast on Spotify
https://open.spotify.com/show/31fWKKIup2NxoQaJAqfzNJ
C.S. Lewis Quote
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/526469-of-all-tyrannies-a-tyranny-sincerely-exercised-for-the-good
Federalist 51 (James Madison)
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-10-02-0279
Federalist 78 (Alexander Hamilton)
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Hamilton/01-04-02-0241
Tags:
#liberty
#freedom
#courts
#justice
#law
#judge
#drugaddiction
#drugtreatment
#tyranny
#despotism
#problemsolvingcourts
#separationofpowers
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
65
views
Episode 102. Test Your Knowledge of U.S. Gun Laws
Show Notes:
Episode 102. Test Your Knowledge of U.S. Gun Laws
In this episode, Alex Ooley discusses a quiz on US gun laws published by The Trace, an organization that promotes gun control. The host acknowledges the bias in the quiz but finds it instructive. The quiz covers topics such as background checks, private sellers, failing a background check, psychological evaluations, timeframes for background checks, training courses for concealed carry, permitless carry, registration of pistols, ownership of certain weapons, minimum age for AR-15 ownership, federal regulators and recalls, and lawsuits against manufacturers. The host provides explanations and critiques for each question, highlighting the importance of individual rights and the potential dangers of gun control measures.
Takeaways
The quiz on US gun laws published by The Trace is biased but provides insight into the perspective of gun control organizations.
Universal background checks may not effectively reduce crime and can lead to universal registration, which is a step towards confiscation.
Requiring training or permits for the exercise of the right to bear arms infringes on individual liberties.
The Protection of Lawful Commerce and Arms Act protects gun manufacturers from lawsuits related to the criminal or unlawful use of firearms.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Background
05:38 Question 1: Background Checks
09:29 Question 2: Private Sellers
13:45 Question 3: Failing a Background Check
16:45 Question 4: Psychological Evaluation
18:28 Question 5: Timeframe for Background Check
21:00 Question 6: Training Course for Concealed Carry
24:24 Question 7: Permitless Carry
25:30 Question 8: Registration of Pistols
27:13 Question 9: Ownership of Certain Weapons
29:34 Question 10: Minimum Age for AR-15 Ownership
33:31 Question 11: Federal Regulators and Recalls
36:21 Question 12: Lawsuits Against Manufacturers
39:29 Conclusion
Resources:
The Trace:
Quiz: https://www.thetrace.org/2024/02/gun-regulation-america-background-check/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Trace_(website)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everytown_for_Gun_Safety
https://www.thetrace.org/about-the-trace/
https://www.thetrace.org/donor-financial-transparency/
David Yamane:
https://twitter.com/davidyamane/status/1757106563762815123
https://gunculture2point0.wordpress.com/2023/05/27/the-road-ahead-2023/
https://www.amazon.com/Gun-Curious-Professors-Surprising-Americas/dp/1476695873
https://guncurious.com/
https://www.amazon.com/Concealed-Carry-Revolution-Liberalizing-America/dp/096003837X/?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_w=ystig&content-id=amzn1.sym.cf86ec3a-68a6-43e9-8115-04171136930a&pf_rd_p=cf86ec3a-68a6-43e9-8115-04171136930a&pf_rd_r=130-7501097-1279548&pd_rd_wg=VPcRU&pd_rd_r=9ffe6aed-822f-48b3-9be6-3fa587f53127&ref_=aufs_ap_sc_dsk
https://gunculture2point0.wordpress.com/2023/09/28/my-podcast-appearances-cumulative-list-and-links/
https://gunculture2point0.wordpress.com/2020/07/08/gun-culture-2-0-or-how-a-liberal-professor-became-an-armed-american/
https://www.youtube.com/@LightOverHeat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyjApAbUX-4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Klzj2bVmxDk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFJfjI8tQhc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uNEJ-SDIPg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTCUXbJaEL4
Crime Prevention Research Center (John Lott):
https://crimeresearch.org/
https://crimeresearch.org/?s=universal+background+check&et_pb_searchform_submit=et_search_proccess&et_pb_include_posts=yes&et_pb_include_pages=yes
Tags:
#liberty
#freedom
#responsibilities
#personalresponsibility
#firearms
#guns
#training
#mindset
#2a
#rights
#selfdefense
#guncontrol
#tyranny
#despotism
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
68
views
Episode 101. After Covid: Twelve Challenges for a Shattered World by Jeffrey Tucker
Show Notes:
Episode 101. After Covid: Twelve Challenges for a Shattered World by Jeffrey Tucker
In this episode, host Alex Ooley shares an article by Jeffrey Tucker titled 'After COVID: 12 Challenges for a Shattered World.' The article highlights the need for a new citizen movement that rejects the authoritarianism and compulsion of the pandemic response. It discusses the successes and failures of the resistance, the issues of tech surveillance and censorship, the impact on money and banking, business enterprise, regulatory capture, public health, educational institutions, the deep state, crime and war, immigration, shattered lives, the history of the response, and the use of force as a policy tool. The episode emphasizes the importance of learning from the lessons of the pandemic and working towards a society that values voluntary interaction and minimizes the use of violence and force.
Takeaways
The pandemic response highlighted the need for a new citizen movement that rejects authoritarianism and compulsion.
Tech surveillance and censorship have been institutionalized, and the mass media has performed poorly during the pandemic.
The Federal Reserve played a crucial role in the pandemic response, and the push for a central bank digital currency raises concerns about a China-style social credit system.
The pandemic response was a boon for big business and a disaster for small business, highlighting the need for regulatory and litigation reform.
The deep state and regulatory capture have become pervasive, and public health measures neglected overall health and well-being.
The pandemic response disrupted educational institutions and highlighted the need for alternative approaches to education.
The trauma of the pandemic has shattered lives and communities, and the history of the response needs to be examined to prevent similar mistakes in the future.
The use of force as a policy tool during the pandemic raises concerns about the erosion of individual freedoms.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction
02:08 The Need for a New Citizen Movement
04:10 Successes and Failures of the Resistance
06:05 Tech Surveillance and Censorship
09:01 Money and Banking
11:10 Impact on Business Enterprise
12:03 Regulatory Capture
13:13 Public Health
16:16 Educational Institutions
17:43 The Deep State
19:14 Crime and War
22:08 Immigration
23:29 Shattered Lives
25:12 The History of the Response
27:10 Force as a Policy Tool
29:35 Conclusion
Resources:
After Covid: Twelve Challenges for a Shattered World ⋆ Brownstone Institute
https://brownstone.org/articles/after-covid-twelve-challenges-for-shattered-world/
Jeffrey A. Tucker, Author at Brownstone Institute
https://brownstone.org/author/jeffrey-tucker/
Links to Show:
Website:
https://forgeoffreedom.com/
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/forgeoffreedom
Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/forgeoffreedom
Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/theforgeoffreedom/
YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/@theforgeoffreedom
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/c/theforgeoffreedom
Podcast:
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/forgeoffreedom
Tags:
#liberty
#freedom
#responsibilities
#personalresponsibility
#happiness
#goodlife
#history
#COVID
#pandemic
#government
#lockdown
#rights
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
114
views
Episode 100. Involuntary Manslaughter: The Conviction of Jennifer Crumbley and Safe Storage Laws
Show Notes:
Episode 100. Involuntary Manslaughter: The Conviction of Jennifer Crumbley, Safe Storage Laws, and the Right to Keep and Bear Arms
In this episode, host Alex Ooley, discusses the case of Jennifer Crumbley, who was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter for the actions of her son, who killed four people at Oxford High School in Michigan. The case raises questions about the criminal liability of parents for the actions of their children. Alex also explains the different states of mind in criminal cases and the higher burden of proof required in criminal prosecutions. He also discusses the implications of safe storage laws and the importance of personal responsibility in preventing tragedies. The episode concludes with a call to preserve individual freedom and spread the message of liberty.
Takeaways
Parents can be held criminally liable for the actions of their children, as demonstrated in the case of Jennifer Crumley.
Criminal cases require a higher burden of proof and different states of mind must be proven, such as intent or negligence.
Safe storage laws, while well-intentioned, may have unintended consequences and can embolden criminals.
Personal responsibility, including arming teachers, can be an effective deterrent to mass killings.
Preserving individual freedom and spreading the message of liberty is crucial in preventing the erosion of rights.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction to the Case
02:27 Criminal Liability of Parents
03:22 Higher Burden of Proof in Criminal Cases
04:17 Different States of Mind in Criminal Cases
06:42 Criminal Negligence
07:11 Case Against the Parents
08:13 Unusual Case
09:19 Desire to Prevent Mass Killings
10:18 Responsibility of Firearms Dealers and Manufacturers
11:23 Safe Storage Laws
13:42 Critique of Safe Storage Laws
18:53 Importance of Personal Responsibility
19:22 Arming Teachers
21:18 Verdict and Sentencing
29:23 Gross Negligence and Involuntary Manslaughter
32:29 Conclusion
Resources:
Video shows moment Jennifer Crumbley is found guilty of involuntary manslaughter - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFFI_Lps4XU&t=81s
Jennifer Crumbley convicted in Oxford shooting deaths
https://lawandcrime.com/live-trials/live-trials-current/jennifer-crumbley-convicted-in-deaths-of-high-school-students-killed-by-her-son-in-oxford-high-school-shooting/
Michigan Involuntary Manslaughter Law - FindLaw
https://www.findlaw.com/state/michigan-law/michigan-involuntary-manslaughter-law.html
Is Guilty Verdict for School Shooter's Mom a Precedent or an Outlier? – Bearing Arms
https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2024/02/07/is-guilty-verdict-for-school-shooters-mom-a-precedent-or-an-outlier-n80241
Model Criminal Jury Instructions - criminal-jury-instructions.pdf
https://www.courts.michigan.gov/4ad42f/siteassets/rules-instructions-administrative-orders/jury-instructions/criminal/current/criminal-jury-instructions.pdf
Why the Case Against Ethan Crumbley's Parents Is So Unusual | TIME
https://time.com/6126647/crumbley-parents-charges/
Mens Rea - A Defendant's Mental State - FindLaw
https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-law-basics/mens-rea-a-defendant-s-mental-state.html
Actus Reus - FindLaw Dictionary of Legal Terms
https://dictionary.findlaw.com/definition/actus-reus.html
Michigan Safe Storage Law
https://www.fox2detroit.com/news/michigans-safe-storage-gun-law-begins-feb-13-what-to-know
https://www.michigan.gov/mdhhs/safety-injury-prev/firearm-safety/secure-storage-law
https://www.michigan.gov/mdhhs/-/media/Project/Websites/mdhhs/Safety-and-Injury-Prevention/Firearm-Safety/Firearm-Storage-Penalties.pdf?rev=530dcf33a80445c3845e764ad7b76fb4
John Lott re Safe Storage Laws
https://crimeresearch.org/2021/12/at-real-clear-politics-why-gun-storage-laws-would-do-more-harm-than-good/
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2021/12/07/why_gun_storage_laws_would_do_more_harm_than_good_146851.html
Links to Show:
Website:
https://forgeoffreedom.com/
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/forgeoffreedom
Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/forgeoffreedom
Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/theforgeoffreedom/
YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/@theforgeoffreedom
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/c/theforgeoffreedom
Podcast:
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/forgeoffreedom
Support the Show:
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/forgeoffreedom/support
Tags:
#liberty
#freedom
#responsibilities
#personalresponsibility
#firearms
#guns
#training
#mindset
#2a
#rights
#selfdefense
#safestorage
##manslaughter
#michigan
DISCLAIMER: This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, medical, or financial advice. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect the views of any organizations or individuals they may mention. The hosts and guests are not liable for any damages that may result from someone listening to this podcast.
160
views