DISMISS THE JUDGE AND VOID HIS ADJUDICATION
DISMISS THE JUDGE AND VOID HIS ADJUDICATION
For help with your situation click on the link here and fill out the form:
https://form.jotform.com/72196346394162
Thank you for your help in Restoring the Constitutional-Republic one county at a time.
PLEASE CONTACT US HERE ABOUT YOUR SITUATION: https://form.jotform.com/72196346394162
This link is in the description of the video.
In this important video we discuss how to DISMISS ANY CASE, GET OUT OF JAIL, IMPEACH THE JUDGE, VOID JUDGMENT, NULLIFY JUDGMENT, UNDER RULE 60(b)(4) REQUEST VACATION OF JUDGMENT
Every case that is brought by the STATE is void; for example, STATE OF FLORIDA v. JOHN DOE. That's right; that case is VOID.
Here's Why: In the Constitution of the United States, in Article III it establishes in two instances in which the United States Supreme Court has exclusive personal jurisdiction and that is,
1) anytime a foreign dignitary is named a party,
and,
2) anytime the STATE is named a party.
So anytime a STATE takes a side against you in any case, then the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction, exclusive personal jurisdiction. That means that no other court in the nation has authority to oversee that particular case.
Now in all cases, where the STATE has chosen to take a side such as Taking the side of the accuser; there's always two parties in a complaint. There's a party of the accuser and there's a party of the
accused. It's the petitioner and the defendant. So when the STATE chooses to take a side of the petitioner, then that means that it must recuse itself from acting as the judge in the case because Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution says: "In all cases in which a STATE shall be Party, the Supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction,"
So no other court has the authority to be able to oversee that particular case and the judges in every STATE were bound by anything in there which created that obligation and those judges had a duty and
obligation to recuse themselves anytime the STATE became party in the cause.
Failure to have the Supreme Court hear the case nullifies the case. It renders it void. And so under Civil Rule 60(b)(4), you're able to then request vacations of those judgments.
Every case where the Judge fails to uphold the US Constitution, which is a failure to perform his duty, is a violation of his Oath of Office. This is an impeachable offense. The judge is no longer in good standing.
The Judge takes an "Oath of Office" to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, within Article VI, it says specifically: "…the judges in every state shall be bound thereby anything in the Constitution or laws of any states contrary notwithstanding."
So as a result the Judge is no longer fit to continue in the office as a Judge and thus is immediately impeached.
So any actions performed from that moment forward under the court is obviously going to be void. It's going to be rendered void because no judge can continue to sit in his office after committing perjury because perjury is, of course, a violation of trust. So at that point, they no longer have jurisdiction.
Jurisdiction:
Jurisdiction is removed anytime that you have a judge that acts without jurisdiction he's at the point of "WARRING" against the Constitution and anything that's rendered from that moment forward is going to be rendered void and not valid.
Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
Judges and prosecutors have absolute immunity unless they totally lack subject-matter or personal jurisdiction in the case. A judge acting without subject-matter jurisdiction is acting without judicial authority. Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution”, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original].
Denied provisions in the constitution. $250,000.18 USC 3571
Violation of Oath of Office, $250,000 fine. See: 18 USC 3571
Conspiracy against rights:
In the case Barron v. Baltimore, the court said the "Bill of Rights, which is the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, that they are not a restriction against the state governments, but only a restriction against the federal government.
United States Bill of Rights: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bill_of_Rights#Application_and_text
Conspiracy against rights, $250,000 fine. See:18 USC 242
If your case was or is without a Grand Jury Indictment; Clause 1 of Amendment V says:
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury."
If the court failed to give you your Constitutional Rights; Article VI, it says specifically:
"the judges in every state shall be bound thereby anything in the Constitution or laws of any states contrary
notwithstanding." Failing to give those rights to the individual IS A CRIME.
Deprivation of rights under color of law, $1,000 fine. See: 18 USC 241
If your case was or is without a Jury Trial; Article III, it says: "the trial of all crimes, with the exception of impeachment, shall be by jury, and the trial shall occur in the state wherein which the crime is said to have been committed."
Article VI of the United States Constitution, it says specifically, "the judges in every state shall be bound thereby anything in the Constitution or laws of any states contrary notwithstanding."
So, the real hitch pin resides with state judges. The state judges, they swear an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, but within Article VI, it says specifically, "the judges in every state shall be bound thereby anything in the Constitution or laws of any states contrary notwithstanding."
So the Constitution establishes a contract. It's a social contract between the people. We gave it to the government, said governance in accordance with these procedures and processes. So what it does is it establishes obligations; because that's all that a law is. A law is simply an obligation.
So I have the obligation to not kill someone, or I have an obligation not to speed my car, or I have an obligation not to assault someone. If I breach my obligation, if I breach my duty, then that would result in a violation of someone's
rights. So rights always derive from another's duty to act, okay? So where there is no duty, there cannot be right. Now, an obligation can be seen from two different perspectives.
From the one bound, the obligation is a duty and from the one entitled the obligation is a right. So you don't actually have any rights until someone else breaches their duty to act, and that's really, really important here because most civil rights cases, they end up failing in procedural defaults because they want to come out and say that they
have rights, like I have this right that's been violated. But before you have that right, you must first establish that someone else had a duty to act, or else you have no case. You have no argument. And that's why most cases, civil rights in particular, that's why they fail in procedural default is that they fail to recognize the fact that before you have a right that has been violated, you must first establish that someone else had a duty to act, and they breached that duty, and as a result, then it caused a violation of your rights. And then you can move forward with
your case in particular.
And so, for the last 245 years, not one single United States citizen has ever been protected by all the provisions and guarantees of the United States Constitution, and that's egregious failure of the justice system, particularly headed by the highest court in our land.
So the way it works is that when the Supreme Court of the United States, being the highest court in the land, all of the courts within the jurisdiction of the United States all have to answer to it. So when they put out a ruling that's contrary to law or unconstitutional or illegal, then that would immediately impeach the judges.
Because remember, what it says is, in Article III, it says: "the trial of all crimes, with the exception of impeachment, shall be by jury, and the trial shall occur in the state wherein which the crime is said to have been committed."
Now, what does that mean?
It says that all crimes except for impeachment shall be by trial by jury. Why is it that impeachment is not included in the list? Because impeachment is a per se - by or of itself - incident.
You don't have to have a jury question whether or not the crime has been committed by simply virtue of failing to fulfill the obligations defined within the Constitution of the United States, failing to give those rights to the individuals IS THE CRIME.
What the judges are there to do to is to fulfill the obligations defined within the Constitution of the United States. They are to ensure that the people are given the rights. The people have the right to due process law because the judges in every state have the duty to ensure that those rights are provided, So the peoples rights derive from the Judges breach of duty. So when the judge fails to perform his duty and his obligation established by law and
Constitution in particular, then that results in a violation of the peoples right.
Failure to perform those obligations as defined within it, is a breach of legal duty. It's an impeachable offense. It's a per se offense. Therefore, you don't have to have a jury in place to be able to determine whether or not there's a finding of facts. The fact is they breached their duty which resulted in a violation of your rights and as a result, they're immediately impeached because Article III says: “that the judges, both the United States and of several states, shall maintain their office while in good behavior.”
Good behavior is defined as the avoidance of criminal behavior.
So the moment that a judge engages in criminal behavior, he's no longer fit to continue in his office and is thereby discharged.
Now, we know that perjury is the result of failure to fulfill the obligation. So anytime that they fail to do their job, because they promised, they made a promise through the oath of affirmation that they will do what the Constitution says, that promise is for a future date, a future time. And so if they fail to perform that at that future time, of course, that results in the violation of their oath which is the crime of perjury and they've already implicitly accepted punishment as a result of a failure to perform. So when they don't fulfill the promise, that results in the violation of the right. It's an impeachable offense. They're no longer in good standing and so as a result they're no longer fit to continue in their office and thus are immediately impeached. So any actions performed from that moment forward under the court is obviously going to be void. It's going to be rendered void because no judge can
continue to sit in his office after committing perjury because perjury is, of course, a violation of trust. So at that point, they no longer have jurisdiction. Jurisdiction is removed.
Anytime that you have a judge that acts without jurisdiction, of course, he's at that point warring against the Constitution and anything that's rendered from that moment forward is going to be rendered void and not valid.
So according to Civil Rule 60, which deals with judgments and the removal of judgments, a judgment is either valid or it is void. It's valid in all cases except for when the court rendered the decision when it lacks subject matter jurisdiction or personal jurisdiction.
Now subject matter jurisdiction is the right to oversee the type of case brought before it. So for instance, in the case of a death, you wouldn't take it to a small claims court because they wouldn't have subject matter jurisdiction to oversee the disposition of those deceased assets, right? They would take it to a probate court because a probate court is the one that would have, of course, subject matter jurisdiction.
Now personal jurisdiction is the right to oversee the parties involved in the dispute.
So in the Constitution of the United States, it establishes in Article III two instances in which the United States Supreme Court has exclusive personal jurisdiction and that is,
One: anytime a foreign dignitary is named a party and,
Two: anytime the state is named a party.
So anytime a STATE takes a side against you in any case, then the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction, exclusive personal jurisdiction. That means that no other court in the nation has authority to oversee that particular case.
Now in all cases, the state is chosen to take a side, right? Taking the side of the accuser, right? So there's always two parties in a complaint. There's a party of the accuser and there's a party of the accused. It's the petitioner and the defendant. So when the state chooses to take a side of the petitioner, then that means that it must recuse itself from acting as the judge in the case because Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution says: "In all cases in which a STATE shall be Party, the Supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction,"
So no other court has the authority to be able to oversee that particular case and the judges in every state were bound by anything in there which created that obligation and those judges had a duty and obligation to recuse themselves anytime the state became party in the cause.
Failure to do so doesn't validate the conviction. It actually nullifies it. It renders it void. And so under Civil Rule 60(b)(4), you're able to then request vacations of those judgments.
See Also: Crimes Committed Under the Color of Law
PLEASE CONTACT US HERE ABOUT YOUR SITUATION: https://form.jotform.com/72196346394162
This link is in the description of the video.
Quotes and dialog: A man is simply a product of his environment.
So if our leaders are leading us toward criminality, then we're going in the wrong direction, obviously. We need to turn, we need to go a different way. We don't want to be led into criminality because obviously, then we're going to start producing criminals as a result of it.
So before we can deal with the criminality of the people, we first must deal with the criminality of the leadership of this country. We need to have the country going in the proper direction by people that are choosing to be obedient to the law and not violate it. And until we do that, we can't actually hold people accountable because what they're
doing is they're acting outside of the law.
Anytime you act outside of the law, then that's unlawful. It's lawlessness. And so you can't have convictions where there is no law because they're already operating under law.
Part of what I'm about to explain is the hierarchy of law.
We've got a very specific structure of law that was supposed to have the Constitution of the United States, be the foundation and everything was to derive from that. The opposite of constitutionalism or the opposite of the Constitution would be case law or judge-made rulings.
And so when we have a flip, basically a flip of the architecture of our legal doctrine, where the Constitution is supposed to be the base and judges are supposed to go to it to determine whether or not a constitutional violation has occurred. And instead, they go to a judge-made ruling from 1884 to make a determination as to whether or not constitutional rights have been violated.
Obviously, we've got it completely upside down then. These judges, when they go to a judge-made ruling, a decision that's the opposite of the Constitution, to make a determination as to whether or not your constitutional rights have been violated that is absolutely contrary to the Constitution, and it results in a highly discriminatory system, a criminal enslavement system, as opposed to a criminal justice system.
Because then what happens is that then you have the ability for judges to alter or amend the Constitution of the United States based upon their own social, political, or public policy, which is something known as legal realism. And that is absolutely contrary to the Constitution, and it results in a highly discriminatory system, a criminal enslavement system, as opposed to a criminal justice system, which is exactly what we have today.
Therefore we must rebuild this temple of liberty. We have to rebuild justice. We have to flip it back over with the Constitution at the foundation and everything deriving from it. And unfortunately, that means that there's going to be a whole lot of cases that are going to have to be reconciled. They're going to have to be rendered void. So this is an opportunity for our country to start over. Start over without the slavery institution being a part of it. Because when our forefathers and founders, when they started our country, they started what was known as an egalitarianism type of government, which is the belief that all men are equal.
Well, unfortunately, when you have an egalitarianism type of government or form of government, you have to
have all men actually start out equal. And if you don't, then you have a discriminatory system, one that can actually create classes of people. And so we have the ability to perpetually discriminate built into the system. Fortunately, with an egalitarianism government, the law will ultimately treat everyone the same.
So, if we start out with enslaving people because our forefathers and founders refused to give up their property, then unfortunately, we're going to have a system that's going to have the ability to perpetually discriminate and result in an enslavement of people. And so ultimately, every single man, woman, and child will be enslaved by the system if we don't correct it and reconcile it. And this is probably the only opportunity we're going to have, but we've got to bring everyone up to an equal status. We've got to start over like it should have been done 245 years ago.
And that's what we seek to do. We are not doing it to destroy anything. We are not doing it because of money. we are not doing it because we think that these people need to get over on whatever it was that they did.
What we are doing here is what's in the best interest of the country.
We're trying to get us to move forward where we have a sustainable system, a sustainable life, where we can actually look up to the Constitution of the United States for our needs and our sustenance every day and know that we can have faith and believe in it because the system's adhered to it. Without that structure, we live in chaos and
we can't live in chaos.
We must have our leadership of this country abide by the laws of the United States because that's the only thing that binds the nation together. Each one of these states are bound by the laws of the United States. There's nothing else that does it. So, absent the faith in the Constitution of the United States, absent our belief in the Supreme Law of the land, there is no land. There is no nation. So, we need to return to the faith of our design system, okay?
So, this is the letter that remanded my case to the United States Supreme Court. The great philosopher Nietzsche once said, Those who fight monsters should see to it that in the process they don't become a monster.
There are two vastly opposing legal doctrines at work in America at this time.
One: Our system of government is founded upon the "government of laws" doctrine, which is constitutionally based. It's built upon the theory that in order for laws to be legitimate, they must be considered just and equal. This is the egalitarianism approach which our Constitution is framed upon. In order for all men to be equal, government and laws must first treat them equal. This is the way that our system is designed to work based upon a fixed set of laws and principles in which the courts and people adhere to and which every United States citizen is accustomed to.
Two: The opposite of the "government of laws" doctrine is the legal realism doctrine, which is very much alive and at work here in America, destroying our system of government and infringing on the rights of the people. Legal realism, of course, is the theory that law is not based upon a formal set of rules or principles, but instead upon judicial decisions, deriving from their own social, political, or public policy. This is not constitutionally based, as it does not permit the fair and equal treatment of people.
An excellent example of legal realism is the belief that a judge made ruling such as Hurtado v. California can alter the provisions or guarantees of the United States Constitution.
When one attempts to combat the doctrine of legal realism, they oftentimes utilize horrible judicial decisions, such as Plessy v. Ferguson or Dred Scott v. Sanford, whereby the United States Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger B. Tany stated in his dissenting opinion that, "blacks are not and were not intended to be included, under the word citizen, in the Constitution. Blacks are so far inferior that they have no rights which a white man is bound to respect. Slaves are private property protected by the Constitution."
I don't think there's a single United States citizen alive today who can help but feel shame and anger at the horrible words spoken by the highest member of the highest court in our land. There's no doubt that that decision came at a time of great conflict for a nation, and clearly biased in sympathy of itself.
The alteration of the Constitution in order to perpetuate slavery is not approved by God and should never be supported by good men.
What has happened has happened, but to deny it would be a great travesty. You see, a slave-based system cherishes ignorance because that's the only security for its oppression.
Slavery is the mortal antagonist to our republican institution. Truth is the only thing which people can be certain of, but truth doesn't cease to be true simply because no one has the courage to speak up to defend it, or because someone else disagrees with it. Truth is never dependent upon the consensus of opinion.
If a thousand people believe something to be foolish, yet one person ought to be true, it is still true. Truth can never be made a lie, and more than a lie can be made truth.
The truth is that slavery by any other name is still slavery. Simply re-titling it justice doesn't make it any less appalling. Changing it from a private institution to a state-run institution doesn't make it any more constitutionally acceptable. It is still slavery, and it is still a horrible injustice and wrong against humanity, regardless of what you call it or how you disguise it.
PLEASE CONTACT US HERE ABOUT YOUR SITUATION: https://form.jotform.com/72196346394162
This link is in the description of the video.
While we're on the topic of truth, let's produce some more truth.
In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, there were 8 of the 9 United States Supreme Court justices who all dissented the opinion that blacks are not people, and therefore not entitled to the provisions and protections of the United States Constitution. In this case, there was one single brave Supreme Court justice who dissented with the rest, stating, “our Constitution is colorblind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. With respect to civil rights, all citizens are equal before the law.”
This brave patriot was Justice John Marshall Harlan, and this wasn't the only time he found himself as the lone dissenter against every other justice on the United States Supreme Court. One other such instance was in the case of Hurtado v. California.
You see, the truth is that the same 8 of the 9 United States Supreme Court justices who said that slaves are private property protected by the Constitution, also said the United States citizens are not protected by the provisions and guarantees of the Fifth Amendment.
The truth is the same 8 of the 9 United States Supreme Court justices who said that blacks are not people, also said that the United States Constitution is not the supreme law of the land, and does not enjoy legal superiority over conflicting provisions with state constitutions and laws.
The truth is that the same 8 of the 9 United States Supreme Court justices, who said that blacks are far inferior to white men, also said that geographical discriminations are acceptable under our Constitution and government.
The truth is the same 8 of the 9 United States Supreme Court justices who said that blacks are not, and were not intended to be included on the word citizen in the Constitution, also said that states have the right to bridge the privileges and immunities of United States citizens.
The truth is the same 8 of the 9 United States Supreme Court justices who allowed their political interests for the advancement of an industry to cloud their good judgment, also put into practice a ruling intended to advance that industry under a different name, overstepping the separation powers and legislating from the bench in violation of United States Constitution and the oaths of the offices in which they serve.
George Washington voiced his concern about geographical discriminations in his farewell address whereby he stated: "In contemplating the causes which may disturb our union, it occurs as a matter of serious concern for the characterizing of parties by geographical discriminations whence designing men may endeavor to excite a belief that there's a real difference of local interests and views."
Foreseeing the potential for dissension here in America, Mr. Washington advised vigilance against the first dawning of every attempt to alienate any portion of our country from the rest or to enfeeble the sacred ties which now link together the various parts.
The bonds which unite us as one people are origin, language, belief, and laws. These are the four great ties that hold our whole society together. The Constitution binds the American people to goals that are incompatible with slavery.
President Abraham Lincoln said, "It has long been a grave question whether any government not too strong for the liberties of its people can be strong enough to maintain its own existence in great emergencies." Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall echoed this sentiment when he said, "Grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency when constitutional right seems too aggravating to endure."
The strongest bond which holds our nation together is the faith in the laws between us. This is not the United States of California or the United States of Washington. We didn't serve our country in the military fighting for Texas or Alabama. We were defending America as we are now and as we will continue until such time as God or death has relieved us of this obligation.
It's time now for the courts to do the same. Here's some more truth. The truth is the United States citizens are governed by the laws of the United States. The truth is the United States citizens are guaranteed the rights secured by and enumerated in the Constitution of the United States. The truth is that no person can be held to answer for capital or otherwise infamous crime unless on the presentment or indictment of a grand jury. The truth is that one brave Supreme Court Justice did the right thing and stood for American principles at a time of great peril and his sage wisdom can be trusted today. God bless Justice John Marshall Harlan.
The truth is the United States citizens can believe and have faith in the United States Constitution because the truth can always be trusted to fight battles. The truth can always defend itself as long as there's someone with the courage to speak it.
The role of government is to govern but that role to govern must be fair. Government ceases to govern when it chooses to take sides. It's no longer governing but rather ruling. Every citizen is entitled to fair and equal governing in the same way that every citizen is entitled to the equal protection of laws. Thomas Jefferson voices to us when he said, "Bear in mind this sacred principle that though the will of the majority is all case to prevail that will to be rightful must be reasonable that the minority possess their equal rights to which equal law must protect and to violate would be oppression."
To understand the rationale behind Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution which states, "In all cases in which a State shall be Party, the Supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction," we can turn to the author himself and the words that he published in The Federalist, Circular Number 10, New York Packet, November 23rd, 1787. The article is titled "The Union as a Safeguard against Domestic Faction and Insurrection." In the article James Madison said, “No man is allowed to be a judge in his own cause; because his interest would certainly bias his judgment, and, not improbably, corrupt his integrity. With equal, nay with greater reason, a body of men are unfit to be both judges and parties at the same time.” States cannot be and were never intended to be both judge and party at the same time because the bias prejudice impartiality which would ultimately transpire as a result of it. States cannot be both accuser and judge or else innocence will suffer.
So in the same way and for the same reasons why Tanawah M. Downing versus State of Washington and the current civil action is unconstitutional so also is State of Washington versus Tanawah M. Downing in the original criminal action is unconstitutional. If 1 plus 2 equals 3 is unconstitutional then obviously 2 plus 1 equals 3 is also unconstitutional. Simply rearranging the order of the parties does not magically change the representation of the parties.
Article 3, Section 2 of the United States Constitution clearly states, "In all cases in which a State shall be Party, the Supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction." State of ILLINOIS v. CITY OF MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN, et al. Syllabus
The State of Illinois has filed a motion for leave to file a bill of complaint against four Wisconsin cities and two local sewerage commissions for allegedly polluting Lake Michigan. Illinois seeks to invoke the Court's original jurisdiction on the ground that the defendants are instrumentalities of Wisconsin and that this suit is therefore one against the State that must be brought in this Court under Art. III, § 2, cl. 2, of the Constitution which confers original jurisdiction on the Court '(i)n all cases . . . in which a State shall be a party,' and 28 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(1), which provides that the Court shall have 'original and exclusive jurisdiction of (all) controversies between two or more States . . ..'
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1251(b)(3) the Court has 'original but not exclusive' jurisdiction of actions by a State against citizens of another State, and under § 1331(a) a district court has original jurisdiction 'of all civil actions wherein the matter in controversy exceeds $10,000 ...and (arises) under the Constitution (or) laws . . . of the United States.' Held: To Continue Syllabus go to: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/406/91
As a result both Tanawah M. Downing v. State of Washington and State of Washington v. Tanawah M. Downing are illegal and therefore unconstitutional and the only court with jurisdictional authority to resolve both matters is the court which had jurisdictional authority in the case to begin with which is the United States Supreme Court in accordance with the United States Constitution.
Our forefathers who framed our constitution were simple yet wise men. They weren't establishing complex principles or elaborate institutions to have only rich or educated or noble statuses could understand. You see they were simply trying to create a legal accounting system which adequately and fairly reconciled the debt owed to society. If you choose to violate the law you incur a debt to which you are charged and then called to account so you can pay the debt.
Now these are all very simple accounting terms. Now the way the debt normally works is if I want to purchase something from a store, a bill will first be generated which I sign and accept. Then my account is charged and I incur a debt which I then have to pay. This is a very simple method for transactions to which anyone can understand. However if the store charges the person's account without billing them first that is called fraud you must always bill before a charge is generated.
Now how all this applies in this case is that an indictment is called a bill. So absence in an indictment people are being charged fraudulently because they're not being billed first. Understanding this now anyone who claims that a bill of indictment is not first needed before charging someone's account doesn't understand the basic principles and practices of the system which they're dealing with.
As a result of this very basic fundamental element of our nation's legal accounting system being ignored millions of United States citizens have incurred illegal and fraudulent debt. America must address this flaw in our nation's legal accounting system. In accordance with rule 23 Class Actions of the https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_23 rules of civil procedure and in light of all the aforementioned evidence as well as the supporting evidence petitioner asked the United States Supreme Court to authorize the application of the class action advice in this habeas corpus proceeding.
Included within Addendum 3 the court will find the names of only a few of the thousands of petitioners who filed a written habeas corpus pursuant to TITLE 28 U.S.C 2254 between April 10, 2019 and September 2019 whose cases raised the exact same argument and who were illegally and unconstitutionally dismissed by the district court despite the jurisdictional error and who are all now entitled remaining of the case to United States Supreme Court for legal and constitutionally acceptable adjudication.
One last point for this video is that every single thing that we are advocating is consistent with God's divine attributes. Release of prisoners, return of exiled captives, love in lieu of hate, compassion not condemnation, forgiveness instead of vengeance, equity not tyranny. Content is derived Respectfully and peacefully, the servant of Justice, Tanawah M. Downing.
http://articleatlas.com is here to help you with your annual credit report, credit repair, cease and desist letter, credit history, credit rating. http://articleatlas.com
PLEASE CONTACT US HERE ABOUT YOUR SITUATION: https://form.jotform.com/72196346394162
This link is in the description of the video.
50
views
1
comment
Service on NY Attorney General on Behalf of Donald Trump
Service on NY Attorney General on Behalf of Donald Trump
Service on the State of New York Attorney General, Letitia James
Service is being provided on the State of New York Attorney General, Letitia James, on
behalf of Donald J. Trump, for the crimes of Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law (18
USC §242), Conspiracy to Deprive of Rights (18 USC §241), Kidnapping (18 USC §1201)
and any other crimes as ascertainable by the evidence on the record, by and between agents
of the State of New York.
The affidavit is being served by Tanawah M. Downing, Sui Juris, who was present at the
courthouse the day that Mr. Trump was arraigned and therefore, can order the arrest for the
felony’s committed in his presence, as he is empowered by Oath to support and defend the
Constitution for the United States of America against all enemies foreign and domestic,
taken on November 19, 1996 at Military Entrance Processing Station, Spokane,
Washington, United States of America. As an Agent empowered to enforce the laws of the
United States, this order for arrest of Alvin Bragg, Juan Merchan and the Deputy Sheriff
who performed the unlawful arrest on Mr. Trump in New York County, State of New York
on April 4, 2023, is fully with force and effect.
The purpose of the Grand Jury is to protect the innocent from hasty or malicious charges
by an overzealous prosecutor. It is not a proceeding intended to protect the accuser, rather
the accused. So, when 2 or more persons conspire for the purpose of preventing any party
in any cause from participating in said cause, the crime of “Conspiracy to Obstruction
Justice” has occurred. Therefore, when the Prosecuting Attorney, Alvin Bragg, conspired
by and between the accuser, Stormy Daniel’s (Stephanie), and then the Judge, Juan
Merchan, proceeded with a Grand Jury proceeding with the intent to prevent the accused
from being present to confront the accusations against him, by that crime, all actions or
decisions rendered from that moment forward, by the State, are void, wholly without force
or effect. A maxim of law is, “You cannot break the law in order to enforce the law.” By
the crimes committed by Agents of the State, in an act of Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice,
Mr. Trump was unlawfully brought before a judicial proceeding that lacked the authority
to speak the law. Mr. Downing hereby submits this criminal affidavit, as a Sui Juris
litigator, sworn to Support and defend the Constitution for the United States of America,
on behalf of Donald J. Trump for the crimes committed against him, in the pursuance of an
adjudication that by these crimes, are hereby rendered void.
General James, do the right thing, discharge the duties of your Office, fulfill the promises
that you have made to the People of the State of New York and hold criminals accountable
for their crimes. The People do not care what title they carry or Office they hold, criminals
must be held criminally liable for the crimes that they commit against the People.
Having been made aware of the criminal conspiracy, by and between Agents of your State,
you now have an obligation to act and failure to do so will make you complicit in the
crimes, due to your complacency.
Blessings to you and to yours.
112
views
The Rationale behind Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution
To understand the rationale behind Article III, Section 2 of the United
States Constitution which states, "In all cases in which a State shall
be Party, the Supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction," we
can turn to the author himself and the words that he published in The
Federalist, Circular Number 10, New York Packet, and November 23rd,
1787. The article is titled "The Union as a Safeguard against Domestic
Faction and Insurrection."
In the article James Madison said,
“No man is allowed to be a judge in his own cause; because his
interest would certainly bias his judgment, and, not improbably,
corrupt his integrity. With equal, nay with greater reason, a
body of men are unfit to be both judges and parties at the same
time.”
Article III Judicial Branch
Clause 2 Supreme Court Jurisdiction
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and
Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the Supreme
Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases
before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate
Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and
under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.
56
views
REDEEM YOURSELF - BECOME A SECURED-PARTY aka CREDITOR
REDEEM YOURSELF - BECOME A SECURED-PARTY aka CREDITOR
Become a secure-party a.k.a. Creditor by redeeming yourself from the commercial scheme being operated against everyone. Stop allowing government-corporations to survive that serve themselves under a socialistic bankrupt democracy. Transfer from Debtor-Slave to Secured-Party/Creditor by perfecting your sovereignty. Debtors own nothing, have no rights; only privileges. Recognize the commercial-program and operate within their system where there’s no money, just commercial-paper. Wage peace, not war.
Redemption involves disciplines of history, government, commercial-law, statutory-procedure, banking & finance, real-estate, and diplomacy. Each subjects has its own specialized-language. The war raging is one to influence what you think and how you act; a prison without bars, the ultimate form of leverage.
HISTORY: Anonymous-men, through their agents, employees of United States, Inc., and their sub-corporations, began, under the Lincoln-Administration, to hi-jack the Constitution and three branches of the Constitutional-Republic. A quasi-governmental corporate-takeover was engineered to take control of the 50 states, the banking-system, and money-coining & -printing. Civil-War, bankruptcy, and confiscation of the nation’s wealth, created a context/EMERGENCY for enslavement of formerly sovereign-people of the 50 formerly-sovereign-states under COLOR-OF-LAW.
NAIL IN THE COFFIN: 1938 - Supreme Court rulings were partitioned to prevent invocation of any law based on Common-Law, to be replace by the Uniform-Commercial-Code [U.C.C.], and courts of International Contract-Law/Admiralty. COUP 'D ETAT: you unwittingly aided and abetted by ignorance-of-history and -law, signed and acted yourself into this system of commercial-slavery. You do this when you get a job, get married, give birth, register your car, take out a mortgage, use Federal-Reserve-Notes, or join the military.
Are you a landowner in America? Warranty deeds & fee titles to your land read TENANT or TENANCY. The title or deed-document establishes your right as a tenant, not landowner and is drafted for transfer by a licensed BAR Attorney, just as it was carried out within the original English feudal-system from which you presumed yourself to have escaped in 1776.
Recover what’s been stolen from you, redeem yourself from a life of false-perceptions. Redemption wages peace with your adversary and turns the fraud that’s been perpetrated on you to your advantage, so you control your property and prevail in any venue involving agencies and employees of the state- and federal-government. Move from debtor to elevated-status of creditor.
212
views
DEFINITION OF REDEMPTION AND HOW IT HELPS RESTORE THE CONSTIUTIONAL-REPUBLIC
DEFINITION OF REDEMPTION AND HOW IT HELPS RESTORE THE CONSTIUTIONAL-REPUBLIC
Thank you for helping restore the Constitutional-Republic one county at a time.
In this video we will define and explain the importance of, Redemption.
Understanding and carrying out redemption is a primary key to restoring the Constitutional-Republic. Redemption makes you the superior title-holder of your life. and everything in it
Before we get started please note that the references to Biblical-scripture in this and other videos is to show the reader that the Biblical-connection to the operation of commercial-law from the past to today is constant and operates in all that you do.
What is the definition of Redemption?
There are a few definitions of redemption.
Redemption can be defined as, "Deliverance from the power of alien-dominion and the enjoyment of the resulting freedom; restoration to one who possesses a more fundamental right or interest."
The best Old-Testament redemption-example was the deliverance of Israel's people, today's American's, from bondage, from the dominion of Egypt's alien-power or today's Washington, DC.
We can look at the past and see the parallel to the present. What we want to accomplish today is the Redemption of all people of the United States from the US of A Corporation in Washington D.C. that is posing as a GovernMent-ControlMind and has militarily-invaded the United States via Northern Command whose J-2 is actively violating the 1974 Privacy Act by spying on U.S. Citizens.
The Expository Dictionary of the New-Testament defines redemption as, the natural sense of delivering of setting Israel free from the Roman-yoke. (See; Luke 24:21)
Redemption's commercial-definition may be stated as: "The recognition and action taken to redeem the debtor and all the property pledged, to take control, to file notice, to lien all the property, to restore right(s), title(s), and interest(s) in property to sever the commercial-bondage and acquire the standing and capacity to discharge all fines, fees, taxes, debts and judgments of the debtor and all commercial matters due to the US Bankruptcy a.k.a. "National-Emergency imposed upon the people without full disclosure and consent."
With redemption you become a Creditor and are no longer a Debtor.
As you can see, if we all redeem ourselves, our property, our land, and our titles then we can free ourselves from the tyrannical slavery that is being imposed upon us from a corporation in Washington the District of Columbia that is using police and military-force to usurp violent-control over us - akin to living in Nazi-Germany.
The Police and Military are employing a racketeering operation against us and the participants are the fake-courts, judges, policy enforcers, clerks of court, jails, tow truck companies, bail bondsmen and so called justice-centers that administer your trust without your fully-informed consent.
It's time to deliver ourselves from evil by way of redemption. In doing so we can restore the Constitutional-Republic one County at a time.
Thank you.
210
views
The Hidden Truth_ Government's Unseen Company
The Hidden Truth_ Government's Unseen Company
Government rapes, pillages and plunders you via attorneys, state agencies and the IRS. You believe Constitutional due-process and fairness still exists in the Law, courtroom and everything is the way it's supposed to be. They altered the facts of history in text books to hide agendas! A commercial scheme has been implemented by government without your knowledge or consent.
You live in a fictional-world and are dragged into the commercial reality of fines, fees, taxes, DEBTS, and court. Your blood and labor is converted into what you think is dollars along with the message, 'Go forth and be a good citizen/subject, do what you’re told, shut-up and be sure to vote!’ In this fictional-world of make-believe, the masses are subjected to playing a gigantic Monopoly-Game where there’s no real-money and bankers win.
Reliable sources, including attorneys, reveal Law has no bearing on what happens in court proceedings as much as the Procedure of which is only known to BAR members - judges, prosecutors, attorneys, defense-attorney you hire or who is compelled upon you, who extracts your time – community-service/slave-labor, money/bail-liens-levy-garnishment-fine-restitution, property/child-home-car-bank-account, your liberty/detention-jail-prison-probation.
FACTS: Attorneys may ONLY re-present your Debtor/artificial-person/entity. Court-proceedings are purely Administrative and not Judicial as the State and Federal organic-Constitutions mandate. In these Administrative-proceedings, these so-called courts refuse to explain the Nature-and-Cause of the action, never prove Jurisdiction and never allow you to have Counsel-of-your-Choice and never allow the jury to decide the law in a case/trial. Those Administrative-Tribunals are not Constitutional Judicial-Courts of Due-Process.
So-called, American-Politicians praise the passage of Bills no members of Congress read, or brought before the unbiased masses for scrutiny: because the Federal-Constitution is not for the-People. Bills pass that profoundly restrict freedom-of-speech, property-rights, and freedom-of-travel, but give public-servants more-power & authority without accountability to the people. Tax-Bills - Federal, State, property, traffic tickets, child-support payment come at you from them. Do you have the money to pay this? You might be jailed or forced to do community-service-work to PAY a debt-to-society.
274
views
AFFIDAVIT INFORMATION PART THREE - THE CLAIM PROCESS
AFFIDAVIT INFORMATION PART THREE - THE CLAIM PROCESS
Do i need a witness and bonded-notary when signing my affidavit?
Yes, both. You must sign your affidavits in front of a witness while also having them notarized by a bonded notary.
A bonded notary will register your affidavit in their books, which is important if we need to file a claim against the person we served with the affidavit.
Can we file an affidavit against the government?
Yes, the affidavit is the only way to file a tort-claim against law-breaking government-elected-officials and appointed-officials.
What happens if the person does not answer my affidavit?
The affidavit process is a three-step process. If you do not hear back after filing the first affidavit then the person is accepting your claim. You will need to follow through with the other two affidavits to complete the process. You must give the person three chances to dispute your affidavit.
What if the person refuses to pay the bill?
If the person has accepted the affidavit and refuses to pay the bill you sent, you will need to file a claim in court to receive your money.
What if the person does not pay the claim?
In order to have your claim paid you must supply the person with 3 bills. After the chance to dispute your affidavit has expired the person has accepted your claim. Now you must bill the person for damages in order to be paid.
Can i file a lien against the person?
Yes. Check with the courts in your area to find out how to file your claim.
Will a judge issue a judgement against my claim?
Normally you will must file a claim in court for a Judge to review the claim. The Judge will then order a judgement on the claim. Depending on the judgement is how you will proceed.
Thank you for joining us in restoring the constitutional-republic one county at a time.
33
views
AFFIDAVIT INFORMATION PART 2
AFFIDAVIT INFORMATION PART 2
More about the affidavit. Can anyone write an affidavit? What if someone disputes your affidavit. What if my affidavit knowingly contains false information. Restore the Constitutional-Republic one county at a time.
38
views
AFFIDAVIT INFORMATION AND FACTS
AFFIDAVIT INFORMATION AND FACTS - WHAT IS AN AFFIDAVIT AND CAN IT BE USED IN COURT. YES. IT IS A SWORN STATEMENT THAT YOU SIGN UNDER OATH IN FRONT OF A BONDED-NOTARY THAT YOU ARE AFFIRMING THE FACTS WITHIN AS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF YOUR KNOWLEDGE. THAT AFFIDAVIT MAY BE USED IN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND FILED INTO THE CASE.
113
views
How to Reclaim Your Soul from the GovernMent-ControlMind
How to Reclaim Your Soul from the GovernMent-ControlMind
They stole your name at birth and created a financial-bond and kidnap you at will as the surety for the bond. Your cinstitutionlly-protected rights displayed in 1933 and you only have the right to contract.
please wake up.
359
views
5
comments
THE CONSPIRACY CAFE Episode One HOLLYWOOD AND VINE the Ultimate Conspiracy Movie
THE CONSPIRACY CAFE Episode One HOLLYWOOD AND VINE the Ultimate Conspiracy Movie.
The entire feature is on Amazon's Prime Video at this link:
https://www.amazon.com/Hollywood-Vine-Kimberly-Pal/dp/B0794YPY5L
344
views
UNITED STATES LEADER Ronald Sends Secure Party aka Creditor Paperwork to US Treasury in Puerto Rico
UNITED STATES LEADER Ronald Sends Secure Party aka Creditor Paperwork to US Treasury in Puerto Rico.
I teach this entire process in my book at this link: TRHE SOLUTION AN INSTRUCTION MANUAL FOR SOVERIGNTY AND REEDOM.:
https://www.amazon.com/Solution-Instruction-Manual-Sovereignty-Freedom/dp/B089LYGZC2/ref=sr_1_1?qid=1706229522&refinements=p_27%3ARONALD+RUSSELL+FARNHAM&s=books&sr=1-1&text=RONALD+RUSSELL+FARNHAM&ufe=app_do%3Aamzn1.fos.006c50ae-5d4c-4777-9bc0-4513d670b6bc
309
views
UNITED STATES LEADER Ronald 2021 SUPER BOWL HALF TIME SHOW LOCKSTEP VAX DEATH SYMBOLISM
UNITED STATES LEADER Ronald 2021 SUPER BOWL HALF TIME SHOW LOCKSTEP VAX DEATH SYMBOLISM
Did the musical-artist, THE WEEKEND intentionally cast a spell on billions of living-souls across earth who were watching the halftime show? Does the performance show the ritualistic murder by v a x of the plan demic? Can you trust the US OF A CORP in D.C. that is posing as a ControlMind-GovernMent and has militarily-invaded the United States via www.northcom.mil ?
624
views
The Ronald Show Season One Episode 1 - Documenting The Collapse Of Life As We Know It
The Ronald Show Season One Episode 1 - Documenting The Collapse Of Life As We Know It. Started in 2009, this is the very first moment of this ongoing, documented 15-year journey and unscripted reality-show. From Palm Bay, Florida to Los Angeles, California, to Denver, Colorado, Columbia, Maryland, Queens, New York, Arkansas, Missouri, Tennessee, Las Vegas and many more. "I've been every where, man." And a lot of it has been on TV and in the movies. Get ready for the unexpected and surreal.
449
views
You Do Not Have Constitutional Rights
You Do Not Have Constitutional Rights. Have we been lied to about having rights as living-men and living-women, What is a sovereign? Why did the Fraternal )Order of Police invent the term "Sovereign-Citizen?" How do we protect ourselves from Corporations that are posing as GovernMents-ControlMinds? Did the US of A Corp in D.C. really militarily-invade the United States via Northern Command www.northcom.mil
Check out my book on Amazon, THE SOLUTION AND INSTRUCTION MANUAL FOR SOVEREIGNTY AND FREEDOM.
If you have a screenplay and book to write then check out my book on Amazon, HOW TO WRITE A SCREENPLAY IN 30 DAYS OR LESS.
507
views
MARITIME ADMIRALTY TRAINING FOR COURT
MARITIME ADMIRALTY TRAINING FOR COURT - Courts use legal-english and tactics to fool the general public and use multiple jurisdictions and force, coercion threats and violence. Here is important information you must know to help save you and your children from tyranny.
553
views
Brevard County Sheriffs Steal Private Property
Brevard County Sheriffs Steal Private Property. From living-Soul Rononymous. They stole his picture and biometrics and now are attempting to use it against him in their Administration Center dressed up to look like a court.
490
views
1
comment
Melbourne Florida Police Violate Commercial Code
Melbourne Florida Police Violate Uniform Commercial Code by arresting Honorable living soul who conditionally-accepted all of the offers made to him by the Melbourne Florida Police and Brevard County Sheriff's office supervised by the negligent Sheriff Wayne Ivey who is under investigation for misconduct in public office, a felony punishable by prison-time.
912
views
14
comments
United States Leader Ronald Abandoning YouTube Google and US of A Corp
United States Leader Ronald Abandoning YouTube Google and US of A Corp. Will you do the same & follow me on Rumble?
510
views
The Conspiracy Cafe Episode 10 JAN 25 2022 Ronalds Police Encounter and Victorious Defense
On January 24th 2022 at 10:25am EST in Palm Bay, Florida the Palm Bay, FL Police forced me to come to a stop because they claimed I ran a stop sign. I told them I am not a driver or operator of a vehicle for hire and I don't want need or have a driver license and if they want my name it's ten thousand dollars cash up front and I answer questions for 500 dollars per question. After a few minutes of me staying in honor and conditionally accepting their offers, they left without any incident or paperwork.
709
views
5
comments
U.S. LEADER SHOW Doctor Reveals the VaxNation Plandemic
U.S. LEADER SHOW Doctor Reveals the VaxNation Plandemic
: Ronald-Russell : Farnham is the owner of RONALD RUSSELL FARNHAM all rights reserved
THE SOLUTION AN INSTRUCTION MANUAL FOR SOVEREIGNTY AND FREEDOM
https://www.amazon.com/Solution-Instruction-Manual-Sovereignty-Freedom/dp/B089LYGZC2/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=the+solution+paperback+ronald+farnham+instruction+manual&qid=1592937496&s=books&sr=1-1
THE SECOND COMING OF THE MESSIAH book
: Ronald-Russell has written and published the non-religious Sequel-to-the-Bible that is the esoteric-road-map to take us through the second coming of the Messiah, the Awakening / Apocalypse, the rapture, and a thousand years of peace. Check it out on Amazon, here -
https://www.amazon.com/The-Second-Coming-Messiah-Awakening/dp/1466379693/ref=pd_rhf_dp_p_t_2_WVDD
HOW TO WRITE A SCREENPLAY IN 30 DAYS OR LESS book
Learn to write a screenplay, turn it into a book, and then make the movie. : Ronald-Russell's book teaches you to do exactly that. Buy it for yourself or a friend or family member that wants to write -
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1463440324/ref=s9_psimh_gw_p14_d2_i1?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=center-2&pf_rd_r=1ATQG80P8S1E54PHC5WM&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=1389517282&pf_rd_i=507846
HOLLYWOOD AND VINE dvd
: Ronald-Russell wrote, produced, directed and edited this action adventure feature legnth motion picture that puts a stamp on the Messiah character who goes to los angeles to save the world. Shot on location.
https://www.amazon.com/HOLLYWOOD-AND-VINE-the-movie/dp/B07D13TC4J/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1528047506&sr=8-2&keywords=dvd+hollywood+and+vine
HOLLYWOOD AND VINE book
: Ronald's book, HOLLYWOOD AND VINE is based on the final shooting script of his movie of the same title, HOLLYWOOD AND VINE. It contains the solution to end war and poverty and eliminate the Military Industrial Complex.
https://www.amazon.com/Hollywood-Vine-Messiah-Prevents-Nuclear/dp/1508471231/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1445023324&sr=8-2&keywords=hollywood+and+vine
RONONYMOUS dvd
Tired of being a slave of United States of America corporation that has invaded the United States via Northern Command www.northcom.mil? This documentary create Rononymous who devises the first step of the revolution for all living souls to capture their Birth-Certificates and remove themselves from state jurisdiction
https://www.amazon.com/Rononymous-Ronald-Russell-Farnham/dp/B01J4E22GC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1469808884&sr=8-1&keywords=rononymous
ALIEN ABDUCTION DOCUMENTARY dvd Part 1 UFO Abduction of Rob Amos
Ronald hosts this interview of Rob Amos who recounts his experience with a strange craft that approached him and his friend while fishing on a lake in Wisconsin - six hours of missing time during a physical abduction by other-than human entities or military masquerading as aliens
https://www.amazon.com/TRUE-STORIES-Episode-Abduction-Amos/dp/B01FT6W566
ALIEN ABDUCTION DOCUMENTARY streaming: Part 2 A Life Time of Alien Abductions
Is the United States of America working with other-than-human entities that are manipulating the DNA of unsuspecting humans by staging fake alien abductions? Watch my documentary and decide for yourself -
https://www.amazon.com/Stories-Episode-Lifetime-Alien-Abductions/dp/B07BGJTJZ2/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1521129991&sr=8-4&keywords=ronald+farnham
HOLLYWOOD AND VINE streaming
Please watch and share
https://www.amazon.com/Hollywood-Vine-Kimberly-Pal/dp/B0794YPY5L
RONALDS TEE-SHIRTS
BLEEP LIFE https://teespring.com/stores/bleep-life
MEME LIFE https://teespring.com/stores/meme-life-3
Wear my RONONYMOUS Tee-Shirt and other designs at Meme-Life and Bleep-Life
https://teespring.com/rononymous-meme-life?pid=2&cid=576
771
views
1
comment
HOLLYWOOD AND VINE Mega-Trailer
HOLLYWOOD AND VINE Mega-Trailer
This is the full three minute trailer for H & V mega-version.
3
comments
The Ronald Show August 10th 2021 FASTING - TO LIVE STOP EATING - DR PELZ
The-Ronald-Show-August-10th-2021-FASTING - TO LIVE STOP EATING - DR PELZ
WHY: There is a massive conspiracy to reduce the world-wide
population to Five-Hundred-Million
SUBSCRIBE-CLICK-LIKE-SHARE my vid:
SUBJECT: Ronald Show AUG 10 2021 FASTING - TO LIVE STOP
EATING - DOCTOR MINDY PELZ
SUMMARY: Live a healthy life & survive to 2025 - stop shoving
junk into your face hole three times a day.
ACTION: Join Doctor Mindy Pelz's Five-Day Fast-Training week -
subscribe to her fasting-lifestyle youtube-channel.
WATCH: this video
515
views
2
comments
The-Conspiracy-Cafe Episode-Two May-14th-2021 Who-Are-We-Where-Are-We-From-Why-Are-We-Here
Are we Living-souls having an apparently physical experience in Heaven? Are we living in base-reality and real flesh and blood? Are we avatars in a holographic quantum-computer simulation without souls who are just heling create a data-set?
These questions and more in this episode of The Conspiracy Café.
Wanna be free and sovereign then check out my book, THE SOLUTION: https://www.amazon.com/Solution-Instruction-Manual-Sovereignty-Freedom/dp/B089LYGZC2
703
views
Conspiracy Café Episode Three May 2021 United-States Under-Military-Occupation-by-NORTHCOM
NORTHCOM Headquartered in Colorado Springs; Its J2 is violating the 1974 Privacy Act
1.29K
views
7
comments