The Right Podcast

In this video, we delve into the legal missteps in District Attorney Bragg's case against President Trump, analyzing key news reports and legal perspectives. Join us as we uncover the intricacies of this case and provide insightful analysis. Don't forget to like and share this video to support our channel! #DABragg #PresidentTrump #LegalAnalysis

The Supreme Court hear arguments regarding the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. And whether the January 6th rioters should be charged with this act.

GPT In a groundbreaking ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court has endorsed Texas' controversial immigration law, empowering local law enforcement to detain migrants. This decision signifies a pivotal shift from the Biden administration's more lenient immigration policies, igniting widespread debate across the nation. Supported by the court's conservative majority, the verdict challenges the notion that immigration enforcement is exclusively a federal prerogative, drawing applause from Texas leaders who argue it's essential for combating crime and drug trafficking. Conversely, the decision has faced stern criticism from the White House and immigrant rights groups, highlighting a deepening divide over immigration policy. With the legal confrontation far from resolved and local officials grappling with implementation challenges, the ruling sets the stage for ongoing disputes over immigration enforcement and its implications for community safety and the federal-state dynamic.

The Right Podcast's thoughts on this week's SOTU Address

Super Tuesday Recap.

The Supreme Court on Monday handed a sweeping win to former President Donald Trump by ruling states cannot kick him off the ballot over his actions leading up to the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol — bringing a swift end to a case with huge implications for the 2024 election.

A nationally recognized polling company, which accurately predicted the outcome of the 2020 election, has suggested President Joe Biden is currently showing "significant" vulnerabilities and his chances for winning are slim at best.

Double standards refer to the application of different sets of principles, rules, or expectations to different individuals or groups, particularly when such differentiation is unfair or inconsistent. Biden was deemed in violation , but won't be charged because "Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury … as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory… It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him."

the major revelations of Robert Hur's report on President Biden's mishandling of classified documents, the lack of charges recommended despite the findings, and the political and media reactions to this situation. Include comparisons to former President Trump's and Hillary Clinton's cases to provide context and highlight the perceived double standards in legal responses.

In Nevada's Republican primary on Tuesday, Nikki Haley appeared to lose decisively to the option "none of these candidates," a troubling sign for her campaign as she seeks crucial electoral momentum against rival Donald Trump. With the majority of the expected vote reported, "none of these candidates" received nearly double the votes that Haley earned as of early Wednesday morning.

The Right Podcast Talks about 1) The Border 2) Fani Willis and the Trump case in Georgia 3) The Impeachment Vote on Mayorkas. Come join the discussion.

This is The Right Podcast's Introduction video.