Nobel Prize Protest 2023

Read more about Nobel Prize Protest and the event in Stockholm: https://nobelprizeprotest.com/2023/12/10/december-8th-marked-for-covid-vaccine-victims-remembrance-memorial-sites-proposed-worldwide/ A few hundred participated in the candlelight vigil in Stockholm to honor those who died from mRNA vaccines and to protest the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine being awarded to mRNA research. Torches were lit, speeches were made by MoDs party leader Andreas Sidkvist, who also initiated the Nobel Prize protest, and by the nurse Michele Wilcox. A minute of silence was also held for all who have died. Finally, all torches and candles were symbolically extinguished for all lives that have been extinguished. A floral wreath with the text Honoring All Lives Lost and Harmed by mRNA Vaccines was left at the entrance to the Nobel Prize Museum. Finally, Andreas Sidkvist encouraged everyone to make December 8th a day of remembrance next year for all COVID vaccine victims. This date is symbolically important because it was on December 8th, 2020, that the first dose of the COVID vaccine was officially administered in the world. Sidkvist also designated the Stortorgsbrunnen fountain in Gamla Stan as a memorial monument for those harmed by the COVID vaccines in Stockholm. He urged people to leave flowers and memorial candles there throughout the year in memory of those who were injured or died due to the COVID vaccines. He also encouraged people to designate a place in their hometowns to honor the memory of the deceased and remind everyone of the tragic crime committed in connection with the administration of the so-called COVID vaccines.

Läs mer om Jonathan Gilthorpe och Nobelprisprotesten här: https://nobelprizeprotest.com/2023/12/13/jonathan-gilthorpe-the-nobel-prize-in-physiology-or-medicine-being-awarded-for-research-on-mrna-vaccines/ Denna intervju innehåller Dr. Jonathan Gilthorpe som diskuterar Nobelpriset i fysiologi eller medicin, som tilldelats för forskning om mRNA-vacciner. Gilthorpe, en forskare med 30 års erfarenhet inom mikrobiologi, virologi, cell- och utvecklingsbiologi samt neurodegenerativa sjukdomar, uttrycker skepticism om säkerheten och effektiviteten hos mRNA-vacciner. Gilthorpe uttrycker oro över rapporterade biverkningar och dödsfall i samband med COVID-19 mRNA-vacciner. Han föreslår att antalet rapporterade dödsfall i Sverige på grund av COVID-vacciner är betydligt högre jämfört med andra vacciner under de senaste tio åren. Han kritiserar bristen på respons på dessa frågor och hävdar att människor skadas eller dör som ett resultat. När det gäller Nobelpriset ser Gilthorpe utmärkelsen som ett politiskt beslut avsett att främja mRNA-vacciner, vilka han påstår är lönsamma för läkemedelsföretag. Han hävdar att mRNA-vacciner alltid kommer att ha biverkningar och potentiellt dödliga konsekvenser på grund av deras verkningsmekanism, som han jämför med en hagelgevärsmetod. Enligt Gilthorpe kan dessa vacciner få kroppen att attackera sig själv, vilket leder till tillstånd som cancer, autoimmunitet och neurodegenerativa sjukdomar. Han nämner att han känner många människor som har upplevt biverkningar från COVID-19-vacciner och kräver att deras användning upphör. Han anser att det var för tidigt att tilldela ett pris för denna teknologi och kritiserar beslutet som politiskt. När det gäller vem som borde ha fått Nobelpriset istället, specificerar Gilthorpe inte någon särskild individ eller forskning men erkänner slumpmässigheten i urvalsprocessen för priset. Han kritiserar inte forskarna Katalin Karikó och Drew Weissman direkt, men antyder att deras teknologi har använts felaktigt av regeringar, regulatorer och läkemedelsföretag, vilket resulterat i skada och ett påstått mörkläggande av sanningen.

Read more about Jonathan and the Nobel Prize protest here: https://nobelprizeprotest.com/2023/12/13/jonathan-gilthorpe-the-nobel-prize-in-physiology-or-medicine-being-awarded-for-research-on-mrna-vaccines/ This interview features Dr. Jonathan Gilthorpe discussing the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, awarded for research on mRNA vaccines. Gilthorpe, a research scientist with 30 years of experience in microbiology, virology, cell and developmental biology, and neurodegenerative diseases, expresses skepticism about the safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccines. Gilthorpe raises concerns about the reported side effects and deaths associated with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. He suggests that the number of deaths reported in Sweden due to COVID vaccines is significantly higher compared to other vaccines over the past ten years. He criticizes the lack of response to these issues, asserting that people are being injured or dying as a result. Regarding the Nobel Prize, Gilthorpe views the award as a political decision intended to promote mRNA vaccines, which he claims are profitable for drug companies. He argues that mRNA vaccines will always have side effects and potentially deadly consequences due to their mechanism of action, which he compares to a shotgun approach. According to Gilthorpe, these vaccines can cause the body to attack itself, leading to conditions like cancer, autoimmunity, and neurodegenerative diseases. He mentions knowing many people who have experienced side effects from COVID-19 vaccines and calls for the cessation of their use. He believes it was too early to award a prize for this technology and criticizes the decision as being political. Regarding who should have received the Nobel Prize instead, Gilthorpe does not specify any particular individual or research but acknowledges the randomness in the selection process for the award. He does not criticize the researchers Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman directly but suggests that their technology has been improperly used by governments, regulators, and drug companies, resulting in harm and an alleged cover-up of the truth.

Read more about the Nobel Prize Protest: https://nobelprizeprotest.com/sv/2023/12/12/sasha-latypova-on-the-nobel-prize-in-physiology-or-medicine-being-awarded-for-research-on-mrna-vaccines/ Sasha Latypova, a retired expert from the pharmaceutical industry with 25 years of experience, expresses strong criticism of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine being awarded for research on mRNA vaccines. She argues that this technology has led to extensive health losses, including millions of deaths, injuries to hundreds of millions of people, miscarriages, sterility, reproductive issues, increased cancer incidence, and heart damage. Latypova accuses the vaccine technology of being dangerous, claiming it produces incorrect proteins that cause autoimmune diseases. Latypova argues that the Nobel Prize should instead be awarded to doctors who advocated for early treatment and warned about the dangers of mRNA vaccines. She mentions Dr. Mike Yeadon and Dr. Woodard as examples of individuals who made early and accurate predictions about the risks of the technology. She also criticizes the awarding of the prize as being politically motivated and not based on scientific merit. Latypova refers to a recently published article in the journal Nature, which she claims confirms her viewpoints about the shortcomings of mRNA technology.

A few hundred participated in the candlelight vigil in Stockholm to honor those who died from mRNA vaccines and to protest the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine being awarded to mRNA research. Torches were lit, speeches were made by MoDs party leader Andreas Sidkvist, who also initiated the Nobel Prize protest, and by the nurse Michele Wilcox. A minute of silence was also held for all who have died. Finally, all torches and candles were symbolically extinguished for all lives that have been extinguished. A floral wreath with the text Honoring All Lives Lost and Harmed by mRNA Vaccines was left at the entrance to the Nobel Prize Museum. Finally, Andreas Sidkvist encouraged everyone to make December 8th a day of remembrance next year for all COVID vaccine victims. This date is symbolically important because it was on December 8th, 2020, that the first dose of the COVID vaccine was officially administered in the world. Sidkvist also designated the Stortorgsbrunnen fountain in Gamla Stan as a memorial monument for those harmed by the COVID vaccines in Stockholm. He urged people to leave flowers and memorial candles there throughout the year in memory of those who were injured or died due to the COVID vaccines. He also encouraged people to designate a place in their hometowns to honor the memory of the deceased and remind everyone of the tragic crime committed in connection with the administration of the so-called COVID vaccines.

Introduktion till Sven Roman I en nyligen genomförd intervju diskuterar Sven Roman, en framstående barnpsykiater och överläkare, sina tankar om Nobelpriset i Fysiologi eller Medicin. Detta pris har fått stor uppmärksamhet för att ha blivit tilldelat forskare som bidragit till utvecklingen av mRNA COVID-vacciner. Romans syn på COVID-pandemin och Vaccin Roman delar sin erfarenhet som medicinsk specialist och hans tidiga reaktioner på COVID-pandemin. Han uttrycker förvåning över hur pandemin hanterades, särskilt med avseende på låg dödlighet kontra omfattande nedstängningar och brist på användning av behandlingar som kunde ha räddat många liv. Hans engagemang blir tydligt genom hans initiativ, som "Doktorsuppropet" från mars 2021 och deltagandet i internationella konferenser. Kritik mot Nobelpriset i Fysiologi eller Medicin 2023 Roman kritiserar starkt beslutet att tilldela Nobelpriset till de forskare som möjliggjorde produktionen av mRNA COVID-vacciner. Han hävdar att vaccinerna har lett till omkring 17 miljoner dödsfall globalt, en siffra han beskriver som en katastrof. Vem Borde Ha Fått Nobelpriset Istället? Enligt Roman skulle Peter McCullough, en amerikansk kardiolog, ha varit en mer lämplig mottagare av Nobelpriset. McCulloughs bidrag till behandlingen av COVID-19 och hans omfattande forskning på hjärtsjukdomar i samband med njursjukdomar framhävs. Romans uppskattning av McCulloughs arbete understryker hans engagemang för patientvård och vetenskaplig integritet. Avslutande Tankar Sven Romans starka åsikter och hans djupa engagemang i COVID-19-pandemins behandling och förvaltning ger en unik insikt i den pågående debatten om vetenskapliga upptäckter och deras erkännande. Hans synpunkter ger en annan vinkel på hur vi bör värdera och belöna medicinska framsteg, särskilt i krisens tider. Blogginlägg: Nobelpriset i Fysiologi eller Medicin och mRNA-vacciner - En intervju med Sven Roman Introduktion till Sven Roman I en nyligen genomförd intervju diskuterar Sven Roman, en framstående barnpsykiater och överläkare, sina tankar om Nobelpriset i Fysiologi eller Medicin. Detta pris har fått stor uppmärksamhet för att ha blivit tilldelat forskare som bidragit till utvecklingen av mRNA COVID-vacciner. Romans syn på COVID-pandemin och Vaccin Roman delar sin erfarenhet som medicinsk specialist och hans tidiga reaktioner på COVID-pandemin. Han uttrycker förvåning över hur pandemin hanterades, särskilt med avseende på låg dödlighet kontra omfattande nedstängningar och brist på användning av behandlingar som kunde ha räddat många liv. Hans engagemang blir tydligt genom hans initiativ, som "Doktorsuppropet" från mars 2021 och deltagandet i internationella konferenser. Kritik mot Nobelpriset i Fysiologi eller Medicin 2023 Roman kritiserar starkt beslutet att tilldela Nobelpriset till de forskare som möjliggjorde produktionen av mRNA COVID-vacciner. Han hävdar att vaccinerna har lett till omkring 17 miljoner dödsfall globalt, en siffra han beskriver som en katastrof. Vem Borde Ha Fått Nobelpriset Istället? Enligt Roman skulle Peter McCullough, en amerikansk kardiolog, ha varit en mer lämplig mottagare av Nobelpriset. McCulloughs bidrag till behandlingen av COVID-19 och hans omfattande forskning på hjärtsjukdomar i samband med njursjukdomar framhävs. Romans uppskattning av McCulloughs arbete understryker hans engagemang för patientvård och vetenskaplig integritet. Avslutande Tankar Sven Romans starka åsikter och hans djupa engagemang i COVID-19-pandemins behandling och förvaltning ger en unik insikt i den pågående debatten om vetenskapliga upptäckter och deras erkännande. Hans synpunkter ger en annan vinkel på hur vi bör värdera och belöna medicinska framsteg, särskilt i krisens tider.

https://rumble.com/v40pqjn-watch-the-speeches-from-the-candlelight-vigil-in-stockholm-december-10th-20.html

ntroduction to Sven Roman In a recent interview, Sven Roman, a distinguished child psychiatrist and chief physician, discusses his views on the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. This award has garnered significant attention for being awarded to researchers involved in the development of mRNA COVID vaccines. Roman's Perspective on the COVID Pandemic and Vaccines Roman shares his experience as a medical specialist and his early reactions to the COVID pandemic. He expresses surprise over the management of the pandemic, especially regarding the low mortality rate compared to extensive lockdowns and a lack of use of treatments that could have saved many lives. His engagement is evident through his initiatives, such as the "Doctors' Appeal" from March 2021 and participation in international conferences. Criticism of the 2023 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine Roman strongly criticizes the decision to award the Nobel Prize to the researchers who made the production of mRNA COVID vaccines possible. He claims that the vaccines have led to about 17 million deaths worldwide, a figure he describes as a catastrophe. Who Should Have Received the Nobel Prize Instead? According to Roman, Peter McCullough, an American cardiologist, would have been a more appropriate recipient of the Nobel Prize. McCullough's contributions to the treatment of COVID-19 and his extensive research on heart diseases linked to kidney diseases are highlighted. Roman's appreciation of McCullough's work underscores his commitment to patient care and scientific integrity. Concluding Thoughts Sven Roman's strong opinions and his deep involvement in the treatment and management of the COVID-19 pandemic provide a unique insight into the ongoing debate over scientific discoveries and their recognition. His viewpoints offer an alternative perspective on how we should value and reward medical advancements, especially in times of crisis.

Sign the petition and start your own Candlelight Vigil here: https://nobelprizeprotest.com/ Sophia Keivanlo delivers a message from Nobel Prize Protest Committe. Keivanlo expresses amazement at how their protest against the Nobel Prize is gaining global attention. She mentions that people from 75 different countries have visited their website, NobelPrizeProtest.com, and are organizing local candlelight vigils. These vigils are held in memory of those who have been harmed or killed by experimental mRNA vaccines in recent years. Keivanlo encourages more people to read about their cause on their website, where they can also register to host their own candlelight vigil. Alternatively, she suggests going to a local place of worship to light a candle and pray for a future marked by love, medical freedom, physical freedom, and mental freedom. This future should be one that can be proudly handed over to the next generations. She concludes by thanking the supporters and wishing them well.

🕯 Sign the petition and start your own Candlelight Vigil here: https://nobelprizeprotest.com/ Sophia Keivanlo delivers a message from Nobel Prize Protest Committe. Keivanlo expresses amazement at how their protest against the Nobel Prize is gaining global attention. She mentions that people from 75 different countries have visited their website, NobelPrizeProtest.com, and are organizing local candlelight vigils. These vigils are held in memory of those who have been harmed or killed by experimental mRNA vaccines in recent years. Keivanlo encourages more people to read about their cause on their website, where they can also register to host their own candlelight vigil. Alternatively, she suggests going to a local place of worship to light a candle and pray for a future marked by love, medical freedom, physical freedom, and mental freedom. This future should be one that can be proudly handed over to the next generations. She concludes by thanking the supporters and wishing them well.