The Unwashed Professor

The Democrat and a Brief History of Criminal Conspiracies in the United States

Read with me as I discuss the merits of Burton Folsom, Milton Friedman, and God's authoritative canon regarding the beauty of liberty in economics and in self-government. Then, take up the word and confound the enemies of truth, promote faith in Christ, and fight for liberty wherever you may be.

What indeed separates man from beast, if not metacognitive ability (the ability to think about one's own thoughts and evaluate one's choices), the Socratic method, and understanding fallacies and why we must avoid them.

One can observe Ann Coulter, a proponent of the Republican Party, sometimes mocking members of the Democratic Party by casting aspersions at their apparent inability to construct a syllogism, an essential trait for promoting and preserving logical reasoning. Coulter emphasized this point by implying that its members lack said ability, not because of any innate incompetence necessarily, but because of an aggregate preference among them for popular support, money, office, deliverance from justice from crimes, and the corruption of law I dedicate this video to the ongoing effort at the Unwashed Professor to inculcate and preserve logical reasoning as a mechanism for also preserving the agency of man in the United States. Specifically, I shall address the syllogism.

"It's the death of the West!" America, you screwed up, but it's not too late to turn back the tide of seemingly overwhelming sexual license given way to endless layers of subsidized idleness, critical theories masking evil as nominally good, and the promised invasion by peoples possessing lesser value systems.

We have lost our ability to reason because, in the West and in the aggregate, we have apostatized from the faith of our fathers. Inasmuch as we depart from believing our own senses, which lead to a belief in Christ and a divine origin, we simultaneously lose our ability to consider material facts. This explains why the most wicked in our midst are falling prey increasingly to epistemic relativism and the notion that one can change independent truth merely by thinking about it.

We continue our discussion on why we should no longer refer to the "Left" as merely a political or cultural phenomena. Those whom we refer to in this way comprise more simply an international faction of dissenters of the Judeo-Christian value system. Before they hated us, they hated God. After, they can only hate themselves for what they have done--the embodiment of and very definition of an endless hell or misery and guilt. Unless they repent in sackcloth and ashes, and accept the truth of all things, there is no hope for them and there is no hope for the West.

Richard Edwards published Competitive Debate in 2008, which expounds the merits of logic and the keeping of traditional stock issues by contrasting the exploitation of known fallacies by leftist factions and their embrace of the critique with logical reasoning and plain old truth. This comparison can help contemporary students of debate, law, and culture draw conclusions about how important it proves to preserve logical reasoning and the epistemology of material facts. The Unwashed Professor posits that the principal way for doing this entails encouraging a belief in self-evident truths, including those which lead men to believe in Christ and support the cause of truth and liberty, lest we lose our rights and our country forever.