Empowering SA

Discovery dismissed the credibility of doctors and scientists who don’t share their view. Who decides which sources are credible or not? Science is not determined by consensus; it is developed by application of the scientific method, which includes observation, experimentation, analysis, transparent sharing of information, independent review, replication by others, and debate. On Tuesday 7 June, the Chief Executive of NEASA, Gerhard Papenfus, participated in a panel discussion during the CHRO-SA’s virtual HR Indaba. The topic was Mandatory vaccinations: Where we are now and where we are headed'. Two of the other panellists were Dr Noluthando Nematserani, Head: Centre For Clinical Excellence at Discovery, and Steven Teasedale, Chief People Experience Officer at Discovery. Dr Nematserani invited the CE of NEASA to a further discussion to convince him that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the appropriate action, but she herself has since declined numerous requests for such a debate. This series of videos is about certain comments made by Discovery with regards to Covid vaccines and vaccine mandates. Discovery claims to have played a very important role in convincing South Africa that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the solution to the Covid-challenge. Participants Dr Herman Edeling (Neurosurgeon), Dr Stephen Schmidt (Physician), Prof Johann Holm (Engineer) and Gerhard Papenfus (CE of NEASA) discuss. Part 1: https://rumble.com/v1uc7zk-covid-19-the-controversy-continues.-origin-of-the-discussion-part-18.html?mref=tj4b5&mc=ckrmd Part 2: https://rumble.com/v1ukgd0-covid-19-untrustworthy-messages-from-the-authorities.-part-29-the-controver.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=2 Part 3: https://rumble.com/v1uksym-covid-19-were-sa-citizens-able-to-give-informed-consent-part-38-the-controv.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=3 Part 4: https://rumble.com/v1ulehc-covid-19-vaccines-as-a-covid-mitigation-measure.-part-48-the-controversy-co.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=4 Part 5: https://rumble.com/v1ulkas-mrnadna-vaccines-vs-childhood-vaccines.-part-58-the-controversy-continuess.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=5 Part 6: https://rumble.com/v1uly1i-covid-19-dismissing-different-views.-part-68-the-controversy-continues.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=6 Part 7: https://rumble.com/v1um0fw-the-status-of-the-vaccine.-part-78-the-controversy-continues.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=7 Part 8: https://rumble.com/v1um85y-vaccine-hesitancy-and-the-use-of-mandates-to-overcome-it.-part-88-the-contr.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=8

See the full discussion here: Part 5: https://rumble.com/v1ulkas-mrnadna-vaccines-vs-childhood-vaccines.-part-58-the-controversy-continuess.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=5 Discovery equated injection of SARS-CoV-2 viral genetic material with the vaccines we received as children. The fact is that they are totally different. Telling patients and employees that it is simply the vaccine you got as a child, is false. On Tuesday 7 June, the Chief Executive of NEASA, Gerhard Papenfus, participated in a panel discussion during the CHRO-SA’s virtual HR Indaba. The topic was Mandatory vaccinations: Where we are now and where we are headed'. Two of the other panellists were Dr Noluthando Nematserani, Head: Centre For Clinical Excellence at Discovery, and Steven Teasedale, Chief People Experience Officer at Discovery. Dr Nematserani invited the CE of NEASA to a further discussion to convince him that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the appropriate action, but she herself has since declined numerous requests for such a debate. This series of videos is about certain comments made by Discovery with regards to Covid vaccines and vaccine mandates. Discovery claims to have played a very important role in convincing South Africa that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the solution to the Covid-challenge. Participants Dr Herman Edeling (Neurosurgeon), Dr Stephen Schmidt (Physician), Prof Johann Holm (Engineer) and Gerhard Papenfus (CE of NEASA) discuss.

See the full discussion here: Part 5: https://rumble.com/v1ulkas-mrnadna-vaccines-vs-childhood-vaccines.-part-58-the-controversy-continuess.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=5 Discovery equated injection of SARS-CoV-2 viral genetic material with the vaccines we received as children. The fact is that they are totally different. Telling patients and employees that it is simply the vaccine you got as a child, is false. On Tuesday 7 June, the Chief Executive of NEASA, Gerhard Papenfus, participated in a panel discussion during the CHRO-SA’s virtual HR Indaba. The topic was Mandatory vaccinations: Where we are now and where we are headed'. Two of the other panellists were Dr Noluthando Nematserani, Head: Centre For Clinical Excellence at Discovery, and Steven Teasedale, Chief People Experience Officer at Discovery. Dr Nematserani invited the CE of NEASA to a further discussion to convince him that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the appropriate action, but she herself has since declined numerous requests for such a debate. This series of videos is about certain comments made by Discovery with regards to Covid vaccines and vaccine mandates. Discovery claims to have played a very important role in convincing South Africa that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the solution to the Covid-challenge. Participants Dr Herman Edeling (Neurosurgeon), Dr Stephen Schmidt (Physician), Prof Johann Holm (Engineer) and Gerhard Papenfus (CE of NEASA) discuss.

See the full discussion here: Part 5: https://rumble.com/v1ulkas-mrnadna-vaccines-vs-childhood-vaccines.-part-58-the-controversy-continuess.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=5 Discovery equated injection of SARS-CoV-2 viral genetic material with the vaccines we received as children. The fact is that they are totally different. Telling patients and employees that it is simply the vaccine you got as a child, is false. On Tuesday 7 June, the Chief Executive of NEASA, Gerhard Papenfus, participated in a panel discussion during the CHRO-SA’s virtual HR Indaba. The topic was Mandatory vaccinations: Where we are now and where we are headed'. Two of the other panellists were Dr Noluthando Nematserani, Head: Centre For Clinical Excellence at Discovery, and Steven Teasedale, Chief People Experience Officer at Discovery. Dr Nematserani invited the CE of NEASA to a further discussion to convince him that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the appropriate action, but she herself has since declined numerous requests for such a debate. This series of videos is about certain comments made by Discovery with regards to Covid vaccines and vaccine mandates. Discovery claims to have played a very important role in convincing South Africa that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the solution to the Covid-challenge. Participants Dr Herman Edeling (Neurosurgeon), Dr Stephen Schmidt (Physician), Prof Johann Holm (Engineer) and Gerhard Papenfus (CE of NEASA) discuss.

See the full discussion here: Part 5: https://rumble.com/v1ulkas-mrnadna-vaccines-vs-childhood-vaccines.-part-58-the-controversy-continuess.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=5 Discovery equated injection of SARS-CoV-2 viral genetic material with the vaccines we received as children. The fact is that they are totally different. Telling patients and employees that it is simply the vaccine you got as a child, is false. On Tuesday 7 June, the Chief Executive of NEASA, Gerhard Papenfus, participated in a panel discussion during the CHRO-SA’s virtual HR Indaba. The topic was Mandatory vaccinations: Where we are now and where we are headed'. Two of the other panellists were Dr Noluthando Nematserani, Head: Centre For Clinical Excellence at Discovery, and Steven Teasedale, Chief People Experience Officer at Discovery. Dr Nematserani invited the CE of NEASA to a further discussion to convince him that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the appropriate action, but she herself has since declined numerous requests for such a debate. This series of videos is about certain comments made by Discovery with regards to Covid vaccines and vaccine mandates. Discovery claims to have played a very important role in convincing South Africa that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the solution to the Covid-challenge. Participants Dr Herman Edeling (Neurosurgeon), Dr Stephen Schmidt (Physician), Prof Johann Holm (Engineer) and Gerhard Papenfus (CE of NEASA) discuss.

See the full discussion here: Part 5: https://rumble.com/v1ulkas-mrnadna-vaccines-vs-childhood-vaccines.-part-58-the-controversy-continuess.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=5 Discovery equated injection of SARS-CoV-2 viral genetic material with the vaccines we received as children. The fact is that they are totally different. Telling patients and employees that it is simply the vaccine you got as a child, is false. On Tuesday 7 June, the Chief Executive of NEASA, Gerhard Papenfus, participated in a panel discussion during the CHRO-SA’s virtual HR Indaba. The topic was Mandatory vaccinations: Where we are now and where we are headed'. Two of the other panellists were Dr Noluthando Nematserani, Head: Centre For Clinical Excellence at Discovery, and Steven Teasedale, Chief People Experience Officer at Discovery. Dr Nematserani invited the CE of NEASA to a further discussion to convince him that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the appropriate action, but she herself has since declined numerous requests for such a debate. This series of videos is about certain comments made by Discovery with regards to Covid vaccines and vaccine mandates. Discovery claims to have played a very important role in convincing South Africa that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the solution to the Covid-challenge. Participants Dr Herman Edeling (Neurosurgeon), Dr Stephen Schmidt (Physician), Prof Johann Holm (Engineer) and Gerhard Papenfus (CE of NEASA) discuss.

Dr Herman Edeling (Neurosurgeon) and Prof Johann Holm (Engineer) discuss the effects of the booster shot in Australia. View the full discussion here: https://rumble.com/v1ulehc-covid-19-vaccines-as-a-covid-mitigation-measure.-part-48-the-controversy-co.html

Pfizer Documents: 375% more side effects in the TREATMENT group (got the v**) vs the PLACEBO group (didn't get the v**) See the full conversation here: Part 3/8 COVID-19: Were SA citizens able to give informed consent? | The Controversy Continues https://rumble.com/v1uksym-covid-19-were-sa-citizens-able-to-give-informed-consent-part-38-the-controv.html Were Discovery’s remarks about the vaccine’s safety and effectiveness based on their own research or were they simply repeating other authorities’ opinion? Was their own opinion based on facts, science, studies or any rational explanations? Have the authorities shared sufficient and trustworthy information with the public to enable them to make informed decisions about Covid-treatment? It is absurd to mandate something for which the safety and efficacy trials have not been completed. On Tuesday 7 June, the Chief Executive of NEASA, Gerhard Papenfus, participated in a panel discussion during the CHRO-SA’s virtual HR Indaba. The topic was Mandatory vaccinations: Where we are now and where we are headed'. Two of the other panellists were Dr Noluthando Nematserani, Head: Centre For Clinical Excellence at Discovery, and Steven Teasedale, Chief People Experience Officer at Discovery. Dr Nematserani invited the CE of NEASA to a further discussion to convince him that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the appropriate action, but she herself has since declined numerous requests for such a debate. This series of videos is about certain comments made by Discovery with regards to Covid vaccines and vaccine mandates. Discovery claims to have played a very important role in convincing South Africa that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the solution to the Covid-challenge. Participants Dr Herman Edeling (Neurosurgeon), Dr Stephen Schmidt (Physician), Prof Johann Holm (Engineer) and Gerhard Papenfus (CE of NEASA) discuss. Part 1: https://rumble.com/v1uc7zk-covid-19-the-controversy-continues.-origin-of-the-discussion-part-18.html?mref=tj4b5&mc=ckrmd Part 2: https://rumble.com/v1ukgd0-covid-19-untrustworthy-messages-from-the-authorities.-part-29-the-controver.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=2 Part 3: https://rumble.com/v1uksym-covid-19-were-sa-citizens-able-to-give-informed-consent-part-38-the-controv.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=3 Part 4: https://rumble.com/v1ulehc-covid-19-vaccines-as-a-covid-mitigation-measure.-part-48-the-controversy-co.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=4 Part 5: https://rumble.com/v1ulkas-mrnadna-vaccines-vs-childhood-vaccines.-part-58-the-controversy-continuess.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=5 Part 6: https://rumble.com/v1uly1i-covid-19-dismissing-different-views.-part-68-the-controversy-continues.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=6 Part 7: https://rumble.com/v1um0fw-the-status-of-the-vaccine.-part-78-the-controversy-continues.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=7 Part 8: https://rumble.com/v1um85y-vaccine-hesitancy-and-the-use-of-mandates-to-overcome-it.-part-88-the-contr.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=8

The vaccination rate in the US is 80% vs15% in Niger (Africa). Accumulated proportional Covid death rate in US is 3,166 per million and 12 per million in Niger. See the full conversation here: Part 3/8 COVID-19: Were SA citizens able to give informed consent? | The Controversy Continues https://rumble.com/v1uksym-covid-19-were-sa-citizens-able-to-give-informed-consent-part-38-the-controv.html

What is the status of the so-called ‘vaccine’? It is still in an experimental phase because the safety and efficacy data has not been established. If an experiment takes until the end of 2023, then SAHPRA can’t tell the country in 2022 that it is not experimental anymore. It will be experimental until the experiment is finished. The laws of man cannot change the laws of nature. On Tuesday 7 June, the Chief Executive of NEASA, Gerhard Papenfus, participated in a panel discussion during the CHRO-SA’s virtual HR Indaba. The topic was Mandatory vaccinations: Where we are now and where we are headed'. Two of the other panellists were Dr Noluthando Nematserani, Head: Centre For Clinical Excellence at Discovery, and Steven Teasedale, Chief People Experience Officer at Discovery. Dr Nematserani invited the CE of NEASA to a further discussion to convince him that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the appropriate action, but she herself has since declined numerous requests for such a debate. This series of videos is about certain comments made by Discovery with regards to Covid vaccines and vaccine mandates. Discovery claims to have played a very important role in convincing South Africa that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the solution to the Covid-challenge. Participants Dr Herman Edeling (Neurosurgeon), Dr Stephen Schmidt (Physician), Prof Johann Holm (Engineer) and Gerhard Papenfus (CE of NEASA) discuss. Part 1: https://rumble.com/v1uc7zk-covid-19-the-controversy-continues.-origin-of-the-discussion-part-18.html?mref=tj4b5&mc=ckrmd Part 2: https://rumble.com/v1ukgd0-covid-19-untrustworthy-messages-from-the-authorities.-part-29-the-controver.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=2 Part 3: https://rumble.com/v1uksym-covid-19-were-sa-citizens-able-to-give-informed-consent-part-38-the-controv.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=3 Part 4: https://rumble.com/v1ulehc-covid-19-vaccines-as-a-covid-mitigation-measure.-part-48-the-controversy-co.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=4 Part 5: https://rumble.com/v1ulkas-mrnadna-vaccines-vs-childhood-vaccines.-part-58-the-controversy-continuess.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=5 Part 6: https://rumble.com/v1uly1i-covid-19-dismissing-different-views.-part-68-the-controversy-continues.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=6 Part 7: https://rumble.com/v1um0fw-the-status-of-the-vaccine.-part-78-the-controversy-continues.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=7 Part 8: https://rumble.com/v1um85y-vaccine-hesitancy-and-the-use-of-mandates-to-overcome-it.-part-88-the-contr.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=8

Mandates were used to get acceptance and bypass hesitancy. What does the law say about it? Do we have to have informed consent in the workplace being exposed to a specific biohazard or harm? You can’t use a workplace and the need for someone to earn an income to force or coerce them into taking a specific treatment. On Tuesday 7 June, the Chief Executive of NEASA, Gerhard Papenfus, participated in a panel discussion during the CHRO-SA’s virtual HR Indaba. The topic was Mandatory vaccinations: Where we are now and where we are headed'. Two of the other panellists were Dr Noluthando Nematserani, Head: Centre For Clinical Excellence at Discovery, and Steven Teasedale, Chief People Experience Officer at Discovery. Dr Nematserani invited the CE of NEASA to a further discussion to convince him that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the appropriate action, but she herself has since declined numerous requests for such a debate. This series of videos is about certain comments made by Discovery with regards to Covid vaccines and vaccine mandates. Discovery claims to have played a very important role in convincing South Africa that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the solution to the Covid-challenge. Participants Dr Herman Edeling (Neurosurgeon), Dr Stephen Schmidt (Physician), Prof Johann Holm (Engineer) and Gerhard Papenfus (CE of NEASA) discuss. Part 1: https://rumble.com/v1uc7zk-covid-19-the-controversy-continues.-origin-of-the-discussion-part-18.html?mref=tj4b5&mc=ckrmd Part 2: https://rumble.com/v1ukgd0-covid-19-untrustworthy-messages-from-the-authorities.-part-29-the-controver.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=2 Part 3: https://rumble.com/v1uksym-covid-19-were-sa-citizens-able-to-give-informed-consent-part-38-the-controv.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=3 Part 4: https://rumble.com/v1ulehc-covid-19-vaccines-as-a-covid-mitigation-measure.-part-48-the-controversy-co.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=4 Part 5: https://rumble.com/v1ulkas-mrnadna-vaccines-vs-childhood-vaccines.-part-58-the-controversy-continuess.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=5 Part 6: https://rumble.com/v1uly1i-covid-19-dismissing-different-views.-part-68-the-controversy-continues.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=6 Part 7: https://rumble.com/v1um0fw-the-status-of-the-vaccine.-part-78-the-controversy-continues.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=7 Part 8: https://rumble.com/v1um85y-vaccine-hesitancy-and-the-use-of-mandates-to-overcome-it.-part-88-the-contr.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=8

Discovery dismissed the credibility of doctors and scientists who don’t share their view. Who decides which sources are credible or not? Science is not determined by consensus; it is developed by application of the scientific method, which includes observation, experimentation, analysis, transparent sharing of information, independent review, replication by others, and debate. On Tuesday 7 June, the Chief Executive of NEASA, Gerhard Papenfus, participated in a panel discussion during the CHRO-SA’s virtual HR Indaba. The topic was Mandatory vaccinations: Where we are now and where we are headed'. Two of the other panellists were Dr Noluthando Nematserani, Head: Centre For Clinical Excellence at Discovery, and Steven Teasedale, Chief People Experience Officer at Discovery. Dr Nematserani invited the CE of NEASA to a further discussion to convince him that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the appropriate action, but she herself has since declined numerous requests for such a debate. This series of videos is about certain comments made by Discovery with regards to Covid vaccines and vaccine mandates. Discovery claims to have played a very important role in convincing South Africa that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the solution to the Covid-challenge. Participants Dr Herman Edeling (Neurosurgeon), Dr Stephen Schmidt (Physician), Prof Johann Holm (Engineer) and Gerhard Papenfus (CE of NEASA) discuss. Part 1: https://rumble.com/v1uc7zk-covid-19-the-controversy-continues.-origin-of-the-discussion-part-18.html?mref=tj4b5&mc=ckrmd Part 2: https://rumble.com/v1ukgd0-covid-19-untrustworthy-messages-from-the-authorities.-part-29-the-controver.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=2 Part 3: https://rumble.com/v1uksym-covid-19-were-sa-citizens-able-to-give-informed-consent-part-38-the-controv.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=3 Part 4: https://rumble.com/v1ulehc-covid-19-vaccines-as-a-covid-mitigation-measure.-part-48-the-controversy-co.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=4 Part 5: https://rumble.com/v1ulkas-mrnadna-vaccines-vs-childhood-vaccines.-part-58-the-controversy-continuess.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=5 Part 6: https://rumble.com/v1uly1i-covid-19-dismissing-different-views.-part-68-the-controversy-continues.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=6 Part 7: https://rumble.com/v1um0fw-the-status-of-the-vaccine.-part-78-the-controversy-continues.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=7 Part 8: https://rumble.com/v1um85y-vaccine-hesitancy-and-the-use-of-mandates-to-overcome-it.-part-88-the-contr.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=8

Were Discovery’s remarks about the vaccine’s safety and effectiveness based on their own research or were they simply repeating other authorities’ opinion? Was their own opinion based on facts, science, studies or any rational explanations? Have the authorities shared sufficient and trustworthy information with the public to enable them to make informed decisions about Covid-treatment? It is absurd to mandate something for which the safety and efficacy trials have not been completed. On Tuesday 7 June, the Chief Executive of NEASA, Gerhard Papenfus, participated in a panel discussion during the CHRO-SA’s virtual HR Indaba. The topic was Mandatory vaccinations: Where we are now and where we are headed'. Two of the other panellists were Dr Noluthando Nematserani, Head: Centre For Clinical Excellence at Discovery, and Steven Teasedale, Chief People Experience Officer at Discovery. Dr Nematserani invited the CE of NEASA to a further discussion to convince him that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the appropriate action, but she herself has since declined numerous requests for such a debate. This series of videos is about certain comments made by Discovery with regards to Covid vaccines and vaccine mandates. Discovery claims to have played a very important role in convincing South Africa that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the solution to the Covid-challenge. Participants Dr Herman Edeling (Neurosurgeon), Dr Stephen Schmidt (Physician), Prof Johann Holm (Engineer) and Gerhard Papenfus (CE of NEASA) discuss. Part 1: https://rumble.com/v1uc7zk-covid-19-the-controversy-continues.-origin-of-the-discussion-part-18.html?mref=tj4b5&mc=ckrmd Part 2: https://rumble.com/v1ukgd0-covid-19-untrustworthy-messages-from-the-authorities.-part-29-the-controver.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=2 Part 3: https://rumble.com/v1uksym-covid-19-were-sa-citizens-able-to-give-informed-consent-part-38-the-controv.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=3 Part 4: https://rumble.com/v1ulehc-covid-19-vaccines-as-a-covid-mitigation-measure.-part-48-the-controversy-co.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=4 Part 5: https://rumble.com/v1ulkas-mrnadna-vaccines-vs-childhood-vaccines.-part-58-the-controversy-continuess.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=5 Part 6: https://rumble.com/v1uly1i-covid-19-dismissing-different-views.-part-68-the-controversy-continues.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=6 Part 7: https://rumble.com/v1um0fw-the-status-of-the-vaccine.-part-78-the-controversy-continues.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=7 Part 8: https://rumble.com/v1um85y-vaccine-hesitancy-and-the-use-of-mandates-to-overcome-it.-part-88-the-contr.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=8

Participants Dr Herman Edeling (Neurosurgeon), Dr Stephen Schmidt (Physician) and Prof Johann Holm (Engineer) discuss at which point and why they became sceptical about the false and harmful messages propagated by the authorities with regards to Covid-‘vaccines’. On Tuesday 7 June, the Chief Executive of NEASA, Gerhard Papenfus, participated in a panel discussion during the CHRO-SA’s virtual HR Indaba. The topic was Mandatory vaccinations: Where we are now and where we are headed'. Two of the other panellists were Dr Noluthando Nematserani, Head: Centre For Clinical Excellence at Discovery, and Steven Teasedale, Chief People Experience Officer at Discovery. Dr Nematserani invited the CE of NEASA to a further discussion to convince him that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the appropriate action, but she herself has since declined numerous requests for such a debate. This series of videos is about certain comments made by Discovery with regards to Covid vaccines and vaccine mandates. Discovery claims to have played a very important role in convincing South Africa that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the solution to the Covid-challenge. Part 1: https://rumble.com/v1uc7zk-covid-19-the-controversy-continues.-origin-of-the-discussion-part-18.html?mref=tj4b5&mc=ckrmd Part 2: https://rumble.com/v1ukgd0-covid-19-untrustworthy-messages-from-the-authorities.-part-29-the-controver.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=2 Part 3: https://rumble.com/v1uksym-covid-19-were-sa-citizens-able-to-give-informed-consent-part-38-the-controv.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=3 Part 4: https://rumble.com/v1ulehc-covid-19-vaccines-as-a-covid-mitigation-measure.-part-48-the-controversy-co.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=4 Part 5: https://rumble.com/v1ulkas-mrnadna-vaccines-vs-childhood-vaccines.-part-58-the-controversy-continuess.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=5 Part 6: https://rumble.com/v1uly1i-covid-19-dismissing-different-views.-part-68-the-controversy-continues.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=6 Part 7: https://rumble.com/v1um0fw-the-status-of-the-vaccine.-part-78-the-controversy-continues.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=7 Part 8: https://rumble.com/v1um85y-vaccine-hesitancy-and-the-use-of-mandates-to-overcome-it.-part-88-the-contr.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=8

Do the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risk? The aim of any treatment is to reduce the absolute risk to a lower value, and not to introduce risk. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the safety and efficacy of the Covid ‘vaccine’. Vaccines were proposed as a mitigation measure. Other options include natural immunity, which is longer lasting. Evidence finds that the Covid ‘vaccines’ cause more harm than good. On Tuesday 7 June, the Chief Executive of NEASA, Gerhard Papenfus, participated in a panel discussion during the CHRO-SA’s virtual HR Indaba. The topic was Mandatory vaccinations: Where we are now and where we are headed'. Two of the other panellists were Dr Noluthando Nematserani, Head: Centre For Clinical Excellence at Discovery, and Steven Teasedale, Chief People Experience Officer at Discovery. Dr Nematserani invited the CE of NEASA to a further discussion to convince him that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the appropriate action, but she herself has since declined numerous requests for such a debate. This series of videos is about certain comments made by Discovery with regards to Covid vaccines and vaccine mandates. Discovery claims to have played a very important role in convincing South Africa that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the solution to the Covid-challenge. Participants Dr Herman Edeling (Neurosurgeon), Dr Stephen Schmidt (Physician), Prof Johann Holm (Engineer) and Gerhard Papenfus (CE of NEASA) discuss. Part 1: https://rumble.com/v1uc7zk-covid-19-the-controversy-continues.-origin-of-the-discussion-part-18.html?mref=tj4b5&mc=ckrmd Part 2: https://rumble.com/v1ukgd0-covid-19-untrustworthy-messages-from-the-authorities.-part-29-the-controver.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=2 Part 3: https://rumble.com/v1uksym-covid-19-were-sa-citizens-able-to-give-informed-consent-part-38-the-controv.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=3 Part 4: https://rumble.com/v1ulehc-covid-19-vaccines-as-a-covid-mitigation-measure.-part-48-the-controversy-co.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=4 Part 5: https://rumble.com/v1ulkas-mrnadna-vaccines-vs-childhood-vaccines.-part-58-the-controversy-continuess.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=5 Part 6: https://rumble.com/v1uly1i-covid-19-dismissing-different-views.-part-68-the-controversy-continues.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=6 Part 7: https://rumble.com/v1um0fw-the-status-of-the-vaccine.-part-78-the-controversy-continues.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=7 Part 8: https://rumble.com/v1um85y-vaccine-hesitancy-and-the-use-of-mandates-to-overcome-it.-part-88-the-contr.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=8

Discovery equated injection of SARS-CoV-2 viral genetic material with the vaccines we received as children. The fact is that they are totally different. Telling patients and employees that it is simply the vaccine you got as a child, is false. On Tuesday 7 June, the Chief Executive of NEASA, Gerhard Papenfus, participated in a panel discussion during the CHRO-SA’s virtual HR Indaba. The topic was Mandatory vaccinations: Where we are now and where we are headed'. Two of the other panellists were Dr Noluthando Nematserani, Head: Centre For Clinical Excellence at Discovery, and Steven Teasedale, Chief People Experience Officer at Discovery. Dr Nematserani invited the CE of NEASA to a further discussion to convince him that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the appropriate action, but she herself has since declined numerous requests for such a debate. This series of videos is about certain comments made by Discovery with regards to Covid vaccines and vaccine mandates. Discovery claims to have played a very important role in convincing South Africa that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the solution to the Covid-challenge. Participants Dr Herman Edeling (Neurosurgeon), Dr Stephen Schmidt (Physician), Prof Johann Holm (Engineer) and Gerhard Papenfus (CE of NEASA) discuss. Part 1: https://rumble.com/v1uc7zk-covid-19-the-controversy-continues.-origin-of-the-discussion-part-18.html?mref=tj4b5&mc=ckrmd Part 2: https://rumble.com/v1ukgd0-covid-19-untrustworthy-messages-from-the-authorities.-part-29-the-controver.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=2 Part 3: https://rumble.com/v1uksym-covid-19-were-sa-citizens-able-to-give-informed-consent-part-38-the-controv.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=3 Part 4: https://rumble.com/v1ulehc-covid-19-vaccines-as-a-covid-mitigation-measure.-part-48-the-controversy-co.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=4 Part 5: https://rumble.com/v1ulkas-mrnadna-vaccines-vs-childhood-vaccines.-part-58-the-controversy-continuess.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=5 Part 6: https://rumble.com/v1uly1i-covid-19-dismissing-different-views.-part-68-the-controversy-continues.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=6 Part 7: https://rumble.com/v1um0fw-the-status-of-the-vaccine.-part-78-the-controversy-continues.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=7 Part 8: https://rumble.com/v1um85y-vaccine-hesitancy-and-the-use-of-mandates-to-overcome-it.-part-88-the-contr.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=8

On Tuesday 7 June, the Chief Executive of NEASA, Gerhard Papenfus, participated in a panel discussion during the CHRO-SA’s virtual HR Indaba. The topic was Mandatory vaccinations: Where we are now and where we are headed'. Two of the other panellists were Dr Noluthando Nematserani, Head: Centre For Clinical Excellence at Discovery, and Steven Teasedale, Chief People Experience Officer at Discovery. Dr Nematserani invited the CE of NEASA to a further discussion to convince him that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the appropriate action, but she herself has since declined numerous requests for such a debate. This series of videos is about certain comments made by Discovery with regards to Covid vaccines and vaccine mandates. Discovery claims to have played a very important role in convincing South Africa that taking the ‘vaccine’ is the solution to the Covid-challenge. Participants Dr Herman Edeling (Neurosurgeon), Dr Stephen Schmidt (Physician), Prof Johann Holm (Engineer) and Gerhard Papenfus (CE of NEASA) discuss. Part 1: https://rumble.com/v1uc7zk-covid-19-the-controversy-continues.-origin-of-the-discussion-part-18.html?mref=tj4b5&mc=ckrmd Part 2: https://rumble.com/v1ukgd0-covid-19-untrustworthy-messages-from-the-authorities.-part-29-the-controver.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=2 Part 3: https://rumble.com/v1uksym-covid-19-were-sa-citizens-able-to-give-informed-consent-part-38-the-controv.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=3 Part 4: https://rumble.com/v1ulehc-covid-19-vaccines-as-a-covid-mitigation-measure.-part-48-the-controversy-co.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=4 Part 5: https://rumble.com/v1ulkas-mrnadna-vaccines-vs-childhood-vaccines.-part-58-the-controversy-continuess.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=5 Part 6: https://rumble.com/v1uly1i-covid-19-dismissing-different-views.-part-68-the-controversy-continues.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=6 Part 7: https://rumble.com/v1um0fw-the-status-of-the-vaccine.-part-78-the-controversy-continues.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=7 Part 8: https://rumble.com/v1um85y-vaccine-hesitancy-and-the-use-of-mandates-to-overcome-it.-part-88-the-contr.html?mref=tj4b5&mrefc=8