EpisodeGeorge

In this episode George reveals an internal Labor Party email instructing all candidates to have separate bank accounts so that the public cannot see who is giving political donations to individual politicians. Next, George uses Labor Party mines & energy minister Kon Vatskalis as an example to show how he could have received political donations from a Chinese billionaire in exchange for Australian oil, gas & uranium resources, and hidden them if he wanted to.

In this episode, George shows the name of an anti-mandate lawyer involved in a community lawsuit against the Labor Party health minister allegedly appearing on an internal Labor Party election volunteer list, which raises the issue of a possible undeclared conflict of interest. For the record, the name of the lawyer appears in several more sensitive documents that are hidden in a different location, on a storage device which contains photographs of sex and children. I separated some of the sensitive information for safety, just in case the police raided my house. Retrieving it would take a couple of days, which I will get around to eventually in a follow up video.

In this question & answer, George tells a stubborn journalist that since the Labor Party is full of politicians who own shares in oil & gas companies, it means that the Labor Party will push for oil, gas & petrochemical development. Then, since the Labor Party holds corrupt elections & rigged court cases, it means that both opinions & voting doesn't matter at all while the Labor Party is in charge.

In this episode, George proves that he has internal Labor Party documents by showing a scan of former Labor Party chief minister Natasha Fyles' passport and childish resume. After that George mentions political gossip about the way senior Labor Party figures control or blackmail others using drugs and sex. Lastly, he mentions a historical event called the Darwin Rebellion, in which an abusive government was removed about 100 years ago in 1918, and its similarity to an initiative called the National Strike Australia.

George explains how the corrupt Northern Territory Electoral Commission falsified an election report in section 7.77 to cover up election rigging, using evidence. George also shows how a supreme court justice named Stephen Southwood falsified evidence in a court judgment for the supreme court case with citation Mamouzellos v Vatskalis & Ors [2018] NTSC 57. Justice Southwood falsified evidence across paragraphs 11, 12, 13, 17, 19 & 58 of the judgment, although in this video, only the falsification to paragraph 11 is shown. Everything in this description is the opinion of George Mamouzellos.

George explains a High Court precedent about an election dispute, with citation c17/2013 The Australian Electoral Commission v Johnson & Ors. This precedent was created by Clive Palmer in 2013 when he disputed an election in Western Australia in 2013. The reason for the explanation is because this precedent shows why the election disputed by George Mamouzellos in the case Mamouzellos v Vatskalis & Ors [2018] NTSC 57 should have been overturned. Instead, the corrupt Northern Territory Electoral Commission lied across its written statements and even falsified the election report in section 7.77 to keep the matter covered up. To see a presentation of how the election report was falsified in section 7.77, please see Episode 8 of Episode George.

George explains how the rigged election helped Labor Party Chief Minister Eva Lawler, and gives an example of a woman named Carolyn Reynolds who was treated in a shocking way by supreme court justice Stephen Southwood. For those new to the case, justice Stephen Southwood is a judge in the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory who falsified evidence across several paragraphs of a court judgment with citation Mamouzellos v Vatskalis & Ors [2018] NTSC 57. The Labor Party of the Northern Territory is helping to protect justice Southwood from prosecution, in the opinion of George Mamouzellos.

George explains how the corrupt Judicial Commission of the Northern Territory dismissed a filing against supreme court justice Stephen Southwood out of hand. The explanation shows several pieces of evidence falsified by justice Southwood in his corrupt judgment, for a case in the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory with citation Mamouzellos v Vatskalis & Ors [2018] NTSC 57. Later in the explanation, George compares the case to the notable case against Children's Commissioner Colleen Gwynne, and makes an argument that both supreme court justice Stephen Southwood and electoral commissioner Iain Loganathan should both be referred to the Department of Public Prosecutions and investigated under the Criminal Code Act 1983: s81 Abuse of Office - arbitrary & prejudicial conduct; and s109 Perverting the course of justice George also explains how the corrupt Labor Party controls the entire judicial process in a 9 step process. Everything in this description is the opinion of George Mamouzellos