Interest Of Justice

Go to WHO Watch: WHOWatch.org/EXITtheWHO & sign up there: See you all soon as we start on the worlds most formidable legal & ethical strike force the world has ever faced. We have to because the threat is the most formidable threat humanity has ever faced. Sue the WHO Legal Initiative (Idiot’s Guide to EXIT the WHO) SIGN UP NOW: WHOWatch.org/EXITtheWHO SuetheWHO.Substack.com SuetheWHO.org StopCrimesAgainstHumanity.org StopCovidVaccinesNOW.org GiveSendGo.com/StopCrimesAgainstHumanity

Interest of Justice Spoke To Jeremy Ferrar and the World Health Organization Chief Scientist at the General Programme of Work 14 (GPW14) in Geneva CH on January 12, 2024, (GPW14), 2025–2028 “Advancing health equity and health systems resilience in a turbulent world: a global health agenda for 2025–2028. IoJ protested the 11.3 Billion dollar funding of the SDG's, emerging technology, mRNA vaccines and viral vector. Here's the transcript: Here’s the Speech: My name is Dustin Bryce from IoJ and the collective action of the Global Science Integrity Task Force and Anti corruption unit I’d like to say thank you so much for this opportunity to speak here at this CSO’s consultation today and for the GPW working group. we appreciate it for the involvement of CSO’s I’ll try to make this as quick as possible to allow others, In the previous meeting we attended on Oct 30, 2023 GPW14, our sister organization free speech association was censored by World Health Organization after posting a video of UN head of communications saying the UN owns the science on climate and works with Google to rig the search results. SDG 13 climate emergency is not scientifically agreed upon and still in dispute. In order for WHO to meet their obligation of science integrity the WHO must prove and debate the contentious science of climate emergency as well as the SDG 3 which involves the novel gene vaccine science. We are very concerned that the SDG 3, involving unproven vaccine interventions about the mRNA and Viral vector, are unethical under Nuremberg Code and prohibited for affecting future generations without informed consent. We're callingthe Surgeon General of the State of Florida has issued a global call to action to halt mRNA due to the very real issue of proven DNA integration and WHO has failed to act appropriately by FAILING TO DELIST THE EUL FOR COVID VACCINES. The WHO should not increase funding to the EUL program because we tried to contact people to delist the EUL yesterday as a matter of fact and the email is broken., there may not be enough staff in regards to this, so there is no way to actually delist the toxic covid vaccines. We cant stop the global breach of obligations to human rights or protect the health and welfare of humanity because the EUL program is not functional and needs assistance. We are very concerned that WHOs misinformation programs are censoring and silencing dissenting professionals such as our experts that speak out about this crime against humanity of experimentation on the genome. These WHO information management programs are causing global systematic widespread human rights violations and must be stopped not funded. We’re actually calling on Jeremy Farrar to create a global action and come in to speak to our chief scientists, some of our head chief scientists that we have formed in our collective action that we have created. WHO's focus must be on the target of funding independent anti corruption actions because WHO refuses… Would you please conclude? Definitely In conclusion, We believe an independent monitoring, verification and assessment body at arm’s length or separate from WHO such as our Global Science Integrity Task Force is crucial to success of the international system for pandemic preparedness and response. Being a primary stakeholder in PPR. We haven't seen any public portal and we think there should at least be a public portal for them to participate in these events. Thank you so much for the time to speak and sincerely we appreciate to have a voice and free speech. Thank you… If you think we did a good job, feel free to donate: http://www.interestofjustice.org/donate Join us on Substack - https://interestofjustice.substack.com/ Join us on Telegram - https://t.me/InterestOfJustice Join us on X - https://twitter.com/interestofjust1

Live hearing in Costa Rica to take the experimental jabs off the market

IoJ showed up to the HHS INB Listening Session On June 28, 2023 to protest the Pandemic Treaty and expose WHO crimes. IoJ stated that they should not continue forward until they respond to our criminal complaints filed against the WHO within the ethics departments and also to expose the WHO for refusing to answer criminal charges of serious breach of international obligations by undue experimentation and crimes against humanity. Here's the speech "This treaty is not salvageable because it violates international law including making experiments into health policy, vaccine passports, financial burdens on 3rd world countries and so much more including persecution of so call mis information. The WHO and the HHS have zero authority delegated to even negotiate this criminal treaty which violates so many rights and norms. the only thing that is important is that there are unanswered criminal charges against the WHO which HHS and the WHO DG Tedros are ignoring in order to continue illegal relations and continue drafting the void treaty. We expect an answer from you to the criminal charges we informed you of in May 2022 and again May 2023 which are still unanswered by both Tedros and HHS. HHS is clearly aiding the WHO Pre-qualification Program to commit crimes using biological agent causing undue experimentation. Those are crimes that WHO and HHS refuse to answer to. It appears that HHS wants to make these crimes into some kind of international Norm through the WHO treaty. Our organization has a mission and our job is to prevent corruption and for that reason we forbid you to continue any relations with the WHO, including the treaty. There are far more important things to attend to than making a void treaty, such as answering our serious criminal charges. We are very frustrated WHO and HHS ignore our very serious criminal charges and continue doing void corrupt acts against human rights. It means you are forcing us to sue you and sue the WHO to prevent your corruption and void treaty that would strip many rights from the people. What if we are right there is a serious legal problem with the treaty and the entire relations with the WHO which is criminal? There are hundreds of pages on your desk proving many crimes and many unanswered emails asking for responses. Shouldn't the HHS answer us first in case we are right that the WHO and HHS are engaging in serious human rights violations in the WHO pre-qualification program and by negotiating this treaty? If you all continue to ignore us and our criminal charges be aware that our organization will be forced to sue ALL of you in your individual and official capacity for breach of duty and we will absolutely prove that the pandemic treaty is VOID on it's face for many reasons as well as the weaponized misinformation programs, vaccine passports and so much more. Its all void and illegal so we prohibit you from continuing. Consider this speech a writ of prohibition. We will follow up in writing Thank you very much Its all Void! Thank you and have a fabulous day" If you think we're doing a good job support and sponsor our mission!: Support IOJ's fight here: www.interestofjustice.org/legal-fund or www.SueTheWHO.org/donate www.interestofjustice.substack.com https://t.me/InterestOfJustice We are winning! Don't let them trick you into believing otherwise. IoJ will not stop until humanity wins this! TYRANTS ARE DOOMED!!! #ExitTheWho #SueTheWHO

Interest of Justice speaks for the third time at the Health and Human Services Office of Global Affairs (HHS OGA) to once again protest the IHR Amendments and also to expose the WHO for refusing to answer criminal charges of serious breach of international obligations by undue experimentation and crimes against humanity. Here's the transcript below: First: HHS and WHO still owe us a response from May 2022 and 2023. HHS is in the wrong for moving forward with these IHR amendments when we testified here last month to show you your very clear duty to leave the WHO for International breach of obligations and delicts. 4. Second, The amendments cannot be binding. Jus cogens international norms would require the binding recommendations of a specialized agency that cause damages to waive immunity and be responsible for reparations. 5. Article 1 outrageously attempts to make investigational vaccines and gene based therapies as well as "other vague health technologies". Experimental biological agents are not a health product. The proposed definition is void and reckless because FDA website states "investigational biologics are not found by FDA to be safe or effective and furthermore may cause serious adverse reactions". 6. Annex 6 would unlawfully consider vaccination certificates for research phase products. The concept of Digital ID's, certificates and QR codes is disproportionate and the WEF risk report this month admits they canfacilitate“the identification, surveillance and persecution of individuals or groups.” 7. Annex 1 pg 33 countering misinformation and disinformation is not within the authority of the WHO or member states and as its been used, it already allows for the weaponization of government to systematically suppress free thought, a non derogable right that can never be limited. These misinformation programs flat violate jus cogens and are therefore void. 8. Article 3 removing well established respect for dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms for arbitrary undefined words is an assault on rule of law, dignity of man and obviously void 9. We remind HHS that if you dare adopt one void provision that violates peremptory norms of jus cogens human rights, which the majority of proposals do violate these norms, it will automatically render the entire instrument void. 10. It is worth mentioning that A UK FOIA regarding the proposed amendments reveals "a legal opinion and a risk analysis regarding the U.K. position" is not able to released because "releasing the requested information would likely harm the relations between the United Kingdom and other WHO member States and also UK interests abroad". Right there it goes to show the proposed amendments sound good in public but in secret the amendments are inherently harmful to diplomatic relations between WHO member States. HHS must leave the WHO now. Its your duty. Thank you very much! IOJ is very proud of all the people who came to speak up. It goes to show the power of an individual because in May 2022 IOJ stumbled across the opportunity to speak and in turn we applied this year which we got to speak May 3rd, 2023. This led to us getting a return invite by HHS and we then shared the opportunity with researcher/activist James Roguski to share with our audiences... the result: we PACKED THE MEETING with real honest good people who really forced HHS to realize the real consensus is NO we the People do not want these amendments to the IHR. HHS promised the group that they will listen to us and read our written comments and insist" NOTHING HAS BEEN ADOPTED OR CONCLUDED". We are winning! IoJ will not stop until humanity wins this! #ExitTheWho #SueTheWHO Support IOJ's fight here: www.interestofjustice.org/legal-fund www.interestofjustice.substack.com https://t.me/InterestOfJustice

Epic Video Of Dustin Bryce from Interest of Justice Speaking Truth To Power In May 3, 2023 HHS Stakeholder Listening Session In Preparation Of The 76th WHA. (Exposing W.H.O. Crimes) This session was to "advise the US Government prior to the 76th WHA". They are now advised why they must exit the WHO. You are welcome. Please support the official Exit the WHO and Sue The WHO fund here: SueTheWHO.org/donate FIRST Item: 17.10 WHO reform. It is very obvious World Health Organization is not functional and needs reforming. However, it is also very obvious that there are structural defects, which are inherent within the make up of the WHO, which make it nearly impossible to reform the WHO. How can the WHO be reformed when they claim sovereignty so you have to go through their own remedy system which is non responsive, such as claim # 881786000902 and 637327854202? The WHO even made rules that will allow for the confidentialities of crimes! Its set up in a way they do not have to reform because they choose to censor the whistleblowers, to control information and ignore facts proving the WHO pseudo science is actually destroying the determinants of health. This is very dangerous for US to be so heavily reliant on the WHO failing captured regulatory "health" oversight. We agree the WHO does need to reform, however, as a WHO recognized stakeholder in pandemic preparedness and response, we need the HHS to understand that even a recognized stakeholder cannot get anything done within the WHO internal oversight system, despite having filed multiple charges since December 2022. The people that you hired WHO to serve are injured, vulnerable and completely defenseless against the imbalance of power of the non reformable and non responsive WHO. In the opinion of our organizations, many scholars, historians and thousands of recently censored dissenting medical experts, such as our Chief Scientist Dr. Yeadon, the former VP of Pfizer, the WHO should be prohibited as a private monopoly which interferes with commerce and lessens health and scientific standards due to political interference in scientific decision making and clear conflicts of interest. HHS does not need to waste time in WHA meetings hashing out how to reform the failing WHO. Its too burdensome of a proposition and a waste of time and money. Far more important is the obligation that HHS has to uphold scientific integrity and accountability. To us stakeholders, that means HHS needs to prohibit any further funding and collaborations until the WHO can provide a shred of evidence to challenge our Chief Scientists peer reviewed evidence that shows the PCR test makes false positives and therefore the covid emergency is a fraud. The charges that are still unanswered by the WHO are very serious charges of fraud. Our unanswered charges of WHO fraud are backed by real science of the rigor HHS accepts, which show the entire declaration of emergency is in bad faith and a violation of international law. HHS cant keep the relationship going with the WHO if the HHS wants to be in conformity with law, science and their ethical obligations to ensure science and accountability in their collaborators. SECOND item: item 23. Audit and oversight matters. First, Interest of Justice, Free Speech Association, Stop Agenda 2030 institute, Health Rights Association would like to give a friendly thank you for accepting our RSVP on such late notice: According to UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES POLICIES AND PRINCIPLES FOR ASSURING SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY first paragraph: “HHS uses scientific information to support and inform policy and program decision making. Accordingly, scientific and scholarly information developed by the Department or considered in Departmental decision making must be of the highest quality and the result of rigorous scientific and scholarly processes. Most importantly, it must be trustworthy. Accordingly, maintaining the integrity of our scientific and technical activities is essential.” The WHO's science is not trustworthy. We repeat. The WHO is not trustworthy insofar as their technical recommendations for covid-19 go. In reality the majority of WHO recommendations are completely unscientific and all WHO guidance says they are not liable for damages from taking their scientific advice. So they are unscientific and unaccountable. When we say the WHO is untrustworthy to rely on for science we are not exaggerating. WHO is failing to respond to serious charges against the DG and chief scientist as well as against the organization regarding breach of duty under all of the ethics and research guidance, including the UN procurement standards of conduct. These issues affect the invalidity of the relationship with the WHO at this point where independent oversight and accountability is wholly illusory and a false promise which injures US Citizens and the entire International Community. Due to the lack of accountability there is no functional audit and oversight of the WHO. We believe it is in the best interest for the United States and all member states to immediately withdraw from the WHO and not adopt any further negotiations towards IHR amendments, pandemic treaty, Agenda 2023, SDG, Strategic Dialogue or otherwise. At this point HHS is under an obligation to exit the WHO because they are not functional, as demonstrated by the lack of response to multiple charges. THIRD Item, 24: Collaboration within the United Nations system and with other intergovernmental organizations So far collaboration within the United Nations system, and other intergovernmental organizations includes the Covid Action Platform, which was the brain child of Klauss Schwab of the WEF, after speaking with 200 of his capitalist stakeholder members of the World Economic Forum. They decided for the first time in history the private sector will assist in a pandemic response. This collaboration within the United Nations system is now scrubbed online because it was the worst idea in history. This collaboration within the UN system is a disastrous public private monopoly that has proven to destroy economies and destroy lives based on intentionally horribly unscientific WHO measures. The UN collaborations caused HHS to be involved with monopolized information and committing delicts under UN direction and control. It is our opinion and our wish that HHS quickly exit the WHO and UN system and cease all UN collaborations because the UN and WHO are not trustworthy for science and are not answering to our multiple charges of fraud, serious undue psychological and medical experimentation and crimes against humanity. HHS should agree that their collaborators and partners are responsive to charges and disprove all charges, or remedy the errors. UN is above the law and people widely feel the WHO is acting as our unaccountable overlords. Collaboration within the UN system is untenable and will be the downfall of our republic. Our organizations cannot stress enough how important it is to exit the WHO and cease all collaboration within the UN system. We will send a longer explanation before the written comments deadline. Please exit the WHO and stop wasting time and money debating the unscientific agendas in WHA. http://www.interestofjustice.org https://interestofjustice.substack.com/ https://t.me/InterestOfJustice https://noticeanddemand.org/ (Sign The Global Demands)

Interest Of Justice 90 second video to the WHO/INB on the "New international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response: contributing to the second round of public hearings at the WHO/INB" Here is the question from the WHO/INB in which IOJ is responding: "Based on your experience with the COVID-19 pandemic, what do you believe should be addressed at the international level to better protect against future pandemics?” 90 second video transcript by IOJ: "Interest of Justice experience in the declared COVID-19 pandemic was a loss of health from unnecessary limitations on rights not strictly required by the exigencies of the situation Ordinary administrative measures and treatments were always available to treat covid-19, but were not utilized in order to declare the pandemic. The treaty is intended to re-define pandemic, despite the word being already defined in customary law. The WHO concedes that a pandemic cannot be controlled, therefore, If the WHO were to try to better prevent future pandemics they would not only be going against the unequivocal rules of science, they would be going against their previous COVID-19 declaration of pandemic where the WHO confessed that a pandemic cannot be controlled. To protect health in the future there should be no centralized international level healthcare system and blanket measures are presumed disproportionate on their face. To respect the sovereignty of each country as well as meet the who’s obligations to the IHR article 3 section 4, The control and management of pandemics should be left to each individual nation to handle in the way that their sovereign legislators intended in their own regulations. The WHO unilaterally lowered the bar for the word pandemic by omitting the one essential element required by the common law, which is the essential element of “great danger to life, or high mortality rate”. The WHOs definition of pandemic wrongfully allows for the imposition of measures merely because of an apprehension of potential danger, violating article 54 of the Siracusa principles. Resolving this breach of WHOs obligations must be addressed before any pandemic treaty is drafted." There is much more that IOJ wanted to say but didn't get the due process to explain why it was a fools errand. So below is the transcript of what IOJ expressly wanted to say in regards to the WHO's question to the public. Ordinary administrative measures and treatments were always available to treat covid-19, which makes a declaration of pandemic in violation of international law, however the unnecessary measures were Imposed merely because of The Who’s apprehension of potential danger. The WHO declared the pandemic while they say pandemic was not defined, which is arbitrary and capricious on its face and especially shocking because Tedros declared march 11 2020 and we quote: “We have therefore made the assessment that COVID-19 can be characterized as a pandemic. Pandemic is not a word to use lightly or carelessly. It’s a word that if misused can cause unreasonable fear leading to unnecessary suffering and death. This is the first pandemic caused by a coronavirus and we have never before seen a pandemic that can be controlled at the same time.” Below is the information so you can submit your own video to the WHO/INB: You are invited to submit a video statement of up to 90 seconds, accompanied by a transcript, in response to the following guiding question: "Based on your experience with the COVID-19 pandemic, what do you believe should be addressed at the international level to better protect against future pandemics?” Statements can be submitted in any of the six official WHO languages (English, French, Spanish, Arabic, Russian, Chinese). The submission period will open on Friday 9 September and will close on Tuesday 13 September 2022. Further information about the registration process, the terms and conditions for participation, and the process to submit a video statement is available at https://inb.who.int/home/public-hearings/second-round WHO will broadcast two three-hour segments of a selection of compiled video statements on the WHO website – https://inb.who.int on 29 and 30 September 2022. Other video statements will be made available on the WHO website following the hearings. Interest of Justice video tutorial on submitting the video: https://rumble.com/v1izqtb-notice-w.h.o.-is-accepting-your-90-sec.-video-september-9-13-2022-pandemic-.html?mref=138ft6&mc=6x039 http://www.interestofjustice.org Support the cause! https://interestofjustice.org/donation

PUBLIC NOTICE to submit your video to the second public hearing in regards to the WHO's (World Health Org.) creation of the "pandemic treaty". www.interestofjustice.org/submit-who-video Second round: 29-30 September 2022 The second round of public hearings will address the guiding question: “Based on your experience with the COVID-19 pandemic, what do you believe should be addressed at the international level to better protect against future pandemics?” Video submission Deadline September 9-13, 2022 to this address - https://inb.who.int/home/public-hearings

In a stunning press conference on Weds., August 3, 2022, Costa Rica's newly elected President, Rodrigo Chaves, accompanied by Minister of Health, Joselyn Chacón, repeatedly denounced mandatory "vaccination" as not only illegal, but against key recommendations made by none other than the World Health Organization) and the Pan-American Health Organization. Sensitive to how hostile media and political opponents had portrayed them, the two underscored the fact that they were following WHO/PAHO guidelines, and were not "anti-vaxxers" who are "anti-science". They showed that the National Vaccination and Epidemiology Commission (CNVE) had not only broken the law, but that the members of the commission occupied their positions illegally. The President declared: "Costa Rica's people are not cattle, that you beat with a piece of wood and force to get vaccinated".

Dustin Bryce from Interest Of Justice.Org lays down the Rules as the oversight Committee on the HHS hearing for WHO Stakeholders. Interest Of Justice believes that there was NOT enough time to prepare for this event and it was difficult to have true meaningful participation as a true democracy requires. IOJ was able to speak and be heard multiple times in this even which was very unexpected and an amazing opportunity to tell the truth to their WHO about all of their structural defects and why they should be reformed or abolished. This is the 2nd video out of many in the series which will be posted in time. Dustin the floor is yours! Thank you so much So first off I would like to say that the children have been affected most of all during the Pandemic in preparedness. If basically it’s very important that all member states shall apply section 3 of the annex 5 of the IHR and the WHO and if the WHO will not reform the WHO should be re-conformed and have oversight and if they do not then they should be defunded! We cannot express enough why the IHR amendments should not be implemented for all of the reasons that I have stated before and all of the documentation that has been sent and The structural defects and intent with the WHO require complete overhaul by the people, civil society groups and nation states. We cannot express enough that those should all be stated as well as the climate change factor should never be a cause for an emergency…That right there is very much a problem for everybody. I’d like to speak on behalf of a lot of people that would like to say a lot of the things that I have been saying and that the people are speaking and we believe that the IHR implementation is way too early right now for due process reasons and basically that we would like our voices be heard as for due process Thank you so much for the floor.

Dustin Bryce from Interest Of Justice.Org lays down the Rules as the oversight Committee on the HHS hearing for WHO Stakeholders. Interest Of Justice believes that there was NOT enough time to prepare for this event and it was difficult to have true meaningful participation as a true democracy requires. IOJ was able to speak and be heard multiple times in this even which was very unexpected and an amazing opportunity to tell the truth to their WHO about all of their structural defects and why they should be reformed or abolished. This is the 1st video out of many in the series which will be posted in time. Here is what was said in the two minute speech by IOJ: "Greetings" "My name is Dustin Bryce from Interest Of Justice.Org and we are an oversight committee and a private research institute" "We prepared a short speech to encompass all topics we chose for ease." "First, we think the most important is WHO reform. There are inherent conflicts of interest with the WHO’s financing coming from private sector and private foundation stakeholders that financially gain from the implantation of many of the agendas on today’s table including Financing and implementation of the program budget 2022-2023." "Second, the immunization agenda 2030 relies on the false presumption vaccines save lives and “underpin global security”, which is not true for WHO’s more broad definition of vaccine which usurps countries sovereignty by changing the legislator made definition to include gene editing vaccines and have demonstrably killed more people from all cause mortality than all other vaccines combined.." "Third, In regard to Implementation of the international health regulations, people have the right to participate in the design, implementation and approval of all health policy but are clearly excluded in the short notice which denies due process. Many thousands of marginalized primary stakeholders believe the proposed IHR amendments must be withdrawn for lack of substantiation of the necessity, proportionality and reasonableness pending time for due process, participation and legal actions." "Fourth, equity must be defined in a way that includes traditional medicine as freedom of choice and a viable alternative to the gene vaccines which alter the human genome, the heritage to humanity." "Last, 2 hours is far too short of a session to meaningfully discuss these important topics and we feel we did not receive meaningful participation."

The WHO invited Interest Of Justice to the historic WHO pandemic treaty public hearing as a stakeholder, panelist and speaker. The lucky break to speak was because GAVI was unprepared when called and lost their spot which prompted the WHO to randomly call Interest Of Justice. The transcript is here: "We request the following: All technical recommendations and limitations to rights in an emergency shall conform to the requirements set in the Siracusa Principles. No treaty can be binding which confers upon the WHO the power to issue or enforce pandemic guidance which may supplant the nations constitution, written definitions and sovereign legislation. Persecution and censorship of diversity of opinion regarding WHO’s “evolving science” is expressly prohibited; free and open discourse shall be protected and encouraged in the public interest to prevent imbalance of power and systematic violations of human rights The centralization of national health data, gene and biotechnology, AI with Big Tech and media, poses an international security threat that must be prevented at all costs. Pre-determination and punishment of misinformation with no written law defining misinformation backed by science and due process, is prohibited by law and punishable. The WHO shall not exaggerate the seriousness of the diagnosis, complicate the treatment, or artificially create alarm situations in response to spurious interests; if found guilty the member states should agree to permanently stop all funding and relationships with the WHO, in the public interest The WHO must immediately declare all yearly funders with full transparency and allow for independent oversight with the ability to immediately remove all conflicts of interest The Member States require WHO agrees to be liable in the event that damages arise from the use of the guidance The final decision in a truly democratic process, should be made by the people rather than the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body which may be widely perceived as biased and usurping individual and national sovereignty. Procedures for meaningful participation by all people in the enforcement of human rights enshrined in Siracusa Principles shall be made readily available in all future WHO pandemic guidance" https://www.interestofjustice.org https://interestofjustice.substack.com/p/interest-of-justice-establishes-strict?r=1f2x1f&s=w&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web