Independent Community TV, Victoria BC (ICTV)

250 Scientists with concerns about the harm Electromagnetic Radiation from Ear buds causes Bit of a challenging exercise keeping a coherent line of talk while doing ones own scene switching in the background. Yesterday, Saturday Sept 24, 2022 one of the articles in the various news feeds I collect raised the matter of the Global appeal https://emfscientist.org/index.php/emf-scientist-appeal to the UN signed by 250 + scientist re the harm caused by the proliferation of Electromagnetic Frequency in our environment. I found the article in the Nedxus News feed https://nexusnewsfeed.com/ 250-scientists-highlight-concerns-with-earbuds https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/home-family-pets/250-scientists-highlight-concerns-with-earbuds Ther article notes the ill effects are associatyed with Cancer • Cellular stress • Increase in harmful free radicals • Genetic damages • Structural and functional changes of the reproductive system • Learning and memory deficits • Neurological disorders • Negative impacts on general well-being Looks like a cross section of modern illnesses and health concerns of modern life.

There is a considerable amount confusion about 5G, Some of the statements are at best misleading and in many cases out right wrong. Yes, I have concerns about the harm electromagnetic radiation causes and am concerned about the additional harm that the mmwave portion of 5 G will cause. I also know there is very little mmwave 5G currently deployed anywhere in the world. Canada like many other countries has not even auctioned off the frequencies yet- in the case of Canada the spectrum auction will not occur until 2024 at the earliest. Yes, the 5G frequencies below about 6 Ghz are in use virtually everywhere and yes there are serious health and environmental issues the use of these frequencies has caused. I know from personal experience the harm that even a short (30 sec or so) exposure to 10 GHz can cause. Look at the left side of my face. The paralysis there is the result of an operation to remove a massive vestibular schwannoma– Usually called an Acoustic Neuroma, a benign tumour in the myelin sheath/Schwann cells of the 8 th cranial nerve. Don’t let the “benign” nature of the tumour mislead lead one to think it is a minor tumour. Over 20 hours of brain surgery in 2 operations and more follow up treatment it is a serious operation that requires the breaking open the skull to conduct the operation and a cumulative total of 6 months ( in my case of time spent in the hospital to recover – my tumour was MASSIVE – the largest I have heard of anyone having and required extra operating and recovery time)” I had originally planned to explain 5 G in one video but once I started preparing for it realised the topic would quickly overwhelm most people and they would need a break to process the information. This video will be about the formal definition of 5G as defined and set out in the official protocol documents for 5G, they are part of International Mobile Telecommunications-2020 (IMT-2020 Standard) https://www.itu.int/osg/spu/imt-2000/technology.html under the auspices of 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) reading and understanding the document is heavy reading that few apart from industry people will do. There is nothing significant about the use of 5 in 5G other than it is a marketing term referring to the 5 th generation of Cell Phone Technology. The next protocol they are currently working on is 6G and scheduled to be deployed starting in 2030 (don’t think they will make that date) and they are even working on developing 7G expected to be deployed in 2040. For me the protocol has only a few essential points to focus on. The new 5G developments include what is referred to as a “beam forming antenna”. In simple terms this means the main beam can be focused into a specific direction. The main advantage for this technology is it at least in theory requires less power to broadcast in a narrow defined cone than broadcasting multi directional, this also will allow more devices to connect through a given antenna. Other key points re 5G is it is multiple frequencies and the technology is being unleashed on the public in stages making it difficult to really nail down 5 G issues as the occur. The frequencies used and timing of their release will vary between countries. The frequencies are classed into 3 groupings – low, mid and high band frequencies. In most locations world wide the low and mid band frequencies are already in use or being deployed. These frequencies are also grouped into a category called called Frequency Ranges (FR) FR1 is from 0.41 Ghz to 7.125 GHz (10 MHz to 7125 MHz) and FR2 (also referenced as mmwave is from 24.25 GHz to 71 GHz (when I started preparing this a few days ago the upper bound was 52.6 GHz – specs keep being changed now the upper bound is 71 GHZ. Radio frequencies are specified in terms of their cycles per sec or the wave length – the distance the wave travels in 1 sec. The numbers are related by the formulas c = λ · f λ = c / f = c · T f = c / λ where “c” is the speed of light 299,792,458 m/s λ is the wave length and f is the frequency in cycles per sec. A look a this spread sheet will give one an idea of the progression of frequencies as the wave length is decreased. To confuse the discussions even more the various Telcos use their own marketing terms for at times essentially the same sub set of their 5 G usage. Recently Verizon began using the term 5G Ultra Wideband. In the case of Verizon this term refers to the use of a wide frequency >500 MHz. Th wider band opens up the ability to carry more data, unfortunately it also opens up a little studied area of Radio Frequency. The complications the brillion precursor. A discussion of the precursor effects is a complicated discussion quickly getting into the area of Quantum Physics https://scientists4wiredtech.com/what-are-4g-5g/brillouin-precursors/ Another area of Radio Frequency that is part of Quantum Physics is, is radiation a wave or particle. The answer is it is both according URL

As difficult as it is to accept our prime ministers, presidents etc are doing the job they were hired to do, and they are doing their job well. Most politicians are serving their bosses well. Yes, hat includes the much ridiculed Joe Biden, despised Justin Trudeau and recently departed Boris Johnson. The problem is most people think the a fore mentioned and their cohorts are there to work for the people. No, they and whoever is anointed to replace them are there to further, enhance and otherwise assist the world elite and other fends of Klaus Schwab in their take over of the world’s resources – not so much the global population which apparently is not only redundant to their needs but even worse are in the way of their theft of the world. At one time the leader of a country, tribe or clan was a person their people would follow in to battle, a person they could believe was there to inspire and lead them to a better life. When was the last time your country or any country had a leader that inspire dsuch confidence? It has been many years since any of us have had such a leader. Now, it seems each time a country needs leadership out of a crisis the leader suddenly tests positive for covid or generates some other personal health crisis to escape the leadership mantel and hid from the public. Our current and for the foresee-able leaders will only be in place to serve the Global elite, World Economic Forum etall as they progress in their goal to seize the world and our resources. The leaders are there to divert the public and provide a target to “throw rotten eggs” at. One of the main tools they are use is to divide the population into opposing camps. Dividing us into left wing right wing camps is one of their effective tools. A tactic designed to keep us fighting with ourselves and not see the real crime that is being committed, the theft of the world. Does it matter whether you voted for a left of center or right of center party when you are with out food, no heat for ones home etc. The time for fussing about left wing/right wing is passed. The immediate need is for food that day, water that day or heat for the cold winter day. Time for people of the world to unite as one and take back our world, our freedom, our lives from Klaus Schwab and fiends. (actual as bad as Klaus Schwab is he is only there as another target to rally against rather than the criminals directing him) We must stand up to them and reignite our freedoms. These are some of the reasons I signed the https://reignitefreedom.com pledge.

Believe it or not, a Proportional Voting system can give us a better democracy. A proportional voting system will give us citizens MORE power, and take a bit of power away from those at the top who now have ALL the power. At least, a Proportional Voting System will give us the Governments we actually VOTE FOR. The goal of a Proportional Voting system is to give political parties SEATS in Parliament based on the VOTES they actually get. So a political party that gets 15% or 25% of the votes ... will also get 15% or 25% of the seats. Our current voting system, called First Past The Post, does NOT give parties seats based on the number of votes they get. First Past the Post gives the bigger parties EXTRA seats. A LOT of extra seats. And that seems unfair because it gives some voters a lot more "power" than other voters. And why should I as a voter be penalized just because I support a smaller party. Here's an example from the last Ontario election. Voting systems ARE important. If we had a Proportional Voting system in Ontario, we would not have a Doug Ford Conservative Government in Ontario because The Conservatives only got 40.8% of the votes. POLITICAL PARTY % OF VOTE SEATS VOTES NEEDED TO WIN A SEAT Conservatives 40.8% 83 23,000 NDP 23.7% 31 36,000 Liberals 23.8% 8 140,000 Green 5.9% 1 279,000 Independent 1 WITH A PROPORTIONAL VOTING SYSTEM .... we would probably have an NDP, Liberal Green Coalition Government. That coalition would have about 54% of the votes, instead of the 41% the Conservatives got. Now perhaps, there could be a Conservative Liberal Coaliton .... representing about 64% of voters. COALITION GOVERNMENTS: In Proportional Voting systems, Coalition Governments are used. If one party actually gets more than 50% of the votes, which is unusual ... they can form a government by themselves. But usually, two or more parties will form a coalition that has more than 50% of the votes and seats. IN ONTARIO, we would probably have, as I said, an NDP, Liberal, Green coalition. Or maybe a Conservative / Liberal coalition. This is good in a couple of ways. FIRST, it means that at least our governments represent more than half of us ... in the current Ontario government, only 41% of voters are 'represented'. And second, it brings more voices into government. In Ontario, Doug Ford personally has a huge amount of power, and is able to whatever he wants ... or whatever he is being told to do. In a Coalition Government, there are other voices in Government and it means more discussion and hopefully more thought. And, more ideas are represented. I think these are good things. Is it too much to ask to get the governments that we vote for ... well in Canada yes - it is too much to ask. They - our .01% ruling class - will not let us have a more democratic voting system like PR because that would give us more power and those at the top now have virtually ALL the power and that is the way they like it and they do not intend to give up ANY of their power to a bunch of saps like 'The People Of Canada'. 1.... This is a topic seldom discussed, because those at the top don't want us talking about how to have a better democracy. A better democracy would give us people a bit more power. And they won't allow that. 2... In Canada now, we use a voting system called First Past The Post. We all know how it works. We vote in a provincial or federal election. The person who gets the most votes in "our area" wins, and goes off to be a part of the Parliament or Government. 3... But what is not discussed in Canada is that our First Past The Post voting system does NOT give us the governments that we vote for. This means that WE vote for one government ... but our voting system translates that into something quite different .. and gives us a government that we didn't vote for. NOW THIS IS KIND OF IMPORTANT DON'T YOU THINK .... THE FACT THAT OUR VOTING SYSTEM DOES NOT GIVE US THE GOVERNMENTS THAT WE VOTED FOR. You would think that a story of that importance ... would get mentioned somewhere. But it never is. We have election after election over many decades and the fact that our voting system doesn't give us what we voted for is never discussed. Now, maybe I'm wrong and our current voting system is very good - but shouldn't we citizens KNOW something about this. But we d