Deplorable Social

WHAT IN THE WORLD ARE THEY SPRAYING? tells the story of a rapidly developing industry called geoengineering, driven by scientists, corporations, and governments intent on changing global climate, controlling the weather, and altering the chemical composition of soil and water - all supposedly for the betterment of mankind. Although officials insist that these programs are only in the discussion phase, evidence is abundant that they have been underway since about 1990 - and the effect has been devastating to crops, wildlife, and human health.

To those who have maintained a firm grasp on realty, it might appear as though most others have lost it. In this 7 minute interview, Professor Desmet clearly breaks down the complex psychological condition known as Mass Formation. I hope this interview is as eye opening for you, as it was for me. May his powerful words help you to better navigate your relationships and future.

Courtesy of @ChiefNerd

"Right now, these guys are running for cover, and they're trying to change the subject. They're willing to start a war... to try and cover. That's because they know there's a lot of big name people that belong in jail."

The Colonel gives a very sober-minded analysis of the situation in Ukraine.

Dr. Peter McCullough at a Pennsylvania Senate hearing 3/4/22 Four Pillars of Pandemic Response 1. Reduce Spread 2. Early Treatment 3. In Hospital Care 4. Vaccination for High Risk Video courtesy of @VigilantFox

Full Interview Here: https://rumble.com/vwfu7j-edward-dowd-explains-bombshell-fraud-charge-re-pfizer-hiding-deaths-data.html

In October 2020 Dr Andrew Hill was tasked to report to the World Health Organisation on the dozens of new studies from around the world suggesting that Ivermectin could be a remarkably safe and effective treatment for COVID-19. But on January 18th 2021, Dr Hill published his findings on a pre-print server. His methods lacked rigour, the review was low quality and the extremely positive findings on ivermectin were contradicted by the conclusion. In the end, Dr Hill advised that “Ivermectin should be validated in larger appropriately controlled randomized trials before the results are sufficient for review by regulatory authorities.” The researcher seeking a global recommendation on Ivermectin had instead recommended against it. A media onslaught against the medicine ensued. What were Dr Hill’s reasons for doing so? Were his conclusions justified? Or were external forces influencing his about-face? One year on, this film recalls exactly what happened from the perspective of somebody that experienced it first hand; Dr Tess Lawrie; also featuring contributions from Dr Pierre Kory and Dr Paul Marik who worked closely with Dr Hill during the same time frame. ⁣If you like what Oracle Films does, you can support us here: buymeacoffee.com/oraclefilms ⁣ Follow us on Telegram: t.me/OracleFilms