Video 3 - Darple Is Occult
WARNING: THIS VIDEO CONTAINS IMPLICIT & DISGUSTING IMAGES, MORE THAN VIEWER DISCRETION FOREVER IS GREATLY ADVISED. YOU HAVE NOW BEEN GIVEN FAIR WARNING, GAZE UPON AT YOUR OWN RISK.
Transcript: Let's go to Brave with DuckDuckGo, and turn safe search to off, and type in Headshot, and behold, there is pretty normal stuff, for the most part right? Now let's type it in with a spelling error. Still some pretty normal stuff. Now let's head over to Google Chrome, and type in the same thing and go to images. Even more pretty normal stuff. Now let's type it in with the same spelling error. My eyes, this unholy profound disgrace!!! Google is a bunch of pedophiles, they are supposed to have this stuff removed with their algorithms, although that is suppression of information; but no, rather Google finds it specifically, and puts it up top, instead of showing the related results first. They show that they are assisting the porn, sex-trafficking, and the Babylon 2.0 movements. Just today, they just changed all their little apps to look like the one rainbow as well. They are run by perverted Satanists. They have been trying to usher in the New World Order for a long time, like I always said; here now I show proof once again. Look how there is nothing else related to the misspelled word. Sycophants, their punishment for their crime needs to be death, executed now, in order to protect the world and its natural creatures.
Update - 3/24/22: This no longer brings up the results, but if you play around with the word headshot, that is the amount of h's in it, it will still show up. See this would be fine, if the Google hadn't claimed they were trying to make it safe for kids, on restricted mode, but they did, so it shows their true intention.
NewTube: https://newtube.app/user/Daily_Dubbings/JNnqycD
UGETube: https://ugetube.com/watch/video-3-darple-is-occult_RaDkfOls1rxAyPa.html
Brand New Tube: https://brandnewtube.com/watch/video-3-darple-is-occult_fg4aPIPVFdRRHR8.html
20
views
Podcast 1 - Jesus Is Risen
Jesus Lives!!!!
Transcript: So, is it actually possible to prove that Jesus did not rise from the dead? --No, it is not. It is just of matter of, well, faith. There is more evidence that Jesus was real than Julius Cesar. Jesus's life is not a debatable question, in fact, the one thing that is universally agreed on by all scholars & historians, is, that He died. His apostles all died horrible deaths for what they believed they saw, excluding John whose death is unknown, also excluding Judas, who committed suicide via noose-style hanging in a field; Which makes it highly unlikely that they would've lied about Jesus rising from the dead. No one could have taken the body, because a guestimated 30-35 Roman Soldiers were guarding it. The soldiers were also unharmed, which means a mob of people didn’t steal the body after a skirmish. The Romans would have been killed for sleeping on the job, and so they had an agreement with the Jews to say Jesus’s disciples came deep into the night and stole the body. Now this would appear to be the disciples’ excuse for the body disappearing, but over 500 people saw Jesus after He died, so mass hysteria could not work as these were random-about people, many of which were loyal Jews, and mirage could not have affected that many people, especially at the same time. Before Jesus was taken down from His cross, they pierced His side to make sure He was dead, being that He appeared to already be dead within 6 hours, & His mother cried so loudly & begged them not to break His legs. Red blood cells & plasma flowed out, which is what happens when your blood stops flowing for an extended period of time; it separates into layers. It couldn't have been someone else, because at the beginning of His floggings, His mom watched Him get beat & Him carry His crossbeam to Golgotha, & then mourned at His death. Despite contrary belief, Jesus's death was not due to His crucifixion process, which is death by blood loss due to the floggings, suffocation via fixation, severe shock, & possibly heart complications. Although He bled more than some due to the crown of thorns, it would not be enough to cause Him to die in 6 hours. Since they did not break His legs, the suffocation would take much longer to be a factor in his death, so it is not a cause. He had not eaten in approximately 36 hours more or less, but that is not so far fetched to be the cause of death, so it too is not a death factor. He was not in shock while on the cross; He spoke to his mom, John, the criminal who repented, the roman soldiers, & The Father from the cross with coherent thought, so it is not a cause of death. He did not die from blood loss, because with His last breaths he cried out in a loud voice, "Father, INTO YOUR HANDS I COMMIT MY SPIRIT". Severe shock with possible heart complications is not possible either for His death, because with His last breaths, He talked with coherent thought & appears to have not struggled for lack of breath, but rather have struggled in exhaustion. Extreme exhaustion is not possible as a cause of death, because Jesus was well nourished generally speaking & was in above average physical shape. He was not weak either, probably having been a carpenter for a time, and walked around constantly. It appears Jesus literally gave His life up to His Father, as it says in John 10:17-18, “For this reason the Father loves Me, because I lay down My life so that I may take it back. No one has taken it away from Me, but I lay it down on My own. I have authority to lay it down, and I have authority to take it back. This commandment I received from My Father.” So unless YOU somehow disagree with the fact that it was actually Jesus who died not by but during His crucifixion, then the whole story couldn't have been made up therefore. Meaning that it is just a matter of FAITH for you, as well as your inability to accept reality; that is if you believe Jesus didn't rise from the dead--Even though it is the only option when the facts are presented.
NewTube: https://newtube.app/user/Daily_Dubbings/r9qlXz7
UgeTube: https://ugetube.com/watch/mtyVH5N7xfYXbwq
Brand New Tube: https://brandnewtube.com/watch/HPfqdPjbIEnudhY
SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/joe_mommu/jesus_is_risen
Song: It's Our Fight
Artist: Steve Jablosky
35
views
Video 2 - Was There Actually A Gap In Genesis?
Was there actually a gap in Genesis? That is the question that will be discussed today.
Summary: So many Christians believe in the Gap Theory which occurs in between Genesis 1:1 & 1:2, specifically in between, "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. The earth was without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep..." (ESV), but this may be impossible! In Hebrew, Genesis 1:2 as the entire verse acts almost as a note to Genesis 1:1, meaning it is not possible for a gap to be there, or is it? So what is the true story you may be asking yourself? God created his heavenly beings before time began, before Genesis 1:1, the amount of time God took to create the heavens & the earth is unknown, however, to some it appears to be millions of years. Now why is that? That is because in the Bible it describes the being created in water, out of water, through the Word of God, and was floating within in the skewed out waters that consumed the universe. It appears that after a certain amount of time creating the "foundation" of the earth, God created hell due to a civil war when the highest, most powerful & beautiful cherub, wanted to be God, as God had placed him on his mountain on the earth in geographical eden, the Garden of God, the tallest mountain out of them all on elevated platform; to take care of it, & was greatly rewarded with several different stones placed on his head. He took a third of the angels with him as well as an unknown amount of other beings. They had their battle and got whoped & imprisoned in the lowest bowels or "heart" of the earth. Some of the fallen beings are allowed to free roam in spiritual form out of pity, not to many though that it would cause a problem. It appears that sometime during the war with the satan, according to Jeremiah 4:23-28, Satan corrupted the whole world. Fruitful lands became deserts and cities laid to waste due to God's fury!!! All the birds were trying to hide between the waters that the earth was "floating in" & that were in the earth's atmosphere, and the land. So God "finished" his heavens & earth, & does Genesis 1:3 & so forth to make better & fix our reality for us. So it seems like there really is a gap, but it is between Genesis 1:2 & Genesis 1:3, which we thankfully know of due to critical thinking and historical reasoning skills & processes as well as natural grammatical spaces that occur within human nature. Dinosaurs may have been on the old earth, but some were also on the "new" world as they found real dinosaur skin in 2012, but it was rotten. Noah's flood would explain some of the coal we have but barely any, as in 1751 A.D, 13,300 years of coal were used, & also there are 100 sedimentary layers that are followed by COAL, meaning that it would have to be from "old" earth. That is also why in Genesis it says according to their like kinds, because there previously was similar fauna & creatures! However, there is another way this could occur to the non-regeneration Genesis standpoint!!! Due to the Hebrew being so old between Genesis 1:1 & Genesis 1:2, the almost acting as a note part could be instead an reminding insert, meaning that a gap could be allowed there!!! Which would also mean that the meaning of Jeremiah 4:23-28 would not be the ending to the old earth that will be done to the new one, no, it could be rather that the new one will appear like old earth before God had spiced up it, and that he had not created ancient life there. This also means that the hosts of heaven are actually beings, not planets, there by making it so the angels & other beings were not with God before Genesis 1:1. This would also mean the universe still did indeed take millions of years to make, however, the planets were not remade, and were unchanged in them their selves. Satan and his angels fell between the 2nd day & The Fall of Man, and Satan & his angels were supposed to help guide the whole operation of man ruling the animals & the ecosystem. Which means Eden was an elevated platform entirely & there were many mountains but the biggest being the mountain of God. And that hell was made to house these fallen, meaning the unpopulated areas of the world would suffer earthquakes & fault lines. While the unexplainable amount of coal would be do to the naturally building of the earth, which could also be applied to the 1:2 – 1:3 Gap Theory. And when God says their like kinds, it is because he is mid-process of thinking of the kinds.
LET ME KNOW WHAT YOU THINK ON HOW IT ACTUALLY HAPPENED!!!!!!!!!
NewTube: https://newtube.app/user/Daily_Dubbings/BLkJIhT https://newtube.app/user/Daily_Dubbings/ay0wOw5
UGETube: https://ugetube.com/watch/561PNUjOtYEkgX8
Brand New Tube: https://brandnewtube.com/watch/McXmZsfS4xknhFK
Audio Only Version on SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/joe_mommu/was_there_actually_a_gap_in_genesis
302
views
1
comment
Video 1 - 3 More Broken Theories
You know what other three theories also don't work?--"Evolution", Freudian Psychology, & Communism/Socialism!!!!
CREATING A SMALLER WAGE GAP IS OBVIOUSLY NOT WORTH HAVING YOUR RIGHTS TAKEN AWAY!!!!!!
I had an extremely fun & hard time getting the audio to come out for this first vid, so listen in closely, & try to understand what the words are, volume adjustment may be needed.
Transcript: Is “Evolution” even possible? No, it is not. The chances of life spawning out of a burning rock is literally zero. The mitochondrial DNA in all creatures would have each the characteristics of most of the other creatures, in fact, our very own DNA would have specific characteristics of other creatures as well. Yet, all forms of life, for animals have eyes, bugs are invertebrates, sea creatures have fins. And a creature can’t just spectacularly pick the traits it wants to develop, so sectional development couldn’t have work. In fact, most creatures are so complex, that if a particular organ, had to develop over time, none of said creatures would be alive. You are so complex, that your brain literally puts our processing power, your body is an ultimate machine full of life, your brain is the computer, and your spirit is the user. If “evolution” was accurate despite everything just said, Your life would go through many stages of different creatures due to the unlocked genes, and by the time you died, you would barely make it to the final form, let alone if you could get to human, as a final step. A cotton factory produces cotton, a womb produces it like kind. All the above actually suggest intelligent design. The DNA appears to resemble a signature of someone. Is it not curious to you that throughout all of the universe, your little rock you live on is perfectly distant from its star at a nearly perfect temperature varying within 13 degrees that life is allowed to live? Have you ever realized that despite other forms of life being found on Mars like lizards and ancient reptiles, Earth is the only one with sustained life? Has it ever occurred to you that bacteria can be found on comets that have an atmosphere? Has it been made known to you that one of the most awesome machines ever made, was no more than a majority of simply carbon and water, not even the size of a spec of an atom in comparison to the universe? Lucy is simply an extinct type of ape, that has more orangutan like features, they’ve examined the bones, there is no alternative explanation. It could only stand from its legs for a limited time due to the muscle structure around its hips. There is no actual proof that neanderthals existed, in fact, they are just assortments of pieces of extinct species of, a displaced bone of another animal, older humans, or humans with disorders like extreme arthritis. Now that we have established from above that each creature was made with intelligent design. It wouldn’t make sense that some people would be partly neanderthal, because first off, they don’t exist, second of all, 96.5% of human DNA is identical to primates, & thirdly, they could be related simply to some of the mislabeled older humans. Charles Darwin & Sigmund Freud were both obviously mistaken about what they believed, but limited by the scientific equipment of their time, the stances made sense in a way, at first first glance. They also did make known & or discover new developments in science. Charles Darwin upon wondering how life suddenly one day came into existence, tried to essentially use what somewhat resembles a modern microscope to view bacteria, thinking they were a simpler form of life. So he thought that bacteria was spontaneously generated, so that must be how live also came into existence. So how is that reasoning somehow credible in any era? That life just casually spawns up everyday like, no biggy. To his theory, why would bacteria still be around? Because of the need to develop better characteristics, life became larger. Then why didn’t bacteria follow along? Is it because most of the genes are locked down? That’s exactly right. His own logic is broken, as there is no way he could put bacteria into a category of a separate spawning of life, because then how we came to be wouldn’t make sense. That his theory is called by many The Spontaneous Generation Theory, because Reason # 1, life spontaneously generated one day along with bacteria (which is also alive) one day, and bacteria is still being generated to this day for some reason somehow. Reason # 2, it that the idea of this theory was spontaneously generated in Darwin’s brain, it literally came out of nowhere. However, Darwin did make micro-evolution more accepted which is fact. Micro-evolution is the slow change of a few of a creature’s genes to better adapt to input whether from the environment, food, radiation, etc... Sigmund Freud, was also stupid in his own way, but also a pervert, as he was sexually aroused by his mom when he was only a boy one day when he “accidentally” saw her undressing. Whenever something was troubling a person that he didn’t understand or didn’t appear physical, he would instantly say that it is in their mind, they have an inability to accept reality or their status in life, etc…. Then he might even give a medical diagnosis to the person, revolving around mental status, when for we know, it could’ve been a parasite eating one's brain, a non-apparent physical issue. Freud also thought the way you are is only because of how you were nursed, brought up, & what the environment is like around you, when obviously humans are much more than a storage unit & logic program. However Sigmund Freud did get parts of one thing right, and that is the recognition of the Ego, the Id, & the Super-Ego, which are the basic workings, and overall mechanical setup and functions of how a brain operates; as like your consciousness, your subconscious, processing part of your brain, and possibly a want that extends from one “section” to the others. Sigmund looked up to and greatly admired Darwin, he was much younger than Darwin, and was greatly influenced by his work which would direct him toward psychoanalysis. Freud was not an orthodox jew, but he did have some instructions from the scriptures, whether that means anything at all or not. Karl Marx was also mistaken on his theory, Communism. Although living partially communally is actually a benefit, as you can rely on one another & also spread excess capital. Communism is essentially slow death. Under the toughness of early industrial capitalism, Karl Marx under a Monarchy wants the peasants to finally get some rights, and get the pay they deserve, so people upon his teaching of the people will rule, communally, overthrow monarchy in Russia. However, for everyone to rule was too democratic and would result in chaos, so a select group of people became the rulers. As you may have already caught on, Communism is like an early test phase for a U.S.-like political system. However, it is not necessarily capitalistic, being more feudal in nature. So now, the Russians would set up that economy that we just mentioned, right? Wrong. The ruling party does essentially what a monarchy en-tales, they set up themselves as supreme rulers and elect a party head official to rule of the land, instead of setting up different branches of government filled with people elected by other people in particular areas around Russia. Now some would say, Oh, that was a failed attempt at a good political system & economy, they could try it again. Well, instead of that, how about they just go straight to the stink’in U.S.-like political system and avoid all the trouble & chance of reverting back to a dictatorship? That is because Karl Marx as stated before can’t handle the stress of the world he lives in & is too worn to go on somehow, like as if he had the worst life. So really, Karl Marx wanted a simpler, less technological culture, yet he didn’t understand he would be working just as hard in an agricultural one. In that same way though, an increase in agriculture in the U.S. would be a benefit. Some people said well, if we slowly import communism, and make it slightly less harsh, people will accept it. Well no Steiner Sherlock. That’s how you slowly integrate anything that people don’t want, you also have to give them a reason, like lets say, a Plandemic, so that they have to rely on the people pushing socialism to get an essential item in life, & unwilling trade their position, to stand with more socialistic values, whether they like it or not. You also can’t come out and address it directly, because then people will riot & start an uprising. However, socialism is even more dumb than communism because now there is an even larger gap of time for the society to become totalitarian. Communism wants the state to provide everything through people’s labor, which ignores the individual’s rights (being more feudalistic in nature as stated above), creating that the state issues bread out or a small amount of currency to buy different forms of food. Socialism wants everything to be free, which is the same exact thing, just worded differently. Sigmund Freud, Charles Darwin, & Karl Marx all had a few things in common, they were all marked with depression, had severe family problems, a lack of fulfillment, & a godless lifestyle, & BROKEN THEORIES.
NewTube: https://newtube.app/user/Daily_Dubbings/eIXaV0p
UGETube: https://ugetube.com/watch/yYCj5twu8t6ofu8
Brand New Tube: https://brandnewtube.com/v/gqTlOY
Audio Only Version on SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/joe_mommu/3_more_broken_theories
617
views
Podcast 3 - Time Travel Is Unachievable
Transcript: Albert Einstein was indeed brilliant, despite him being too unfocused to do math problems that he would have his wife do after he would make them to see if his equations were accurate to prove a theory. He had ADD & a form of Aspergers, so he had a high I.Q. and a slightly low E.Q. & at times was a little strange therefore. However, the theory of his that is incorrect, is that of time travel. Time is in & around all things & the universe, if time is always moving, then how can we access it? Well because it is not a material matter, it would have to due with electrons & the inside of atoms at certain speed, all of them at the exact same speed, with out breaking bonds on a vessel you were in, which would be much faster than the speed of light. However, because we are in time & it is always flowing, & everything is subjugated to it & inside of it, we can therefore not mess with time, we can’t disrupt its flow. Radiation causes accelerated decay process, meaning your body ages faster because of the break down, possibly causing a shorter life expectancy. So if you went a way from the a star in a vessel, you would age less, however, if you were to have it pitch black in the vessel, and avoid radio contact, then you would age even less, however, you wouldn’t be able to see, and your life at that point would be futile, you could go to a pitch black planet not by any stars so the gravity does effect you in your ship, which is parked somewhat near the surface, but then what is even the point? You would still age, even with enhanced systematic repairs on your body itself that would break through 3 centuries of current science, but your brain would eventually send out a signal to your body saying its time to go home, even if you did life 400 years in that terrible way, alone, isolated, in pure darkness.
NewTube: https://newtube.app/user/Daily_Dubbings/ezTkLFR
UGETube: https://ugetube.com/watch/Qv4gmHEFTwPnpw6
Brand New Tube: https://brandnewtube.com/watch/podcast-3-time-travel-is-unachievable_w7xIpsqUSkxJckY.html
SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/joe_mommu/time_travel_is_unachievable
Song: You Are God Alone
Artist: Phillips, Craig, & Dean
83
views
Podcast 2 - The 2nd Temple Destroyed
"What was the greatest prophesy with the most direct reference Jesus gave before he resurrected?", you may be thinking. Well, we'll be going over that in today's podcast.
Transcript: Jesus was God incarnate of Flesh, which means he would be a prophet as well, right? That's probably what your thinking. To that note, he indeed is. This podcast is about one of the greatest prophesy that has already happened, which is the destruction of the Second Temple in Jerusalem. Matthew 24:1-2, Jesus left the temple and was going away, when his disciples came to point out to him the buildings of the temple. But he answered them, “You see all these, do you not? Truly, I say to you, there will not be left here one stone upon another that will not be thrown down.” Also recorded in Mark 13:1-2, And as he came out of the temple, one of his disciples said to him, “Look, Teacher, what wonderful stones and what wonderful buildings!” And Jesus said to him, “Do you see these great buildings? There will not be left here one stone upon another that will not be thrown down.” As well as in Luke 21:5-6, And while some were speaking of the temple, how it was adorned with noble stones and offerings, he said, “As for these things that you see, the days will come when there will not be left here one stone upon another that will not be thrown down.” (ESV) The Jews of Judea rebelled in 66 A.D. Emperor Nero sent an army under General Vespasian. By 68 A.D, resistance in the Northern part of the province had been wiped out. Nero then died, due to the chaos that ensued, Vespasian declared himself emperor. Titus, his son, led the remaining soldiers to Jerusalem. The Roman legion began squeeze in on around the stronghold. By 70 A.D, the walls of the city were breached, the ransacking began. Then the Romans ended the battle when, their lust for battle and detestation of the Jews, against Caesar's orders, by burning and destroying the Second Temple. They took the giant stones that were unthinkably movable, that they had put there in the first place for the Jews under Herod the Great to revitalize the modest and small temple that the Jews had built after they were released from Babylon due to the Persians, and hurled them down into the Valley nearby. The Romans then slaughtered thousands. Thousands more who hadn’t bit the dust were sold off into slavery & sent to the mines in Egypt. Many were sent to various arenas, and we all know how that turned out. Within 3 years, all the pockets of resistance were spat out. The sacred relics from the Temple were put on display in Rome as celebratory items of the victory. So, in case you had to rewind the video half-dozen times, Jesus was indeed a prophet even BEFORE he resurrected.
Go to http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/jewishtemple.htm to see for yourself.
NewTube: https://newtube.app/user/Daily_Dubbings/4r1u1hB
UGETube: https://ugetube.com/watch/podcast-2-the-2nd-temple-destroyed_q9yIUHBdfnkTN9k.html
Brand New Tube: https://brandnewtube.com/v/taU3Mp
SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/joe_mommu/the_2nd_temple_destroyed
Song: Cities in Dust
Artist: The Everlove
89
views