Theory C: No 757 Hit the Pentagon on 9/11 (with 30 min Q&A)

No 757 hit the Pentagon on 9/11: Craig McKee and Adam RuffShow more

In our presentation we will review all the evidence that points to a staged event at the Pentagon and not a real crash of a Boeing 757 into the building. We will also examine claims that there is significant evidence to support an impact by Flight 77 itself.

We'll look at the accounts of eyewitnesses, particularly those interviewed by Citizen Investigation Team. While some of these do believe the plane they saw did hit the building, the flight path they describe is too far north to have created the alleged damage path. And almost all of these witnesses describe a right bank by the plane that they saw approaching the Pentagon.

One of the most important witnesses is Lloyde England, the cab driver who claims his vehicle was impaled by a piece of the first pole alleged to have been knocked over. We'll show that England's account, which supports the official story, simply can't be true. We'll also review some of the problematic arguments that have been made in support of the claim that England's account is true.

We will also address the "damage" that is claimed in the official story (and by some of the conference presenters) to have been caused by Flight 77. We contend that it cannot be proven that Flight 77 did this "damage," and the physical evidence does not support an impact by any 757.

Why "No 757" and not "no plane" or "nothing" hit?

It's very simple. If we prove that there was no impact of a Boeing 757 with the Pentagon, then we've proven that the official story is false. And this keeps the burden of proof exactly where it should be: with the U.S. government and the mainstream media.

When we go beyond this statement, we risk taking the burden of proof on ourselves. Indeed, some of the presenters in this conference appear to believe that the burden should fall on the Truth Movement to prove exactly what happened and exactly how it happened.

When I created the "No 757 hit the Pentagon" list in 2017, my purpose was to bring together the vast majority of those in the 9/11 Truth Movement who agree with this statement but who may have their own idea about what exactly happened.

Of course, if we can absolutely prove exactly what happened, much as researchers in the Truth Movement have proved the use of nanothermite in the demolition of the Twin Towers, then so much the better. But either way, our focus must be on challenging the official story and its many anomalies and impossibilities. We should be highlighting all that is false in the official narrative., not trying to prove that more and more of it is true.

We look forward to making our case at 9/11CON.

Here are some of the many articles I've written on the Pentagon on my website, Truth and Shadows (TruthAndShadows.com):

http://truthandshadows.com/2019/03/20/lloyde-englands-tall-pentagon-tale-part-1/

https://truthandshadows.com/2019/04/28/lloyde-england-part-2/

https://truthandshadows.com/2017/12/29/chandlers-failed-pentagon-methodology/

https://truthandshadows.com/2017/12/11/the-no-757-hit-the-pentagon-list/

http://truthandshadows.com/2015/03/19/hijackers-did-not-board-planes/

https://truthandshadows.com/2015/10/03/chandler devotes most of pentagon talk to boosting elements of the official story

http://truthandshadows.com/2019/02/13/most-persistent-911-threat/