Killstream: Nick Fuentes vs Destiny, the invasion of Ukraine by Russia

This invasion is prominently regarding the expansion of NATO that is further encroaching into Russian sovereignty. NATO was formed to counter the Soviet Union and was to protect Europe from the threat of the Soviet Union. Of course in 2014 you got the medhan, where a pro-western power was installed, and has fueled the wars in Donebask ever since. For the 22 years between the fall of the Soviet Union and the medhan revolution, there is no crisis in Ukraine. It is not until the 2014 coup when NATO begin to ignore the Russia’s. Now they’re beginning a full demilitarization of Russia and they’re claiming that Russia is trying to rebuild the Soviet Union back to its former glory. But where was the provocation, the provocation was the continuation of the pro western Ukraine, it was the western forces that precipitated this. In September of 2020, the United States flies bombers across the Donebask region. So before we dive in, I’m curious if Destiny grants that Russia has a legitimate security interest in Ukraine being a vassel, we can’t do that. But are security interests relevant? And what about Ukraine’s security interests. But is Ukraine secure right now? Was Zelensky daring Russia to bomb Ukraine. The expansion of NATO is not enhancing the security of Ukraine and it is not enhancing the security of the United Kingdom. This is what Zelensky is inviting a no fly zone over Ukraine, the point is this. The point is that this NATO expansion is not good for anybody. And remember the NATO states are beholden to the United States, we know that the United States run NATO. This is not good for Ukraine, this is not good for America, and this is not good for Russia. The problem is Porshenko and Zelensky had too much ambition in joining NATO and they thought that NATO would have their back. You have to pay attention to these things otherwise you have a crisis. If we’re going to say that NATO should never expand, doesn’t that mean that every nonalliance should just start getting nukes, isn’t that situation bad for everybody is it not? Think of the Bay of Pigs and how the United States wouldn’t tolerate surface to surface missles in Cuba. The crux of the argument is that America is not a benign Hegemon and NATO spends over 1.2 trillion dollars on military. The reintroduction of theatre missiles into Europe destabilizes power, NATO is explicitly an anti-Russia alliance. And its expanding on Russia’s borders on black sea fleet. And everybody should admit that this invasion is a bad outcome for every nation, and we have to admit that the United States has played a role in ratcheting up the escalation. Here is the reality, we are at risk for a World War 3 scenario.

This summary is only the tip of the iceberg as this debate is informative and really wraps a bow on both sides of the argument regarding Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine. Despite what you may think of Nick Fuentes and Destiny, I think a lot of people will learn a lot from this debate and you can tell that they both prepped very well for it.