Zoom Call 03.02.2022

3 years ago

DOCS: http://www.lawofboris.com/files/03032022.zip

Also recommend people view: https://rumble.com/veke0p-law-of-boris-part-7-of-8.html

Success Story using equitable right of set-off in conjunction with the Lord's Prayer; subrogation; some testimonies; Rule 19 discussion

Unless proof of claim the United States paid the State of Birth to register and or record man/people born for conversion into a governmentally recognized “surety,” “franchise,” “tax payer,” or a “statutory or juristic Person” by operation of law as the [YOUR NAME], et al., name is derived from the [Your Full Name] name affixed to a certificate of live birth; as the States receive allotments for each live birth each State bore from appropriations provided by Congress with Title V of THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT OF 1935; and as Article 1 Section 8 Clause 17 limits jurisdiction of Congress;

Or proof of claim for the alternative agreement to rebut United States vs PeWee Coal, 1951 (341 U.S. 114, 71 S.Ct. 670, 95 L.Ed. 809) because “whatever might have been one’s losses had one been left free to exercise one’s own “business judgment”, the crucial fact is that the State of Birth and United States choose to intervene in one's "business judgment" by taking possession of the live birth event and operating control by registering such event to secure the Social Security Funds and other grants offered by the United States. By doing so, the State of Birth and United States became the proprietor and, in the absence of contrary arrangements, are entitled to the benefits and subject to the liabilities which that status involves;”

Else, one is the Act of God and Force Majeure behind the event registered and recorded in this world of insurance and contract

Loading 3 comments...