International Grand Jury - Day 5 - Economical Destruction

As has been proven over the previous four days of the International Grand Jury sessions, Covid is easily treated in the early stages, just like the annual flu. However, that early treatment was denied by health agencies around the world. That resulted in the use of harmful and deadly treatments, leading to nearly six million deaths around the world as of Feb. 22, 2022.

Governments around the world worked very hard to convince everyone Covid-19 was as deadly as the Black Plague and simply speaking to your neighbor could be sentencing yourself to death. To increase that fear, the WHO promoted the use of the PCR test (designed by Dr. Christian Drosten of Germany), which had been rapidly developed. The design never went through peer-review and was published and accepted by the WHO within three days of the completion of the design.

The RT-PCR process was invented by Kary Mullis in the 1980s, for which he won a Nobel Prize. It was designed as a research tool, used to multiply the number of a particular sample to create enough for scientists to study.

A sample is combined with a solution containing enzymes, nucleotides and more. This combination is put through cycles of heating and cooling in which the sample RNA or DNA is split in half, after which each half combines with particles from the solution to rebuild the half. The sample strand is not the entire genome of the virus, but only a very small portion.

As each cycle of heating and cooling is conducted, the number of strands doubles... 1 becomes 2 becomes 4 become 8 becomes 16, etc.

In his patent, Mullis stated samples should only be put through 20 - 30 cycles. The rebuilding of each strand is not perfect and sometimes it will combine with the incorrect particle. This error then moves forward as the cycles repeat. Mullis stated over 30 cycles is very likely to result in something very different than the original sample.

Dr. Drosten's design recommended 45 cycles, which the CDC testing guidelines followed. The CDC instructions stated the process was to use 45 repetitions.

Mullis was quite adamant for decades that the PCR could never be used as a test to diagnose any illness. He repeatedly butted heads with Fauci when Fauci used it to 'diagnose' HIV. Conveniently, Mullis died in August 2019 - just 3 months before Covid appeared in China.

The same CDC testing guidelines also admitted no isolated sample had been available when the PCR 'test' was designed and could not rule out bacteria or some other pathogen causing a positive result.

"Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test [RT-PCR] was developed... "

"•Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.

•The performance of this test has not been established for monitoring treatment of 2019-nCoV infection.

•The performance of this test has not been established for screening of blood or blood products for the presence of 2019-nCoV.

•This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens."

https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

This information was repeated in the July 2020, December 2020 and July 2021 versions of the guidelines. In July 2021, the CDC announced it would be phasing out the PCR 'test' by the end of 2021 and replacing it with a test that could tell the difference between the annual flu and Covid.

Knowing all of this, the CDC used this 'test' through all of 2020 and 2021.

In November 2020, an International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences (ICSLS) reported their review of Drosten's PCR design, laying out the flaws. They determined at 35 cycles, 97% of the positives were false positives. What would be the percentage at 45 cycles?

https://cormandrostenreview.com/

BTW, it appears Dr. Drosten got his doctoral status under false pretenses. He is currently under investigation.

The ever growing number of deaths from medical malpractice and the explosive number of false positives of the PCR 'test' were used to justify lock downs... initially proposed to be only 15 days. However, in many places around the world, that 15 days has turned into nearly two years.

Large stores were allowed to stay open, but Mom and Pop stores were forced to close. Churches, restaurants and schools were forced to close, but liquor stores and stripper businesses were allowed to remain open. The logic of what was closed and what remained open did not exist, but if anyone dared to question it, they were attacked and censored.

Then came the vaccines. The message was clear, if you wanted to work, if you wanted to be a part of society, you had to get vaccinated... then get boosted.

The world was told the jabs would prevent people from catching and spreading Covid. When that was proven false, the world was told the jabs would reduce hospitalizations and deaths. The CDC has gone to great lengths to hide the data, but the rest of the world was reporting it. Scotland and England publicly reported the raw data. Israel, Iceland, Gibraltar and other countries were reporting what they were seeing in the news. They all reported the same thing... 80% and more of the Covid deaths were in the fully vaccinated.

The only medical viewpoints allowed were those from Dr. Fauci, Dr. Birx and Dr. Redfield of the CDC. The vast majority of news outlets refused to interview doctors with a different opinion, and if they did, they insulted them or refused to allow them to speak. Any videos or articles with opposing opinions were deleted or buried on the internet. Social media accounts were closed down (Facebook and Twitter).

The question is why?

Why deny early treatment and cause massive deaths?

Why use a 'test' designed to give massive false positives?

Why lock down small businesses and allow big business to continue?

Why were opposing views of doctors and scientists shut down? Why were second opinions suddenly denigrated?

Big businesses got richer - Wal Mart, Amazon, while hundreds of thousands of small businesses and jobs were destroyed.

The wealth of big tech grew by billions, as did the wealth of Big Pharma.

So, what is the endgame of all this horror? While a few vastly increased their wealth, the rest of the world has had great financial loss. It is time for answers...

Additional sessions of the Grand Jury:

Day 1 - https://rumble.com/vu6650-international-covid-grand-injury-exposing-the-crimes-opening-statements.html

Day 2 - https://rumble.com/vuwoxr-international-covid-grand-jury-day-2-controllers-behind-the-scenes.html

Day 3 - https://rumble.com/vux6bn-international-covid-grand-jury-day-3-the-fraudulent-pcr-test.html

Day 4 - https://rumble.com/vvhizq-international-covid-grand-jury-day-4-injections.html

Day 6 - https://rumble.com/vw64eu-international-covid-grand-jury-day-6-eugenics-and-closing-arguments.html

https://covid-crime.org/grand-jury/