Bill Gates: SADLY the virus itself, particularly the variant called Omicron, is a type of vaccine

Gates said: "SADLY the virus itself, particularly the variant called Omicron, is a type of vaccine. That is, it creates both B-cell and T-cell immunity and it's done a better job of getting out to the world population than we have with vaccines."

With his choice of the word 'sadly', Gates further exposed his agenda and interests. If it were about public health, he might have used the word 'luckily':

"LUCKILY the virus itself, particularly the variant called Omicron, is a type of (natural) vaccine. That is, it creates both robust and durable sterilizing B-cell and T-cell immunity, and it spreads automatically and freely. It's significantly less dangerous and more effective than the genetic 'vaccines', which turned out to be the biggest medical fiasco in the history of mankind."

Gates' agenda is clearly not about public health, but about getting as many vaccines in as many shoulders as possible ('vaccine maximalism'). It may also be about profits, population reduction and other goals.

One huge problem with natural immunity is that it's not profitable and doesn't allow scaring people into compliance. People are not going to get vaxxed if they're realize there wasn't a significant danger in the first place and/or they're already protected now through naturally acquired immunity. The government or companies can try to force the population to get vaxxed, but that will backfire as soon as enough people start to realize it's not about public health.

It could be explained that Gates misspoke. That he ONLY meant the public health response has been too slow. I'm not buying that strained explanation at all.

Other indirect incriminating evidence against Gates due to which he has lost all benefit of the doubt:

- At Davos a few years ago, he said that his investments in vaccines have delivered a 20x return. It could be said that he meant a return in terms of public health. That mass vaccination has been 20x cheaper than the costs in the widest sense of the word of people getting sick. It could also be said that his financial return on investment is 2000%.

- In his TED talk, he was talking about how mass vaccination would lead to a slow or even reduction in population. It could be said that he meant that if people have confidence their children will survive, they will choose to have less children. It could also be said that vaccines in general, and certain vaccines in particular, are toxic.

- A mass vaccination program in Africa was caught with sterilizing children. They were given 5 injections when 1 would've been enough. Robert Kennedy Jr. discusses this in the book 'The Real Anthony Fauci'.

- There is a rumor that even while Gates was busy with mass vaccination campaigns all over the world, he wouldn't let his own children get vaccinated. His doctor is supposed to have said this to other doctors at a conference. Unfortunately I don't remember where I heard this. It could have been in Robert Kennedy Jr.'s book.

Gates seems to have coined the term philanthro-capitalism. It's supposed to mean doing philanthropy while also profiting himself. It could be that he's doing good for both others and himself (win-win), but it could also be that he's just busy with his own agenda such as enriching himself or winning the Nobel prize (win or win-lose).

The whole philanthropy could just a be a ruse, a misleading term, just like all the misleading terms in '1984' (e.g. Ministry of Peace concerned with war, Ministry of Truth concerned with lies, Ministry of Abundance concerned with scarcity).

FULL TRANSCRIPT OF WHAT GATES SAID

Sadly the virus itself, particularly the variant called Omicron, is a type of vaccine. That is, it creates both B-cell and T-cell immunity and it's done a better job of getting out to the world population than we have with vaccines. If you do surveys in African countries, you get well of 80% of people, have been exposed either to the vaccine or to various variants.

What that does is it means the chance of severe disease, which is mainly associated with being elderly and having obesity or diabetes, those risks are now dramatically reduced because of that infection exposure. It's sad we didn't do a great job on therapeutics, only here, two years in, do we have a good therapeutic.

Vaccines: it took us two years to be in oversupply. Today there are more vaccines than there is demand for vaccines. That wasn't true. Next time we should try and make it, instead of two years, we should make it more like six months. Some of the standardized platform approaches, including mRNA, would allow us to do that. It took us a lot longer this time than it should've.

SOURCE: https://www.bitchute.com/video/B9m0lAuNd3F0/