COVID jabs causing large numbers of deaths according to Bradford Hill criteria | Peter McCullough

The Bradford Hill criteria are used to establish if one factor causes a certain outcome (causal relationship) or if events are merely related (correlation).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradford_Hill_criteria

An example of the former is that rain causes wet streets, but not the other way around. An example of the latter is that higher consumption of ice cream is related with increased shark attacks on humans. The ice cream does directly cause the shark attacks, but hot weather leads people to buy more ice cream and also to go swimming more often. More swimming leads to more risk of shark attacks on humans. Ice cream consumption and shark attacks are correlated, but not causally related.

The factors mentioned by dr. Peter McCullough:

1) It's a massive signal. Some examples of this massive signal:

- 30x increases in adverse events reported in VAERS
- 12x increase in diseases in the U.S. military in 2021 compared to baseline. This is not just minor ailments, but also severe injuries such as cancers, heart attacks, strokes, neurological issues, etc.
- life insurers are reporting a 40% increase in deaths in the working population
- massive increase in heart injuries and thrombo-embolisms in athletes
- life insurer Aegon reported a 258% increase in claims in the third quarter of 2021 compared with the third quarter of 2020

2) There is a dangerous mechanism of action (the spike protein, inflammatory lipid nanoparticles, possibly other harm ingredients)

3) There are other conditions caused by the vaccine that can be fatal.

4) There is consistency among the different adverse events reporting systems in different countries such as Eudravigilance, Yellow Card system.

5) Strong temporal relationship between the vaccine and the deaths and injuries. Injuries tend to start within hours to a few weeks after the injection. Some people die months after being injected, but often they've gotten severely ill shortly after the jab and went downhill from there.

Not mentioned by dr. McCullough but also a strong signal: there is a strong dose-reponse relationship. The adverse effects after the second dose of the COVID jabs tends to be significantly worse than after the first dose. Exception is with those who have already acquired natural immunity, who tend to already have severe adverse reactions after the first dose.

REFERENCES
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation

SOURCE: https://rumble.com/vuiadi-according-to-bradford-hill-tenets-of-causality-the-vaccines-are-certainly-c.html