Final Fantasy 2 and 5 are good because variety, while FF1 and FF3 lacks variety

2 years ago
4

To sum it up. FF1 and FF3 i think main problem is, it just doesnt add variety to the game as FF2 and FF5 do. (Even though i have criticized FF5 for feeling too much like a visual novel.. i may have been wrong, because gameplay still does feel like it adds variety to the game so it doesnt feel the same). Overall FF2, FF4 (If you can ignore midget look vs realistic looking human in that game) and FF5 seems like the golden one as far as i can see. Just sucks Square are George Lucasing their games too much, just find a way to release the game with original graphics. Thats all i ask for. But good stuff

Loading comments...