Christina Parks, PhD: Using mRNA technology is completely unethical due to risks, lack of knowledge

NOTES
All the evidence points to the spike protein being the most toxic protein in SARS-CoV-2, yet we seem to find it no problem to make a vaccine that induced to body to make massive amounts of toxin in a short period.

There is growing scientific evidence that people of African American descent respond more vigorously to RNA viruses and therefore may need a lower dose of vaccines. With vaccines you want to activate the immune system, but if you active it too much, it becomes harmful, especially in the absence of adequate vitamin D blood levels. African Americans have a higher chance of being deficient in vitamin D, because the melanin in their skin leads to less vitamin D being produced when exposed to the same intensity and duration of sunlight, compared to people who have lighter skin.

Adequate vitamin D is crucial for effective protection against COVID. It has positive side-effects, such as less problems with diabetes and hypertension.

Christina Park's dad died from COVID just 3 days ago. He received some early treatment, but their oxygen generator was defect. He needed to go to the hospital where the oxygen he received was helpful, but the hospital refused to continue his effective treatment. The halting of treatment caused him to go downhill fast and die. He didn't pass away from COVID, but from lack of appropriate care. The hospital refused to deviate in any way from their ineffective protocol.

The scientific proof that people of African descent tend generate a much more vigorous immune response that could go hyperinflammatory, is incredibly unlikely to be due to chance. See the work of Gregory Poland for more information. For instance this article:
https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/discussion/mayo-clinic-discovers-african-americans-respond-better-to-rubella-vaccine/

Whistle blower William Thompson from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), showed that African American boys have 2-3x the likelihood of being diagnosed with autism if they had received the MMR vaccine on time. Thompson was then forced to shred all this 'undesired' data.

The PCR test is a method to multiply certain genetic fragments exponentially. Each cycle doubles the amount of these specific fragments. Using too many cycles can easily result in an enormous proportion of false positives, because the amount of genetic material found becomes too little be meaningful. Furthermore, the materials used degrade with each cycle. After a certain number of cycles, they become less and less specific. Then you're amplifying something, but you don't know what. Using the PCR test with 40 cycles (which is not uncommon at all nowadays), leads to an enormous likelihood of clinical false positives.

Some people tend to say that clinical false positives are not that bad ("You can never be too safe"), but in fact they are harmful, because the consequences of this false test result are harmful. For example, kids might not be allowed in school or to participate in sports if they have a positive test result.

People are waking up to corruption in medicine recently, but this has been going on for a lot longer. Vaccines approved for children have the advantage for producers of liability protection. Now the pharmaceutical companies have a highly desirable business model: mandatory products and no liability if they produce harmful products. This led to more and more mandated vaccines for children, and also safety corners being cut.

Because people were under the ILLUSION that ALL vaccines were ALWAYS beneficial or at the very minimum harmless, nobody pushed back against this exploding vaccine schedule. The COVID jab fiasco is exposing this fallacy, and more and more people are waking up.

COVID vaccine manufacturers are keen on vaccinating children for COVID, even though children are at no statistical risk of this disease. Therefore a risk-reward analysis will always turn out negative from the child's perspective. The pharmaceutical company's benefit is much more than selling more of their highly profitable product. The law is such that once their product is on the child vaccination schedule, they retain liability protection. Now they can go from a product that is only approved for emergency use (EUA) to a product that has full approval without liability risk. The manufacturers will NEVER accept liability, because they know for a fact that the claims are guaranteed to bankrupt their company.

The COVID jabs may lead to mutations in the p53 gene. This is a huge problem, because this is a tumor suppression gene. A mutation in the p53 gene is likely to lead to a much higher probability of a tumor becoming metastatic and killing the host. Do we have perfect proof that this is the case? No. Do we have perfect proof that this life-threatening high risk is NOT the case? No! We should have insisted on performing and passing the necessary tests, before we injected this experimental product into billions of shoulders, and especially before injected it into the shoulders of kids.

It is possible that RNA inserts itself into DNA (reverse transcription), but more importantly, RNA can regulate DNA. It is unpredictable what will happen when RNA regulates DNA, but many bad outcomes are possible. Since there is little to no scientific knowledge on this subject, using this genetic technology is completely unethical.

SOURCE

Sen. Ron Johnson moderates a panel discussion, COVID-19: A Second Opinion. A group of world renowned doctors and medical experts provide a different perspective on the global pandemic response, the current state of knowledge of early and hospital treatment, vaccine efficacy and safety, what went right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term.

More at www.ronjohnson.senate.gov

https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html