Gender differences in vaxx adverse reactions - Craig Paardekooper

Women are 2 to 3 times more likely to get an adverse reaction than men. Their adverse reactions are not trivial at all.

DESCRIPTION BY CRAIG PAARDEKOOPER
I look at data from -
1. Vigiaccess
2. Vaers
3. Eudraviligance
4. Pfizer's own reports

and demonstrate that the covid vaccines of Pfizer, Moderna, and Astrazeneca cause 2 - 3 times the number of injuries in women compared o men.

This is a huge safety signal, showing that the vaccines are not consistent in their effects upon different groups of the population. One group (women) suffer 3 times more adverse effects than another group (men).

The vaccine was only granted EUA on the basis that its effects would be consistent. This gender disparity negates its EUA authorisation.

Has the government acknowledged this safety signal? No
Has the government carried out an investigation? No
Has the government suspended the roll out until this issue is resolved? No

It is therefore apparent that the government is ignoring the safety signals.

If the governments intention is to ignore safety signals, then their intention is not to protect you from harm. However, it is the government that is actually pushing the thing that is causing the harm. My conclusion is that they are causing harm intentionally.

Once we establish that they are intending harm, then it is natural to ask WHY, what is the purpose?
Why are the vaccines targeting the female gender? I would suggest that this has something to do with reducing reproduction.

SOURCE: https://www.bitchute.com/video/xbtNAMlczhDM/