Authorities telling you NOT to trust the authorities and be skeptical on the COVID jab

...however they said this ONLY in relation to the Trump administration. With the Biden administration, they want you to think and behave the polar opposite.

If you even dare to ask a critical question, you're an anti-vaxxer. If you're young and healthy and want to see more research on a completely new genetic technology first, you're an anti-vaxxer. If you do your own research and notice the companies and authorities THEMSELVES saying that many research steps have been skipped, you're anti-scientific. If you already have acquired natural immunity ― which is the most effective, durable, robust, transmission reducing type of immunity ― and therefore don't need and want to get jabbed, you're an anti-vaxxer.

If you've already been jabbed and speak out about your horrible adverse events, you're an anti-vaxxer. If you've spent your career developing vaccines (such as drs. Geert Vanden Bossche and Robert Malone) and speak out negatively on these jabs, you're an anti-vaxxer. If you've been vaxxed yourself but are against mandates, you're an anti-vaxxer. If you conclude it's a huge red flag that the pharmaceutical companies have no product liability and want 75 years (!!!) to make their data public, you're a conspiracy thinker.

If you don't want to get vaxxed for others, because there it has been scientifically proven that these therapies don't significantly reduce transmission and may even make you MORE dangerous to others, you're still selfish and a danger to society. If you conclude that all previous vaccines for corona viruses (and other viruses such as RSV and dengue) were halted due to antibody dependent enhancement causing the deaths of test subjects, you're still going to lose your civil rights if it's up to the tyrannical authorities. If you see previously healthy people all around you dying and getting severely ill shortly after the jab, you're anti-scientific because these are all anecdotes that should be discarded.

Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minnesota) was worried about pressure on the FDA on the vaccines in October 2020 under the Trump administration. About a year this exact same thing happened under the Biden administration to approve boosters, which led to the resignation of two FDA official with many decades of experience. The CDC also contradicted a negative recommendation of the expert panel on boosters.

If you opt for early treatment, you're anti-scientific because these have not been approved by the (captured) authorities. That expert opinion is the lowest form of evidence, makes no difference. That the WHO, FDA, CDC, NIH and other institutions hardly concern themselves with science and public health, but mostly with profit, politics and ideology, makes even less difference. That there actually turns out to be 'Gold Standard' scientific proof on repurposed medicines, supplements and treatments, makes no difference. That there is absolutely no scientific evidence on the safety, efficacy and necessity boosters, makes no difference. Double standards aren't recognized.