Dr. Pierre Kory and dr. Paul Marik: the data show COVID vaccines don't reduce all cause mortality

Drs. Pierre Kory and Paul Marik inform us about the following:Show more

FIRST, the U.S. data on vaccinated versus unvaccinated hospitalized patients are totally unreliable. The authorities are hell bent on achieving maximum vaccine uptake, and will lie and manipulate in any way necessary to achieve that goal. The authorities are making claims without publishing the data so that independent people can analyze it. This is a huge red flag. Other countries, like Israel and the United Kingdom, are doing a much better job of being transparent.

SECOND, the real goal of vaccination should not be less positive tests, less disease, less hospitalizations, etc. caused by a specific disease. No, the real goal of vaccination should be to reduce all cause mortality and all cause morbidity (disease from all causes). If the side-effects of a therapy are worse than the benefits, all cause mortality and morbidity will increase, and the therapy is a bad choice.

When you look at Pfizer's own clinical trial of the COVID 'vaccine', published in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, it showed clearly that the all cause mortality in the vaccinated group was HIGHER than in the placebo group. At the very minimum, this shows that the vaccine has no all cause mortality benefit. It may even show that the vaccine INCREASES mortality due to all causes.

NB: The same trial also showed that there were more severe adverse effects in the vaccine group than in the placebo group.

The data show that the COVID vaccines may reduce your risk of getting hospitalized and dying due to COVID somewhat for a few months, but the adverse effects are worse than the benefits.

(Some people, including myself, have started using the term 'injected Kool-Aid' instead of 'COVID vaccines'. This is absolutely justified.)

THIRD, the data on COVID hospitalizations are incomplete at the minimum. They should show whether the patients have received effective combination treatment or not. If this figure were to be presented, it would show that approximately 0% of the hospitalized patients received early treatment.

NB: Complete and accurate data would also show that approximately 100% of the hospitalized COVID patients, have significantly lower vitamin D blood levels than 50 ng/ml. Also, the majority is likely to have (morbid) obesity and other comorbidities, such as high blood pressure, cardiovascular conditions, diabetes 2, immune suppression, et cetera. Furthermore, the data should distinguish between whether patients are in hospital because of COVID or whether they're there for unrelated reasons and merely have a positive highly oversensitive PCR test.

FOURTH, many countries all over the world have been heavily vaccinated and now the omicron variant is not only spreading like wildfire, but also causing disease among the vaxxed. So what is the response of these countries? Is it to conclude that obviously the jab is not working at best and may be even making things worse, and therefore they should switch strategies? No, it is to double down: a massive booster campagin with the exact same vaccine that already failed miserably. 🤦‍♂️

FIFTH, the omicron variant is not only much SAFER than the injections, but it also provides much BETTER and more DURABLE protection, whilst also REDUCING TRANSMISSION (thereby protecting others). So what VALID MEDICAL reason is there for a massive booster campaign against with a toxic ineffective vaccine for a relatively mild disease for which we have fantastic prevention and early treatment?

If there isn't a valid medical reason, but there may be valid political and financial reasons motivating corrupt politicians and 'experts', isn't it about time that people wake up and stop complying with a policy that causes them significant net harm?

----

REFERENCES
Article 'Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months' in The New England Journal of Medicine, published September 15, 2021.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2110345

The death statistics are in Table S4 on page 11 of the Supplementary Appendix of that article:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2110345/suppl_file/nejmoa2110345_appendix.pdf

In the period between dose 1 and unblinding, there were 15 deaths in the vaccinated group and 14 deaths in the placebo group.

Table S3 on page 10 of the supplementary appendix summarizes the adverse events. In the periode between Dose 1 and and 1 month after Dose 2 during the blinded follow-up period, there were 127 serious adverse events from any cause in the vaccinated group and 116 in the placebo group.

Just a short time later, Pfizer/BioNTech mentioned to the Federal Drug Administration (FDA), that they 'forgot' to mention a few deaths:

"From Dose 1 through the March 13, 2021 data cutoff date, there were a total of 38 deaths, 21 in the COMIRNATY [vaccine] group and 17 in the placebo group."

Source: page 23 of this report: https://www.fda.gov/media/151733/download

Though the absolute numbers are small, overall deaths were 24 percent higher among vaccine recipients.

In conclusion, the vaccinated group fared worse in both the all cause mortality and all cause morbidity.

----

SOURCE: This segment has been taken from FLCCC's Weekly Update of Dec. 29th, 2021.
https://odysee.com/@FrontlineCovid19CriticalCareAlliance:c/FLCCC-WEBINAR-122921_FINAL:3

The segment starts at 1h15m27s.