WA Police officer successful injunction against employer over Vaccine

Interview outside court with Augusto Zimmermann https://g.co/kgs/iCvJQQ
and Judy Wilyman https://g.co/kgs/LUUSpf
re successful court injunction against WA police commission mandate injection program of police.

there are various critical facts shared in this interview in particular
0.50 inalienable right to freedom and choice

1.40 forcing the jab / coercion

2.30 Chief Health officer Violating right to bodily autonomy

3.00 min summary of court case injunction

4.10 how would this case effect the community

6.40 The precautionary Principle - relevant to emergency laws - false info by the states

7.30 false info by states case to - cant call it Vaccine program because it fails the definition "Vaccine eliminates/stops not reduce" ... only in market for 1 yr - requires 10 yrs to validate the adverse effects

9.10 official register of deaths .. its only 1% of correct data - will take up to 10 yrs to complete the official data

10.30 precautionary Principle includes not using mandates due to unknown

11.48 border chaos is by law in disregard to the Constitution

12.32 Coercion breach, Doctors are obliged to promote Govt policy not patient health - all directives is opposite to prevent and create health.

14.10 McGowan is political not health

15.00 once powers given its very difficult to retract and become permanent

15.40 NSW different tact ... is it the premier or their timeline and Medical Apartheid

17.00 political issue - complying is totalitarian regime

17.40 genetic modification tech requires 10 yrs to determine causality

18.30 Privacy issue - Jab is excuse for invasion of privacy - - > HISTORY SHOWS Every dictatorship starts with excuse of emergency powers

20.10 today advocating freedom is sited as a radical. Leaders constantly changing rules; more jabs coming and forcing forward more fears - now its jab 5yrs which is proven to have almost nil exposure .. why ??

21:30 why jab people at no risk - raised in the court case

22.30 Health Minister in collision as they know jab of children not required

22.50 WA govt new industrial law - huge liability on employers Incl manslaughter - where employees that gets harmed in workplace - forcing worker to get jabbed means employer can be charged with manslaughter which is far worse then the fines for not forcing.

25.10 UK govt official decision not to jab children due to high risks

26.00 industrial laws criminality on employers for consequences to employees forced to be jabbed

27.10 WHO confirms injection of children is high risk and genetics means each person is different reaction, it can cause disease in the future

credit source live camcast TV https://www.facebook.com/live.camcast/videos/2176330339191379