Example of late reporting and unreliable data in Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)

This video depicts report 1954800 in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) of a 33 year old man who received 2 Moderna COVID shots. See
https://openvaers.com/openvaers/1954800

Unless this man had extremely bad comorbidities such as morbid obesity, he had no significant risk of COVID. The toxic injection has caused horrific side-effects, which left him permanently disabled, put him on the heart transplant list, and may kill him.

There are at least two other important things to learn from this report.

First of all, the man has had adverse effects since March of 2021, but the report was only published in December of 2021. This delay may or may not be due to VAERS. However, it makes you wonder how many more vaccine injuries have already happened many months ago, but will only be reported in the future.

This kind of late reporting makes informed consent impossible. You can't rely on the data if "the data" are incomplete. (Ever realize who people like Fauci and others always give the impression that they're rely on "the data", implying that anybody who disagrees with them is a quack anti-vaxxer conspiracy thinker who should be dismissed?)

Second of all, the report says "Days to onset: 28". This means the first day of adverse events was 28 days after the last shot. However, the first sentence of the description says:

"His arm was sore almost immediately, within 10 hours he felt fatigue, by the 2nd day he started coughing, loss of appetite, couldn't sleep, within the first week his cough worsened and he said his chest felt pressure."

So the report should have said: "Days to onset: 0", because his adverse effects started immediately and never went away. The vaccine fanatics will point to the "Days to onset" of 28 and conclude that it could be pure coincidence.

They will also point to the low statistical likelihood of an adverse event by dividing the number of adverse events in VAERS by the total number of shots. However, not only is there LATE reporting (as this case shows), but there is also significant UNDERreporting.

Steve Kirsch has calculated in 8 different ways, that the Under Reporting Factor (URF) is about 41. This means that the ACTUAL number of adverse events from the COVID shots is 41 times larger than the number of PUBLISHED adverse events in VAERS.

The recent scientific article 'COVID vaccination and age-stratified all-cause mortality risk' calculates an URF of 20:

"Comparing our estimate with the CDC-reported VFR [Vaccine Fatality Rate] (0.002%) suggests VAERS deaths are underreported by a factor of 20, consistent with known VAERS under-ascertainment bias."

Notably, it also says:

"Comparing our age-stratified VFRs with published age-stratified coronavirus infection fatality rates (IFR) suggests the risks of COVID vaccines and boosters outweigh the benefits in children, young adults and older adults with low occupational risk or previous coronavirus exposure."

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355581860_COVID_vaccination_and_age-stratified_all-cause_mortality_risk

Said differently, the 'cure' is worse than the disease, at a minimum for everybody except the old and very comorbid.

The vaccine fanatics tend to how VAERS cannot be trusted, because it relies on voluntary reporting and is not a proper surveillance system. There are many things to say about this, but one thing to realize is that the shortcoming of VAERS are not a BUG, but a FEATURE. They are by design.

The vaccine True Believers don't want anybody to know about vaccine risks, so they put up as many barriers as possible for reporting and publishing unwanted information, such as risks. Any reports of risks can now be dismissed as mere "anecdote", which is a euphemism for unreliable garbage that should be ignored. According to Steve Kirsch, there used to be a much better vaccine adverse event reporting system than VAERS, but it showed that the then existing vaccines were so unsafe, that the authorities shut it down.

Page 255 of the Federal Register of 1984 (auspicious year) says:

"However, although the continued availability of the vaccine may not be in immediate jeopardy, any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation's public health objectives. Accordingly, because of the importance of the vaccine and of maintaining public confidence in the immunization program that depends on it, good cause exists to issue these amendments as a final rule effective immediately."

You read that right. The goal of the authorities is NOT complete and accurate reporting so the population can make an informed decision, but the goal is to maximize vaccine uptake. They achieve that by suppressing or minimizing any unwanted or negative data, such as low necessity, vaccine risks and bad efficacy. They'll lie and manipulate to get you to do what may be in THEIR best interest.

You can download the PDF here (attention: 65 megabytes):
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1984-06-01/pdf/FR-1984-06-01.pdf