Dr. Tess Lawrie's presentation on the conversation between her and dr. Andrew Hill about ivermectin

At the end of 2020 and the very beginning of 2021, dr. Andrew Hill was very enthusiastic about the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 (and rightly so). He even said so publicly multiple times.

Hill wrote a scientific article analyzing all the available scientific evidence on this subject and published it as a pre-print. It showed that ivermectin was very effective and also safe, but strangely concluded that it should not be used until more large scale randomzied controlled trials were available.

The latter makes no sense at all, since all decision should be based a risk-benefit analysis. If (1) there is an urgent situation, (2) a medicine is extremely safe and has a reasonable signal of efficacy, and (3) the best alternative is very bad, the medicine should be used immediately.

Dr. Hill said in private a Zoom meeting with dr. Tess Lawrie in January of 2021, that he had not written the conclusion to his article, but that his sponsor had.

It is clear that dr. Hill has been bought. What he has published is not Science, but marketing for Big Pharma.

If research shows that ivermectin is very safe and effective against COVID, there can be no (more) Emergency Use Authorization for experimental inoculations and hyper-profitable medicines like remdesivir and monoclonal antibodies. This would result in countless billions of dollars of lost profit for Big Pharma.

To get their billions, Big Pharma had to 'kill' their competition, which they did.

It is absolutely clear the 'science' and 'the scientific method' are two completely different things. You cannot trust anything that is in any scientific journal. If an article says that an expensive medicine is safe and effective, it may be due to fraud and manipulation or it may be the truth. If an article says that a cheap medicine doesn't work, it may be due to fraud and manipulation or it may be the truth.

The whole system is corrupt, from scientists to universities, from scientific journals to the 'health' authorities, from politicians to the media.

In this video, Lawrie shows a video recording of part of the Zoom meeting between her and Hill. It is unfortunate for us that she is reasonably soft on Hill and doesn't show more.

If you want to know more about what was said in the Hill-Lawrie meeting, there is a comprehensive transcript in Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s new book 'The Real Anthony Fauci'. Lawrie calculated how many people would die even if ivermectin were delayed by only a few weeks.

If I'm not wrong, Hill drastically changed his stance right after his university got a $40 million grant by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation or the Wellcome Trust.

SOURCE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcnBYMtZAjE