Minimum Standard of Response, the Rule of Law and 2nd Amendment Suffrage

The right to self-defense was written into the Constitution, is an important American value, yet continues to be persistently fought by authoritarian politicians who want to not only disarm citizens, but impede one's right to fight back against criminal attacks. This debate came to a critical mass during and after the Kyle Rittenhouse trial. Rights to own, carry and use firearms to defend oneself are upheld by some states, but heavily restricted in states in a nation where a Constitutional right to do so is written as guaranteed. London Center for Policy Research's Second Amendment Project aims to correct this diversion from protections of our rights and ourselves.
In this edition of Thought to Action, London Center for Policy Research Senior Fellow and leader of the Second Amendment Project LTC (British Army, Ret) Tim Wilson and Distinguished Fellow Navy Capt (Ret) Pete O'Brien explore the concepts of Minimum Standard Response, the rule of law and why we need 2nd Amendment Suffrage. On the latter point, Wilson and O'Brien discuss how to correct the current state of affairs dictating although one is licensed to carry firearms in one state, they can be arrested for possessing one in another.

Thank you for watching; please feel free to comment, share and subscribe.

Or, please feel free to make a contribution here: paypal.com/us/fundraiser/charity/1338653

Thought to Action is presented by the London Center for Policy Research https://www.londoncenter.org​