Sewell vs RUSD Supreme Court "Contested elections"
H.O.T. supported This case involves Wis. Stat. 7.54 "Contested elections". which provides: In all contested elections cases, the contesting parties have the right to have the ballots opened and to have all errors of the inspectors, either in counting or refusing to count any ballot, corrected by the board of canvassers or court deciding the contest. The ballots and related materials may be open only in open session of the board of canvassers or in open court and in the presence of the official having custody of them. The petitioners ask the Supreme Court to review Wis. Stat. 7.54 in challenging parties the right to review in open court ballots they assert were miscounted such that an incorrect election outcome will be sustained unless the errors alleged by the challengers are corrected by the circuit [court]?
-
11:46
HOT Government
2 months ago $1.14 earnedLindee Brill's Speech in Plymouth WI: Why She Stands Out as a Candidate for District 27
6176 -
1:25
WMAR
3 years agoSupreme Court ends eviction moratorium
3311 -
0:52
Reuters
2 years agoAbortion protesters gather outside Supreme Court
69016 -
4:47
American Center for Law and Justice
2 years agoCHALLENGED at the Supreme Court
1.39K4 -
0:41
New York Post
3 years agoSupreme Court ends federal eviction moratorium
1.35K17 -
6:12
Dinesh D'Souza
2 years agoWill the Supreme Court Overturn Roe v. Wade?
2.64K27 -
2:14
Howard Lutnick
2 hours agoLaunching the FMX Futures Exchange
16.1K1 -
LIVE
WeAreChange
2 hours agoUS Sends Troops To Middle East As Region On Brink Of ALL-OUT War
2,715 watching -
46:37
Kimberly Guilfoyle
6 hours agoOne Kama-Lie After Another, Interviews with Betty Cardenas & Phil Kerpen | Ep. 160
30K31 -
1:22:35
Redacted News
4 hours agoHigh Alert! Israel Readies FULL SCALE Invasion of Lebanon, Putin Warns Use of Nukes | Redacted
92.1K207