Premium Only Content

Sewell vs RUSD Supreme Court "Contested elections"
H.O.T. supported This case involves Wis. Stat. 7.54 "Contested elections". which provides: In all contested elections cases, the contesting parties have the right to have the ballots opened and to have all errors of the inspectors, either in counting or refusing to count any ballot, corrected by the board of canvassers or court deciding the contest. The ballots and related materials may be open only in open session of the board of canvassers or in open court and in the presence of the official having custody of them. The petitioners ask the Supreme Court to review Wis. Stat. 7.54 in challenging parties the right to review in open court ballots they assert were miscounted such that an incorrect election outcome will be sustained unless the errors alleged by the challengers are corrected by the circuit [court]?
-
2:33:19
HOT Government
1 day ago $0.18 earnedDr Frank Speaks Election Integrity in Jackson Wisconsin
121 -
1:25
WMAR
3 years agoSupreme Court ends eviction moratorium
3501 -
0:52
Reuters
3 years agoAbortion protesters gather outside Supreme Court
69516 -
4:47
American Center for Law and Justice
3 years agoCHALLENGED at the Supreme Court
1.39K4 -
0:41
New York Post
3 years agoSupreme Court ends federal eviction moratorium
1.36K17 -
6:12
Dinesh D'Souza
3 years agoWill the Supreme Court Overturn Roe v. Wade?
2.65K27 -
20:33
Sideserf Cake Studio
1 day ago $3.73 earnedI Built A Bikini Bottom Fish Tank CAKE!
33.8K11 -
LIVE
Gore TV
1 hour agoNO LOOT?! Fine 😤 I’ll Build My Own Gun! 🔫🪵✨
131 watching -
LIVE
XxXAztecwarrior
2 hours agoPlaying Normals Big Red Hunting Delta Force
190 watching -
2:22:46
The Connect: With Johnny Mitchell
1 day ago $14.05 earnedOne Man's Mission To Stop Human Trafficking: How A Billionaire Mercenary Saved Hundreds Of Children
45.2K33