Sewell vs RUSD Supreme Court "Contested elections"
H.O.T. supported This case involves Wis. Stat. 7.54 "Contested elections". which provides: In all contested elections cases, the contesting parties have the right to have the ballots opened and to have all errors of the inspectors, either in counting or refusing to count any ballot, corrected by the board of canvassers or court deciding the contest. The ballots and related materials may be open only in open session of the board of canvassers or in open court and in the presence of the official having custody of them. The petitioners ask the Supreme Court to review Wis. Stat. 7.54 in challenging parties the right to review in open court ballots they assert were miscounted such that an incorrect election outcome will be sustained unless the errors alleged by the challengers are corrected by the circuit [court]?
-
12:08
Crossroads with Joshua Philipp
1 year agoSupreme Court Makes Major Ruling on Election Case
9761 -
59:32
American Center for Law and Justice
6 months agoSupreme Court Takes 2024 Election Case: What You Need to Know
18.9K26 -
5:11
MLordandGod
1 year agoSupremes to review case Challenging American Election Results!
992 -
33:44
TRUTH LOGIC AND COMMON SENSE
6 months agoWHAT WILL HAPPEN WITH THE SUPREME COURTS BALLOT DECISION
128 -
4:35
DavidEagle
1 year agoSupreme Court Case For Elections On Docket
4 -
1:00:58
The StoneZONE with Roger Stone
1 year agoCould This Supreme Court Case Overturn the 2020 Election? The StoneZONE with Roger Stone
36.6K53 -
27:43
Declarations of Truth
1 year agoElections going to court
7742 -
6:39
Theonly1jeremy
1 year agoELECTION INTEGRITY APPEALS CASE HEADING TO GA SUPREME COURT
16 -
6:39
Emerald Robinson
1 year ago $0.31 earnedELECTION INTEGRITY APPEALS CASE HEADING TO GA SUPREME COURT
3302 -
59:22
American Center for Law and Justice
6 months agoMAJOR Supreme Court Filing TODAY in Election Protection Case
20.3K11