Top Vaccine Scientist Censored and Deplatformed by Linkedin

Dr. Nikolai Petrovsky, MD, PhD in immunology, has been involved in pandemic vaccine research for the last 25 years, having developed more than 20 vaccines including against SARS, MERS, COVID19, swine and bird flu, Ebola etc.
https://kirby.unsw.edu.au/event/professor-nikolai-petrovsky-vaccines-and-biodefense-covid-19-flu-and-beyond

He has been principal investigator on five NIH vaccine grants totaling over 50 million dollars, with a focus on development of vaccine adjuvants and pandemic vaccine platforms. He has authored over 200 research papers and has won several prestigious awards. His current focus is development of the Covax-19 vaccine against COVID-19.

“It’s hard when I have to say— that as a vaccine developer— I am not fully confident about what's happened over the last 18 months. And I'm not the only vaccine developer in the world who is extremely uncomfortable right now.”

“We have a situation where we have some very new technologies in their infancy— and that is the mRNA vaccines and the adenovirus vector vaccines, which are the only ones that you're being forced to have. Or certainly some of us are being forced to have, to remain in employment.”

“What level of confidence do we have that they have been through the usual process, which is usually 10 to 15 years of rigorous testing in thousands of people. Now those thousands of people accept the risk, because they're in a clinical trial. They’re given a very extensive warning— this could kill you, this could maim you— and they still sign up and agree to that process. And then they’re followed for 5, 10, 15 years. And if they survive, and there are no terrible occurrences, then regulators will look at all of that data and approve the product. Now, that hasn't happened in this situation, which is really a first.”

“Yes, you may accelerate things and develop a vaccine very rapidly... and there's uncertainties. But then you have to tell people the honest truth. I can't tell you whether in 10 years there will be a side effect of an mRNA vaccine or they won't be— no one can. In truth, no scientists can.”

“And so if they can't, how can they mandate something which has that level of uncertainty around it? You have to get informed consent. So rather than mandates—which I think are completely abhorrent in this situation— they should be [getting] informed consent forms, so that everyone having one of these vaccines is getting all of the information and then saying, “of my free will, not under duress, I am signing and agreeing to have this vaccine.” And that's not happening. Quite the opposite. Just because the state tells you to do something, doesn't mean it's right. And I think we really need to question that.”

“One, we're not following a principle of informed consent. Two, we're actually mandating this in the absence of informed consent. And I just have serious ethical problems with that.”