Sorry, Charlie: Subway Defends "100% Tuna" Sandwich Against "No Tuna DNA" Lawsuit Claim
2 years ago
1.21K
Subway launches SubwayTunaFacts.com , forced to defend against the allegation that its "wild-caught 100% tuna" sandwich contains no tuna DNA, but does contain DNA from other commonly-consumed animals. This comes in the wake of the recent Frosted Strawberry Pop-Tarts suit complaining Kellogg's injects other fruits, but very little strawberry. Do frivolous lawsuits serve a purpose in our society...beyond pure entertainment value?
The Members at https://BillWhittle.com certify that Right Angle — with Scott Ott, Stephen Green and Bill Whittle – is made with "wild-caught 100% man DNA". Anyone who tells you otherwise is selling something.
Loading 20 comments...
-
16:20
Bill Whittle: Conservative Opinion | Humor
17 days ago $4.21 earnedA Winning Coalition?
3.29K9 -
4:41
John Shepherd McKenzie
2 years agoGod's lawsuit against Israel
722 -
0:15
Mr Producer Media
2 years agoLittle Girl Defends Herself Against Creepy Man
3.31K27 -
0:15
The Post Millennial Live
2 years agoLittle girl defends herself against creepy Joe.
4.1K38 -
2:12
WXYZ
2 years agoLocal woman files lawsuit against Walmart
69719 -
2:16
WXYZ
2 years agoDana Nessel joins lawsuit against USPS
1131 -
0:59
KGTV
3 years agoFact or Fiction: No tuna in Subway tuna sandwich?
22 -
9:48
Dr Steve Turley
2 years ago $4.46 earnedPoland DEFENDS BORDERS Against MIGRANT ONSLAUGHT!!!
8.74K1 -
1:01
KMTV
2 years agoKellogg's files lawsuit against its striking cereal workers
108 -
LIVE
Fresh and Fit
1 hour agoAfter Hours w/ Girls
4,991 watching