The moon hoax is not only in the footage, it is also in the technology

Generally, only the footage is taken into account in the discussion of the moon hoax.
When the media talk about the moon hoax, they exclusively talk about problems in photos and videos, and think they have the answer to these problems.
In fact there are many more anomalies in the footage than the ones the media are talking about, but the media seem to completely ignore them.
The moon hoaxers only criticize the footage and hardly talk about the technology.
When the technology is considered, it is only to say that the computer of Apollo had a power well below the one of the current computers; the Apollo believers respond to this argument by saying that most of the computations were done by computers on earth, and that the computer of the lunar module only had a minimum of work to do that it was fit for; and this computer was not intended to play video games on.
However the computer still had to make the guidance of the spaceship, for it was something that the computers on earth could not do, at least not as well as the onboard computer, because of the communication time between the moon and the earth.
Since this was a fresh new territory to explore, I got interested into the technology of the lunar module, and I have read many technical documents on Apollo written by NASA engineers, including the hand manual of the lunar module.
What I have discovered was really awesome; I have found that:
- The computer of the lunar module (and of the command module) could not work at all, so there is no point comparing it with current computers; on the other hand, the (IBM) computer of the saturn rocket was a normal computer which could really work, but of course with the performances of its time.
- The commande interface of the lateral jets (RCS) could not work, which means that, even if the computer had worked, it could not anyway have maneuvered the lunar module.
- The radar could not work
- The communication system could not work
- The powered descent was abnormal
- The landing procedure was illogical and aberrant
- And the survival equipment of the astronauts was dangerous to use
And even the technical documents describing the technology of the lunar rover and the ALSEP were showing they could not work.
In other words, NASA would have landed on the moon with a technology which was not working at all.
And it was entirely intentional, which shows that the whistleblowers were not only among those who faked the footage, but also the engineers who were in charge of faking the technology of the lunar module.