2 years ago

535

#australia #VaccineMandate #authoritarianism

Full transcript of this speech by Michael Gunner, Northern Territory Chief Minister:
"Ask yourself these 3 questions: (1) In my work, do I come into contact with vulnerable pepole? (2) Is my workplace at a higher risk of infection? (3) Do I work on infrastructure or logistics that are critical to the territory? If your answer is 'maybe', or 'I don't know', you need to get the jab. Critically, the direction also applies to industries who directly face customers and circumstances where the worker may not know a vulnerability of the person they are interacting with.

"So it is simple, if your job includes interacting with members of the public, then you need to get the jab. If you work in hospitality, you need to get the jab. if you work in retail or in a super market, you need to get the jab. If you are behind the counter at the bank, if you are a receptionist or positions like that, you need to get the jab. If you are a barber, a hair dresser a beauty therapist, you need to get the jab. All these workers and many many more directly interacting with member of the public. That means you are frontline workers in our economy. That means you must be vaccinated.

"Of course there can be exemptions, but these are extremely narrow and must be backed up with medical evidence. Simply not wanting the vaccine is not a reason.

"Today, we are also announcing the date from which this mandate comes to effect. From Saturday, the 13th of November, if you have not received at least your first dose of a vaccine, you will not be permitted to attend your work place in that role and a failure to comply with the direction is a $5000 fine. That means that workers must have received at least their first dose by Friday the 12th of November at the latest. You have 30 days."

----

The COVID19 vaccines can best be characterized as experimental, genetic, 'leaky', 'narrow', non-durable, unsafe, resistence promoting jabs. They DO NOT reduce transmission, therefore any mandate "to protect others" is unscientific and should be out of the question. This has been known for months now, so governments and 'experts' that tell you differently, are flat out lying and committing crimes against humanity.

Question: If you are protected by vaccination, why does someone else need to be vaccinated to protect you? If you are not well protected by the vaccine, why do you think someone else's vaccine will protect you by reducing transmission?

Question: Why force vaccination on everyone whilst at the same time strictly prohibiting early treatment with highly effective, safe, cheap available repurposed medications as supplements such as ivermectin, zinc and quercetin?

It is by now well known that the vaccines have NEGATIVE efficacy in the first few weeks after receiving the jab, therefore you are MORE likely to get infected, be infectious and get sick during that period.

Natural immunity is at least 20 times better at reducing transmission than the vaccines. Natural immunity is probably lifelong, robust, and does not select for resistant variants.

The vaccinated can turn into COVID superspreaders, because the vaccines reduce symptoms, but not transmission. The vaccinated can be highly infectious and not know this due to the reduced symptoms. Due to this lack of symptoms, they may continue their life as normal, and endanger others, while they might otherwise have quarantined.

The vaccinated have significant risk of antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) with newer variants, thereby endangering themselves, others and the health system.

These vaccine mandates are another conspiracy theory turned into fact. It is strong proof that public health is not a significant priority for the Australian government. The lives of the young and healthy are put at risk to 'protect' the elderly and morbidly obese, whilst there are significantly safer, less harmful and more effective options available. The latter are not only ignored in spite of strong requests, but are actively suppressed.

Vaccine mandates, especially for experimental unsafe jabs, are in opposition with the Neuremberg Code of 1947 and the Declaration of Helsinki of 1964.

Source: https://twitter.com/RealCarlVernon/status/1448365079938936837

Loading comments...