Pandemic Preparedness in the Next Administration: Keynote Address by Anthony S. Fauci

Presentation given on January 11th, 2017.Show more

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNXGAxGJgQI.

How can Fauci know for sure that "there will be a surprise outbreak"? If a wave of an infectious disease happens every few years, how can it be a "surprise"? If an infectious disease happen frequently, it would be expected and not a surprise. If a pandemic happens only very infrequently, how can Fauci know "for sure" that it will happen during the next four years? If Fauci had said that there would be a pandemic eventually, that it's inevitable to happen sooner or later, that would've been like saying water is wet. But instead, he made a very specific prediction. He could've said that there COULD be or MAY be a surprise outbreak, but he said there WILL be a surprise outbreak.

Is this a plandemic, i.e. a planned pandemic? Does Fauci have 'guilty (fore)knowledge'? After all, 'The best way to predict the future is to create it.'

Is this a PCR-demic? The hyper-oversensitive PCR test with at least 95% clinical false positives, allows you to manufacture a 'pandemic' of 'cases'. The definition of a case used to require people who are actually sick, but it has been hijacked to mean just a positive test results. A person does not even have to be sick to be a 'case'. By controlling the number of cycles (amplification) of the PCR test, you can both create and end a 'pandemic' at will. Not only can disease easily be misclassified, but also death. Somebody who died with a positive test can easily be classified as a 'COVID death', even though COVID might have had little or nothing to do with the death. Said differently, there is a huge difference between dying WITH a positive test and dying DUE TO COVID. If there really were an extremely bad pandemic, you would see significant excess all-cause mortality around the world in 2020 compared to the average of 2014 through 2019. However, this does not seem to be the case, especially when you correct for 2018/2019 being a mild flu season, gradual population growth and more elderly people.

Until 2009, the WHO definition of a pandemic required there to be a global infectious disease with serious morbidity and mortality. In 2009, WHO removed the morbidity and mortality from the definition. Under the new definition, even the mildest flu season can be called a pandemic. Fauci references the 2009 'pandemic' which was the first instance of abuse of the new definition, because this was just a normal flu season.

It is by now known for certain that Anthony Fauci funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) on behalf of the U.S. government to do Gain-Of-Function (GOF) research. This research aims to make pathogens more transmissible and/or virulent (sick-making), therefore more dangerous. He ordered and funded this research, even though this was expressly prohibited by president Obama due to its inherent catastrofic global public health risk. It was also known for years among insiders, that the WIV had sorely lacking safety measures, even though it was officially a laboratory of the highest safety class.

Full transcript of section in the first couple of minutes:
"I thought I would bring that perspective to the topic today, [which] is the issue of pandemic preparedness. And if there’s one message that I want to leave with you today based on my experience, and you'll see that in a moment, is that there is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming [Trump] administration in the arena of infectious diseases, both chronic infectious diseases in the sense of already ongoing disease — and we have certainly a large burden of that — but also there will be a surprise outbreak. I hope by the end my relatively short presentation, you will understand why history, the history of the last 32 years that I’ve been the director of the NIAID, will tell the next administration that there’s no doubt in anyone’s mind that they will be faced with the challenges that their predecessors were faced with."