"Bagram is not necessary for what we are going to try to do here with Afghanistan".
2 years ago
57
June 23, at budget request hearing, Austin was asked about saving Bagram but Milley needed to insert himself to say this.
"Bagram is not necessary, tactically or operationally for what we are going to try to do here with Afghanistan".
Posted on 8/26/2021, 6:03:09 PM by RandFan
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3989194/posts
Loading 1 comment...
-
0:09
Will Cain
2 years agoIt Takes Biden THREE Tries to Say the Word "Afghanistan"
4592 -
0:41
Mr Producer Media
2 years agoNational Security Advisor: We Consult With Taliban On Everything In Kabul
1907 -
0:31
BonginoReport
2 years agoBlinken: "Of Course" Taliban Still Have US Weapons
1.48K21 -
27:00
Underground USA
1 year agoSudan: Afghanistan 2.0?
16 -
1:10
woketowoke
1 year agoWe didn’t leave equipment in Afghanistan
1 -
11:17
One America News Network
2 years agoThe Real Story - OAN Afghanistan Answers with BG Don Bolduc
194 -
17:41
One Islam Productions
1 year agoTHESE PEOPLE WILL HELP IMAM MAHDI FROM AFGHANISTAN
9 -
0:18
Najmudinsaraj
2 years agoKabul Afghanistan
19 -
13:51
FedupAmerican1982
1 year agoPakistan uses "verbal terrorism" to silent Imran Khan, the people's choice
2 -
5:11
KimStark1917
1 year agoEk Notun Bangladesh| Rongin Shilpi |Dilshad Nahar Kakoli | Imran|Kona|Brig Taufiq|Maj Ashraf| Shahed
9682