Ben vs Entire NASA Climate Team

Ben vs NASA Climate Website Team [Round 2]

1) They focused on Laschamp, cosmic rays and climate change. I did not. I corrected their focus on Laschamp (well, apparently not), focused on SOLAR forcing, and climate change was only half of the story.

2) They cherrypicked articles that did not reflect a total treatment of the field- old articles that do not at all represent the current state of the science. The current state is what I showed, with more papers, newer papers, and the inclusion of broader perspectives on cosmic ray atmospheric electrification, the solar part in climate forcing, and the biosphere risk of a magnetic excursion.

3) NASA ignored numerous critical aspects of my initial response video/letter. The parts they addressed were insufficient, old, often incorrect, confusing, and indicative of their failure to grasp the simple theme of an argument.

Note: Their letter is being copied/pasted to everyone who mentions our initial response to them. They did NOT send a copy to me.

Round 1:
NASA’s Original Article: https://climate.nasa.gov/blog/3104/fl...
Our Original Response: https://youtu.be/K08PuUPnINk
My Letter, "Geomagnetic Extinction": https://spaceweathernews.com/wp-conte...

Something about 500 papers? https://spaceweathernews.com/wp-conte...

CLIMATE FORCING Playlist https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

Our TEXTBOOKS, KIDS' BOOKS, HATS, SHIRTS: https://spaceweathernews.square.site

RESPONSE TO ALL DETRACTORS: https://youtu.be/aHBDF_3Dk_k

Free Versions of Our Peer-Reviewed Papers:
http://suspicious0bservers.org/wp-con...
http://suspicious0bservers.org/wp-con...
[If the sun can influence earthquakes, it can influence climate]

Our Websites:
https://ObserverRanch.com
https://www.Suspicious0bservers.org
https://www.SpaceWeatherNews.com
https://www.QuakeWatch.net/prediction...
https://www.ObservatoryProject.com
https://www.MagneticReversal.org
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/observatoryp...
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mobileobser...