Voting Integrity at the Supreme Court
2 years ago
179
There are several ways the election process could not be equally open to a group based on race or color. While the most obvious, a law restricting such access would be a violation, the law takes into consideration other ways of unlawful discrimination.
In that, its members have less opportunity than other members of the electorate to participate in the political process and to elect representatives of their choice.
This is what the DNC alleged in their lawsuit. That two parts of Arizona’s election law provide less opportunity for blacks, American Indians, and Hispanics to vote.
Watch and learn from Constitutional Expert, Paul Engel, and there is always much more to learn back at America Out Loud: https://americaoutloud.com.
Loading 1 comment...
-
13:13
America Out Loud
1 month agoTikTok is Spyware, just like Facebook and Google... so what gives
314 -
0:33
Newsy
2 years agoSupreme Court Upholds Arizona Voting Restrictions
8.17K89 -
4:41
One America News Network
2 years agoSupreme Court ruling affirms Ariz. ballot integrity laws
12K100 -
1:51
Newsy
2 years agoSupreme Court Ruling Deals A Blow To Voting Rights Advocates
1.41K12 -
3:22
NEWSMAX
2 years agoSupreme Court Rules to Uphold AZ Voting Laws
24.3K28 -
2:13
KNXV
2 years agoSupreme Court upholds Arizona voting restrictions, ruling they're not discriminatory
981 -
5:42
NEWSMAX
3 years agoSUPREME COURT TO DECIDE ON ARIZONA VOTING LAW DISPUTE
5.13K19 -
0:28
Newsy
3 years agoSupreme Court To Hear Voting Rights Cases
1.89K14 -
1:08:38
Russell Brand
2 days ago“You’re Going To Get KILLED!” Mike Benz EXPOSES CIA Secrets Like NEVER Before - Stay Free #363
338K749 -
1:35:13
Roseanne Barr
2 days ago $74.67 earnedKeep My Name Out Yo M*Therf*Cking Mouth! | The Roseanne Barr Podcast #47
153K368