Constitutional Crisis and Solutions with Bob Schulz

We The People Foundation: For more information, to contact us or make a donation visit https://wethepeoplefoundation.org As time is of the essence, we encourage you to read the petition docketed at the supreme court and visit us here in the “show notes” often for updates. To read the first petition, visit: https://www.supremecourt.gov - then paste the Docket No. 20-1626 in the search window and click Docket Search, then open the Docket and click “Petition” to read.Show more

VIDEO MESSAGE BY BOB SCHULZ, JUNE 12, 2021

Transcript:
GOOD DAY. MY NAME IS BOB SCHULZ.
I AM A FOUNDER OF THE WE THE PEOPLE FOUNDATON FOR CONSTITUTONAL EDUCATION AND THE WE THE PEOPLE CONGRESS, BOTH INCORPORATED IN NEW YORK STATE.
42 YEARS AGO, THROUGH FIRST-HAND EXPERIENCE, I REALIZED GOVERNMENT IS NOT ALWAYS BENEVOLENT, DOES NOT ALWAYS HAVE THE PUBLIC INTEREST UPPERMOST IN ITS MIND AND IS NOT ABOVE MANUFACTURING A CRISIS AND PRESCRIBING A SOLUTION THAT WILL BENEFIT A FEW OF THEM AND THEIR FRIENDS AT EVERYONE ELSE’S EXPENSE.
I ALSO REALIZED THAT WITH GOVERNMENT-RUN EDUCATION CAME A LACK OF PROPER CIVIC EDUCATION -- THAT RISING GENERATIONS HAVE NOT BEEN TAUGHT THE HISTORY, MEANING, SIGNIFICANCE AND EFFECT OF THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR STATE AND FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONS AND DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE – AND THAT TOO MANY PEOPLE ARE NOT ANCHORED TO THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF OUR LIBERTY, FREEDOM AND EQUAL JUSTICE FOR ALL CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.
I CAME TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE ULTIMATE POWER IN OUR SOCIETY IS MEANT TO RESIDE IN THE PEOPLE AND THE IMPORTANCE OF THE PEOPLE HOLDING GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABLE TO THEIR WILL AND CONSENT AS EXPRESSED IN THEIR FEDERAL AND STATE CONSTITUTIONS.
42 YEARS AGO I REALIZED NO GOVERNMENT CAN CONTINUE GOOD UNLESS UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE PEOPLE AND THAT ABSENT POPULAR VIGILANCE GOVERNMENT SLOWLY BUT SURELY, LIKE A THIEF IN THE NIGHT, GAINS GROUND AND LIBERTY LOSES GROUND.
THE CONSTITUTION CANNOT DEFEND ITSELF AND INDIVIDUALS AND SMALL GROUPS HAVE A HARD TIME PREVAILING IN THEIR EFFORTS TO HOLD GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABLE.

TO HOLD GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABLE
TO THE RULE OF LAW

1979 TRI-COUNTY TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION, INC. (TCTA)

1990 ALL-COUNTY TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION, INC. (ACTA)

1997 WE THE PEOPLE FOUNDATION FOR CONSTITUTIONAL EDUCATION, INC. (WTPF)
and
WE THE PEOPLE CONGRESS, INC. (WTPC)

FOR 42 YEARS, BELIEVING ONE WITHOUT THE OTHER IS FOR NAUGHT, WE HAVE WORKED TO IMPROVE THE LEVEL OF BOTH CIVIC EDUCATION AND CIVIC ACTION IN AMERICA.
OUR MOTTO: “ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS”
OUR PLAN IS TO INSTITUTIONALIZE CITIZEN VIGILENCE, STATE-BY-STATE, ORGANIZING THE PEOPLE FOR THE PURPOSE OF HOLDING GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABLE WITH RELIANCE ON THE RIGHT TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES AND CITIZEN VIGILENCE CENTERS – ONE IN EVERY STATE .

MY PURPOSE TODAY IS TO NOTIFY PEOPLE OF THE TWO INITIATIVES WE NOW HAVE UNDERWAY IN DEFENSE OF CRITICALLY IMPORTANT INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS THAT ARE GUARANTEED BY THE PETITION AND ELECTORS CLAUSES OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.

THE PETITION CLAUSE READS
CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW … ABRIDGING … THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE …AND TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES. 1ST AMENDMENT.
NO COURT HAS DECLARED THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE GOVERNMENT UNDER THE PETITION CLAUSE.
THEREFORE, WE MUST RELY ON A THOROUGH REVIEW OF ITS HISTORICAL RECORD TO DETERMINE WHAT THE WORDS MEANT AND WHY THEY WERE ADDED TO OUR BILL OF RIGHTS?
HISTORY DOES SPEAK LOUDLY.
FIRST OF ALL, A CLOSE READING OF THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE SHOWS AMERICANS ABOLISHED THEIR GOVERNMENT IN 1776 BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT REFUSED TO RESPOND TO THEIR PETITIONS FOR REDRESS OF THE GRIEVANCES LISTED THEREIN.

QUOTING THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE:

IN EVERY STAGE OF THESE OPPRESSIONS WE HAVE PETITIONED FOR REDRESS IN THE MOST HUMBLE TERMS: OUR REPEATED PETITIONS HAVE BEEN ANSWERED ONLY BY REPEATED INJURY. A PRINCE WHOSE CHARACTER IS THUS MARKED BY EVERY ACT WHICH MAY DEFINE A TYRANT, IS UNFIT TO BE THE RULER OF A FREE PEOPLE.

A REVIEW OF ITS ORIGIN, LINE OF GROWTH, SCOPE AND PURPOSE SHOWS
THE INTENT OF THE PETITION CLAUSE WAS THAT IT SERVE AS ONE OF OUR MOST IMPORTANT CONSTITUTIONAL CHECKS AND BALANCES – MEANT TO PROVIDE THE PEOPLE WITH THE MEANS TO KEEP GOVERNMENT WITHIN THE BOUNDS DRAWN AROUND ITS POWER BY THE WILL AND CONSENT OF THE PEOPLE AS EXPRESSED IN THEIR STATE AND FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONS.

TO BE CLEAR, AS GOES THE RIGHT TO PETITION SO GOES THE STRUCTURE OF THE CONSTITUTION.
IF WE LOSE THE RIGHT TO PETITION GOVERNMENT TO RECTIFY ITS VIOLATIONS WE LOSE THE CONSTITUTION.
IN DEFENSE OF OUR RIGHTS UNDER THE PETITION CLAUSE WE HAVE A CASE PENDING IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT

Robert L. Schulz v United States
U.S. Supreme Court, Case 20-1626
Docketed May 21, 2021

PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO READ OUR PETITION. YOU CAN DO SO BY GOING TO THE COURT’S HOME PAGE AND ENTERING THE CASE NUMBER IN “DOCKET SEARCH.”

Background

1999-2002: Government did not respond to our petitions for redress of violations of the Constitution’s prohibitions against
• Direct, un-apportioned taxes Income tax
• Undeclared Wars Iraq Resolution
• Invasions of privacy Patriot Act
• Un-enumerated Powers Fed. Reserve Act

2003: We then Petitioned for Redress of a violation of the Petition Clause itself:
• We challenged the Federal tax withholding policy which prevents People from peacefully enforcing their Rights by retaining their money until those grievances were redressed.
• The Government responded immediately to the Withholding Petition.

2003-Present: Litigation
• 2003-2005: Schulz v. IRS
• 2004-2007: We The People v. United States (B.Kavanaugh)
• 2007-2008: United States v. We The People (S.Sotomayor)
• 2015- : Schulz v United States

Reasons for Granting the Writ:
• First Impression: No court has declared the meaning of the Clause. Doing so now would provide an important public service.
• According to the Historical Record, Government is obligated to respond to petitions. With every Right there is a Remedy. Any Right not enforceable is not a Right
• Recent rulings by the Supreme Court: Original intent determines the meaning of a Right, Heller (2008) and Guarnieri (2011)
• D.C and 2nd Circuit Forerunners abolished Right to Petition and thus the structure of the Constitution

OUR OTHER INITIATIVE IS IN DEFENSE OF OUR RIGHTS UNDER THE ELECTORS CLAUSE OF ARTICLE I, SECTION 1 WHICH READS IN RELEVANT PART:

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress:

IN DEFENSE OF OUR RIGHTS UNDER THE ELECTORS CLAUSE WE HAVE AN IMPORTANT CLASS ACTION PENDING IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ROBERT SCHULZ, ANTHONY FUTIA and all others similarly situated

v. UNITED STATES

U.S. District Court, District of Columbia

Case 21-cv-448

PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO READ OUR PETITION AND OUR COMPLAINT. YOU CAN DO SO BY GOING TO: the website mentioned above.

Background

2020 The electors in 31 States were unconstitutionally

chosen, 401 electors in all. This means no candidate

for President and Vice President received a majority of

the 538 electors.

Dec. 14, 2020 The electoral college met and certified the results of

the November election.

Dec. 18, 2020 Following the vote by the Electoral College, certifying

all 538 electors, including those unconstitutionally

chosen, Schulz served his representative with a FIRST

AMENDMENT PETITION FOR REDRESS OF

VIOLATIONS OF THE GUARANTEE AND ELECTORS

CLAUSES OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, seeking to

have the Congress decide not to certify the results of

the Electoral College. My representative did not respond.

Jan. 5, 2021 Before noon, every member of Congress was served

with a copy of the Petition, signed by 1,053 people

representing all 50 states. There was no response. The

Congress went on to certify the results of the electoral

college.

Feb. 17, 2021 Every member of Congress was served with a

Complaint and a motion for expended summary

judgment, seeking relief under the 12th Amendment.

The Complaint was filed in the District Court, District

of Columbia.

Mar. 4, 2021 The Court summoned the Senate and the House of

Representatives to respond to the complaint within 60

days. Neither the Senate nor the House of

Representatives responded to the court summons.

May 14, 2021
Schulz and Futia filed and served a motion for default
judgment.

Argument
• The facts are clear and undisputed.
• The Court must apply the law (the Electors Clause and the 12 Amendment) to the facts of the case.

THE TWELFTH AMENDMENT READS IN RELEVANT PART:

and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice… The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

THOSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SUPPORT THE FOUNDATION’S WORK CAN DO SO AT ITS ACCOUNT ON PAYPAL.

WE THE PEOPLE FOUNDATION

FOR CONSTITUTIONAL EDUCATION, INC.

(FOR CIVIC EDUCATION)

WE THE PEOPLE CONGRESS, INC.

(FOR CIVIC ACTION)

2458 RIDGE ROAD, QUEENSBURY, NY 12804

(518) 361-8153

BOB@GIVEMELIBERTY.ORG

PAYPAL:
https://www.paypal.com/donate/?token=VxYlodFVR49sk9X15W4e56VhR18aEN61LtozLsLnXMA5Vs4l5DmDKqLUkFFBFDxTFJtoMm&country.x=US&locale.x=US