So much for Trump’s SCOTUS Picks Being Originalists, Reinterpret Computer Fraud and Abuse Act

In a case involving a police officer taking a bribe to run a license plate, all three of Trump’s nominees to the Supreme Court decided to show that their talk of being originalists in regards to the Constitution and Federal Law is just that, talk. They decided to ignore the letter of the law and interpret the 1986 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act from a modern perspective ignoring the time it was written in. In the process, they allowed the cop to skate on his taking money to run the license plate.

In this video we take a look at the non originalist decision Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and Barrett all came too.

Where you can find me:

BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/constitutionalist-libertarian/

Odysee: https://odysee.com/@ConstitutionalistLibertarian

D.Tube: https://d.tube/c-libertarian

Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-365367

Minds: https://www.minds.com/ConstitutionalistLibertarian

Gab: https://gab.com/ConstitutionalLibertarian

Parler: https://parler.com/profile/ConstitutionalistLibertarian/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/constitutionalist.libertarian.18

YouTube: Banned

Twitter: Banned