Should You Buy the RetroTINK 5X Vertical Stand from RetroFrog.net

In this episode, we unbox and test out the vertical stand designed for the RetroTink 5x from Todd Gill at RetroFrog.net.

Chapters:
0:00 - Introduction
1:30 - Unboxing
2:36 - Test Fitting
3:34 - SCART Cable Management
5:30 - Installing the Feet
6:29 - Final Thoughts

Ok, I know we have posted a lot of content around the RetroTink 5x, and for many reasons. We've focused on the hardware, and we've focused on how games look through it. One of the things I haven't talked about much is how I have the RetroTink 5x hooked up or stored in my setup. See, I basically placed my RetroTink 5x in my cabinet where I had my RetroTink 2x, which was ok, but not idea. When I saw the tweet go out from Todd Gill of RetroFrog that he was designing a vertical stand for the RetroTink 5x, I knew I needed one. As soon as it was available I placed an order.

Todd has created many products for the gaming community for some time. Focusing on 3D printed designs, he's created 3D printed items for the Gamecube, MiSTer, OSSC, and other retro items. As such, the Vertical Stand for the RetroTink 5x has a very finished feel to it. The Vertical Stand itself has a channel for the RetroTink to sit in, along with a storage area for the remote control as well. On the side of the stand, there is a molded spot for a hook and loop strap to hold the SCART cable securely. The underside of the stand is completely smooth, although Todd does provide 4 adheasive feet to help prevents sliding around.

The RetroTink 5x just sits into the base itself rather nicely. The base is broad enough that tipping over isn't an issue. When mounted into the base, it provides a much more compact and condensed footprint compared to when it is laying on a shelf vertically. I also prefer this orientation with the SCART connector and cable as it addresses my major complaint about the RetroTink 5x, in that the SCART cable exits towards the front and not towards the rear of the device. While it still exits in this direction, the integrated hold-down is much more elegant in its design than just letting the cable flop around where-ever.

Why it RoX:
- Only $12
- SCART Cable Management
- Integrated remote stand
- Incredibly stable
- Reduces overall footprint

What could be improved?
- More color options
- Shorter hook and loop strap
- Have the RetroTink 5x snap into place for a secure connection

Should You Buy One?
This is a super-easy recommendation to make. For the money, this is possibly the best investment you could make regarding your RetroTink 5X. Sure, I admit that right now it is still hard to get your hands on a RetroTink 5x, but more are on the way and production won't be limited. That being said, this is an amazingly simple yet functional design, and I am glad to see Todd step up to the plate with a great solution to an issue I didn't even realize I wanted fixed until I saw his design! For as inexpensive as it is, the RetroFrog vertical stand for the RetroTink 5x is the closest to a must-have accessory I've come across in some time.

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCznAOWQLsiCAMNRq9fzQJpw/join

Order the Vertical Stand for the RetroTink 5x from RetroFrog.net by visiting https://retrofrog.net/products/retrotink-5x-pro-vertical-stand?variant=39827407175863

Follow Us on Social Media!

Instagram - @RoXolidProductionsGK
Twitter - @RoXolidStudios
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/RoXolidProductions/

Get early access to our videos and support RoXolid Productions for as low as a dollar a month through our Patreon page, https://www.patreon.com/RoXolid

Looking for some RoXolid Merch? Check out our T-Spring store for shirts and swag at https://teespring.com/roxolid-productions-official-s

Would you like to have your products featured on RoXolid Productions? Do you have Questions? Comments? Email us at RoXolidMail@Gmail.com!!

The footage used in this review are used under the Fair Use laws, referenced below:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—

(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.
(Pub. L. 94–553, title I, § 101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2546; Pub. L. 101–650, title VI, § 607, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5132; Pub. L. 102–492, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3145.)