Continuing Legal Education: Fraud Is the Linear Distance Between Immune Response and Prevention

REMEMBER THE MOVIE WHERE THE JEWEL THEIVES CONTINUED TO TRIP THE ALARM UNTIL SECURITY GOT TIRED?

A basic math axiom that you learned in freshman algebra: the whole is equal to the sum of all of its parts, synergistic fantasies notwithstanding. Gobbledygook in yields gobbledygook out. If you begin with crap, you get crap. No alchemy.

The Emergency Use Authorization Test only required pharmaceutical companies, i.e. Moderna, Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson to essentially develop a vaccine that created an alarm system that would work for at least two months. That is the wording in the contract, and when they say that the vaccine is anywhere between 66% and 95% efficacious, in your head you may be thinking that the SEALs arrive and shoot OBL in the eye, but the reality, or the standard for the test was that the alarm would go off to tell your body that COVID-19 was about to set it off, and hopefully your immune system will buckle down.

One bit of information that they were lacking was the infectious dose. Think of the Abbottabad Raid. Two teams of SEALS, equipped with a dollhouse to identify the only security compound in a crappy neighborhood, but with no idea how many terrorists are inside or even if there were subterranean structures to permit reinforcements from the military academy only a mile away, or a stealthy escape.

You might say to yourself, but we actually captured OBL, but remember, as even reported in The New Yorker, we crashed a freaking helicopter that had to have made a lot of noise, and, under the precedent established in the Eichmann case if the country that provided you an extradition agreement does not object when spec ops types come in and take you away, you cannot argue defective extradition at your crimes against humanity trial.