The Great Flood Really Happened

Acknowledged Oceans Of Water In Earth's Crust:
“Researchers acknowledge underground oceans of 10, 30, even 100 times as large as the oceans on Earth’s surface!” Universal Model, A New Millennial Science. Volume 1, P. 281, 493

https://www.newscientist.com/article/...​

http://www.academia.edu/6380700/Is_th...​

Did Humans Really Die In The Flood?
Human Fossils? ...MOST fossils are simply preserved via permineralization where minerals transferred by water fill in the pore space within organic tissue. (http://www.digitalatlasofancientlife....​). Petrification (where rock/minerals REPLACE entire tissue and cell structure) is not nearly as common.

Smithsonian reports knowledge of fossilized human remains of 6,000 individuals or so. Human bones, giant shark teeth, bugs encased in amber, and mammoth tusks/skeletons are examples of living things that were fossilized (preserved) in the flood waters- but not necessarily petrified (turned to stone). Most fossilization processes appear to be associated with water, heat, and pressure. Exceptions are remains encased in ice (mammoths in tundra), petroleum (mammoths in La Brea tar pits), or anaerobic (no oxygen) water (mammoths in Colorado peat bog). Note that all the exceptions still require water- all are results of the Great Flood. https://youtu.be/pYgSNt-K80I​ https://youtu.be/GGeHqcCxTIc_​

How Did All Land Animals Fit On One Ship?
There wasn't 66,000 species. ...There are approximately 350 official dog breeds (there are hundreds of additional non-official breeds), not including foxes, jackals, coyotes, dingos, African wild dogs, and various wolves from around the world. All of these are inter-fertile (capable of producing VIABLE offspring), and are simply...DOGS. Therefore, only a male puppy, and female puppy, were needed to produce all the hundreds of varieties of domestic and wild dongs alive today. Apply this truth/logic to the story of Noah to reach a realistic figure of life on the Ark.

Does Radiometric Dating Prove Millions Of Years?
Keep in mind that scientists admit that radiometric dating (their flagship dating method) is only reliable out to about 50,000 years (look it up). Therefore, anything beyond this is pure speculation (4.5 billion years??? really??). However, radiometric dating is not really even reliable to 50k years. This is because the technique can only be accurately calibrated out to about 10,000 years. They use tree ring dates (dendrochronology) to calibrate, and the anchored lines only extend back to about 10,000 years. Therefore, even radiometric dating is unreliable beyond 10,000 years. Going further- repeated testing has shown that radiometric dating isn't particularly accurate at any point beyond a couple thousand years. This is because there are so many assumptions that must be guessed at wile using the dating method, and so much potential for sample contamination and variation since the time the sample was created.

Song: Jim Yosef - Link [NCS Release]
Music provided by NoCopyrightSounds.
Watch: https://youtu.be/9iHM6X6uUH8​
Download/Stream: http://ncs.io/LinkYO​

Material for this video was prepared according to the fair use laws of the United States. Video clips and photos that are used herein are used to demonstrate scientific truth. Any questions concerning the content used should be directed to umtruthseeker@gmail.com.