Dominion: fact checking the fact checkers

Dominion is suspicious, let's review some reasons why:Show more

They have roots in Smartmatic which admitted to rigging the Venezualian elections

They set themselves up in all the swing states

Their VP of security and strategy is supposedly a hard-core anti-trumper as revealed by his facebook posts and saying on an antifa call that he'd make sure Trump wasn't re-elected.

This analysis shows that counties with Dominion had an average 5.6% boost to Biden over Trump than what was expected according to the county's demographics, which is exactly what you'd expect to see if these machines were used to cheat.

We also have the evidence of vote-switching from the real-time data sent through Edison research showing, in this one example of many, around 18,000 votes being removed from Trump and given to Biden in Pennslyvania in less than a minute

And of course it's funny that democrats and big tech and the MSM are dismissing this all as conspiracy theory now in unison after being concerned about it before the election

But speaking of the fact checkers, let's get into a specific example here, in Ware County, GA.

You are probably aware that fraud has been specifically detected in multiple states using Dominion. In Ware County, GA it was detected by a hand recount and in Antrim County, MI it was shown in horrific detail by a forensic analysis.

In Ware county the hand recount found that Dominion had shifted 37 votes from Trump to Biden.

I was discussing this with a very studious liberal friend of mine and and here's the 'fact checker' site he sent me to to explain it away:

Dominion machines didn’t ‘flip’ votes in Ware County, Georgia (apnews.com)

AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. A 37-vote difference between the results of an initial vote count and a hand recount in Ware County, Georgia, resulted from a human tabulation error that was quickly flagged and amended, according to Ware County Elections Supervisor Carlos Nelson.

They say it was simply a 'human tabulation error' with no further explanation. OK so my friend sent me to another 'fact checker' site that tried to explain it further.

PolitiFact | Dominion Voting Machines didn’t switch 37 votes to Biden in Ware County, Georgia

Here' what it said:
"In this case, the worker accidentally submitted the same batch twice after a flawed ballot stopped the machine, once before the ballot was fixed and once after it was fixed.

Really, this is the 'human tabulation error'. This doesn't make sense to me. Here is a sample Dominion Ballot from Georgia:

Notice it has the QR code which is a unique identifieer for the ballot. Now the most obvious thing in the world for Dominion to do would be to register the ballots according to the QR code so each one is unique, so the software wouldn't allow the same ballot to be counted twice, no matter how many times it is scanned.

This is an obvious feature to me. I use gradescope to grade my student's exams and it doesn't matter how many times I upload the same PDF of a student's exam. Each student has their own ID and gradescope will just match each student to just one scan of their unique exam.

But don't take my word for this. Let's see what Dominion has to say.

In MI there were multiple allegations of people scanning in the same ballot multiple times. Melissa Carronne for example talks about this. But in the same hearing, towards the end, we were assured by the canvasser that scanning the same ballots wouldn't add any votes. And let's take a look at this other 'fact check' article from the

Bridge Detroit:

Dominion Voting: Claims of Detroit elections fraud 'false and inaccurate' - Bridge Detroit

This 'fact check' affirms the following, as per Dominion's official explanation:

Dominion Voting Systems explained that the pollbooks were not off by thousands of votes because the tabulation machines do not recount ballots when there is a jam.

“The system application discards automatically when there is a jam,” a company representative said. “Dominion’s tabulators count voter-verified, hard-copy paper ballots that are 100% fully auditable.”

OK so Dominion and other fact checkers assure us that re-scanning after a jam doesn't re-count votes. So what does that say about the supposed 'human error' in Ware County, GA? Let me connect the dots for you, it says it's complete BS. But let's just say it's true, let's say that rescanning the same ballots does cause Dominion to keep re-adding the same votes. Then the testimony in Michigan poses a serious problem, despite what Dominion and the fact checkers say there. And in Georgia it poses a serious problem too. Perhaps you recall the infamous State Farm Arena video, well further examination showed Ruby Freeman re-scanning the same ballots there multiple times.

So whichever of these conflicting 'fact checkers' you want to believe, we're left with some serious problems. Look, Dominion is suspicious. Our concerns will not be allayed by state officials simply telling us their elections were secure.

Goergia's secretary of state Raffensperger says they conducted an audit on the machines and found no evidence of hacking. But where is that report. All I can find is a statement the audit found:

According to the Pro V&V audit, all of the software and firmware on the sampled machines was verified to be the software and firmware certified for use by the Office of the Secretary of State.

But so what if the software was verified? The software that flipped votes in Ware County was verified too!

We need full tranpsarency. If the elections were secure, then why not let us examine all the machines? What do you have to hide, why not allow this if it would allay all the concerns? Our concerns for election integrity will not be allayed until we can have transparency on this, and if we give up the fight for election integrity we will have ceded our God-given right to self-governance.